CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › mistybear87 › Posts

Posts by mistybear87

1133 posts shown.

Mark Ruiz8 said:Can someone give me a total layman's explanation of what diffusers actually are? And who's actually using them?

Basically, the diffuser is located underneath the rear of the car, and its whole purpose is to manage the airflow moving under the chassis.

By being really meticulous with the design, you can effectively "exhaust" a massive amount of that air. Since there isn't as much air coming in from the front, you create a high-velocity stream, which ultimately helps the car stick to the track through increased downforce.
Well, that was quite the atmosphere 🙂

image
fadedpanther4 said:Just like how what's being said right now is also based on facts. 😛

The FIA actually said something else entirely 😬
fadedpanther4 said:Well, yeah... just think back to everything people were saying here during Ferrari's era of dominance. ☕

People talked about just about anything, mostly just basic stuff, really. 😬
It always seems to be the same story, doesn't it? As soon as someone manages to win, they’re immediately labeled a cheat, a fraud, a scoundrel, or whatever other insults people feel like throwing around ☕.

Look, if the FIA says those diffusers are perfectly legal, then the rest of the field just has to deal with it. They can either swallow the dust behind the leaders or get back to the drawing board and design a better diffuser themselves ☕.
tralalalalala 🙂
Williams, tralalalalalalalala, Williams 🙂🙂🙂
Michael Lee4 said:Fuck !!!!, they are ugly 😁

I can't stand you, 😬

Goodnight
There isn't any BBC streaming available; you can only listen via the radio, and even then, you have to be using a US IP address
2009 Car Reveal in Formula 1 ·
Arthur Doyle70 said:Don't you think it's just about VN Australia😬?

From what I can gather, there’s going to be another inspection at the next race, but if they don't actually change anything, they'll likely remain within the rules.

Then there's the matter of the international appeals court. They'll convene if any of the teams decide to file an official protest regarding the inspection results.

In that scenario, the "fantastic trio" would probably compete in at least two more races while waiting for the court to sit, and only then will we find out who was actually in the right. You can appeal a ruling, of course, but once that's done, the decision is final.
ironfalcon43 said:Only 24 hours left until the first practice session starts🙂

The first practice session kicks off at 8:30 PM our time☕
Donna Nelson23 said:They never actually won a championship title?

That's just the truth
and yet, somehow, every single year turns out to be "their" year. 😬
You might want to keep a close eye on who takes the win this weekend, because if you look back at the last twenty years, only three drivers managed to win the season opener without actually going on to claim the championship title. Our "lucky" winners were Giancarlo Fisichella, David Coulthard, and Ross Brawn. Now we’re just sitting here waiting to see if Jenson Button, Mark Webber, or Rubens Barrichello will join that illustrious club 😬

So, here’s a million-dollar question for you: what exactly do all those drivers have in common? ☕
guys, don't go running away from ☕
5.2 Alternative Propulsion Methods:
5.2.1 The deployment of any hardware or technology beyond that standard 2.4-liter, four-stroke engine mentioned in section 5.1—aside from the single KERS unit—is strictly prohibited when used to...
Is there any doubt that the driver must maintain absolute authority over the vehicle? It really comes down to this: the power must remain entirely under the driver's control at all times while the car is out on the track. There simply isn't any room for automated interference when you're pushing those limits.
Under section 5.2.2, there’s a specific rule regarding how much energy we can pull back from the track. Aside from having one single, fully charged energy recovery system on board, the total amount of recoverable energy stored within the car...
The energy limits are quite specific here, aren't they? We have to ensure that we don't go over the 300kJ threshold. Furthermore, if we happen to recover any energy at a rate exceeding 2kW, that particular amount needs to stay strictly under 20kJ. It’s a delicate balance to maintain, wouldn't you agree?
5.2.3 Is there a limit to how much energy we can actually harness? When it comes to the power output—whether it’s being deployed or recovered—any such system simply cannot exceed 60kW. It feels like a necessary boundary, wouldn't you agree?
There's a rule in place regarding the energy deployment from the recovery systems—basically, you can't let that extra burst of power exceed 400kJ during any single lap. It’s a necessary constraint, isn't it? It keeps things from spiraling out of control and ensures the competition stays balanced.

The measurements are going to be taken right at the point where they connect to the rear wheel drivetrain.
Regarding section 5.2.4: just to clarify the rule on energy storage—it’s strictly prohibited to increase the amount of stored energy in any hybrid recovery system while the car is sitting stationary during a race. It makes sense, doesn't it? You can't just top off your reserves while you're waiting at the pit wall or stuck behind a safety car. All that recharging has to happen while you're actually out there on the asphalt, putting in the work.
Is there anything quite as mesmerizing as a perfectly executed pit stop? I was watching some footage earlier, and it really got me thinking about the sheer, synchronized precision required to pull that off. It’s one thing to drive fast, but to have a crew of twenty people moving like a single organism to swap tires in two seconds flat? That’s art. It makes you wonder, doesn't it? How much of a race is actually won in the heat of the battle on the asphalt, and how much is decided by those frantic, breathless moments in the lane? One loose nut, one hesitant mechanic, and an entire championship effort could slip through your fingers. It’s a beautiful, high-stakes dance.
The driver should always maintain absolute authority over how any such system releases power while the car is out on the track. After all, shouldn't the person behind the wheel be the one ultimately calling the shots?
The car is out there on the track.

Well, there it is.
Amanda Kelly said:Well, damn. You read them wrong. Send me a link.

To me, it seems pretty simple: you're allowed to get an extra 60-70-80 HP (or kW, whatever) for a maximum of 6 seconds per lap.
That would be the power output.

But how much energy they actually need to store to dump all that power in just 6 seconds? That's a whole different story. It comes down to efficiency, tech, and all that stuff...

What I mean is, to get that boost, one person might need 10 kWh (or however many Joules—that's the actual unit) while someone else needs 20, 30, or 100...

Drop the link!

http://argent.fia.com/web/fia-public.nsf/7C4F8D883039AF6AC125757D00369C58/$FILE/1-2009_F1_TECHNICAL_REGULATIONS_Showing-Alterations_17-03-2009.pdf
Raymond Ortiz89 said:So, what's the deal with Honda's engine situation? I mean, seriously, where did all those millions they dumped into this just vanish? It feels like we're watching a massive sinkhole swallow up an entire budget while we're left standing here wondering when the actual results are going to show up on the track. 🤷

The cat's out of the bag now.☕
Amanda Kelly said:Let’s clear up the difference between power and energy here.
From what I recall, there was talk about limiting power, so when you mentioned being under 60 kW, I assume you were talking about maximum power output.

Energy is what gets stored up, which is why the usage duration matters.
It’s probably for the best that they limit how long you can use it; otherwise, drivers would just be using it for half the race.

They aren't allowed to store more than 60 kW, and that's the total amount they can tap into, if I've interpreted the regulations correctly.
Morgan Murphy7 said:I have to say, I'm feeling the exact same frustration about this. It’s really starting to get under my skin. 🤷

I’ve been pondering whether that Hybrid Technology is something drivers are meant to deploy constantly throughout every single lap, or if it's strictly reserved for those critical moments when you're looking to make a pass. It's an interesting tactical question—is it a tool for sustained pace, or more like a tactical burst used only when the opportunity arises?

I mean, they say it’s like having an extra six or seven horsepower under the hood.

And now what?

If a driver finds themselves out in front without anyone to overtake during a lap, what’s the strategy there? Will they just power up the engine? It feels like such a waste to let all that horsepower go to use, almost like leaving an expensive engine idling in a garage when you could be out on the road. 😁

Honestly, I'm completely lost on this one. I just can't wrap my head around it. 🙏

Regarding the Hybrid Technology, there are two main rules to keep in mind:

1) A driver is allowed to utilize up to 60 kW of energy per lap.
2) The total duration of that usage cannot exceed 6 seconds.

So, technically, they could use it all at once for six seconds, twice for three seconds each, or even spread it out into six one-second bursts throughout the entire lap.

But wait—what if a driver actually has enough energy stored for 120 kW, and they hit the button six seconds before the finish line, let go, cross the line, and immediately hit it again? I'm not entirely sure, but theoretically, wouldn't that result in a massive advantage?

I wonder if the Hybrid Technology can actually store more than that 60 kW limit, or if that's the absolute ceiling.
2009 Car Reveal in Formula 1 ·
Raymond Ortiz89 said:I honestly don't think they're breaking any rules. If there were an issue, I'm sure Visa would have stepped in by now. Besides, stripping someone of a victory? I just can't see that happening; it would be such a massive disaster for the sport.

The governing body already stated the diffusers are perfectly legal.

But who knows? The officials at NASCAR races might end up having a completely different take on the whole thing. ☕