Oštrić - Persecution and Banning
in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Who do you guys think would actually make a decent mod for the history sub?
1936 posts shown.
Lawrence Booth2 said:History is my life
History.com is basically my homepage
I read about history every single day
History is literally one-third of my job
And I actually asked to be banned from that subforum because of Smith
lonetrucker4 said:And you know those are lies? People argue about this stuff constantly. I don't hand out bans just because someone makes a claim they don't like. You only get the boot if you're being offensive, if you're a broken record, or if you're stubbornly insisting on blatant falsehoods, etc.
When it comes to threads about the American Civil War, my standards are way more relaxed than they are for ancient history. Everything is still pretty fresh, archives aren't all laid out for everyone, and we haven't got that "historical distance" yet. I haven't banned anyone just for pushing theories I personally disagree with.
I'm also a bit more chill when we're talking about, say, Medieval American history, mostly because there are so few sources. You can defend all sorts of theories there, even if I think some of them are a total stretch.
Same goes for discussions on population genetics since that field is still evolving. People jump to conclusions way too fast, but I usually let it slide unless someone starts acting like they've got a PhD when they clearly don't. I even started that specific thread "what's your personal data, where and how to test," which technically isn't "History," but since it ties into genetic interest, it makes sense to have it here. That thread is actually working out great.
Jeremy Johnson18 said:Killer breakdown 👍 and thanks for the heads up.
I gotta give you some credit too, even if you do go overboard sometimes. You’re basically the mascot of this whole board—one of a kind. 😍
Jeremy Johnson18 said:If I can go a little off-topic since we're wrapping this thread up, I gotta ask: What makes Charles Fox10 such a big deal? 🙂
Charles Fox10 said:Sure, we could, but we rarely do that. Besides, you’re clearly just getting worked up because this isn't even your thread to moderate.
Just don't go there.
mistyotter35 said:But you’re still coming up empty on proof. 🙂
wearybison63 said:Maybe he's a supermod over there🤷
lonetrucker4 said:Most of the people listed in that History PDF have barely ever posted anything, and it's pretty obvious they were picked based on political bias or just being "icons" rather than actual substance. Meanwhile, you've got plenty of regular contributors on this subforum who get totally ignored just because their views don't fit the specific political agenda.
Scott Long71 said:For something like this, a 30-day ban is the bare minimum. I know Saturday is a big day for you, so we'll unban you by then.
God, I'm such a saint. I gotta be careful not to be too nice, or I'll end up looking like a total sucker to my brothers. You owe me one. :)
Scott Long71 said:Do you actually get why you got the Ban? Your Ban will expire once you convince me you understand what happened and promise it won't happen again.
Christian Myers said:You've got a better shot at getting a pardon from the President than getting anything out of 😬
And you can't even spell the damn name right? No way this works out for you now. 🙄
wearybison63 said:So, what, they're trying to pull your airtime again?😁