31 posts shown.
Larry Diaz4 said:So, I guess I've officially become known for my biting remarks—or maybe just my literal bites? Either way, here we go! 🤣🤣🤣 I just hope—Lord knows when—that's how people will remember me. 🤣
One month. Then you go back after six months, then a third time... and then you're set for life! ☕
Honestly, just go permanent. Save everyone the headache. ☕
I’m right there with Louis on this one. Honestly, we need to shut this chat down for at least two or three months, maybe even longer if things don't settle down. ☕
Ban Latica, are you gonna pull a Branimir Glavaš and go on a hunger strike until the chat finally opens up? 🍿
Daniel Kelly57 said:It's Ban Latica and wiredfox. Following the rules, everything is clear. Latica was calling out the moderators. wiredfox was digging up stuff that's strictly off-limits. Man, you're killing people with this constant crusade for justice. You've gone too far. This isn't even the first time. Just chill out, seriously.
Man! 🍿
Come on, man. Let's grab a beer. 🙂
Jacob Alvarez said:I'm with you.
You don't need to be monitoring the chat twenty-four-seven to spot the two or three idiots causing trouble. Why is it always the nuclear option with these people?
That kind of logic just kills the vibe of the whole forum.
So, why not just drop the names?
Look, it’s pretty simple: being a moderator means playing by the same set of rules, no matter who you are or which forum you're on!
Hey there. What are you guys up to?
Drew Ross2 said:And that feeling can be pretty sweet 😍
Man,
if you got a good face and a killer body ☕
So, when am I actually gonna see a photo of your face? 😁 😘
wiredfox, did you open this thread just because I claimed you hadn't? 😂
Look at Red69 and you'll get the picture immediately. She's a total knockout. Great body, gorgeous face.
lonetrucker4 said:There’s no such thing as a six-month ban. You just racked up a bunch of minor infractions, crossed the 200-point threshold, and now you’re looking at two days off. Plus, if you look at the far right column, it tells you exactly when the strike gets wiped from your record.
The moderator told me I got hit with some "parallel" ban lasting six months. Honestly? I don't see any evidence for it. I know what the screen says, but I can't wrap my head around why I'm the only one getting lectured while everyone else just hangs out and trolls without a care in the world.
Hey,
I’m starting this thread because I’m fed up with the bans and the negative points being thrown my way.
Most of my time online is spent on the forums where Louise Hay acts as a moderator.
I just got slapped with a six-month ban on the main board for "off-topic chatting." Honestly, just go look at the threads yourselves—it was just me and one other user who got hit with a six-month ban. Then, a few days ago, I get self-isolated from the US forum for the exact same thing: off-topic posting. Look, I go into a thread, and people are literally talking about stuff that has zero to do with the topic. They’re basically having entire side conversations right there in the middle of a thread. It makes me wonder if the rules actually apply to everyone, or if it’s just a matter of "do I like you or not?" If they don't like me, they ban me; if they do, they let it slide. If she has some kind of personal vendetta against me, she should just say so and we can deal with it.
I want to hear from the other moderators and the people who appointed them. If you don't believe me, I can send screenshots of these negative points. You can check the thread history too—other people haven't even been banned for a single day, while I'm getting hit constantly.
This whole setup is pointless if the rules aren't applied equally. If the standard isn't the same for everyone, then she needs to step down from her moderator position and let someone else take over.
Thanks!
And just to be clear, I didn't start this thread because I enjoy seeing others get banned!