CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › brightheron64 › Posts

Posts by brightheron64

441 posts shown.

Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Carl Lee27 said:The reality is that nowadays, the value of almost anything with a microchip in it—partially, or even primarily or exclusively—is measured by how well it connects to the internet. The whole world is slowly drifting toward this point where you can’t even dream of having a TV without Netflix, cars are gradually becoming connected devices, and even people themselves are getting networked through wearable health monitors, and eventually we'll have chips tracking all sorts of parameters inside the body, naturally being synced up with smartphones and hospitals.
Everything is becoming connected, integrated, and complementary to everything else. Except for Russia, obviously. ☕

I honestly don't know how far this goes; to me, it feels like they're going all the way. Athletes are being banned, vodka is being cut off, and they're shutting down collaborations with philharmonics and universities. It's total isolation.
Take the iPhone, specifically. What is it actually worth without Apple Pay? Without iCloud? Without Apple Maps? Or what happens if tomorrow YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and everyone else pull out or get kicked out of Russia?

The ultimate irony, of course, is that it would be much easier for me to get my hands on a rubber hose at Home Depot than it would be for ExxonMobil.

Actually, LNG should definitely be mentioned, because besides being the future of supply for Europe, more gas has been flowing into Europe via LNG for several months now than through Russian pipelines.

On the domestic front, gas consumption is slowly trending downward, both per capita and in total. Well, it's actually accelerating lately. However, production is also dropping, and it's falling even faster than consumption. Resistance to fracking means these trends will be really hard to reverse. So, beyond just finding a replacement for Russian gas, we also need to compensate for the decline in domestic production. Currently, production from the EU + UK + Turkey + Ukraine covers about 40% of their needs.
Chart 1, domestic production
https://i.ibb.co/BtFt59c/eu-gas-prod...pg-2808719.jpg

So, looking at everyone mentioned above, they’re going to need roughly 550 billion cubic meters of natural gas every single year. Now, out of that massive amount, Russia is currently supplying just under 200 billion cubic meters—which, if you do the math, is somewhere in the neighborhood of 32-36%.
Chart 2, gas sources in Europe
https://i.ibb.co/5TMTxhg/EU-gas.jpg
Honestly, trying to get enough from Norway, Algeria, or even Groningen to cover even a quarter of what we take from Russia? That’s going to be an incredibly tough hill to climb. There might be a glimmer of hope in those huge deposits over in the Eastern Mediterranean, specifically in that Israel-Egypt-Cyprus triangle, but let's be real—that's a medium-term play at best.

Which brings us right to LNG, which is being framed as the most logical path forward. And honestly, it’s way more secure too, especially when you compare it to suppliers like Iran or Russia. LNG gives us the ability to fully diversify because global availability is constantly ramping up, along with the sheer number of people willing to sell it. And keep in mind, these numbers only represent what actually hits the market. You've got Australia, Nigeria, even Qatar—everyone has some untapped potential sitting there waiting to be tapped through their terminals.
Chart 3, LNG
https://i.ibb.co/GPCtQc4/Untitled.jpg
What the chart above doesn't explicitly show is that Americans have stepped up to become the biggest LNG exporters on the planet! And it's actually them who are going to squeeze Russia out of the European market. Between everything currently being built or already approved in the US (most of which was set in motion even before the situation in Ukraine kicked off), they are absolutely on track to have export capacity by the end of 2024 that matches the entire annual volume Europe used to import from Russia. Of course, terminal utilization won't hit a perfect 100%, and not all that cargo is going to head straight to Europe—we still have to account for Australia, Qatar, Malaysia, and the rest of the world—but the scale is there.

But look, in the short term, replacing Russian gas is basically impossible unless you start cutting off consumers entirely. Besides the fact that a good chunk of LNG is already booked up for the next few years, there’s also the issue of that one specific group of people—you know the type, the ones who spent the last twenty or thirty years playing Molotov-Ribbentrop 2.0—who are essentially responsible for putting Russia, Ukraine, and all of Europe in this mess today. They’re the kind of folks who could practically refuse to accept a single LNG tanker. Just for context, about a third of the total LNG capacity in the EU is currently sitting right there in Spain.

By the way, imports from Russia make up about 52-53% of the total gas imports into Europe. On the flip side, Russia's exports to Europe account for about 70-80% of their total gas exports, depending on how much they've started shifting toward China now that the pandemic has wound down.
Since the gas Russia sends to Europe can't just be rerouted to China anytime soon—aside from maybe smaller amounts moving through Yamal LNG—for them, those European exports are essentially lost for the time being. If Europe and America follow through on their end of the deal (and I see no reason why they wouldn't), Europe might actually manage to diversify its imports before Russia can successfully pivot its exports elsewhere.

Look, this is coming from DW, so we know it isn't just Russian propaganda:

Could LNG fill the gap?

While American energy firms are working hard to ramp up LNG export capacity by nearly 20%—aiming for 13.9 billion cubic feet per day by the end of the year, per the International Energy Agency—there is a real concern that this fresh supply might not be quite enough to save Europe if Putin turns OFF The taps...

LNG exporters need time

In the immediate future, "LNG would not be able to fully compensati [ for Any Natural gas shortfall fra Russia ]," noted Weidensteiner, pointing toward "a lack of available short-term capacity among major exporters like the US and Qatar."

The Commerzbank Economist Said that , though Europe still Has The capacity to process or regasify The imported liquid gas, "it would be difficult to deliver it to end-users since the current distribution infrastructure just isn't built for such a massive pivot toward LNG..."

https://www.dw.com/en/if-russia-turn...ity/a-60490682
The start of the Russian invasion of Ukraine (Part 1) in War in Ukraine ·
velvetcyclist95 said:The Philadelphia Orchestra even shut this down on Facebook last night, but honestly? There's zero doubt we'll be seeing the exact same garbage in the headlines again the day after tomorrow. ☕

Honestly, Hmh, it feels like you just have to take a massive detour to avoid reading Index altogether... 👎

At this point, Forum.hr actually ends up being the most reliable source of information out there, and I am being completely serious about that...
The start of the Russian invasion of Ukraine (Part 1) in War in Ukraine ·
neonpuma30 said:Total nonsense, honestly. It’s like Tchaikovsky has anything to do with Putin! 🤦

And then there's the vodka. 🤣

https://www.gannett-cdn.com/presto/2...jpg?width=2560
The start of the Russian invasion of Ukraine (Part 1) in War in Ukraine ·
jadetinker85 said:Pornhub blocks users from Russia

What sanctions? 🤣

It seems our cultural institutions are jumping on the bandwagon too 😲

The Philadelphia Orchestra has pulled several Tchaikovsky pieces from their program due to the situation in Ukraine
The start of the Russian invasion of Ukraine (Part 1) in War in Ukraine ·
Paul Patel95 said:tweet

The US is seriously looking at hitting Russia's central bank with sanctions. We're talking about $634 billion

NEWS: I'm hearing the US is eyeing sanctions on Russia’s central bank, a massive move targeting most of the $643b in reserves Putin has hoarded

No final call yet, but the administration wants to coordinate with European allies to make sure this hits as hard as possible.

Blacklisting Russia's central bank would be without precedent for an economy this size

This would be absolutely "devastating" for Russia, according to
@tashecon
“We would see the ruble crash.”

How exactly?

Are they just going to set it all on fire? 🤔
The start of the Russian invasion of Ukraine (Part 1) in War in Ukraine ·
placidrider48 said:I guess even a crazy sultan can be useful for something, if you think about it.

We'll just have to wait and see if this is merely political posturing regarding NATO membership or if it represents a genuinely firm decision, because...

The Ministry of Agriculture has stated that no grain shortages are anticipated stemming from the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, two countries that supply a substantial amount of Turkey's grain imports.

According to data from the U.S. Census Bureau, Russia accounted for 56% of Turkey's grain imports in 2021, totaling $2.24 billion, while the combined imports from Russia and Ukraine represented 78%, with Ukraine's portion reaching $861 million last year.

https://www.dailysabah.com/business/...onflict-turkey
The start of the Russian invasion of Ukraine (Part 1) in War in Ukraine ·
briskheron said:Russ is playing dirty.
They’ve really gone too far this time. From what I can gather, they'd be facing the death penalty in any US state for doing something like this.
https://mobile.twitter.com/ukrainain...41987808993295

What an incredibly strange arsenal they have piled up right there in front of them. 🤔
The start of the Russian invasion of Ukraine (Part 1) in War in Ukraine ·
Larry Walker24 said:Standard & Poor's just knocked Ukraine's long-term credit rating down from a "B" to a "B-" in both foreign and local currencies. They're basically saying the whole situation with Russia is putting massive risks on the country's economic growth and financial stability.

S&P also mentioned they might slash those ratings even further if this conflict causes Ukraine's external liquidity to dry up.

They did the exact same thing to Russian stocks, dragging them right down to junk status.

S&P cuts Russia's rating to junk, Moody's issues junk warning
https://www.investing.com/news/stock...kraine-2772940

On the flip side, it looks like Russia saw the sanctions coming and played their cards pretty well, stockpiling about $670 billion in hard currency reserves, with a quarter of that held in gold. They even picked up another $5 billion in cash back in December alone...
https://edition.cnn.com/2022/02/21/b...ons/index.html
The start of the Russian invasion of Ukraine (Part 1) in War in Ukraine ·
Richard Wilson4 said:Honestly, I'm betting it's just another rumor, kind of like all that stuff about the Bosphorus...

Who can really say for sure anymore? In this day and age, nothing feels certain... though I suppose it's possible Putin has already brought in some financial experts from Colombia to handle things...
The start of the Russian invasion of Ukraine (Part 1) in War in Ukraine ·
gentleharbor3 said:So, did Zelenskyy personally and intentionally spread the fake news about Turkey closing the straits?
That clown is starting to look like he’s actively fueling the potential for a massive war in Europe on behalf of someone else.

Has the man simply become too immersed in his own cinematic role?

The start of the Russian invasion of Ukraine (Part 1) in War in Ukraine ·
Grace Bennett6 said:If Vladimir Putin doesn't roll into Kyiv, Zelenskyy stays out on the streets right alongside his troops.

He really ought to watch his step so he doesn't end up catching a stray bullet by mistake...

Kyiv is extending its curfew, and anyone caught out after 5 PM is being treated as an enemy
The Mayor of Kyiv announced this Saturday that the curfew—originally implemented due to the Russian invasion—is being extended, warning that anyone found outdoors between 5 PM and 8 AM will be viewed as a hostile presence.

"Any civilians caught out during the curfew hours will be considered members of enemy sabotage and intelligence groups", Vitali Klitschko posted on Telegram.
Roger Fowler said:The US makes money off this entire mess, so why would they ever give anything away for free? Who else is crazy enough to hand out freebies?

That’s true, but all that profit is essentially driving refugees straight to our borders...

Most of Central America is effectively under the thumb of cartels that pull in massive amounts of weapons—guns that are so easily sourced from the US—and in many cases, these groups are actually better armed than the local police forces, even going so far as to threaten the military itself. It leaves ordinary people with absolutely nothing left... they don't have the means to defend themselves, so they're forced to either submit to the chaos or look toward the US for a lifeline...
casualtiger2 said:It's a strange kind of "love." I've met hundreds of Swiss people—both professionally and personally—but not one single person ever talked to me about this passion,
let alone showed off their collection (not even counting public carry).
1. After WW2, anyone who finished military service was required to take their service weapon home—it was based on the idea of national self-defense against foreign threats.
For 99.99% of Americans, the idea that they'd need a gun to defend themselves against their own government is just absurd; maybe except for those extreme anti-vaxxers, far-right types, or leftists nowadays.

That's really what drives the stats on gun ownership and this supposed "love."

2. For quite some time now, fewer and fewer veterans are actually taking their service weapons home (which, by the way, has to be kept under lock and key, separate from ammunition).

3. Knabenschiessen is more like a carnival target shoot where you win a toy than some deep expression of firearm passion.

4. Even hunters supported adopting stricter European Union-style regulations on private gun purchases, which passed easily in a referendum.

5. You won't find guns in any regular store, nor is there any flashy advertising.

6. There is no such thing as a Second Amendment regarding gun rights in Switzerland.

Switzerland: So Many Guns, No Mass Shootings

Switzerland’s Responsible Gun Nuts Pt. 2

PS
It's true—and honestly a bit worrying—that there's also been a spike in handgun requests here. 😢


"Oh, don't worry, they're shooting." 😂
Republican Party - General Discussion in Political Scene ·
Kennedy made an excellent point:

"If you really want to grasp how the Republican Party operates, just go back and rewatch The Godfather, specifically parts I and II."
unknown
hiddeneagle98 said:unknown
William Clark86 unknown:
Americans are just fundamentally schizophrenic and emotionally unstable as a nation. It’s wild how differently we process reality compared to everyone else. If something happens that we’d just shrug off, say "cool," and move on with our day, they’ll spend twenty minutes jumping around like fanatics in a state of pure euphoria. On the flip side, if we encounter something that’s clearly just a total load of crap and we barely blink, they’ll spiral into these massive, rage-filled meltdowns where people start breaking things. It’s that pattern across the board—it’s constant.
Americans tend to be pretty reactive—they’re loud, they get worked up over everything, and they constantly overreact. I wouldn't go so far as to say they've lost their grip on reality, but they definitely lean into the drama.

It’s honestly wild how some cultures just normalize that fake, over-the-top politeness from servers. You go out to eat and suddenly you're being smothered in this manufactured, sugary sweetness that feels completely hollow. It’s like they’ve all collectively agreed to put on a mask of extreme friendliness that doesn't actually mean anything, and we're just expected to play along with the charade.

unknown
Back home, if you decide to cut in line, all you're going to get is some dirty looks or maybe a little snarky comment thrown your way by someone passing by. It’s subtle, almost quiet. But over here? If you even think about stepping out of turn, people lose their minds. You'll have folks screaming in your face, making a massive scene, and if things escalate enough, it’s not uncommon to see someone actually swing at you or pull a handgun. It's a completely different level of volatility.
Yeah, we’re just a bunch of softies, aren't we? Just sitting here, completely pacified and taking it all on the chin.

It’s funny how you see those folks over in London, just standing there in perfectly straight lines at the bus stop like they actually give a damn about order.

And honestly, no matter how much they carry themselves like true gentlemen, those same guys can turn into absolute animals when it comes to how they actually behave.

unknown
I know I'm generalizing here, but look, if you took a hundred Americans and a hundred Europeans and dropped them into the exact same situation, I’d bet my life that way more of those Americans would react exactly the way I just described. It wouldn't be even close.

It’s become part of the actual culture now—it’s seeped into the subcultures, the media, and even the political machine. What we're seeing is this constant, forced conditioning that trains people to react in a certain way, essentially teaching folks to adopt these specific stances when they wouldn't have even thought to act like that otherwise.
Timothy Nelson5 hit the nail on the head earlier. If you actually sat down and mapped out where most violent crime in the States happens, you’d see it’s concentrated in just a handful of urban pockets. Honestly, if you were to isolate those specific areas and look at the data, the numbers would be comparable to the entire European Union.

Americans aren't even close to fixing the mess with the ghettos and the gang violence, and honestly, trying to blame that on some rednecks in the Rust Belt and their Second Amendment rights is a complete non sequitur.

When you look at those high-crime urban centers, the reality is that your Second Amendment rights are basically non-existent anyway; the local regulations are so restrictive they feel more like European law than anything you'd expect in America. Trying to get a concealed carry permit in a place like New York City is a total nightmare, and don't even get me started on open carry—it’s practically a fantasy for a law-abiding citizen there. It’s funny how people complain about gun control when the vast majority of homicides in those cities are actually committed with illegal weapons smuggled across the border from Mexico.

Just a small correction here, the guns are actually flowing from the USA into Mexico (and they still are), rather than coming the other way around...

Slow The Iron River of Guns to Mexico The Biden administration Has an opportunity to stem Illegal gun trafficking to Mexico and Beyond
The Biden administration has an opportunity to stem illegal gun trafficking to Mexico and beyond.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/20/o...ns-mexico.html
Republican Party - General Discussion in Political Scene ·
Ryan Richardson45 said:They’re hiring at my local grocery store.

Of course they’re looking for them—they just need more "shock troops" to head down to the front lines...

Among those arrested during this morning's FBI raid was Piruška Canjuga, who's one of the people implicated in that whole Walmart scandal.

I can only hope that some higher power might actually decide to pull her husband aside too—though I highly doubt the FBI or anyone else ever will—just to ask him, "Hey buddy, how's it going? 😒 Do you happen to remember any of your own...?"
Republican Party - General Discussion in Political Scene ·
Emily Smith6 said:Republican Party sees rating bump following corruption verdict

Quavo:
NBC just released the latest Nielsen data regarding political party popularity. This particular poll was conducted between October 16th and 19th, using a sample size of 1,400 respondents. Interestingly, the survey follows the final court ruling against the Republican Party concerning the massive Ogilvy scandal involving the misappropriation of funds from state agencies and corporations.

Republican Party 27.3%
Can Do 16.1%
Democratic Party 15.9%
Bridge 6.8%
DP 4.1%.

The Republican Party figured out the formula a long time ago: you basically have to screw over the voters just to keep them coming back for more... 😵
Republican Party - General Discussion in Political Scene ·
Emily Smith6 said:unknown: “We aren’t a corrupt party”

unknown:
"The Supreme Court didn't rule that the Republican Party is a corrupt entity or a criminal organization," claimed unknown (Republican Party).

"The Supreme Court ruled that there was liability due to the actions of a specific individual within the party, rather than the Republican Party itself, its members, or its officials," he added.

No, I certainly am... 🤣
Republican Party - General Discussion in Political Scene ·
Nicholas King said:Dubravka Šuica has officially gone ahead and blamed the lack of political division in the country on—get this—America.

Well, I suppose I can finally say I’ve heard just about everything there is to hear.

Since Dubravka Šuica was only about fifteen years old during the smallpox outbreaks, I guess she’s holding onto those memories as some sort of traumatic association with totalitarian lock down measures? 😁

Just a quick little look at the Wikipedia entry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smallpox_epidemics_in_Yugoslavia_1972.

The Reaction
By March 22nd, doctors had realized that Mus had passed away due to smallpox. The government's response was swift and incredibly intense. A state of emergency was declared immediately. Authorities began cordoning off villages and neighborhoods using barbed wire. They also banned public gatherings, closed the borders, and prohibited all travel except for absolutely essential trips. Even hotels were seized by the military to house 10,000 people who might have been exposed to the virus, all under military guard. Furthermore, a massive re-vaccination campaign was launched with assistance from the World Health Organization. Donald Henderson, one of the world's leading experts on smallpox, was brought in to help manage the unfolding crisis.

Within just two weeks, the entire population had been vaccinated again. By mid-May, the infection was halted and things returned to normal. During that epidemic, 175 people were infected, and 35 lost their lives to the disease.

Impact on modern epidemiology
Today, since smallpox is viewed as a potential tool for bioterrorism, US authorities believe such drastic steps could be taken if an attack ever occurred. Just two weeks before the attacks on the WTC, the CDC released guidelines for fighting a potential outbreak. In that document, CDC experts warned the government that in the event of an epidemic, it would be necessary to establish quarantines and essentially challenge the very foundations of individual liberty.

Experts also pointed out that the USA would face much more difficulty implementing such rigorous measures compared to communist America. When the smallpox epidemic hit Muncie, Indiana, back in 1893, officials tried to quarantine the city, but the citizens revolted against the restrictions on their freedom. When they attempted to quarantine the hospital, people used firearms to escape, while others smashed through doors or simply refused to enter the facility at all.


That last part might actually explain best why the USA has become a global leader in terms of death tolls from COVID-19 (exceeding 700,000)...
Republican Party - General Discussion in Political Scene ·
A Republican official just tallied up $233 Universities' spending on cell phones, cameras, and laptops...

Mioković says he had to resort to solo training sessions just to learn how to distinguish what actually matters from what doesn't.

That’s a total of 12 hours for $3.25 (even with a discount)

What an absolute joke! 😠
You figured out the difference between essential and trivial a long time ago—just look at that Republican "Uber Ales" slogan.
Now, if you really need a lesson in that kind of logic, I could offer you a much cheaper alternative: a mere 96 hours plus three loaves of bread and some bottles of water daily, plus a residency fee, and you'll be all set... $0.67
.
According to the records, the assembly also picked up two Apple MacBook Pro 16 laptops for $14781, tax included.

For what, exactly? To watch a Screen Saver loop? Or maybe to spend all day scrolling through Facebook???
I mean, honestly, for that kind of money, a single school could have outfitted an entire computer lab (unless, of course, they're buying through the Department via King ITC)!

200 16GB USB 3.0 drives for $2933

KINGSTON 32GB USB3.2 Gen 1 DataTraveler Exodia (Black + White) - $13 (without any bulk discount)

Man, wouldn't it be something to be the IT supplier for this Republican inner circle... 🕺