CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Scott Allen10 › Posts

Posts by Scott Allen10

1008 posts shown.

Lisa Barrett22 said:So, I'm on Utrogestan (I haven't had my period in like 2 months, so I'm supposed to take the 100mg capsules twice a day for 15 days) and Metronidazole tablets (also twice a day at 400mg) plus Metronidazole vaginal suppositories at 500mg before bed (they found some bacteria during my Pap smear), which I'm doing for 10 days.

I took my dose this morning and felt totally fine. But then I took everything again about an hour and a half ago—both meds and the suppository—and now I'm feeling so dizzy that I'm actually scared to walk.
The Utrogestan packaging mentions dizziness and drowsiness as side effects, and suggests:
- lowering the individual dose
- taking the daily dose all at once at night or vaginally (since you can do it either way)
- shortening cycles or bleeding time (which doesn't apply since I haven't had one in months)
- starting treatment later in the cycle (usually it's recommended for day 17, but I should be on day 19 right now).
Since my cycles aren't regular anyway, that last bit is out.
Usually, these things happen because of an overdose.

Now I'm just sitting here wondering what to do. My OBGYN saw me earlier this morning so I can't really call him back right now. Does anyone know anything about this? Honestly guys, I'm freaking out a little!
😢 😕

I'm not sure about the Utrogestan, but I think you can feel totally safe skipping the Efloran.
Taking Efloran for 10 days is plenty of time to see if there's any progress, assuming the bacteria is sensitive to metronidazole.
And honestly, I don't think there's much point in dragging out an antibiotic course longer than 10 days if it isn't working.

So, if I were you, I'd stick with the gynecological stuff and just drop the antibiotic. But hey, that's just my two cents...
Michael Perez5 said:You know what, this whole thread about how "complicated" organ harvesting is... complicated my ass!

I mean, someone please tell me it isn't possible to just snatch someone up, drive them way out of town, knock them out in some van, rip them open, grab what you need, put the organs on ice, and rush them to a specific spot within a few hours...
Then just dump the body in some field somewhere...

Because honestly, that kind of thing happens!

As far as I'm concerned... it's totally doable!
To be more precise, it’s actually pretty easy to drag someone out of the city and use a van to harvest organs... but definitely not for a legitimate transplant.

Let me break it down for you so it makes sense... an organ explantation has to be performed by a surgeon who is a total master of transplant medicine—someone who actually practices it daily, even if they're just assisting the lead surgeon. You can't just grab any random doctor off the street. You have to know exactly how to access the organ, which vessels to tie off first, where to cut the arteries, veins, nerves, ureters, and the portal bloodstream... plus you need to know exactly which solution to flush the organ with so it stays viable for a transplant and all that.
These specialists only work in specific units where transplants actually happen, and there are only a handful of them in the entire US. And don't even get me started on the surgical techs and perfusionists who come as part of the "package" with the doctors. Then there's the anesthesia team, who absolutely have to be right there in the room too.
So, every single one of those people would have to be complicit in a murder. And what's even crazier is trying to trick a hospital into accepting an organ of unknown origin and cause—with zero paperwork—and then transplanting it into someone without anyone catching on...

It's wild. What can I even say...☕
Henry Campbell5 said:I mean, those three or four transplant centers really matter when someone's getting an organ, but honestly, I feel like it’s way easier to just take them from someone who's already passed away—though what do I know? I'm just a regular person...
and frankly, I'm a little paranoid about it. I'd hate to be in a spot where my life is hanging by a thread and they decide to cut that thread just because I didn't explicitly sign a paper saying "don't take my organs," effectively giving my parts to someone else when I actually could have pulled through.

Don't sweat it, man, that kind of thing is physically impossible. No one gets harvested unless their brain death is absolutely, 100% confirmed. If a brain scan—which is pretty much standard practice to prove brain death—shows even a tiny trace of blood circulating inside the brain, nobody is touching that patient, no matter how desperate things get. For that to happen, you'd need a massive conspiracy involving the anesthesiologist and their tech monitoring the patient, the nuclear medicine specialist faking the results, the imaging engineer, the neurologist or neurosurgeon reviewing the scans and signing off on the death certificate, all the nurses and techs in the ICU, the hospital coordinator, the national coordinator, the entire transplant team that shows up, and basically anyone else in the hospital who hears a whisper about it. It's just not going to happen.
granitebadger25 said:I feel like you shouldn't just focus on the medical side of things, but really try to show your family and everyone around you where you stand on organ donation, you know? It’s one of those deep conversations that can change how people see you, and honestly, being open about it with the people closest to you makes everything so much more meaningful.
Worst case scenario, God forbid, they realize it was actually what you wanted all along, which basically lets them off the hook from all those heavy moral and religious dilemmas they're stressing over.

It's actually pretty straightforward if you look at how things work on the ground. From everything I've seen, it hasn't really happened where a family tries to fight an organ procurement when the donor had already made their positive stance crystal clear while they were still alive.

Regarding that link to the politics thread where everyone was going at it, honestly, aside from a couple of decent points, it was mostly just a massive pile of nonsense. Throughout that whole debate, you had people spinning all these wild conspiracy theories, claiming doctors might intentionally let someone die just to harvest their organs, or that people are being killed in car accidents specifically so their organs can be snatched up and sold on the black market, or whatever other crazy stuff they could dream up.

Since I run into organ explants pretty regularly in my line of work, I figured I’d take a second to clear up a few things about how this all actually works—there's a lot of stuff people seem to totally misunderstand.

To be an eligible donor, you've got to be a patient currently staying in the ICU.
The only way we can actually keep someone's vital signs going after they've been declared brain dead is through intensive medical intervention. We’re talking about keeping them on a ventilator, using a cocktail of vasopressors to stabilize their blood pressure, and constantly monitoring everything from hemodynamic stability to metabolic levels so we can fix any imbalances the second they pop up. I’m only bringing this up because I keep hearing people claim that organs were harvested from patients who passed away in other departments—like neurology, internal medicine, or surgery—but honestly, that’s just physically impossible. You can't harvest anything if the patient isn't being actively maintained like that. And let’s be real about those wild stories people tell, like "they just found him on the street and took his organs"... yeah, right. That kind of thing only happens in movies.

Besides everything else we talked about, the donor really has to be a perfect match for the transplant process. They need to be within the right age range, too. That basically means if there's any sign of cancer, they're immediately out of the running. On top of that, there’s a whole list of systemic issues and infectious diseases that make them ineligible for donation. We also won't proceed with an explant if the patient has suffered a recent hospital-related heart attack or something similar. And obviously, if there's even a hint of injury to the potential organs themselves, they aren't going to be used, and so on.

Look, in the US, it is absolutely impossible to even think about organ procurement unless brain death has been 100% confirmed first.
Honestly, all those stories about someone potentially having a chance to just "wake up from a coma" are complete and utter nonsense.
When you're doing a clinical exam, the first thing that usually tips you off that someone might be brain dead is seeing how they react to basic stuff. You notice pretty quickly when there's zero attempt at spontaneous breathing and they're just completely reliant on the ventilator to do the work. Then you see those wide, fixed pupils that don't even flinch when you shine a light in them, or you deal with massive diuresis—basically diabetes insipidus where the kidneys are just cranking out huge amounts of urine—and it all starts to paint that same heavy picture.
They usually run a series of clinical tests to confirm there's absolutely no brain activity left, like doing a ventilation apnea test or checking corneal reflexes.
If everything else points toward brain death, then we really need to run one of those specific tests that provides 100% certainty and holds up legally to confirm it once and for all.
Most doctors usually go with a brain perfusion scintigraphy, a cerebral angiography, or maybe a transcranial Doppler (TCD). The whole point of running those tests is to get absolute certainty that there’s zero blood flow left in the brain, because once that circulation stops, the brain just can't survive for more than about three to five minutes.
If those tests come back and confirm there’s absolutely zero blood flow anywhere in the brain, then honestly, that patient is gone—there's just no coming back from that. Once that signed report hits the anesthesiologist's or the ICU doctor's hands, they bring in a neurologist or a neurosurgeon to double-check the scans and the written findings themselves just to be certain.
So, you have to fill out this "Brain Death Certificate" that both the anesthesiologist and a consulted neurologist or neurosurgeon have to sign off on. The exact minute those two specialists put pen to paper is officially recorded as the moment the patient passes away. It’s wild when you think about it—legally, the person is gone from that second onward, even if their heart is still beating, their blood pressure is steady, they're breathing, and everything is being perfectly balanced by machines and meds.
Now you’re getting into the heavy, gut-wrenching part of the whole process—this is where they reach out to the family, talk to them, and ask if they're okay with the organ procurement moving forward.

IT IS LITERALLY IMPOSSIBLE TO DO AN ORGAN PROCUREMENT WITHOUT GETTING AT LEAST 6-7 DIFFERENT HOSPITAL DEPARTMENTS INVOLVED (we're talking anesthesia and ICU, surgery, urology, neurology/neurosurgery, radiology, nuclear medicine, microbiology, biochemistry, blood transfusion, all that good stuff...).
I’m just mentioning this to make it clear there aren't any shady deals happening behind closed doors; this procedure involves a massive amount of people working together.
The anesthesiologist is right there managing the patient's vitals. The surgeon pulls the lymph nodes to send off to the tissue typing lab. A radiologist runs ultrasounds on every single organ, checking them over and, which is huge, measuring everything precisely. Microbiology teams analyze blood, urine, or sputum samples if needed to rule out any infections. Then you’ve got the transfusion team screening for things like hepatitis or HIV, determining blood types, Rh factors, and other specific details required for the actual transplant. Nuclear medicine handles the brain scans, and the biochemists are constantly monitoring endless parameters that might need immediate adjustment.
Depending on what’s needed, an ophthalmologist or a urologist might even step in...

FAMILY CONSENT IS ABSOLUTELY VITAL FOR THE PROCUREMENT PROTOCOL TO PROCEED.
If the family says no after the conversation, the whole procurement process stops dead in its tracks—there’s no arguing it, and that's the end of the story.
If the family does give the green light, the hospital coordinator—who’s already on site and is usually the anesthesiologist—notifies the national coordinator that there’s a potential donor and sends over all the paperwork, test results, imaging, etc.

This is where the chain can get a little shaky, because based on those incoming results, the goal isn't necessarily to pick the first person on the list, but rather the MOST COMPATIBLE recipient. So, say your name is Arsen Dedic and you're sitting way down at the bottom of the waiting list; you might find it hard to believe, but you could still be chosen even if there are candidates at the top who are also eligible.
I don't have firsthand knowledge of how that works, though I imagine it’s incredibly difficult to pull off, even if it's not impossible.

Anyway, once a recipient is selected, they’re notified urgently and admitted to a transplant center (like Mayo Clinic, Johns Hopkins, or maybe a major hub in Chicago or Houston).
Then, the procurement team is put together and heads out to the facility where the donor is located. It usually happens in the middle of the night... people arrive, retrieve the organs, the machines are turned off... and that's it.

Just one more thing... in a few instances, due to some "X-factor," Italian procurement teams have actually stepped in to take the organs. That "X-factor" is almost always because it was impossible to pull together a local American team—basically, someone didn't show up for work—so the organs ended up going to an Italian instead of an American.
In my opinion, that’s exactly where we should be looking to figure out why we aren't seeing more transplants. There are so few people who actually know how to manage this, and if one of them drops out of the equation, it's damn near impossible to replace them. But hey, that’s a whole different conversation for another thread.
The donor card is basically just a glorified membership card, kind of like having a pass to a local gym or a video club; it’s mostly just for show.

Legally speaking, doctors actually have the authority to harvest organs without even checking in with the family first. The only thing that can stop them is if the deceased person left behind some explicit, clear instruction saying "no thanks." Of course, you could argue about how anyone is supposed to prove what a brain-dead person's wishes were, but that was the way the system was designed. These recent updates to the donation laws aren't really changing much on the ground, other than requiring everyone to tell their primary care doctor whether they're in or out. That way, if things go south, the anesthesiologists in the ICU can just check the file and see if they're cleared to move forward.
But honestly, until that actually becomes the norm, we'll be waiting a long time...

In reality, though, here's how it actually works in America... We haven't had a single instance where organs were taken without asking the family and getting their written consent after a patient was declared brain dead.
Regardless of what the deceased might have thought about it, the family always has the final say here in the States. No hospital, and certainly no doctor in an ICU, is going to risk a massive legal headache or a media circus by trying to perform an explant against a grieving family's wishes.

Just one more thing... people can't just grab organs "on the sly," sell them, or whatever else people claim. That’s just pure nonsense.
A potential donor in our country can only be someone already in an intensive care unit, where they have all the high-tech diagnostic gear and life support necessary to maintain those vital functions.
Potassium Chloride in Health ·
I wouldn't say it's low, though it might be hovering right near the bottom edge of the range. You know how it goes—reference ranges can shift depending on which lab you use, but generally, you're looking at a normal potassium level somewhere between 3.7 or 3.8 up to maybe 5.5 mmol/l.
Potassium Chloride in Health ·
Potassium is something you get naturally from your diet, and honestly, it’s absolutely vital for how your body works. It plays a huge role in your nervous system because it teams up with sodium to create what’s known as the "K-Na pump," which is basically the foundation for sending nerve impulses throughout your entire body. Messing with those levels—whether you're running too low or have way too much—is a serious situation that can lead to some scary stuff like muscle spasms, heart rhythm issues, or even cardiac arrest.

Your kidneys play a massive part in managing how potassium moves through your system.
I noticed you mentioned taking Aldactone, which is a diuretic used to flush more fluid out through urine, so I'm guessing your kidney function might be a bit wonky right now. Usually, things like diabetes and high blood pressure start swirling around kidney issues, and since you also brought up corticosteroids and systemic diseases, there could be a whole cocktail of causes behind what you're dealing with.
Because of all that, it’s really tough to give any real advice based on just a few scattered details, especially when we're talking about a health issue that sounds pretty complex.

At the end of the day, I think the most important thing is deciding who you actually listen to when it comes to treatment. Are you going to follow a general practitioner, or should you be looking for a specialist—and if so, which kind?
Personally, I’d suggest bypassing the GP for this. Not because I’m being dismissive, but simply because they often aren't equipped to handle these specific kinds of situations without getting a specialist's opinion involved.

If I were in your shoes, I wouldn't hesitate to go see a nephrologist, specifically one who works in hemodialysis units. Those folks really have a lot of power in their hands, so to speak; they deal with more invasive medicine and they truly master those metabolic imbalances, especially everything involving kidney function and the balance of potassium and sodium.
Maybe do a little digging in the hospital breakrooms or ask around to see which smart internist or nephrologist—someone who specializes in dialysis—is highly regarded... I'm pretty sure you won't go wrong with that approach.
Disc decompression surgery/treatment in Health ·
So, what kind of specific symptoms are you dealing with that make you think surgery is the only way out?
It’s not really my specialty, but hey... maybe someone here who specializes in herniated discs can weigh in and give you some clarity.
You should probably head over to a dermatologist just to make sure you're actually dealing with a fungal infection.
If it turns out they are, honestly, stop washing your feet constantly; fungi basically thrive in moisture, so keeping them soaked won't help you get rid of them anytime soon.
Using an antifungal cream like Neosporin, Monistat, or something along those lines ought to do the trick, but the real secret is just being super consistent with whatever treatment they prescribe.
Disc decompression surgery/treatment in Health ·
Honestly, you’re probably better off picking the brain of a neurosurgeon or an orthopedic specialist, depending on where you're planning to have the procedure done.
You can basically split the risks into two buckets: there's the general stuff that comes with any surgery under general anesthesia—like heart rate or breathing hiccups—and then there's the specific risks tied to the actual site, like nerve root compression or other surgical complications.
I know I don't have all the answers, but when it comes to spinal disc herniations, everything is just so incredibly individual; you really need to talk to the doctor who actually sat down with you, looked over your X-ray, CT scan, or MRI, and was the one to recommend the surgery in the first place.
I mean, you can't just show up and say, "Hey, I need to check my hormone levels!" It’s not like that. If you actually want answers, you’d be getting a CT scan to see what's going on in your head or abdomen first.

Your question is a little broad, honestly. Your first move should always be hitting up your primary care doctor. If they think there's something actually worth looking into, they’ll refer you to an endocrinologist, a gynecologist, or maybe a specialist in nuclear medicine... and those are the folks who would actually decide if checking your hormone status is even necessary. And obviously, they aren't just going to run a massive panel of every hormone under the sun—just the specific ones they suspect are off.

Basically, they draw your blood at a lab, spin it in a centrifuge, and then run the tests to find whatever specific hormone is being targeted. Depending on what you're looking for, it can be pretty quick; from what I've seen, if it's a real emergency, you might get results in a few hours. But in the real world? It usually drags on for days or even weeks. Most of the time, it's just because the lab is buried under a mountain of samples or they're short on a specific reagent needed for the test.

To be honest, I think heading straight to a private clinic is kind of a waste of money. They'll absolutely rip you off, and there's a good chance the tests weren't even needed in the first place.
Personally, I’d only consider paying out of pocket for a private specialist if the hospital told me I definitely needed a certain test but the wait times were just ridiculous.
Dealing with water retention in Health ·
restlessmarlin6 said:The reason I'm asking is because I'm taking these pills 🙂

Honestly, I haven't really noticed anything weird happening to me personally—nothing is coming up or anything—though I do feel a bit sluggish right before my period starts... What are all the different ways this can show up, and how do you even spot it?

Oh, and by the way, I drink tons of water, so I’m basically living in the bathroom 😁 plus I have a massive sweet tooth and love salty snacks 😢

Are you dealing with high blood pressure at all?
Not really, but why on earth are you even taking those tablets?
Dosage help needed in Health ·
Honestly, I don't think you need to stress yourself out over this too much... Just follow what you were told and go from there. If your doctor specifically told you to take a double dose for that first one, then yeah, go ahead and do it, but if they didn't mention anything about doubling up, then just stick to the regular amount. It's really that simple!☕
Amoxil usage/side effects? in Health ·
Since you’ve already laid out all those causes, why don't you tell us where they're actually hiding? I mean, if they aren't budging even after months on Amoxil, they've gotta be tucked away somewhere tricky.
Amoxil usage/side effects? in Health ·
Amanda Ward80 said:Doctors usually stick strictly to the sensitivity report when prescribing stuff... but honestly, sometimes things don't go exactly by the book.

And just to answer flagbearer here: I'm looking at Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterococcus spp., Streptococcus agalactiae... plus a few others I don't even bother with.

That’s not really how it works, though. It's super hard to say for sure just chatting on a forum, but I still think your doctor missed the mark here.
When you get those lab results back, they show about ten different antibiotics and how effective they are against the specific bug they found.
Since Amoxil is one of the older options, if the lab says it should work, there's a good chance newer generations or different classes of antibiotics would be just as effective.
So, if you finished a round of Amoxil and didn't feel any better, I don't see why anyone would suggest taking that same thing again instead of trying something newer and equally strong.
Amoxil usage/side effects? in Health ·
Amanda Ward80 said:This is kind of a tangent from the main topic, but I just had to vent about my recent streak of bad luck with meds lately. As of today, I’ve burned through four boxes of Amoxil and two boxes of 1g Klavocin... and honestly, these bacteria still aren't budging.

I don't think it's actually the medicine itself, it's more about the doctor handing you some ineffective, totally wrong antibiotic and calling it a day.
Honestly, I think the situation is even grimmer than what’s been described here. When you're dealing with a life-or-death emergency, the paramedics and ER crews are, on average, completely and utterly out of their depth.
Look, I’m not just bashing them for the sake of it; this is a brutally honest look at the reality on the ground. Most of the people working the ER are just rookie doctors who see the emergency department as nothing more than a temporary pit stop before they move on to whatever specialty they actually want to pursue. You see the same pattern with the mid-level staff most of the time.
The pre-hospital emergency care is just bottom-tier.
Basic resuscitation techniques are handled so poorly—we're talking about failing to secure an airway, struggling with IV access, or just tossing someone into an ambulance without any real immobilization during transport.
I’ve literally watched people roll into the ER trauma bay and die simply because the paramedics failed to secure the airway of a comatose patient. They basically just scoop up a crash victim, toss them into the back of the rig like a sack of potatoes, and dump them at the hospital. In those critical 10 to 15 minutes, they haven't bothered to intubate or perform proper resuscitation... so the person ends up aspirating stomach contents or just plain suffocating.
We are beyond frustrated with how these emergency services operate. Sometimes it feels like the staff is more concerned with looking cool, leaning their elbow out the window of the ambulance, and acting like tough guys while having absolutely no clue what to do when a real emergency hits.
And then they just shrug and move on to the next call like nothing happened...
To be fair, not every single crew is like this, but the vast majority definitely are.

In my opinion, it isn't some deep-seated systemic issue with how things are organized; it's quite simply a massive lack of actual expertise when it comes to handling urgent medical crises.
It is absolutely unacceptable that emergency responders don't know how to perform endotracheal intubation, insert a nasogastric tube, or establish peripheral or central venous lines—all these standard procedures that should be second nature, yet they're treated like rare exceptions in some places.
Amoxil usage/side effects? in Health ·
casualjackal12 said:Hey, can you actually pick up Clavocin without a prescription?

Honestly, I wouldn't mess around with Clavocin unless a doctor tells you to... 🙂
Amoxil usage/side effects? in Health ·
banderas said:I’m just gonna jump back in here and ask this from a woman's perspective: why does that specific med even still be on the market? Like, why bother making it or prescribing it when we have Clavocin?

Thinking about it off the top of my head, I can pretty much narrow it down to three things...
1. There are still certain bugs out there that haven't developed a resistance to Amoxil yet.
2. You’ve got people who end up having an allergic reaction to the clavulanic acid in Clavocin, so they need Amoxil instead.
3. It’s way easier on the wallet since it's much cheaper than Clavocin.
Anesthesia experiences? in Health ·
Elizabeth Miller8 said:Man, you really have to take what those nurses say with a grain of salt because they can definitely get things mixed up sometimes...

...I mean, I totally skipped breakfast and then—bam—ended up throwing up, just some liquid obviously.

haha...maybe I was actually right there in the thick of it with you during 🙂 😁 😉

There’s actually a whole science behind why people throw up after anesthesia, and it usually boils down to two main things...

First off, standard post-op nausea and vomiting is usually just a side effect of the anesthetic itself. It's still circulating through your system and basically messing with your brain centers, triggering that sick feeling. So, honestly, whether you ate or not doesn't really change that part...

But the second reason is way more critical for any anesthesiologist to worry about... going under without an empty stomach is incredibly dangerous because of the risk of aspiration. That’s when stomach contents get sucked into your airways while you're being put under or during the procedure if you aren't using an endotracheal tube. This isn't something to joke about; it's super easy to run into serious trouble when that acidic stomach stuff invades your delicate lung tissue.

So, bottom line: fasting before surgery is primarily about keeping yourself safe, no matter what kind of procedure you're having.