CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Karen Richardson3 › Posts

Posts by Karen Richardson3

180 posts shown.

Religion classes in school - Megathread in Students & Teens ·
brisknomad13 said:Fair point—you can't really put religion in the same box as math or history. Sure, it’s technically on the school schedule, but it goes way deeper than that. Its whole purpose is about connecting people to the Lord—students, parents, teachers, and the whole church community all in one go.

It’s got this depth that’s way more powerful than any individual's attempt to toss aside the human spirit and its specific Christian search for meaning.

Obviously, history shows us that totalitarian systems will always try to force out whatever they don't like, but when it comes to faith, that’s a much tougher nut to crack. It's practically impossible because we're talking about an existential reality, not just some textbook curriculum.

(The critics who actually get this realize they're biting off way more than they can chew)

But honestly, that’s exactly my point.
It’s not just another standard class—you literally just said it can't be compared to them.
Yet, here we are, and it’s still being held in schools.
Even though there are plenty of kids who just tune out entirely.
They end up just hanging out in the hallways instead.

So, I think we just need to ask ourselves—why?

The whole debate really boils down to this one question: why is this happening in a school building instead of at the parish? Like, does it feel a little weird to you that it's scheduled right between History and PE, especially when you consider what its actual "functional goal" is supposed to be?

The only excuse we’ve heard so far is some nonsense about how "not all churches have laptops," which is wild to me—as if having a MacBook is somehow the deciding factor for whether a kid learns about faith or not.
Religion classes in school - Megathread in Students & Teens ·
Alexander Ortiz3 said:The real issue is that the Department of Education hasn't addressed the gaps regarding free periods, supervision, or what students are actually doing during those hours.
Religious education isn't the culprit here, nor is it the responsibility of anyone attending those classes to fix systemic issues that should be handled by the Department of Education.
Trying to solve the "free period" dilemma by making things harder for those enrolled in religious studies is the wrong way to go about it.

Even if what you’re saying is technically true—that the Catholic Church in America was granted an elective slot within the standard school day and isn't responsible for babysitting the kids who don't sign up—the real sting is how immoral that perspective feels.

That's basically why people get so worked up about this stuff in the first place.
I mean, sure, nothing catastrophic is going to happen to a kid sitting around for 45 minutes, but it boils down to this massive hypocrisy from an institution that insists on acting like the ultimate moral compass for society.

I think we can all agree that calling the Church in America a moral authority is about as believable as calling those "non-profit NGOs" anything other than political interest groups.

Honestly, it's all just a joke—both the left and the right are just different flavors of the same taxpayer-funded circus. The only thing that gives me any peace of mind is looking at the stats on how many people are fleeing this country; in another decade or so, you guys will probably end up consuming yourselves, since it seems like nobody left with a functioning brain can get through the day without being on heavy antidepressants.
Religion classes in school - Megathread in Students & Teens ·
Lawrence Torres56 said:Thanks for sharing your thoughts!😉
So, what, I should just go ahead and become illiterate too? Is that the plan?🎉

Who on earth is bringing up politics and democracy here? Seriously... let’s just cut the crap and drop the insinuations and the political demagoguery, alright? Look, you don't have to agree with my take—that's your right—but why the hell the sudden accusations?😲😁
Look, I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: we aren't actually going to be a true secular nation until we finally draw a hard line between the state and the church. Honestly, as long as we keep talking about separation while simultaneously leaning on phrases like "God willing" or keeping religious education in our public schools, all this talk about being a secular country is nothing more than empty noise. It's just pure theater, you know? Can we really claim to be separate when our very language and school systems are still wrapped up in religious tradition? To me, it's all just talk until we actually walk the walk.😉 And honestly, I just don't see any point in us clinging to something that isn't even true, you know? Why would we bother pretending when the facts are staring us right in the face?

Honestly, I don't even have an issue with most people, whether they belong to the majority or the minority groups out there.
I’m honestly just asking from a purely human perspective here—is this actually okay? Like, does it make any sense for twenty-two students and their twenty-two parents to all have to bend over backwards and adjust their entire lives around one or two people? We're talking about everyone having to coordinate afternoon trips to religious education classes twice a week, just because. Is it really reasonable to expect that many families to shift their schedules, or shouldn't those one or two people—and their parents—just stand their ground on their beliefs? Why can't they just let things be and not cause a whole scene while the kids are hanging out in the library during those classes? Seriously, which way is actually more practical or even remotely doable for everyone involved?
I mean, honestly, would the same people demanding all this from everyone else actually have the guts to say the exact same thing if the tables were turned tomorrow? Would they really stand by those same principles if they were the ones sitting in the hot seat instead of pointing fingers? It makes you wonder, doesn't it?

Look, I’m saying this with total sincerity here—and please, don't take this the wrong way because I'm really not trying to offend anyone—but I honestly get the feeling that if we just let kids be kids and actually let them make their own choices for once, this whole mess wouldn't even be an issue in the first place. Isn't it funny how we adults act like we're all about preaching tolerance from our high horses, while we're simultaneously the ones fueling all this intolerance and hatred? We're basically creating the very problems we claim to be fighting, aren't we?

So, is my kid actually going to go through with getting baptized, start talking about God, or whatever? Honestly, it’s not even on my radar, and it's definitely not something that's causing me any sleepless nights. I mean, let him do his thing, right? As long as he isn't out there hurting people or causing chaos, why should I care? It honestly cracks me up when people make such a massive production out of this stuff—like, why all the heavy drama and the intense scrutiny over something so personal?
It is honestly hilarious—like, laugh-out-loud ridiculous—that someone actually thinks they can strip away rights from an entire class of kids just because it doesn't suit their own kid or their personal agenda😉, right? I mean, where does this even end? Tomorrow, someone’s going to decide math is too difficult, so why not just scrap math altogether? Then it’ll be English lit next, and before you know it, we’re looking at the total abolition of the school system itself☕ because there will always be someone out there who’s unhappy with how things work.

My little one isn't going to participate in PE tomorrow because she’s got this cough and feels like she might be running a fever... so she’ll just be sitting on the sidelines watching everyone else play... and what am I supposed to do here, really? Should I go demand that the teacher or the school cancels PE for the whole damn class just so my child doesn't feel isolated or left out?

If you look at it through a certain lens, it’s the exact same headache we deal with regarding religious education, just applied to a different subject... and would it even be decent of me to make that demand? Even if, by some twisted logic, I technically have the right to ask for it?

Seattle, Brooklyn school, 1st grade class of 2015/2016
20 students
12 go to religion class, and 8 don't.
Religion class is the first period, so parents drop the kids off at 7:45 AM, after which those 8 kids just hang out in the school hallway waiting until 8:45.

And since you're calling for "respecting diversity," true respect would mean that Catholic kids get treated exactly the same as kids who aren't Catholic.
Basically, everyone should just follow the standard curriculum set by the Department of Education, which is designed to actually educate students so they can find decent jobs once they graduate, while Catholics, Protestants, or Jehovah's Witnesses can learn about their own faiths outside of the school system however and whenever they want.

Besides, since we've heard that sad story about how local church halls don't even have laptops or proper equipment, I'd suggest the parishioners chip in and buy them themselves.

That's what real respect for diversity looks like.

What's happening here instead is planned indoctrination aimed at one thing: defending territory the Catholic Church has claimed as its own since the Middle Ages—territory where it collects its dues.

And would the people demanding this from others today say the exact same thing if the roles were reversed tomorrow?

I teach my child everything I believe is important and valuable every single day, and I also take them to all the activities I think are essential for their development during our free time. And through all of that, nobody else's kids are left waiting around in a hallway.

The truth is, you guys aren't actual believers, so you need two 45-minute blocks within the official school schedule so someone can teach your kids the basics of "your faith"—a faith you don't even practice a tiny bit in your daily lives.
Notice how there are only two believers participating in this thread whose opinions everyone actually respects, including you, who are basically the textbook definition of an "American Catholic," where your entire faith boils down to "Jesus is a good guy" and "I'll definitely make it to heaven when I die."
Religion classes in school - Megathread in Students & Teens ·
One more thing: I honestly find it pretty bizarre that American Catholics who actually live out their faith every single day—passing those values down to their kids through daily prayer and regular church attendance—would even feel the need for a 45-minute religion class at school twice a week.

And it’s weird (at least from my perspective as an atheist) that someone has to rack up a certain number of "participation points" for attending Mass just to qualify for First Communion or Confirmation. It almost makes it feel like going to Mass is some kind of chore or a penalty you have to serve, rather than a genuine celebration of faith.

In the context of a Catholic faith that's supposed to teach self-denial and humility, this whole topic feels totally out of place:

Why do we constantly feel this pressure to be politically correct?
Out of everyone who signs their kids up for religious education, maybe 20%* actually sit down with their children at home to pray before meals or read the Bible.
The rest of them seem to send their kids just so they can prove they aren't Mexicans or old-school communists.
From what I recall of the Bible, there isn't a single word in there about the historical struggles between Americans and Mexicans, no matter how much some American priests might try to spin it that way. 😁

* And honestly, I don't even think that percentage is that high, but you get my point.
Religion classes in school - Megathread in Students & Teens ·
Matthew Young35 said:Is telling a child they’re headed straight to hell if they don't believe in God really an expression of "diversity"?
I am firmly against allowing that kind of "diversity." It doesn't matter who is delivering the message—whether it's a peer or a religious instructor. Honestly, I would ban those types of instructors from having any access to children, and I'd warn any kid saying such things to stop immediately.

In the 21st century, when church attendance is dropping, a significant number of kids end up hearing more about God than they do about math or computer science. Naturally, you run into situations where one child tells another they'll burn in hell. And that's what the child learned in school, not from some backward parents. That is a true failure of our education system.

Quincy:
It’s honestly wild how some guys just refuse to grow up, like they’re stuck in this permanent state of adolescence where accountability is just a foreign concept to them. You see it all the time—these grown men acting like the world owes them a favor just for showing up, dodging any kind of real responsibility while expecting everyone else to clean up their messes. It’s like watching someone try to play a high-stakes game of poker but they’re still using Monopoly money and getting upset when they don't win; there's just this total disconnect between their age and their actual maturity level. They want the perks of being an adult, like the freedom and the status, but they recoil the second things get even slightly complicated or require a bit of actual grit. It’s exhausting to deal with because you realize you can't build anything solid with someone who treats every minor setback like a personal tragedy or a reason to throw a tantrum. kaže:
It feels like we’ve reached this weird turning point where what used to be Marxism has basically morphed into a modern kind of religion, you know? It’s like one entire ideology just stepped aside to let another one take its place, but they’re both operating on that same kind of dogmatic, unquestionable faith.
Jason Ortiz5 said:I honestly find this whole religious logic thing just fascinating—you know, parents freaking out because their kids aren't following the script, instead of actually teaching them how to embrace diversity or be tolerant. It’s wild. They basically just project their own issues onto everyone else without a second thought.

I had a good laugh once when people tried to ban the Teletubbies just because one of them was a "threat" simply for carrying a purse. Honestly, I'm not even laughing anymore. In a country where you have guys like Mark leading a bunch of mindless followers, I really have to wonder what our future holds.

It’s like what I was saying before—the real headache here is that this whole massive herd of mindless, reactionary sheep basically found their "faith" back in the nineties, and they haven't let go since.

I’m still sitting here scratching my head, honestly, because I just can't wrap my mind around why Catholic theology classes are being taught in government buildings funded by everyone's hard-earned tax dollars. It doesn't matter if you're a Jehovite, a Mormon, an Orthodox Christian, or a die-hard atheist—we're all chipping in for this, yet we're using that money to teach religious doctrine instead of actually prepping kids with the skills they need to survive in the modern workforce.

The only thing I can really wrap my head around right now is that we're looking at a totally calculated attempt to water down the very idea of objective truth and actual science. It feels like there's this intentional push to suggest that scientific facts aren't actually set in stone—as if they're trying to slip us this idea that those types in lab coats are just offering opinions that carry the same weight as a math professor, a history teacher, or a biology expert.

I mean, yeah, that’s exactly why they have schools in the first place. I was pretty much just pointing out the obvious to answer what was being asked.
Religion classes in school - Megathread in Students & Teens ·
Lawrence Torres56 said:Are you actually raising your kid to just swallow everything anyone tells them and build their entire worldview on it? Or are you teaching them to listen to everything, process it, and then decide for themselves what fits their life and what they can just ignore?

Sorry, but if I'm being totally blunt, it feels pretty pointless to vent about what someone said and how our kids took it, especially when you immediately pivot to talking about diversity... because look, if we're teaching our kids at home that everyone is different and that every single person has inherent value regardless of what they believe in, then that kid isn't going to see "non-believers go to hell" or "pray before eating" as a personal attack; they'll just see it as someone else's way of life...
Which basically means the fault doesn't lie with the people saying those things—they're just living their truth and sharing their faith—it lies with us for being so inconsistent with the values we claim to teach our children.

Religious ed isn't mandatory in American schools; we all have the choice whether to enroll our kids or not, and that's where our diversity is respected. Trying to purge it from the system completely just undermines everything we say about embracing differences, and honestly, that says a lot more about us than it does about the people preaching about hell or pre-meal prayers.😉

@Karen Richardson3, please don't 😉,

I’m struggling to follow your train of thought here—could you walk me through the logic of why removing Catholic doctrine from school buildings specifically designed to prep kids for the workforce is somehow an act of rejecting diversity?
Religion classes in school - Megathread in Students & Teens ·
I honestly think there’s something to be said about how much we overcomplicate things sometimes, you know? It feels like whenever we try to tackle a big problem, we immediately jump to the most complex solution possible instead of just looking at what’s right in front of us. It reminds me of that old saying about not using a sledgehammer to crack a nut—we’re out here swinging heavy tools when a simple tap would do the trick. I've spent way too many nights staring at my laptop, trying to engineer this perfect, flawless plan, only to realize later that the simplest path was the one I ignored because it didn't feel "sophisticated" enough. We need to learn to trust our gut more and stop letting the fear of being "too simple" hold us back from actually getting stuff done.
Lawrence Torres56 said:You’ve gotta be kidding me, right?😉
History is supposedly founded on hard facts... and all that jazz? Especially more recent history?😁
Like American English, where they seem to tweak the style guides every single year?
Or biology and physics, where they're constantly dropping new theories on us?

By the way, principles and theories aren't "facts"—Heisenberg or non-Euclidean geometry could be totally debunked next year for all we know.
And it took over a century for non-Euclidean geometry to even get accepted, effectively challenging Euclidean geometry; so why on earth should we assume that some other set of rules won't just come along tomorrow and flip the script again?

Also, how can you be so absolutely certain that God doesn't exist and that everything taught in religious studies is just empty talk? Has science actually proven that God isn't real?

Honestly, you clearly haven't done the homework on these topics, which is why you're just out here spinning this kind of endless, mindless nonsense.

Look, at the end of the day, history isn't just some set of dry facts floating around in space; it’s built entirely on the sources we find. But those sources aren't magic—they have to be interpreted and placed into a larger context to actually mean anything. It really all comes down to the researcher—their specific skills, their depth of knowledge, and how they choose to look at the puzzle pieces. That's why whenever someone digs up a fresh source, it’s such a massive win, because it adds a whole new layer of color to everything we thought we already understood.
The real issue here is that every single researcher is boxed in by their own ideological framework, and honestly, there’s just no escaping it. It’s like when you have three different people trying to recount the exact same thing that happened at a bar last night—you’re always going to get slightly different versions because everyone brings their own perspective and context to the table. But just because the storytelling shifts depending on who's talking doesn't mean the actual event didn't take place.

Honestly, I feel like all this constant arguing over grammar rules and spelling standards isn't even really about linguistic expertise anymore. It’s more about politics and keeping certain people in their cozy, taxpayer-funded positions. It feels less like a pursuit of clarity and more like a way to justify sinecures for specific bureaucrats who are just living off the federal budget.

When you talk about biology or physics and people "dropping new theories," I honestly think you might be using the word "theory" a little bit sideways. It’s a common slip-up, but in those fields, a theory isn't just some random idea someone tosses out over coffee; it's something much more heavy-duty. You probably mean they're putting forward new hypotheses—sort of like laying down a preliminary track before the actual train starts moving.
Think about it this way: religions have been tossing out these massive hypotheses since the dawn of time, yet not one single claim has ever actually been proven. It’s like they’re constantly throwing ideas at the wall to see what sticks, but because none of them have transitioned from a mere suggestion into something backed by hard evidence, the whole concept of a religious hypothesis has never actually graduated into being a legitimate religious theory. 😁

I honestly feel like we need to take a step back and really look at the bigger picture here, because it feels like everyone is just reacting to the immediate noise without considering how all these moving parts actually connect. It’s kind of like when you’re trying to fix a massive engine issue in your car; if you just start tightening random bolts without understanding the underlying mechanics, you’re probably just going to end up making the whole thing rattle even louder. We see people jumping to conclusions every single day, fueled by quick headlines or half-baked takes, and instead of digging into the actual substance of the argument, they just grab the nearest available weapon to use in a debate. I think if we could just find a way to slow down the conversation—to move past that knee-jerk reflex to be outraged—we might actually get somewhere productive, rather than just spinning our wheels in the mud.
I honestly feel like we need to talk about the whole ego thing, because it’s such a massive, heavy weight that people carry around without even realizing how much it's actually slowing them down in life. It’s like when you’re driving down a highway in Los Angeles and someone gets all worked up over a tiny lane change; they aren't actually mad about the traffic, they're just stuck in this loop where their pride feels threatened by a stranger in a Honda, and it turns a simple commute into this unnecessary psychological battlefield. We do this to ourselves constantly, letting our sense of self become this fragile, inflated bubble that pops the second someone offers even a shred of constructive criticism or disagrees with our take on a movie. If we could just learn to let go of that need to be "right" or "superior," we’d probably find that life becomes a lot smoother and way less exhausting, kind of like how everything feels easier once you finally stop trying to prove everyone wrong and just start living for yourself. kaže:
I just wanted to step in and clear up one little misconception I see people tripping over constantly in this thread—everyone keeps asking why religion class isn't scheduled as either the very first period or the absolute last one of the school day.

So, if you’re sitting there wondering why kids are just loitering in the hallways or wasting their time hanging out in the library instead of actually being productive, the answer is pretty straightforward: it’s exactly what the Church wants to happen. The government basically signed off on this themselves, so they can't really act surprised now that everything is playing out exactly how they agreed to let it happen..
I’ve already said this before, but honestly, I don't see the point in aiming all this anger at the church. It feels like we're barking up the wrong tree. The real target should be the government, because they're the ones who actually codified this negligence into law—basically making it legal to ignore kids when they fail to enroll in those mandatory subjects required for voting age.

I honestly feel like we need to take a step back and look at the bigger picture here because sometimes it feels like everyone is just reacting to the surface level instead of actually digging into what’s happening beneath it all. It’s kind of like when you’re watching a high-stakes game between the Yankees and the Red Sox and everyone is screaming about one single bad call by the umpire, completely ignoring the fact that the entire pitching strategy was flawed from the very first inning. We get so caught up in these tiny, isolated moments that we lose sight of the actual momentum of the situation, which is pretty wild if you think about it. I’m not trying to be difficult or shut down the conversation, but I really believe if we don't address the core issues—the stuff that actually drives these patterns—then we're basically just running in circles and getting nowhere fast. It’s about looking at the foundation, not just the cracks in the paint. kaže:
Why is it such a massive taboo to actually sit down and have a real conversation about why religious studies feels like it's operating on a completely different wavelength than, say, math or history? It’s like there’s this invisible wall in our schools where you can debate the nuances of the Constitution or dive deep into the scientific method all day long, but the second you try to question how religious education fits into the academic hierarchy, everyone loses their minds. I honestly feel like we're missing out on a huge opportunity for critical thinking because people treat the subject as this untouchable, sacred thing that shouldn't be scrutinized, whereas every other subject is fair game for skepticism and rigorous analysis. It's almost like we've decided that certain topics are off-limits for logic, which seems pretty counterproductive when you think about how much we value intellectual curiosity in everything else.

I actually started heading down that path myself, but things just kind of hit a standstill.
Honestly, I feel like that’s where the whole thing falls apart right at the foundation.
It honestly feels like such a massive waste of resources when you think about it—taking these public buildings that were specifically built to foster education and using them as a platform to push the religious doctrines of one specific interest group is just total nonsense. It's like if we took a local community college or a public library and turned it into a private headquarters for some niche organization; it completely defeats the whole purpose of having taxpayer-funded spaces dedicated to learning and growth for everyone.
Alex Miller3 said:Man, this constant whining about "creating enemies" has seriously gone too far. It feels like every single thread is just people repeating the same thing over and over. Like, what do you even want us to do? Just roll over whenever some neighbor decides to act up?
Don't you see that in the middle of all this chaos and the current crisis, everyone is acting the exact same way? Everyone ends up seeing everyone else as the enemy...
It's like America is just supposed to listen to every single person screaming for their own political gain and do whatever they say. But how does that even work? Who are we supposed to please? Our neighbors to the East, the West, or the North? There's no winning...

Harold Evans4 said:Exactly. Every time I read these posts about "hostility," all I can think is how incredibly naive that person is.

Man, honestly, it just feels like a massive, overwhelming pile of everything all at once.

It feels like just a few days ago—maybe five, seven, even ten days back—that those Mexicans were maliciously pushing people toward our borders, probably trying to turn them into nothing more than human mud just to screw us over. 🙄 ...while we were basically playing the role of superheroes, being the first ones to step up and lend a hand whenever people were actually in trouble (check out this article: I was just scrolling through some news earlier and stumbled onto this piece about how things are finally starting to look up in certain sectors, and honestly, it feels like we might be catching a break after a long stretch of nothing but headwinds. It’s one of those rare moments where you see a glimmer of actual progress instead of just the usual endless cycle of problems, and it makes you wonder if the tide is truly turning for us. It reminds me of that feeling when you've been stuck in bumper-to-bumper traffic on the I-95 for hours, and suddenly, the lanes clear up and you realize you can actually breathe again—it's not a total victory yet, but the momentum is definitely shifting in a direction that feels right. You have to look at the data, though, because while it's easy to get swept up in the optimism, there's still a lot of work to do before we can say everything is back to normal. It’s like watching a rebuilding phase in a major American city; you see the construction crews working overtime and the storefronts opening up, but you also know there's still a massive amount of structural stuff that needs fixing behind the scenes before the neighborhood really feels revitalized. Still, seeing these positive indicators pop up gives me a sense of cautious hope that maybe, just maybe, we aren't just spinning our wheels indefinitely. Don't sweat whether you're seeing this on Daily News or not, because honestly, you can find the exact same stories popping up all over the major news sites anyway.
We’ve been sharing these photos of our local cops just hanging out and playing with the kids, you know? It’s honestly pretty heartwarming to see them acting like regular people instead of just being the guys in uniform.

It’s honestly exhausting watching the media over in Canada constantly spinning these narratives about how Americans are some kind of villains who "intentionally overwhelm" people just to cause chaos, acting like we’re trying to turn everything into a disaster zone. It's always paired with these dramatic exposés painting our police officers as total monsters while simultaneously acting like the Canadian authorities have nothing but pure hearts and saintly intentions.

It all feels like some big performance staged for the masses, but I honestly don't get it. Given how short of a timeframe we're actually talking about here, I just can't wrap my head around how everyone can suffer from such massive collective amnesia.

Right now, the only real difference is that the influx is running two or three times larger than usual, mostly because people are desperately trying to cross borders while the gates are still open. Everyone knows deep down that these routes will eventually be shut tight, and once that happens, the flow will naturally dry up—it’s just basic math at that point. Sure, there’s always that optimistic chance that things might get streamlined within the EU or some grander global solution might emerge, but honestly, I'm just not feeling particularly optimistic about that happening anytime soon. 😁).
Ashley Robinson58 said:If someone is truly charging at you, there are milder ways to push them back—things like tear gas, water cannons, or rubber bullets, as we’ve already seen. But if they’re persistent enough that those don't work, then you're looking at an invasion of sovereign territory. At that point, lethal force is on the table.

But honestly, from what we're seeing in the footage, the police are really just trying to hold the line and maintain order by using stuff like tear gas, yet the crowds just regroup and push right through anyway. It’s wild because they’re actually putting kids in the front lines—you can see it in the officer statements and the photos—basically using children as human shields to break through the cordons.

At the end of the day, the police just end up giving in because they can't be given an order like "start shooting if the tear gas isn't working." Technically, we're dealing with asylum seekers here, and since they're refusing to even register themselves—which we can figure out based on how people have been burning tents over in Canada—it becomes impossible to tell who actually has a legal claim to asylum and who’s just bypassing the system.

The whole situation is just pure chaos.
It’s heartbreaking to see women giving birth right by the roadside and then having to get back on their feet immediately to keep moving.
These migrants aren't willing to spend even a day or two in a processing center to get registered and moved along via organized transport.
They’re wading through rivers and we're watching them soaked to the bone, even though they don't even need to be crossing water like that.
Then they turn around and accuse us of being inhumane, throwing out these moralizing talking points that sound great on paper but don't match reality.
European Union politicians are basically just putting on a show for the public (Canada is running the same kind of political theater we saw back when the border issues first started; the only difference was we blocked truck traffic just so Joe Biden could score some election points, wasn't that his one big "statesman" move? 🤣 😁 ).
Total mess.
David Baker2 said:Did those water cannons actually stop anyone at the US-Mexico border?
Or did everyone just pivot toward our side after that, making it look like the folks down south were some kind of unstoppable force when, in reality, we just took the brunt of the shift?

But fine, whatever. Who am I to try and enlighten any of you.
Go ahead and cling to your little fantasies for as long as they provide you comfort.

...a literal utopia on earth, right? 🙂

Honestly, I’m leaning toward the idea that nothing is actually being stopped.
The Canadians managed to dodge the brunt of this mess (for now, anyway), but if you watch the footage or listen to what the politicians are saying—like how Joe Biden might remark that "the Canadians are getting worked up, but they'll realize in a few days that there's nothing they can do about it"—it’s pretty clear these people aren't going to be deterred by a bit of spray.

The only way you could realistically stop them would be through pure force, like literal open aggression against them while they're actively trying to cross the line.

That brings up a massive moral dilemma: how would leaders over in the Middle East (the ones currently sending out humanitarian aid and everything) react if they saw "European Union police or military opening fire on unarmed Muslims, including women and children, who are just looking for help"?

It’s a total checkmate situation, regardless of whether we want to spend all our time bickering over whether this counts as an invasion or some sort of unplanned migration driven by specific circumstances.
Religion classes in school - Megathread in Students & Teens ·
brighteagle86 said:I wouldn't go so far as to say religious education numbers are dropping—at least, not where I live.
Washington, D.C. isn't exactly a perfect benchmark, and neither is San Francisco.

But yeah, I get what you mean. I’m just saying my folks down in California all show up, mostly because they're Mexicans 😁
I honestly feel like the EU has just proven it’s completely useless and totally incapable of actually taking action when it matters.
To get even a tiny bit of consensus, you need a whole bunch of different countries to agree, but every single one of them is playing their own game with their own specific interests and allies.
It’s pretty obvious this whole thing is a failed project.
If anything, the people who were busy making noise about how the EU would fall apart once America joined have basically been proven right. 🐔

I mean, look—if we accept the idea that these are needy people coming our way whom we have a moral duty to treat with humanity, is the actual solution really just letting them sit in the mud or trek for days on foot while we just film them and debate them on internet forums? (And let's not forget they end up trampling through people's vineyards and orchards along the way, though I guess that's a minor point compared to the total chaos unfolding everywhere else.)
Is the EU seriously unable to provide more buses, more police presence, or even just people to register everyone properly?

But then, looking at it from another angle: regarding those women giving birth on the move... I feel like I’d truly have to be in a life-or-death situation to decide to travel right before my due date, give birth on the road, and just keep pushing forward.
That is genuinely life-threatening stuff; I don't know if everyone realizes that those historical maternal mortality statistics aren't usually about the birth itself, but rather about postpartum hemorrhaging.

I just don't wrap my head around it, because those women AREN'T in immediate danger to their lives. Even if they were originally, that threat ended the moment they stepped onto Turkish soil.
I can't fathom the motivation to risk your own life and the baby's life when there aren't even grenades being thrown at you.

I wondered if maybe they thought the journey would be shorter, or that they'd actually reach Germany by the time the babies were supposed to arrive.
But hey, I also thought about whether they felt forced because they're essentially acting as tickets for the rest of their families. Who stands to gain the most from a woman giving birth on that specific day?

So, why did those people choose to cross the river? Those photos of the woman with the little boy in the water? For God's sake, surely they knew there was a much more normal way to do things?
When I see those images, combined with the shots of kids being pushed toward the police and then hearing the statements from the officers themselves... I think nobody can deny now that children and women are being used as bargaining chips.
We can almost empathize with it—like, "I might do the same if I were desperate enough to flee and knew it would work"—but it still says everything about the dire situation those women and children are in.

Child trafficking must be booming right now, btw.

The whole thing is just horrific. No matter how you look at it, it's a nightmare and a total disaster for the EU, regardless of whatever (non)existent promises were made.
Religion classes in school - Megathread in Students & Teens ·
Susan James said:Look, I’m looking at this from the perspective of the parents at the school where they tried to organize this. When everyone is willing to chip in, the whole thing hinges on
a) the Department of Education or some agency making decisions that feel like discrimination against kids in religious studies classes
b) the parents of those same kids

In my book, that wouldn't fly
even though I actually found that math session quite helpful, 🙏 🙏 🙏

And here's the kicker: the non-religious kids end up being the minority mostly because so many parents just sign them up for religious ed out of habit. They just don't want their child to feel left out or stuck sitting in the hallway while everyone else is in class.
As soon as better extracurricular options come along—where parents realize their kid isn't just being supervised, but actually getting something valuable out of it—they jump ship immediately.

For me, that first hour works perfectly. It aligns well with her biological clock and my work schedule; having those two hours in the morning to catch up on sleep would be a total lifesaver.
But then you see someone like Miss Daisy, who is totally lost on what to do with her child in the morning. I think there are plenty of parents like that who would actually benefit from early morning childcare sessions, rather than leaving their kids to fend for themselves (where they don't even have a teacher available to watch them).

honestly, kids are checking out on their own too. I was chatting with my little neighbor who's in 7th grade now, and even back in 5th, you could see the numbers dropping—it's like half the class shows up, and mind you, they're still motivated by stuff like that online thread about getting a $1,000 gift card ☕.

up in high school over here in San Francisco, enrollment is basically cratering, even though everyone knows it's "way easier to snag an A in religion than in ethics," which is pretty much the only reason anyone signs up in the first place.

anyway, speaking as a true New Yorker, half my family is from California 😁, and even in those tiny rural towns they come from, being Catholic is mostly just a formality on paper; they show up when there's a festival or once they hit old age and decide to turn back to God.
but they still enroll in those classes just so they don't look like Mexicans.

so yeah, I’m not trying to police anyone’s personal beliefs, but I think we can all agree that you won't find a group of people more "spiritually lukewarm" than Catholics in the West.
it's painfully obvious that they pushed religious studies into the schools because the flock wouldn't even know how to recite the Lord's Prayer if it wasn't mandatory, let alone understand what a holiday like Corpus Christi even is.
Religion classes in school - Megathread in Students & Teens ·
wanderingbadger44 said:That would essentially mean violating the Concordat. 😁 That’s the crux of the matter right there. You mentioned earlier yourself that those agreements aren't something you can just tear up. That agreement is incredibly specific and leaves no room for interpretation: religious studies MUST be integrated into the regular school schedule.

There is a way out, of course, but it comes with a price tag. It would require creating an entirely new elective subject specifically for the students who choose not to take religion.

But let's be real—that isn't going to happen for two main reasons. First off, there's no budget for it; we're talking about adding more hours to a child's school day, pulling more funding from the education budget, and hiring a whole new set of instructors to teach this new subject. (And honestly, someone will probably try to "solve" this by cutting teacher salaries and redistributing that money to cover the new staff.)

The second reason is that the Church would absolutely lose its mind because it might lead to even more kids opting out of religious classes altogether.

In reality, though, that second reason is actually the first one. ☕

Exactly, and honestly, it’s not even about trying to brainwash kids or pretend that theology is somehow identical to something like calculus ☕ 😁

In my opinion, the whole thing is pretty straightforward. Even if I don't get into the messy debate over whether religious studies—regardless of the faith involved—should even be an elective (which is kind of a nonsense concept in itself, though you can see why people argue it based on what was said above), there's still this undeniable, basic fact: any elective subject needs to be organized just like any other elective.

If we end up in a situation where kids who don't pick elective computer science are just wandering the hallways because the school can't figure out how to build a functional timetable, then—and only then—can we accept that the same might happen with English or religious studies.

Otherwise, we're looking at pure discrimination against students choosing other electives, right?

When it comes to the kids, what we're actually seeing is negligence and a total lack of care from both the school districts and the government. Since the government is a co-signatory to those Vatican agreements, they have a responsibility to provide a solution for the students who aren't opting into that specific course.
So, really, it's the state, not the Church, that's responsible for this mess.

The Church is basically just taking advantage of the situation since it works perfectly in their favor.
Religion classes in school - Megathread in Students & Teens ·
Nancy Kelly31 said:Which faith? Every faith... Each one belongs to the cultural circle in which a person was born, as that is naturally the most logical and acceptable path for them.

The difficulty with this topic is that the opposing viewpoints are both entirely logical. Finding any sort of consensus becomes quite difficult under those circumstances. ☕

Take this situation with the churches, for example. What kind of lesson would we actually be providing to small children in these massive buildings designed to hold hundreds of people, when twenty of them might get swallowed up by those enormous pews, feeling completely lost in the sheer scale of it all? Without whiteboards or chalk, without televisions or videos, without projectors or laptops, and without even the simple opportunity to cut, color, glue, or sit on the floor... Churches aren't designed as classrooms; they are places for prayer, meant for large congregations gathered at once. You can barely count the number of churches that possess adequate halls for religious education, and even then, they are mostly found in major cities. But life happens everywhere else too.

However, you all know this already. You are merely pretending that you don't. And that isn't the point. Personally, I would find it much more interesting to discuss how we might solve the issue of children not being enrolled in religious studies. But I see there is little appetite for that here. It is a shame... because many minds working together are inevitably wiser. Provided, of course, that those minds are willing to cooperate. As it stands... 🤷

😁😁😁😁😁

So, I guess what we're really talking about here is that faith acts as this kind of cosmic filler, stepping in to plug those empty spaces in our lives whenever they show up, though how it actually goes down usually depends on the specific cultural bubble you were raised in.

Maybe we can finally get a believer to weigh in and break down what kind of hollow, empty nonsense we're actually dealing with here. ☕

Science is science, plain and simple, mostly because it doesn't care about what cultural bubble you happen to be living in. I get that the Catholic Church is pretty good at pivoting when they need to, and now they’re out here trying to claim they’re "in sync with scientific progress" just to keep the Gen Z crowd from walking out the door, but honestly, give me a break.

Honestly, all you guys are doing is offering a little cushion for people whose egos are too massive to face the reality that they aren't going to be around forever. That's really all there is to it.

Think about it this way—take churches, for example. What kind of lesson are we actually teaching kids living in those massive urban high-rises or sprawling suburban cathedrals? You’ve got maybe twenty kids swallowed up by these giant wooden pews, looking totally lost in that massive, echoing space. There’s no whiteboard, no chalkboard, no TV or video screens, no projectors or laptops, and definitely no chance for them to just spread out on the floor with some crayons, glue, and construction paper. At the end of the day, a church isn't designed to be a classroom; it’s built for mass prayer where hundreds of people gather all at once. If you look for churches that actually have decent, dedicated Sunday school rooms, you can count them on one hand, and even then, they're mostly tucked away in big cities. But let's face it, life happens way beyond those four walls.

We actually used a projector back at our church to display all the lyrics for the hymns, so I’m pretty sure we could easily just bring in a whiteboard or even some old-school chalkboards if we wanted to go that route.
Actually, we ended up having our religion class over at the local parish hall instead.

Look, I’ll be the first to admit that I don't really know much about how church gear actually works or all the technical stuff they use behind the scenes. It feels like there are so many moving parts that it might actually be impossible to run a proper lesson or service most of the time.
So, I’ve been thinking about this, and it really makes you wonder why there isn't any instruction scheduled during the afternoon hours. It’s like, if the athletes are heading out to the field for practice and the little science nerds are busy in the chem lab, what’s stopping the kids from going to their religious studies at that same time? It seems like a missed opportunity for everything to just fall into place.
At the end of the day, isn't that basically how every other religion outside of Catholicism operates anyway?
I mean, I know for a fact that Jehovah's Witnesses get together and spend their time studying the Bible, so if they can manage to handle all that outside of school hours, why is everyone acting like it's such a huge deal? Are you guys seriously that terrified that nobody’s going to show up at your place in the afternoon?

By the way, can you actually tell me how long religious education has even been a thing in our schools? Like, what year did they officially bring it into the curriculum?

I’ve actually been sitting here thinking about how we might tackle the whole issue of kids not signing up for religious education classes, but it feels like nobody around here really wants to dive into that kind of conversation. It’s honestly a bit of a bummer, because I truly believe that if we could just put our heads together, we'd come up with much smarter solutions than anyone could find acting alone. Of course, that only works if everyone is actually willing to pull in the same direction and cooperate, you know? But without that teamwork, we're just spinning our wheels. 🤷

So, I mean, it all really started with a simple suggestion—if we’re facing this massive logistical nightmare where it’s basically impossible to schedule religion classes during that last period for the little kids and the first period for the older ones because we just don't have enough staff, then why aren't we actually hiring more people to fill those gaps?
If the main hurdle is finding enough religious instructors—and honestly, I bet theology students would be jumping for joy if they knew there were actual jobs waiting for them!—just remember that we already have priests and nuns stepping up to teach religion in schools all the time.

Is it really impossible to bring in more staff and structure things better so that choosing an elective doesn't just result in a bunch of kids sitting around doing nothing if they didn't sign up for it?

And can we please stop trying to sanctify the bread, the chairs, and the people inside government buildings? This is a secular nation, and parents from all walks of life—whether they believe in God or not—are sending their kids to these public institutions.
It’s like you can't help but have people see you through the lens of old political oppression, even if that couldn't be further from the truth about who you are today.
Religion classes in school - Megathread in Students & Teens ·
Nancy Kelly31 said:I am not entirely certain if I am expressing myself clearly enough, but I truly believe that faith and science can exist in perfect harmony. There are certain questions where science provides the answers, while others are best addressed through faith. Because of this balance, both can be taught within our school systems without any inherent conflict... It honestly breaks my heart to read posts from certain mothers here who seem so consumed by hatred and intolerance... I fear that if we continue down this path, we will never find a common language. Religious education belongs in the classroom, and it should stay there. All this speculative "what if" arguing is quite pointless, really. It would be far more productive if we all directed our collective energy toward ensuring that no child is ever forced upon a religious instructor if they aren't enrolled, nor left to fend for themselves in the hallways if they have no need for it...

But which faith specifically?

Are we talking about science and Catholicism? Science and Islam? Science and Buddhism? Science and Hinduism? Science and the beliefs of Jehovah's Witnesses? Or maybe science and Mormonism?

Since every single one of those religions offers completely different answers to the exact same questions, I think it would be helpful if you could elaborate on how they "complement" each other when one group believes humans just die and become meat and bone, another believes in judgment day and an eternal soul, another thinks you’ll be reincarnated as a horse or a letter, and yet another insists the world is ending soon and God will snatch up his chosen Jehovah's Witnesses while everyone else just ceases to exist?

It honestly breaks my heart to read some of the mothers in here who seem so full of nothing but hate and intolerance... I really feel like that's why we can never find any common ground.

Look, you religious folks—who claim to be so devoted to God and love—haven't been able to find common ground with other believers since religion was even a thing.
You basically just generate division, diversity, and intolerance all over the globe.

And then you have the nerve to call us—people who truly don't care whether someone is Catholic, Orthodox, Muslim, or Mormon—as "intolerant," simply because we're fed up with the lying, hypocrisy, and deception used to infiltrate government buildings, where you get to hang your religious symbols while our kids are left hanging out in the hallways? 🙏

Religious education belongs in schools and stays in schools. All this "what if" speculation is totally pointless. It would be much better if we all channeled our energy into making sure no child ever has to worry about a religious instructor if they aren't enrolled in class, or being left to fend for themselves somewhere in the building if they don't need it...

Well, it stays in school until there isn't a school anymore. That's just the way things change; contracts are meant to be updated.
We truly have every right to put our energy into ensuring public schools focus on academic subjects, while faith is taught in buildings specifically designed for that purpose—which, by the way, are usually much nicer looking.

And since you didn't actually answer me, I'll just quote myself:

Churches exist, and people keep building new ones.
Wouldn't it be nicer for believers to be there?
Why don't believers send their children to the buildings built to glorify God?
Why is it such a struggle for religious kids to make it to church twice a week?
What kind of believers are they if they actually require taxpayer-funded infrastructure just to learn about their own faith?
Religion classes in school - Megathread in Students & Teens ·
Nancy Kelly31 said:I get the impression you're just trolling here. I honestly can't decide whether it's worth responding to this or not. 🤔
If this is just another attempt to mock believers and the Church, then thank you very much, but I have no desire to participate in this anymore.
And if we are looking for a practical way to handle children who aren't enrolled in religious studies, that is a reality we face. This isn't the way to go about it.
It seems to me that children who aren't enrolled should be grouped together in the same classes rather than being scattered everywhere. That way, everything could be scheduled at the beginning or end of the school day, and everyone would be satisfied. Principals generally manage this new situation quite well now that these individual non-enrolled students are popping up, but it isn't easy. A principal is managing a massive system, and individuals often get lost within it...

rowdypanther12 said:It wasn't meant as a joke; it was just written with a bit of humor.
it seems pretty strange to me when the same person says two completely different things

Look, I’m seriously not trying to make fun of anyone here, and I definitely don't mean to come off as some kind of comedian—though, okay, maybe just a tiny bit, if I'm being totally honest with myself. 😁 ).

Look, I’m just gonna be blunt. Is that really such a big deal? Honestly, I don't have the energy to sugarcoat everything or dress up my sentences just to make them taste better for a bunch of puritans. We're talking about basic physiological needs here, plain and simple.

So, we’re looking at this intense situation where a sixteen-year-old kid gets hit with a massive erection right in the middle of class just because there's a girl sitting directly in front of him—I mean, honestly, can any of the guys out there chime in and tell me if that was a regular occurrence for them back in the day? 😳He’s basically sitting there being lectured that he isn't allowed to touch himself or even go on a date until he finally ties the knot.

It’s like he’s standing at a massive crossroads right now; he can either actually pay attention to what his teacher is laying down and potentially turn into some kind of visionary leader, or he could just lose his mind and start looking for someone to pick a fight with.
I’d honestly love to hear from some guys out there who could just step up and be real about this—like, tell me that you didn't touch yourself or hook up with anyone at all until you actually got married, and that everything felt totally normal and okay with that.
At the end of the day, it all comes down to how they actually control things—basically, the moment girls hit puberty in those traditional societies you see all over the world.

Nancy Kelly31 said:I get the impression you're just trolling here. I honestly can't decide whether it's worth responding to this or not. 🤔
If this is just another attempt to mock believers and the Church, then thank you very much, but I have no desire to participate in this anymore.
And if we are looking for a practical way to handle children who aren't enrolled in religious studies, that is a reality we face. This isn't the way to go about it.
It seems to me that children who aren't enrolled should be grouped together in the same classes rather than being scattered everywhere. That way, everything could be scheduled at the beginning or end of the school day, and everyone would be satisfied. Principals generally manage this new situation quite well now that these individual non-enrolled students are popping up, but it isn't easy. A principal is managing a massive system, and individuals often get lost within it...

When it comes to the younger grades, they really shouldn't be making such a big deal out of everything, especially at the end of the day. I mean, if I have to drop my first grader off at school right at 7:30 AM because I need to get to work on time, suddenly it’s treated like some huge crisis. It feels just as ridiculous when religion class is scheduled as the very first period of the morning; it's like they're trying to make life difficult for parents who are actually just trying to balance a career and a family.

Quincey:
When you're running a massive corporate machine like a Fortune 500 company, it’s easy to see how people can start feeling like just another cog in the gears. Directors are tasked with steering these giant, complex systems, but once that scale hits a certain level, the individuals working within them often end up feeling pretty lost in the shuffle.
haha 😁

It feels like most people have totally lost the plot lately, honestly. You see so many parents signing their kids up for religious education classes when they aren't even believers themselves—it’s purely a formality at this point. It’s like they’re just checking a box because they’re terrified that if they don't, the neighbors will look at them sideways or judge them for not being "true Americans." Or, you know, that classic excuse where they say, "Why make things complicated for the kid? Everyone else is doing it anyway." It’s just this massive wave of conformity where nobody wants to stand out, even if it means teaching something they don't actually believe in.

It’s honestly just like how things used to be with political parties; there isn't really any meaningful difference here.

silentraven6 said:In my opinion, the only fair way to handle this is to move religious education entirely outside of the standard school day. Treat it like an after-school program—just like judo, or language classes, or any other elective that happens outside of regular instruction.

I’d also love to see the Church start opening its own private schools. That way, families who live by their faith and want their kids to stay connected to it can send them there without disrupting the secular framework of the society we all live in.

Bog knows the Church has the money, the staff, and the resources to do it, right?

Exactly.
Churches are everywhere, and they're constantly being built.
Wouldn't it be much nicer for believers to gather there instead?
Why don't religious parents just send their kids to the facilities being built for the glory of Bog?
Is it really that much of a struggle for religious children to make the trip to church twice a week?
What kind of believers are we talking about if they actually need state-funded infrastructure just to learn about their own faith?

I’d also love to see the Church start opening its own schools. That way, people who live out their faith and want their kids to have that same foundation at school could just send them there without disrupting the secular framework of the society we all share.

I mean, Bog knows the Church has the money, the staff, and the resources to make it happen, right?

http://www.newsweek.com/US-education-updates
Religion classes in school - Megathread in Students & Teens ·
Nancy Kelly31 said:I suppose you could look at it as two sides of the same coin. After all, isn't it true that in religious studies, we cover certain topics, such as... let's say, abstinence or understanding biological cycles from a moral perspective? Then, in health class, those concepts are supplemented with information regarding various forms of contraception. 🤷 Besides, these lessons are typically delivered by medical professionals rather than classroom teachers.
As for the other subjects... what else could possibly be different? 🤔 Tolerance, acceptance, non-violence... aren't those all just universal values?

So, religion class basically teaches "it's harder to stay celibate when you're in your fertile window," is that it? 🤣

Can you actually explain how sex ed in a religious setting is any different from what they teach in a standard health class?

Take a high-libido guy, for example. One group tells him, "Hey, if you're feeling pent up, just take matters into your own hands, but once you find a partner, use a condom."
The other group says, "Don't touch yourself; if you find a girl, give it to her, but if you're into guys, you're sick and an affront to God." So basically, just walk around with a massive amount of tension and pretend it's totally fine and won't cause any issues. Heck, maybe you'll even turn into some new Catholic prophet—I mean, history shows people have practically hallucinated from lack of action, so this is totally a legitimate way to live. 😁 )
Religion classes in school - Megathread in Students & Teens ·
Jeffrey Cook55 said:Someone suggested we should hire more religious education teachers just to make sure the class lands at the very beginning or the very end of the school day. Well, looking at the staff rosters for a few local elementary schools here in the States, it’s pretty clear that many of them already have three or four teachers dedicated to that subject. In some districts, there are actually fewer math or foreign language teachers than there are religion instructors, yet those subjects still take up way more time on the schedule. Honestly, I highly doubt hiring more people would change how the bells ring.

What really sticks out to me is that in almost every case, religion class isn't the first or last period of the day anymore. About twenty years ago, it actually could have been. How does that even work? Not much has changed regarding how much time is allocated to specific subjects since then. And let’s not forget that with birth rates dropping, we actually have fewer students in the classrooms now.

Yeah, and this is definitely one of those little headaches.
Back when I was in elementary school (like 20 years ago), we were all on a single-shift schedule, so religion class was always the very last period of the day, and then we’d have an extra session at our local parish.

The parish sessions weren't tied to getting confirmed, I know that for sure because nobody gets confirmed in eighth grade—the Bishop couldn't make it that year or something like that... honestly, our theory was that since kids weren't signing up for religion classes in high school, they decided to do the confirmation thing earlier so they'd be forced to enroll. 😁 Given that, obviously, I didn't sign up; I didn't get confirmed, and frankly, I just checked out of the whole thing because by 15, I was already way sharper than I was at 14. 😁

Basically, it all boils down to hypocrisy and being deceptive. You can do whatever you want if you really want to; they aren't doing this specifically because it would cause a massive drop in the percentage of kids enrolled in religion classes.

By the way, it's going to be really interesting to see how many Catholics actually support teaching Islam in schools, especially considering the migration of Muslims throughout the European Union.
See, the main argument used by American Catholics is always "look how many of us there are," so I really hope they respect that same logic when it comes to a different faith.
Religion classes in school - Megathread in Students & Teens ·
nosorog said:It’s basically the Middle Ages, Karen Richardson3 will get what I mean 😳

I don't see how you can call this the Middle Ages. Back then, people actually had faith in God and the Church.

What we're looking at now is more like the era from 1945 to 1971—and yeah, I picked those dates on purpose because that's when things finally started loosening up—it's just that the slogans have changed.

Basically, all those idiots who used to belt out war songs and brag about little Bo, who supposedly took down 50 Germans with a single bullet, are now singing hymns and acting all proud of our religious heritage.

The people are mourning Joseph Fran, they're mourning King Karađorđe, they're mourning Marshall, and they're mourning Harmon. It's pretty obvious we're just an incredibly emotional bunch of people. 😳

But honestly, what does any of this have to do with teaching religion in schools?
It's huge. ☕