Nancy Robinson26 said:Back in 2005, Jan Wallace was...
Looking at these specific claims, some of them are scientifically proven to be absolutely useless. Take shark cartilage, for example—it’s based entirely on the myth that Great Whites don't get cancer, which is total nonsense; biologists have known that for over a century, yet nobody listens. Then there’s the zeolite myth. It works great for gardening because it holds onto water and minerals in the soil to release during a drought, sure. But the idea that it acts as a toxin absorber in the body—how would it even distinguish between good and bad substances? How would it bind them and then just flush them out? It’s just another fairy tale. As for MMS, that gives me an instant headache. It isn't just illegal; it's the kind of toxic sludge that deserves a death sentence under any reasonable legal code.
There’s plenty more, but I don't see the point in rambling because none of this has any actual peer-reviewed scientific research to back up the idea that throwing random supplements at people actually helps. We can't even reliably talk about the placebo effect here. There are things that are genuinely healthy, like basic nutrition—cheese, turmeric, ginger, stuff like that.
Here is what we know for a fact:
1. Quitting prescribed medication to switch to alternative treatments—especially those proven to be dangerous—is a game of Russian roulette that usually doesn't end well.
2. Everything we swallow has to be processed by the liver. Taking a cocktail of various preparations and supplements—more than five different capsules a day, whether they are meds or supplements—is an incredibly dangerous gamble with your liver and your life in general.
Basically, most of what you mentioned belongs in a "Natural Alternative" PDF group, and those are off-limits here. This forum is tied closely to conventional medicine. Check the rules.
Maybe it's fitting to wrap this up with a quote from Dr. Schreiber, who cuts right through the noise on this topic:
I realize my story might trigger two types of reactions, typical of people who can't stomach anything that deviates from the norm. Some will say, "He's only alive because he didn't suffer from a deadly cancer." I wish that were true—despite the recurrence, the two surgeries, and thirteen months of chemotherapy. Even my neuro-oncologist said, "That's strange. Our genetic analysis shows your tumor has aggressive biology, yet according to you, it’s behaving quite civilly." Maybe it's luck. Maybe it's everything I do to live differently, as I've shared here. Regardless, my case isn't a scientific experiment. It doesn't settle the debate. Only clinical studies can change our collective methods for preventing and treating cancer.
***
But there might be another "typical" reaction to my case—a reaction that feels like a bet against life itself. Skeptics might say, "Before you listen to his advice, wait and see if he even survives until next year." In other words, they would rather see no one break the mold than have them question established views. To them, I'd say: I don't know if I'll be alive in a year, two years, or sixty years. They have a right to say that. I am not invincible. But I am certain of one thing: I will never regret living this way, because the health and heightened awareness I've gained through these changes have added immense value to my life. At the end of this book, I wish all my readers just one thing. Regardless of whether you are healthy or sick, I hope you embrace this awareness—you have every right to it—and that you enjoy a long life in the sun.
Source