lonecanyon8 said:That’s the urinalysis report.
So, this blood work is just this: Antistreptol: 131.
From what I’ve gathered from digging around online, there’s some kind of infection going on in my system. I’ve been trying to connect the dots myself, wondering if it might be a bladder infection or perhaps something wonky happening with my kidneys. I’m currently waiting on the results from my throat and nasal swabs so I can present the whole picture to my doctor and finally get some actual direction on next steps. I’m really hoping it isn't anything serious. 🙄🤷
P.S. My bad—I always seem to skip right over the very first post!
Age: 22
I don't have any major medical history to speak of. I’m currently running some urine tests because of a bladder infection, and I’ve got blood work coming back to check on my stomach—specifically testing for bacteria (which came back negative). There's also this other result that I can't quite wrap my head around; it just says Antistreptol titer 131. I'm still waiting on the throat and nasal swabs to clear up the rest of the situation, too.
Look, they’re telling me these results aren't connected. They say there's no link. But I've managed to connect the dots between this blood work and the urinalysis myself, and frankly, I'm not buying their explanation. I'm looking for a second opinion here...
The first post isn't showing up again! Seriously?
The AST-O results came back clean.
Why on earth did you bother getting a throat swab, a tetanus shot, and all that other stuff? Honestly, everything was already laid out and explained perfectly clearly.
Now we’ve got this whole thing about some bacterium being mentioned—specifically that *Helicobacter pylori* business.
Look, I don't exactly have a crystal ball, am I? And since I'm not sitting right next to you, nor do I possess any psychic powers to read your mind, I have absolutely no way of knowing what your data looks like!Guidelines for posting questions regarding Laboratory Results – Seeking Opinions:
Look, if you actually want any kind of precise or accurate answers regarding your lab results, you need to stop being vague. If you want us to make sense of what your numbers are telling us, please include the following details whenever you type out your findings:
-
Here’s the thing about these lab results: you can't just look at them in isolation. If you send over a bunch of disconnected numbers without the rest of the context, half of them become practically unreadable. You need the full picture to make any sense of what we're looking at.Listen, if you’re going to post your lab results here, for heaven's sake, include the reference ranges! If there are reference values listed on your report, write them down. Every single lab uses different scales, and honestly, a raw number means absolutely nothing without knowing what that specific lab considers "normal." Don't just throw a digit at us and expect an answer—context is everything.
Age—look, you don't need to give me your exact birthdate or anything, but please, just provide a general ballpark. Are we talking early twenties? Late forties? Something like that? It actually matters. You can't just ignore this because reference ranges aren't one-size-fits-all; what’s considered normal for one age group might be totally different for another. Give us a baseline so we aren't just guessing.
-
Listen, here is the bottom line: you absolutely have to explain exactly why you were sent for these tests in the first place. What are your actual symptoms? This is the most critical part of the whole process. If someone tries to interpret your lab results without knowing the underlying reason you’re even under the microscope, they're just guessing. You can't accurately read the data if you don't know what problem we're trying to solve. Give us the context, or the numbers won't mean a thing.Give me a quick rundown of any other health issues you're dealing with. Seriously, if you have anything else going on, please just write it down. It’s the only way to get the full picture.
On another note—and I really can't stress this enough—it wouldn't hurt to mention if pregnancy or anything similar is in the picture. That kind of thing plays a massive role in how the lab results turn out.
Robert Green93 said:I have a question regarding my grandmother.
He’s 75 years old, and this is what the lab results from a few days ago show.
I see you've got elevated levels of creatine and urea on your labs. How exactly are we supposed to fix that?
My red blood cell count looks fine, but my hemoglobin and hematocrit levels are sitting way too low.
How on earth am I supposed to fix this?
They’re pumping her full of meds and just completely screwing her over!
My grandmother actually drinks quail eggs every single morning.
Her appetite is practically non-existent. And right now? Her blood pressure is bottoming out and she’s completely out of it, just totally unresponsive.
The doctors there aren't telling her a damn thing; they just run these endless tests and then nothing happens. No info, no clarity. Just silence.
Honestly, when it comes to what happened while she was in the hospital, I don't even have the energy to write it all down.🙂
Sorry for the long-winded post.
Here is the scan of the results:
http://i45.tinypic.com/wlov80.jpg
Look, you need to list
EVERY SINGLE DIAGNOSIS, without exception,, along with the symptoms or the reason for testing,
AND THE THERAPY—THE EXACT MEDICATIONS SHE IS TAKING.
I see the creatinine and urea levels are quite high. How do we fix that?Dialysis? But she doesn't meet the criteria for that yet.
The erythrocyte count looks fine, but the hemoglobin and hematocrit are low.
How do we address this? It depends on other test results, such as MCV, Fe, UIBC, ferritin, B12, and folate. Given that the MCV is low here, we're looking at hypochromic anemia.
They have her on some medications... There are about 500 drugs listed under basic and supplemental insurance coverage, plus those outside the system like Lupocet or Nexium—now I actually need to know which ones specifically.
There are also roughly 2,000 different diagnoses according to the ICD.
The labs point toward Stage II-III renal insufficiency.
Guidelines for posting questions in the Lab Results - Opinions thread:
To get the most precise and accurate answers regarding your lab interpretations, we suggest you include the following details when transcribing your results:
- Complete results—many values can't be interpreted correctly if they're isolated from the rest of the panel.
- Reference ranges—if there are reference ranges on the report, please include them. Different labs use different standards; a number alone means absolutely nothing without its specific reference range.
- Age—you don't need to give an exact age, but a general idea like "early twenties" or "late forties" is vital because normal ranges change significantly across different age groups.
- The reason for the tests (your actual symptoms)—this is the most critical part. It’s nearly impossible for anyone to accurately interpret findings if they don't know why the tests were ordered in the first place.-
A brief medical history of other illnesses—if you have any, please list them, as they provide a much fuller picture. - Other factors—it’s also important to mention things like pregnancy, as that heavily influences lab values.
LOOK, I DON'T HAVE A CRYSTAL BALL, I'M NOT STANDING NEXT TO YOU, AND I CERTAINLY DON'T HAVE TELEPATHIC POWERS TO GUESS YOUR DATA.