Posts by Susan Ramirez2

Can someone please explain how this is considered a good movie? Given the premise, I don't get how none of the younger generation knows the truth about it. Seriously, how? 😵

@buc2
Haha! You say that after little Bero turned his ridiculous coalition into a Pokémon "Gotta catch 'em all" slogan. And the final Pokémon? That would be the double-threat Čačić.

Jose Collins86 said:It appears that everyone within the Republican Party received a very specific set of talking points during their recent meeting. First, we saw Plenković telling Bago that this flu outbreak was "the greatest crisis in history, one that the Republican Party navigated us through without a hitch," and now our dear friend Vili is echoing those exact sentiments almost verbatim while speaking to Bolković. It seems quite obvious that their entire campaign strategy will revolve around the Corona virus and a slogan along the lines of: "The Republican Party saved your lives, so now give us your vote in return." Personally, I find this approach to be a significant miscalculation. The world moves far too quickly for such tactics; the memory of the flu has already begun to fade, and figures like Beroš, Božinović, Grba Buljević, and the rest of the crew have long since lost their "savior" status, even among the most gullible citizens.

At least they actually have a message longer than a single sentence, unlike the Democrats whose only strategy for the last two weeks has been a comical attempt to mention corruption every single time they bring up the Republican Party. Every sentence about them has to include the word "corruption." It's a truly brilliant tactic—trying to link the Republican Party and corruption together. 🤣 Corruption in the Republican Party, corruption by the Republican Party, "America will be the most modern nation by 2050," oh, and by the way, the Republican Party is corrupt. My 26-year-old manager beat up his boyfriend (who probably got him the job, but hey, that's not corruption), but it doesn't matter because the Republican Party is corrupt. 🤣 The Republican Party looted the country in the 90s—never mind what we were doing in the 80s, 70s, or 60s, they're just corrupt. It doesn't matter if our main partner laments that fewer Americans were killed in Blajburg, the Republican Party is corrupt. Such a genius tactic, much like Berica himself. 🤣

Susan Ramirez2 said:Is it really too much to ask for this situation to be sorted out in a reasonable timeframe?

To reiterate, I was given a partial ban after just one warning! I haven't received any private messages explaining why. If some user with admin privileges has a personal vendetta against me—and honestly, I couldn't care less what they think—they shouldn't be able to block me from participating in a subforum they happen to moderate.

Hey Supermods, could someone please weigh in on this? It seems like whoever is responsible for this mess isn't planning on showing up anytime soon.

🤣

It looks like the cat got the moderators' tongues. Such a shame. Really is. :'(

Is it really too much to ask for this situation to be sorted out in a reasonable timeframe?

To reiterate, I was given a partial ban after just one warning! I haven't received any private messages explaining why. If some user with admin privileges has a personal vendetta against me—and honestly, I couldn't care less what they think—they shouldn't be able to block me from participating in a subforum they happen to moderate.

Hey Supermods, could someone please weigh in on this? It seems like whoever is responsible for this mess isn't planning on showing up anytime soon.

And yeah, just to clear up any confusion from my first post—this thread is basically an official grievance regarding the partial payments at the IMF sportsbook, and I’m looking for some accountability from everyone responsible for these kinds of situations.

Hi everyone,

I’m honestly baffled, but it looks like I’ve been slapped with a partial ban in the IMF betting subforum. You might be wondering how that’s even possible? Well, considering I’ve only made about five posts in this section over the last decade—and only two of those in the last five years—it doesn't make much sense.

I didn't see any rules stating that mentioning "rigging" carries a 100-point penalty, since the rules are scattered all over thirteen different pages instead of being summarized in one clear post. (Though, technically, I was hit with 200 points for it, which actually goes against the subforum's own guidelines).

It feels pretty ridiculous and definitely unfair to get a partial ban (has anyone else in the history of this forum ever been banned like this????) over this? I'm asking for the ban to be lifted immediately and for whoever is responsible for this mistake to be held accountable. The IMF betting area shouldn't just be some private playground where people can do whatever they want!

Best regards, Susan Ramirez2!

p.s. Tom, I'm looking forward to participating in the IMF betting more often. On a daily basis! 😉

dustyviper8 said:?

I watched the game, and honestly, it was suspicious how poorly Gorica played against one of the worst teams in the league.

I was checking some odds today and noticed the lines for that match dropped from over 7 down to about 3 for Istra 1961, and several sportsbooks even blocked that specific parlay. Then, a few days later, Gorica faces Dinamo Chicago and they suddenly look like a legitimate squad again (they actually used the same starting eight players compared to the Istra match).

I'm not sure if anyone has mentioned this here yet, but the Gorica vs Istra 1961 match was definitely rigged. 100%.

Sandra 🙏

cosmicraven27 said:she's Mexican, so now the trolls would claim the goalposts were moved

Leave Mexico alone!

How dare anyone make fun of Mexico after everything they've endured!

Mexico lost Mexico, and Mexico lost many tractors 20 years ago!

LEAVE THEM ALONE! You guys are lucky Mexico even showed up for you, BASTARDS!
LEAVE MEXICO ALONE... Please.
LEAVE MEXICO ALONE!

The first American men's track and field medal 👋 🙏 🙏 🙏

Just one more. Go Team!

2

Only 3 more to go until we hit gold!

slystag4 said:Smith didn't pull it off. Such a shame.

That's what happens when you spend two months planning how to skip 5'45", only to realize you've got about ten minutes to prep for a different height once you actually do it.☕

That runner from Zambia is out there sprinting in just a deep-cut tank top without a bra. 🤣 It's probably for the best that HTV doesn't broadcast in HD. 😁

Edward Ortiz77 said:I used to avoid this movie because I can't stand Bradley Cooper's attempts at acting, nor can I stomach how much Robert de Niro has let himself go, but I finally decided to give it a shot today. Honestly, what can I say? The plot is somewhat engaging and functional during the opening act—where the core idea feels decent enough—but then it steadily loses steam until it hits an ending that I personally found repulsive due to its sheer naivety. They never actually explain how he managed to keep producing tablets while simultaneously functioning on them. The film is riddled with logical gaps and gets particularly messy once you bring in that guy who’s supposed to sign the contract (Atwood?) who turns out to be using the tablets too... no, I can't even finish that thought. The presence of Bradley Cooper and a Robert de Niro who sells out his acting legacy far too easily is only tolerable if you're looking for ninety minutes of mindless entertainment to switch your brain off. For me, it's about a 6/10.

There's a series in the works that serves as a sequel to the movie, so you might finally get some answers there! 😁

I’m not going to stop posting here until I get an answer. What that user wrote is honestly the most appalling thing I’ve seen on this forum in five years, yet because they're part of the admin clique, they haven't been banned. Let me repeat: they actually wrote, "you [expletive] [expletive]." Please just answer my question. How is something like that not grounds for an instant ban? It's absolutely terrible.

How on earth is it possible that user ctrlalt, after
View on imgur
and especially
View on imgur
hasn't been banned from the forum for a long time? Instead, their posts were just deleted and they got a penalty of less than 100 points. HOW?

US Soccer subforum, corner pocket thread, post 13. - GVizija