CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › bluemason3 › Posts

Posts by bluemason3

1288 posts shown.

Edward Flores4 said:Let’s just say I have a very low tolerance for hypocrisy.

I'm just saying it's probably their best way to push back right now—but honestly, I'll leave it to the priests and monks to decide if it's even my business to weigh in.

The whole point of ANY religious or spiritual institution is pretty much just to meddle in politics, fuel wars, and chase profits.

They turn beliefs into formal institutions just to grab legal legitimacy and, by extension, political clout. Then, they use their massive followings as "proof" of how meaningful they actually are, all while lining their pockets along the way.

I can't really get on board with that. Especially when it comes to monastic orders. You might see that pattern more clearly in organized, mainstream religions, but most monastic institutions are founded primarily to help members focus on their spiritual practice. Sure, they often slide into corruption over time... but they also reform. Just look at groups like the Benedictines—they undergo constant reform (think Cistercians or Trappists) whenever the core group gets too loose and some newcomers show up wanting to live a more intense, ascetic lifestyle...

Nothing is ever black and white. 😉
Edward Flores4 said:But what exactly is being "saved" here? Is it this deep attachment to culture, customs, and religious beliefs? It’s the same kind of stuff the Dalai Lama critiques when he looks at things through the lens of marriage... that same intense grip on identity, on owning a sense of individuality and uniqueness... the culture, the language, the traditions, the spouse, the kids...

Total bullshit!!

If he truly wanted to save people, he would tell them that nobody can strip away what they carry inside themselves—a flag in the street could just as easily be Chinese or Polish... an official language could be Bantu for all we care... none of that is worth getting thrown in prison or beaten over. Nobody in America feels more American than they did back during the era of strict federal oversight... and the same logic applies to Tibetans.

But playing the political strategist from the safety of asylum—basically waving someone else's authority around just to preserve a "people" who view him as a sort of demigod—all while protecting his own status as a supreme monarch and a national saint... well, that's worth something, sure, but only in terms of pure ego.

He can talk about non-violence all he wants once he's actually put his own skin in the game. Until then... look, being non-violent is really only a choice when you actually possess the strength to be violent but choose not to. If you don't have any power at all, you aren't being "non-violent"—you're just stuck. It's not the same thing. Just like peace is the foundation of any meaningful action, strength is the foundation of true non-violence.

Seriously, any excuse to start an argument, right? 😁
I'm just saying it's the best form of resistance they have right now. And honestly, it’s up to the priests and monks to stay out of this, unless I want to get dragged into a debate myself.😛
Edward Flores4 said:But honestly, what’s so surprising about that? For years now, the Dalai Lama has been sitting pretty in his "temporary home," advising Tibetans to preserve their culture at any cost—all while insisting they shouldn't resist or resort to violence. It’s a bit much when you consider that this entire culture has been systematically disappearing for years, yet he keeps preaching non-violence and discouraging resistance—which is easy enough to do after you've already escaped and left your people to deal with the chaos on the ground.
Instead of just stepping away from his role as a monarch, he plays the saint, even though people back in Tibet are facing ten-year prison sentences or brutal beatings just for something as simple as holding up a picture of him or flying the Tibetan flag.

Then, on the flip side, he acts all fascinated by science—sending his people off to top-tier research institutes for fMRI scans to study the meditative mind... it sounds wonderful on paper, doesn't it? But when asked if he’d be willing to "lend" his own brain for some testing, he just coolly brushes it off, claiming he hasn't got any special "abilities" because he "hasn't had the time to train."

So, what is the Dalai Lama actually doing? He isn't exactly a master of his craft, and his version of fighting for peace seems to involve running away from the mess and telling everyone else to stay peaceful while they get mistreated.

If you ask me... I wouldn't give him three seconds of airtime on my TV. ☕

They tried armed resistance too, and the Chinese crushed them like a cheap toy. This approach, which wins sympathy from the international community, is probably the best—if not the only—way to save whatever can still be saved.
Liberation as the goal. But for what? in Spirituality ·
So, you have a toothache and you just want it to stop. Even if you try to argue that pain is basically just an illusion, it doesn't really matter—your brain still thinks it's very real, and that tooth is definitely still hurting. 😁 Real liberation happens when the pain finally stops, and let's be honest, the easiest way to make a tooth stop hurting is to just not have the tooth anymore. 😁
Zen is everywhere in Spirituality ·
driftingraven122 said:Yes. Essentially, you "grasp" an object with the mind. Constantly.

I intentionally try to forget I’ve ever even heard the terms mind, body, or consciousness—I just follow the feeling. When I hit that first level, there's this subtle blend of stillness, ease, and a sort of... "sacred" sensation. It’s like walking around and just gliding—never actually touching anything. 😬

The trick is when you step out into the mud (like heading to work) and everything feels quieter, calmer, and slower 🤷... almost like it's under a muffler 😁 until you actually get to the office. 🙂 🤣
Zen is everywhere in Spirituality ·
wiredbear2 said:So, samadhi targets the conceptual mind, while vipassana works to 'deconstruct everything surrounding them.' Could you elaborate on that? 🙂

And what does meditation actually look like in Zen?

driftingraven122 will probably correct me easily since Buddhism isn't my specialty, but in Theravada, there are basically two "techniques" (not counting meta-labels like "meditation" and such). First, there's breath concentration—which isn't actually vipassana, though people mix them up—used to calm and focus the mind. This usually precedes vipassana, which is more of a self-analysis of physical and mental processes. I assume Samadhi is the ideal state reached by that first step, followed by vipassana as a way to deconstruct things through analysis (basically realizing impermanence and the lack of essence in phenomena), or rather, self-observation via vipassana.

Did I get that right? 😬

In Zen, there are three main methods:
1 - shikantaza—just sitting without a fixed object
2 - similar to the method above, focusing on the breath
3 - koan
Zen is everywhere in Spirituality ·
driftingraven122 said:Sitting in a "cool" pose, chasing enlightenment, praying, and your specific take on meditation—they're all functional techniques if you push them to the extreme.

For instance, if you actually understood Buddhist meditation through experience, you’d know what 'reincarnation' actually means and you wouldn't be posting this.

Anyone who thinks their specific theory or technique is the only truth is either totally clueless or—maybe—has some other agenda. 😛

Claiming meditation is just a byproduct of popular religion is pretty nonsensical. The oldest Buddhist texts, the Pali Canon, discuss it as an essential practice. Meditation is baked into the earliest forms of Buddhism. What people call "popular Buddhism" usually refers to the ritualistic and religious practices found in various Asian countries where Buddha is often treated like a deity—which doesn't really align with his original teachings, whether he was a historical figure or not. Plus, if you look at the parallels with other Shamanic traditions (like Jainism, which is still around today), you see the shared roots. These traditions all share a rejection of theistic ritualism, a dismissal of the concept of God, a focus on the "nature of things," expressed asceticism (though less extreme than in Jainism), and the practice of mindfulness, or meditation. These are common threads in the broader context of how Buddhism emerged and its most ancient teachings. It’s more likely that the Shamanic stance toward Buddhism is just a result of Westernized, pop-culture versions of 😉
Zen is everywhere in Spirituality ·
We actually have more extensive and detailed writings that supposedly represent the teachings of the Buddha, compared to the relatively brief Gospels which focus heavily on biography rather than just doctrine. It’s not really an apples-to-apples comparison; Christianity might actually have the fewest details—especially once you look at the period after leaving the Jewish community and the wilderness—which leads to much more improvisation. Of course, every other religion does the same thing, but it’s simply easier to get back to the original 🙂
Zen is everywhere in Spirituality ·
Ashley Ramirez41 said:👎
I guess you’re trying to say that this version holds onto the most original teachings from Siddhartha Gautama?
Look, every kind of Buddhism is "real" Buddhism—but the real question is, how far away from the Buddha are we actually getting? 😕

For me, personally, Zen is the real deal—like, the absolute truth 😉. But hey, I can only speak to my own experience with Zen.
I have no clue what yours looks like... much less what some version of Japanese or American or Chechen Zen is all about 😂

Buddhism is, quite literally, Buddha's teaching. By that logic, the only true Buddhism is the one closest to the source. What you're practicing might be your own Barbabiancism, which could be better than Buddhism, but it isn't Buddhism.☕ 😁
Zen is everywhere in Spirituality ·
jademarlin26 said:I am uncertain what Zen is, but I know quite well what it is not.

Practicing Zen in Japan is a family business, and that is how it should be viewed. Just as Petrov's Christianity has nothing to do with Jesus's teachings, neither does the Zen of Dogen Zenji or Myoan Eisai relate to Buddha's teachings. Given your familiarity with Zizek's thought, you likely know his critique of D. T. Suzuki's perspective on Zen, which clearly shows the Japanese Zen community's support for imperialist campaigns in China and Korea (to say nothing of its influence on the warrior mindset in medieval Japan). Conquering and killing other nations has nothing to do with Buddha's teachings, yet some will still deem those who support such things as competent simply because they live in monasteries, shave their heads, and practice zazen all day, using them as "pro" arguments in debates.

Zen is not found in reciting sutras or performing rituals. These may assist someone unable to verbalize an experience, much like a cane helps one walk while "ill." Once you are healed, the cane is no longer necessary. People enjoy getting lost in translation; it would simply be helpful if they were aware of it, as I cannot deny it can be entertaining. 🙂

That’s exactly why they ignored the Vinaya rules... essentially, they started "zenning" themselves. Most Zen monks outside of Japan—like in China where it originated, or Korea—wouldn't do that. In fact, they aren't exactly thrilled about how Zen developed in Japan.

Of course, there was plenty of interference from military forces in China (Shaolin) too. 🤷
Ultimately, the only true Buddhism is Theravada. 👍
Everything else spread across the world and got mixed up with all sorts of things. Sometimes that resulted in something interesting and unique, and sometimes it just resulted in nonsense.
Judo for the whole world in Spirituality ·
crimsonbison10 said:There's a kernel of truth there, I suppose. But honestly? Treating martial arts—or any combat sport, really—as if you can just sideline the grueling physical conditioning is equally absurd.

So now we're suffering because training is hard? Apparently, physical exertion is a taboo subject and a total trigger for everyone's spiritual neuroses. 😬
Zen is everywhere in Spirituality ·
Edward Flores4 said:I can't exactly go around trashing something that doesn't even exist. I’m still sitting here waiting for someone—anyone, really—to sit me down and actually explain what "spiritual work" is supposed to mean, or even that whole famous concept of "working on oneself." 🤷

Look, if we take Japan as an example—just as a point of reference—people headed off to monasteries for all sorts of different reasons. It’s a lot like what you see in Christian traditions, too. There were times when a child would be placed in a monastery simply because their parents couldn't afford to provide for them, or there was this old custom where one son from a family would be dedicated to becoming a monk. So, you really can't claim that every single person sitting in those monasteries was there solely because of some deep spiritual calling or a burning desire for enlightenment. It just wasn't always that simple.

So, you’ve got tradition—that old-school custom where families essentially designate one kid to enter the clergy—mixed with raw personal ambition, like that deep-seated hunger for enlightenment. Then there’s the whole poverty angle, too, where parents basically drop their kids off at monasteries because they can't afford them. But let's be real—if we're being honest about why people actually end up in a monastery, we should probably add the lowlifes and losers who can't face going back to their hometowns, along with all the lazy types and political radicals looking for an easy out. Honestly, those are some pretty "wonderful" motivations for a monastic life. 🙄

But honestly, plenty of them really are. And the thing is—it’s not even that these people are "stupid" or lack any sense of direction. They aren't just wandering aimlessly through life, thinking they have no clue what to do next and deciding to retreat to a monastery just so someone else can hand them a roadmap. It isn't about being mindless; they aren't just following their teachers like a flock of obedient sheep.

Even in the most prestigious institutions—and let’s be honest, even in places like a high-end monastery—you’re always going to run into a few bad actors. It’s just part of the landscape. But you occasionally stumble upon those rare, standout individuals who actually live up to the standard. Of course, those people are really just the exceptions that prove the rule.

So, I was reading some stuff by D. T. Suzuki recently, and he makes this bold claim that just sitting around in meditation doesn't actually lead you to enlightenment. Honestly? I’m having a hard time buying that. It feels a bit off to me—especially when you look at how other Zen teachers, whether they're working independently or living out their lives in traditional monasteries, approach the whole thing. They seem to say something completely different.

I honestly can’t believe this... it just feels so unnecessary. But I see we’ve got a few "Zen enthusiasts" in here talking about affirmations and reaching enlightenment through all these "spiritual exercises" and meditation sessions. I have no idea where people even get these ideas from—though I'm guessing monasteries must be absolutely crawling with sketches like this.

In my humble opinion—though I'm certainly no guru—Zen, much like any other spiritual practice you might stumble upon, is really just about bringing the mind and the body back into sync. It’s all about that internal harmony. Because of that, I think everything in our spiritual lives actually matters—everything from the way we process our thoughts to how we act, what we eat, how we sleep, even the rhythm of our breathing. Now, whether any one specific habit is going to suddenly catapult us toward "enlightenment" or not? Honestly, that isn't the point. What truly matters is that our entire being undergoes this gradual transformation—not just for our own sake, but so we can actually show up better for the people and the world around us.

So, what you're saying is... you view it as a kind of personal therapy—a way for people to offload their own baggage? That’s pretty much exactly what I was getting at before those folks who use meditation just to chase a "zen" feeling and hunt for external validation started picking at me. 🙄

You have Buddha preaching the importance of steady meditation practice.
You have Bodhidharma doing the exact same thing.
Every single patriarch following him emphasized it too.
Even after the last one, the practice remains—it’s just that enlightenment is viewed as a sudden breakthrough rather than a slow climb.
Zen monasteries in Japan, much like any other Buddhist monastery, follow specific monastic rules and center their lives on meditation.
In fact, Zen in Japan has evolved slightly over time.

The word Zen itself is linked to the Japanese term for Chan, which stems from the Indian word dhyana, meaning meditation. So, Zen Buddhism literally translates to meditative Buddhism. It distinguishes itself from other branches specifically by placing more weight on meditative practice rather than pure philosophy.

Look, if you think that's all fake or foolish, then maybe we shouldn't even call it Zen Buddhism. We might as well just call it nonsense or something similar.😁
Zen is everywhere in Spirituality ·
That’s just how it works. The people who barely scratch the surface always act like they’ve mastered the universe. It’s only when you actually put in the work—really digging deep into the grit of it—that you realize how little you actually know about "enlightenment." 😁
I see it all the time lately. People in the States who can't sit still for five minutes acting like experts on why Zen is superior to Zen practitioners, or why yoga beats out yogis, or why tantra is better than tantrikas. Real experts, clearly. 😁

You guys are just playing at this. Until you spend ten years living in some hardcore, ultra-serious monastery and earn a degree from an Ivy League institution, don't come around here talking about your "unauthorized" version of Zen. 😬 😁
Zen is everywhere in Spirituality ·
jademarlin26 said:Someone sits, someone walks, someone carves, paints, plays music, or acts... all of it is meditation. Practicing meditation is simply living your life; there is no need to emphasize it, unless you are trying to hide the fact that you spend most of your time living someone else's life and only carve out a little time for yourself.

When you open your eyes in the morning, you practically have to exert effort just to separate meditation from your daily routine—not to mention the likelihood of forgetting to do it altogether. It's an exercise in futility, if you ask me.

But then again, most monks in a Zen monastery spend the vast majority of their time just sitting and meditating. Though, I suppose we Americans clearly know better than they do.😁
Zen is everywhere in Spirituality ·
Edward Flores4 said:Spot on. Honestly, Zen is found precisely in the fact that there's nothing to achieve. No specific practice or ritual actually "leads" you to Zen—it just doesn't work like that. Think of these exercises more like clearing out the clutter in your garage; they help you sort through your own personal baggage and mental noise, but those tasks themselves have absolutely nothing to do with the essence of Zen itself.

I guess that’s why Zen practitioners spend most of their day meditating.😁
Fair point, though. They didn't really get it. It wasn't until Americans picked up a few books like *Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance* that we finally realized what Zen actually is.😁
Judo for the whole world in Spirituality ·
Paul Campbell3 said:Oh honey, just look at how things were going down at the local YMCA maybe two or three years ago. 😉
The worst part? Like 90% of those guys at the YMCA don't even practice anything. They just scream and fight in their heads—they haven't stepped foot on a mat in forever, if ever.

Those religious folks might actually show up to their dojo once in a while. 😁

No way she’d talk like that if she had actually met Lukica 🧐
Judo for the whole world in Spirituality ·
Jesse Allen2 said:Someone definitely taught them how to do that, but honestly, who they learned it from doesn't even matter. 😉

Look, I’m not saying there isn't a need for a teacher or a solid methodology. I really don't. But you're missing the mark on one thing: you have to develop yourself independently, too. If you don't take that initiative, you'll never actually reach that level of mastery everyone's always chasing—that elusive Dragonflayin style. It’s over.! 😁

I don't know much about these hippie types. Honestly, you've reached the end once you start acting like Fedor. Usually, people who can't perform in practice tend to pivot toward philosophy and "spirituality." 😁

That’s basically how modern martial arts came to be. After the war eras ended and people lost their old-school status through modernization—and they still needed to eat and maintain a family reputation—they started spinning these grand philosophies out of pure fluff. 😁

Especially those guys who spend more time punching air than actually landing a real strike. 😁
Judo for the whole world in Spirituality ·
Jesse Allen2 said:Just tell us: which specific school produced legends like Jergović, Tolstoy, or Joyce? Seriously, if you know, please share. You'd be doing everyone a huge favor!

I honestly have no clue. I’m not particularly fond of those writers, and I haven't spent enough time digging into their biographies to know where they went to school. Someone definitely taught them how to read and write, though.🤣

Once you've mastered reading and writing, you can pretty much develop your own style independently. But with BJJ, you really need partners and a coach. It isn't just an intellectual pursuit; it's highly physical, and you have to master it through practice. Because of that, formal training probably takes longer... in reality, most people have coaches and instructors for their entire careers.🤷
Judo for the whole world in Spirituality ·
Jesse Allen2 said:"Some"? I think you mean most. So many people start acting loving when there isn't a shred of actual emotion behind it. Most of them! 😢

🤣🤣
Judo for the whole world in Spirituality ·
Paul Campbell3 said:Jeap. But wait, isn't that true for every religion and cult on the planet too?
Even if God is one and the same 😁

Of course he is... though you’ve still got your New Agers😍 and then there's how things look in the Bible.😬