CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Jason Campbell70 › Posts

Posts by Jason Campbell70

3140 posts shown.

graniteharbor502 said:Furthermore, one might argue that even Felipe Massa didn't truly shine today. When we step back and look at the entirety of the session, can we really be certain that these drivers actually extracted their absolute maximum potential? Is it not possible, perhaps, that qualifying was intentionally sacrificed just to prioritize race setups for the cars?

Jean-Éric Vergne made a massive error on his fastest lap, by the way. 😉
And Massa wasn't exactly impressive either. All things considered, can we even be sure these drivers actually pushed to the limit? Perhaps qualifying was intentionally sacrificed just to prioritize race setups.

LOL, such squirming.
Joseph Peterson8 Asks:
Now this is interesting. Vettel was faster than Webber by nine thousandths. 🙂

Alonso is ahead of Massa by 0.392 seconds.

Forty-four times better.
graniteharbor502 said:Has Jergović really made his return to the booth? I was watching Sky, and somehow, the moment passed me by entirely.

What about BBC? 😵
Red flag.

Pirelli. 😁
Good sun out at Silverstone.
sukKi said:image🤣🤣

Now he’s going to let a beard like that grow out for the annual vacation. 🙏
steelmaker83 said:These three-week breaks are dragging on way too long.....way too long...

You wait, and you wait, and you wait... only to miss out in the end. 😁
Raymond Anderson4 said:Ferrari arrived with a strange floor design, looking quite cut away ahead of the rear tires.

They were actually using the same floor; it just wasn't fully assembled yet.
Amanda Kelly said:So you think Spain is the key? Sure, on paper, this looks like a win for Ferrari. I’m guessing the tire strategy is going to be just as much of a gamble as it was back in Spain.
I just can't wrap my head around the idea of us seeing four pit stops again. Word on the street is the track surface isn't nearly as abrasive this time around, and since the pit lane is such a slog—we're looking at about 25 seconds in there—it feels more like a two or three stop race to me.

So, now we’re left wondering: what's the deal with the upgrades?
Three weeks have flown by, and I’m betting we’ll see a decent haul of upgrades soon. I'm honestly curious to see how Lotus plans to play this. We might get an official word from Pilastradamus tomorrow.

Don't forget how much Red Bull has owned this track over the years. It didn't happen by accident. This circuit just plays right into their hands. It’s clear that the layout rewards exactly what makes them elite: their damn aerodynamics.
Beating Red Bull at Indianapolis would actually matter more than just taking the win itself.

It’s about time Ferrari actually starts using Massa for something useful. And I don't mean just picking up easy points to pad the standings—I mean putting him in a position to actually fight for podiums.

Look, it all comes down to one thing: neutralizing Vettel’s advantage. If Alonso can somehow pull ahead, that win would be the ultimate prize—a glimmer of hope in this whole fight. But if Vettel takes it? We're probably looking at the championship being decided before the summer break even hits. I'm talking about the next two real tracks, especially this upcoming one.
Alonso drove a hell of a race in Canada. I’m looking for actual consistency here, not this constant back-and-forth speculation.

The whole Webber situation is pretty interesting. I’m expecting even less patience for Vettel from here on out.

Lotus showed up with open DRD air intakes and a different monkey seat. Just a hunch, but maybe we'll finally see that DRD in action. Even if it's just during some free practice sessions.

Ferrari already debuted a few minor tweaks today. Front brakes and the rear wing.

Mercedes also arrived with a slightly modified rear wing.

McLaren turned up with new decals. 🤣🙏

McLaren is interesting to watch.
The MP4-27 was incredibly fast at the end of its run.
The MP4-28 is basically just an MP4-27 with pullrod front suspension.
The MP4-28 is a disaster—one of the worst McLarens in years.
And the worst part? They aren't fixing it.

It was a somewhat similar story with Ferrari last season.
The F2012 had issues too, across the board.
Then suddenly... the Italians pulled it together. After race five or six, the F2012 actually looked decent, and Alonso climbed to the top of the driver standings.
But then again... those Italians can be sloppy, disorganized, and defeatist.

Something is rotten at McLaren. I doubt the current lineup can fix things enough to get them back to where they belong.

Regardless, tomorrow we finally find out who actually worked over the last three weeks... and who was just coasting.
Joseph Peterson8 said:That isn't just a wish; it's a vision. 🙂

Speaking of visions... I had this dream a few nights ago. I saw a dark car wrecked right on the starting grid, while two Ferraris and a Red Bull were locked in a battle for the lead.

Maybe it was Vettel's car that crashed. Maybe Webber takes the win, Alonso finishes second, and Felipe Massa takes third.

Signed, Pilastradamus. 😍
stormybadger8 said:Bernie and Pirelli will sort it out😁
If they pulled it off for a birthday, they can handle the 600th race😬

Even God can't help Pastor Maldonado.

image
Edward Howard2 said:Ugh... I better not forget to drop my race prediction after qualifying 😁
My last prediction stirred up so much drama that people were still arguing about it a week after the checkered flag. 😂

And don't you worry, my lovely fans, I won't let you down—you're definitely getting a prediction for this race too... 😍

Looking at all the "wishful thinking" predictions coming in so far... honestly, I’d sign off on one where Mark Webber takes the win, but only if the maestro manages to grab second place. 😁

You're going to disappoint me, because you're killing the whole point of watching the race.

Why even bother watching when you'll just spoil everything with your perfectly accurate predictions? At least, if we're judging by that last one.

Everything you predicted the day before actually happened.
The fun of watching the race? Completely ruined.
Pirelli predicts various pit strategies for the upcoming Grand Prix

Formula One teams will be using Pirelli tyres for the Grand Prix this weekend. Even with a conservative mix of hard and medium compounds, expect plenty of pit stops.

Paul Hembery, motorsport director for the Italian tyre manufacturer, suggests we could see three or even four stops if the weather turns.

http://www.etyres.co.uk/news/pirelli...rix-14030.html

Just give me more. 🍿
Raymond Anderson4 said:I don't think it's really about the tires. It's more about the FRIC system, which helps prevent the front end from diving. By doing that, it stabilizes the aero balance and keeps the car at the right ride height.
To be clear, I'm not saying Mercedes isn't struggling with tire wear—that's obviously still an issue.

What does he mean, "it isn't about the tires"?

Raymond Anderson4 said:I don't think it's really about the tires. It's more about the FRIC system, which helps prevent the front end from diving. By doing that, it stabilizes the aero balance and keeps the car at the right ride height.
To be clear, I'm not saying Mercedes isn't struggling with tire wear—that's obviously still an issue.

Then what exactly is he downplaying?
Raymond Anderson4 said:If Ferrari could get their hands on last year's tires, they’d hit the jackpot...
My prediction for this year is
1. Vettel
2. Alonso and Webber
3. Webber
I have my doubts about whether Mercedes will perform well in these previous races. In my opinion, they tend to favor those "stop-and-go" tracks rather than these fast left-right corners... though I could be wrong. We'll see how it plays out.


Yeah, lucky for them, they aren't shredding those rear tires like crazy.
Amanda Kelly said:We're in the same boat here. Pretty much the same situation at my place.
I just don't get what Jerry Rogers6 is on about. 🤷 What exactly are we supposed to be afraid of?

So you dreamed about the United Kingdom too? 😁

Amanda Kelly said:We're in the same boat here. Pretty much the same situation at my place.
I just don't get what Jerry Rogers6 is on about. 🤷 What exactly are we supposed to be afraid of?


Empty stands?
image
Good morning to my fellow forum members, and everyone else can go jump in a lake. 😍
Whichever way you want to spin it... honestly, I don't care. 😍

Man... I was dreaming big.
Both Ferraris finishing in the top three, both fighting for the win...
Even Massa actually making it onto the podium.

Andiamo Ferrari, let's go Fernando!

image
What is the purpose of the report post feature? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Jason Campbell70 said:
Jason Campbell70 said:Oh, right. Thanks for the reminder:

Jeffrey Long said:I never claimed the Democratic Party won the election. I just said the Republican Party keeps winning, even if it's just over rocks and dirt... 😉

As for the Bandit getting the biggest slice of the pie, I think we all know that. But his new strategy for the upcoming elections might actually hurt the Republican Party more than the Democrats (at least, that's my take). It’s just a shame that this pre-election spending spree over the next 30 months will end up on the taxpayers in New York instead of coming out of Bloomberg's own pocket. 🤷


Even though the rules regarding speaking clearly about politics state:
General Rules for the Politics Subforum

......

• Article 5.

• The rules for the Politics subforum apply to the use of derogatory nicknames for both forum members and third parties. Maliciously distorting names like: Sranjo (Tuđman), Kradimir (Čačić), Smranader (Ivo), and similar, as well as maliciously distorting forum member handles, will not be tolerated.


Of course, the post was reported two weeks ago.
And of course, nothing happened.

So?
What is the point of reporting a post?


Seriously... what is the purpose of reporting a post?
What is the purpose of the report post feature? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Jason Campbell70 said:Yeah, you're right to remind me:

Jeffrey Long said:I never claimed the Democratic Party won the election. My point was that the Republican Party keeps winning, even when they're fighting against nothing more than rocks, rubble, and olive trees. 😉

What if it were? Bandit He took the biggest slice of the pie; I think that’s pretty obvious by now. But his new strategy for the upcoming elections? It feels like he's doing more damage to the Republican Party than to the Democratic Party—at least, that’s my take on it. It’s just a shame that all this pre-election spending over the next 30 months will end up being footed by New Yorkers, rather than Bloomberg paying out of his own pocket. 🤷


Even though the rules for the Politics subforum are pretty clear about the violation of rule subforum politics:
General rules of conduct for the Politics subforum.

......

• Article 5.
.....
The rules for the Politics subforum apply to how you address both fellow members and outside figures. We won't tolerate anyone maliciously twisting names—whether it's mocking historical figures like Tuđman, Kradimir, or Sanader, or targeting the usernames of our own community members. Keep it respectful.

Is there any point in even discussing this? It feels like we're just circling the drain. Why does everyone seem so convinced that things will change overnight? History doesn't work that way. We see the same patterns repeating, the same mistakes being made by the same people. Does anyone actually believe the current leadership is doing anything differently than those before them? It’s the same old story, just with different faces. Honestly, it’s exhausting.

Of course the post was flagged two weeks ago.
And of course, nothing has been done.


I?
What’s the point of reporting a post?
What is the purpose of the report post feature? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Yeah, you gave me a good reminder there:

Jeffrey Long said:I never claimed the Democratic Party won the election. My point was that the Republican Party keeps winning, even when they’re just fighting against rocks, rubble, and olive trees. 😉

What if it were? Bandit He walked away with the biggest slice of the pie; I think that’s pretty obvious to everyone. The thing is, his new strategy for the upcoming elections seems like it might actually hurt the Republican Party more than the Democratic Party—at least if you ask me. It’s just a shame that this pre-election spending spree over the next 30 months will end up being footed by New Yorkers rather than Bloomberg paying out of his own pocket. 🤷


Even though the rules for this politics subforum are pretty clear about violations...
General rules of conduct for the Politics subforum.

......

• Article 5.
.....
The rules regarding the Politics subforum apply to the use of slurs or derogatory nicknames directed at any forum member or third party. Maliciously twisting names will not be tolerated. It’s just like how they twist names—like Sranjo (Tuđman), Kradimir (Čačić), or Smranader (Ivo)—to maliciously distort the nicknames of people on this forum. Why do they do it? It’s the same pattern.

Is it just me, or does everyone seem to be talking at once lately? It feels like nobody is actually listening. We need more clarity. Why is everything so muddled? If we want to move forward, we have to start by speaking clearly about politics. Enough with the noise.

Of course the post was flagged two weeks ago.
And of course, absolutely nothing was done.