CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Christian Taylor3 › Posts

Posts by Christian Taylor3

435 posts shown.

Biutiful (2010) in Movies ·
This actually made my day, much like finding a forgotten twenty in an old pair of jeans: Javier Bardem and Alejandro González Iñárritu sitting down with Charlie Rose.!

image

rustywalker42 said:I already dropped my thoughts in the chat thread, but I might as well put them here too. I caught this one back in the summer; it’s a solid piece of filmmaking, though honestly, it’s a pretty heavy watch. Bardem is, as usual, absolutely flawless. The whole thing has such a distinct atmosphere, and personally, I thought they made a really inspired choice with the lead actress. Does anyone know when this actually hits theaters here in the States?

That wasn't actually part of this thread; the answer was posted over in the chat.

So far, this is the only (actual) review:

The dark horse. Asks:
The organizers actually made the right call by moving the outdoor screening of Biutiful from the truck to the Pink House, mostly just to save everyone from freezing their toes off. Honestly, people started bailing on the truck during AMSFF even though it was supposed to be packed. I can't quite tell if they were fleeing the bitter cold, just plain disappointed with the movie, or rushing off to catch that TBF concert that kicked off around 10 PM at the nearby plaza. It’s kind of wild when you think about it—scheduling a massive concert right as the penultimate film of the festival is playing, almost like some sort of chaotic grand finale? Either way, it felt pretty unfair, if not downright disrespectful, to the film itself.

So, after being part of the last sixty Mohicans who didn't get dragged away by TBF, we finally wound up at the Pink House for the festival's grand finale. *Biutiful* is essentially a beautiful film about a really ugly reality. I don't think Inarritu was quite as visceral here as he was with *Dog Love* or *21 Grams*, or maybe even *Babel*, but he’s still definitely in there somewhere, which is honestly way above average for what passes for modern high-budget productions these days. Bardem is, as per usual, fantastic, though he’s starting to feel a bit typecast in roles where he plays basically living corpses (*Life be sea*, *Before night falls*), so you kind of feel like you've already "experienced" him in this mode. His co-star is some Spanish actress I've never heard of who struggles to keep pace with him, while the rest of the supporting cast stays tucked deep in Bardem's shadow—mostly because Inarritu built this entire thing on Bardem's broad shoulders, which, to be fair, carried the whole movie. That said, if it wanted to be truly great, *Biutiful* needed a tighter script; instead of his usual collaborator Guillermo Arriaga, we got Inarritu working with two unknown writers, and unfortunately, that lack of polish is noticeable. I'm also starting to find Inarritu's increasingly globalist approach to "epic" themes a little grating, along with that overt moralizing rhetoric where he tries to weave together every possible race and social class in one pretentious, all-encompassing web. Personally, I found his previous work, *Y Tu Mamá También*, much more grounded and enjoyable.

Looking at the reasoning behind the award for *Honey*, that whole "less is more" minimalist approach is clearly the smarter move—mostly because it leaves more room for interpretation. To me, though, Serban’s minimalism feels organic and earned, whereas with Kaplanoglu, there’s this slight hint of pretentiousness that just doesn't sit right. I also realized I totally forgot to mention yesterday that the kid who serves as the emotional anchor in *Honey* is absolutely brilliant, even if centering a story around a child is always a risky gamble. Actually, looking back at my festival lineup, it's funny how almost every film I've seen so far revolves around a heavy-hitting male protagonist delivering a performance that goes way beyond just being "impressive." There's also this striking parallel between both films from yesterday: the protagonists are both on these redemption quests, trying to carve out a better life for their loved ones than the one they were forced to endure growing up in such a ruthless world. It's like they're all trying to play by the rules of a dirty game just to protect their own, and honestly, I’d like to believe the fact that these two films share such similar themes and outlooks isn't just some happy accident in the festival scheduling.

The very title 'Biutiful' is this ironic, exaggerated phonetic spelling that perfectly captures how distorted reality can get—the kind of twisted beauty that comes from being a byproduct of globalization in the land where the word 'beautiful' actually originates. Even if Guillermo Arriaga wasn't part of Inarritu's crew this time around, we still have the legendary Gustavo Santaolalla, whose score is just as mesmerizing as ever. And honestly, the setting is captivating too; even though they chose locations in the city that most tourists would never bother looking at because they show the gritty underbelly, Rodrigo Prieto’s stunning cinematography manages to give them this almost magical, painterly quality. To me, the whole movie feels like a dark counterpoint to a Woody Allen flick like 'Vicky Cristina Barcelona'—where everything is usually breezy, fluid, and hedonistic, here the raw, grim struggle of marginalized communities casts a heavy shadow over the version of the city we think we know (even if you've seen it firsthand 😁). Ultimately, Inarritu seems to be telling us that life is a mess, but it's worth enduring until death arrives—provided we show up prepared, with our metaphorical ledgers balanced and clean, as if that's our ticket to some better, painless way of existing. Because, as Bardem's visionary character suggests, there's a world of dreams, illusions, and hopes waiting for us on the other side. A place where there used to be just the ocean, salt, water, and wind. That's where life begins.

Anyway, the festival is wrapping up and so is my rambling. 😍
And once again, absolutely nothing to talk about here. It feels like the world is right on the edge of collapsing, and honestly, if it all goes down, I really couldn't care less. It wouldn't be much of a loss.When it comes to actually decent movies, obviously.

goldenhound32 said:If I had such a narrow way of looking at things, I’d probably just end up taking a dull knife to myself.

And I’m just over here using a nail file. 😁

I Billy Bob Thornton He claims the movie is basically just a deep dive into a dark phase of life. His recent comment to the Telegraph actually carries some weight when he claims Hollywood is currently churning out the worst movies in its entire history. From his perspective, these films are basically being engineered to cater to a generation raised on video games—it's just endless, mindless killing for the sake of pure entertainment. He pointed out that even back in the day, traditional violent films usually carried some kind of deeper message or purpose, whereas now we're mostly stuck with vampire flicks and those flashy, hollow 3D spectacles.

That’s true enough, though it’s a pretty broad generalization—Thornton's cowardice is really just a jab at big-budget Hollywood.

Jerry Martinez50 said:Besides, Hollywood isn't exactly the only place where the American film industry actually happens.

Of course it isn't.

Here are a few useful links:

Cinematic Gems from The Last 10 Years you Shouldn't have Missed – Part 1 http://t.co/2egr1fP Cinematic Gems from The Last 10 Years you Shouldn't have Missed – Part 1 Cinematic Gems from The Last 10 Years you Shouldn't have Missed – Part 1 http://t.co/2egr1fP

Cinematic Gems from The Last 10 Years you Shouldn't have Missed – Part 1 NorthforkHonestly, I had no clue that movie even existed. Who actually went out and saw it? Ebert Done.

The top 10 Films of 2010 that you never Heard of 27 of The most Underrated & Underappreciated Films of 2010 The playlist The top 10 Films of 2010 that you never Heard of 27 of The most Underrated & Underappreciated Films of 2010 The playlist

27 of The most Underrated & Underappreciated Films of 2010 The playlist The top 10 Films of 2010 that you never Heard of 27 of The most Underrated & Underappreciated Films of 2010 The playlist http://bit.ly/hZAnpC

For some incredibly stupid reason, I still haven't gotten around to watching it. The American The American Anton Corbijn—this one really caught me off guard. Solitary Man, please Give, White Material Claire Denis White Material Claire Denis Down Terrace... Just all the movies that are actually available.

And honestly, all those lists of the best films from 2010—even if they drive some people absolutely insane—can actually serve as a pretty solid roadmap if you're looking for some genuinely great movies:

BFI | sight & sound | 2010 : The year in Review BFI | sight & sound | 2010 : The year in Review | Looking back at 2010, it’s kind of wild how much ground we covered. If you're trying to make sense of the chaos, I found some decent starting points like BFI | sight & sound | 2010 : The year in Review, reverse Shot's ten Best of 2010, and even that 2010 Movie of The Year : Gravity Was Everywhere Back Then | bad liti piece. For anyone feeling nostalgic or just looking for something better than the usual blockbusters, check out my favorite Movies of 2010 | Movieline or this video | The year in film 2010 , part 1 via @guardian. There are also those " Best ( and Worst ) of 2010 " lists from Time Out New York's and the Hits and Misses of 2010 via Electric Sheep Quote if you want to see where people's tastes diverged. It was definitely one of those years where you had to dig a little deeper to find the actual gems. BFI | sight & sound | 2010 : The year in Review
reverse Shot's ten Best of 2010 reverse Shot's ten Best of 2010
Looking back at everything that hit theaters, deciding on the 2010 Movie of the Year feels like a bit of a toss-up, honestly. There were so many different vibes floating around that year, making it pretty tough to pin down just one standout without feeling like I'm ignoring something great.2010 Movie of The Year : Gravity Was Everywhere Back Then | bad liti 2010 Movie of The Year : Gravity Was Everywhere Back Then | bad liti
Looking back at everything we watched, I’ve finally sat down to put together my favorite movies of 2010. It feels like a lifetime ago, doesn't it? Honestly, there were so many gems buried under the mainstream noise that year, and I'm still trying to wrap my head around how some of these didn't get more love. Here is my personal take on what actually held up. my favorite Movies of 2010 | Movieline http://t.co/TThcVbx my favorite Movies of 2010 | Movieline http://t.co/TThcVbx
video | The year in film 2010 , part 1 via @guardian Looking back at the landscape of cinema from 2010, it’s kind of wild how much there was to digest if you actually bothered to look past the massive blockbusters. If you're feeling nostalgic or just want to catch up on what slipped through the cracks, you should check out this video | The year in film 2010 , part 1 via @guardian. It really makes you realize how much variety we had during that stretch.Cinematic Gems from The Last 10 Years you Shouldn't have Missed – Part 1 video | The year in film 2010 , part 1 via @guardian via @guardian
Year out / Year in : Films to Remember and forget http://tinyurl.com/2v3q3tp
"Best (and worst) of 2010" lists from Time Out New York's critics all on one page http://bit.ly/eICium
Hits and Misses of 2010 http://t.co/0UFjytF via Electric Sheep

Michael Parker92 said:We're facing a chronic shortage of actually good movies, so what's the move?

Like I said, grab a nail file and aim straight for the jugular. 😬

Maybe try doing a little more research—I assume you aren't picking your movies based solely on trailers you saw at AMC Theatres.🤷
Is Mad Max considered Sci-Fi? in Movies ·
I’d honestly just suggest he smash through that whole "dogma" found in every single film encyclopedia, textbook, or academic archive out there, whatever else you want to call them: Mad Max is a cult post-apocalyptic, sci-fi masterpiece.

How?

He should just start his own religion, a sect, or some kind of movement: The Passion of Mad Max—Freeing Max Rockatansky from the genre shackles of science fiction. 🤷Zizek spouts all kinds of nonsense about movies, and somehow people eat it up every single time. As long as they keep buying it, they’ll call him anything from Sydney to New York City, and pay him handsomely for the privilege. The guy even manages to pull models (I think he actually married one). There’s your potential solution.

Just not here; this is starting to feel a little too much like trolling.
Is Mad Max considered Sci-Fi? in Movies ·
rustywalker42 said:Don't have the time right now. I'll get back to the rest of you soon, but here's my quick take on this last one.

So, what would you base it on? Christian Taylor3So, he actually concluded that Mad Max is a Sci-Fi film just because that opening line isn't there? Seriously?

Even that opening line (which is just a voiceover)...

the words: IN THE NEAR FUTURE...come across the screen

... isn't strictly necessary for you to grasp that we're looking at an imagined, non-existent world, or a state of existence presented as a plausible—scientifically grounded—possibility, perhaps as an evolutionary trajectory for our current world. Back when people were actually watching Mad Max, they weren't exactly killing each other over a single jerrycan of gas (you could argue with plenty of examples, since humans have been fighting over barrels of oil since the dawn of time, let's be honest. But not in a post-apocalyptic/setting like this).

By the time we got to Mad Max 2, the director used a narrator to lay it all out clearly for the audience (though, of course, he was nudged in that direction by American producers 😁):

NARRATOR V/O
But, most of all, I remember the
courage of a stranger, a road
warrior called Max. To understand
who he was you must go back to the
last days of the old world ...
Is Mad Max considered Sci-Fi? in Movies ·
George Robinson43 said:Me?
Just like how the Star Wars films fall under the space opera umbrella within Sci-Fi,
Neuromancer serves as a classic example of the cyberpunk sub-genre.
Similarly, Anubis Gates fits perfectly into the steampunk category.
And even The Man in the High Castle can be classified under the dieselpunk label!

Without even a hint of understanding when it comes to Sci-Fi. Mad Max It’s basically a cult classic, that post-apocalyptic stuff. Science Fiction I don't know, I just feel like there's something about a good Sci-Fi film that hits differently when you aren't expecting much from it.

Sci-Fi film Sci-Fi is essentially a cinematic genre that falls under the broader umbrella of fantasy, though it tries much harder to sound plausible. These films typically present us with imagined worlds or hypothetical states of existence that are framed as genuine scientific possibilities—whether we're looking at an evolutionary leap forward from our current reality in futuristic tales, or making contact with unknown contemporary realms, such as alien civilizations or parallel universes. Within the realm of Sci-Fi films, you see certain sub-genres or cycles really start to stand out, like the classic space operas where characters embark on epic voyages through the cosmos, much like the journey seen in Star Trek, or those time travel flicks where people zip back and forth through the ages, similar to Back to the Future. Then, of course, there are the post-apocalyptic stories... Mad MaxWe’ve seen these kinds of themes popping up since the early days of cinema, with classics like Journey to the Moon and Metropolis setting the stage. Hollywood really leaned into this stuff during the 1950s, churning out films like Body Snatchers and B. Haskin's War of the Worlds back in '53. By the 1960s, the genre started gaining some serious artistic respect through the work of directors like Jean-Luc Godard, François Truffaut, and Stanley Kubrick. Then, Star Wars essentially kicked off a golden era where Sci-Fi became a heavyweight genre, thanks to heavy hitters like Steven Spielberg, David Lynch, Ridley Scott, John Carpenter, and Luc Besson, eventually finding its footing on the small screen too with shows like Star Trek.

There have been thousands of articles written about apocalyptic fiction, including... Mad Max:

image

I can't quite make out what you're trying to show me here—the link seems to be broken or pointing to a dead end, which is just my luck, isn't it? If you were trying to share a specific shot from one of the films, maybe try uploading the image directly or finding a fresh link, because right now I'm just staring at a blank screen and feeling slightly foolish for expecting anything else.
I can't quite make out what you're pointing at here, but if this is meant to be some kind of deep dive into cinema history, I might need a little more context to follow along.

More on this:

Check out this link if you're looking for some deep dives into the world of Mad Max: http://www.madmaxmovies.com/publicit...nes/index.html

Well, I guess this discussion is officially dead in the water now. 🙂

If there are any Stefs out there—cheers to you! 😁
Is Mad Max considered Sci-Fi? in Movies ·
Apocalyptic fiction

😛

@rustywalker42, George Robinson43, Walter Grant5

Honestly, those were some pretty interesting and constructive points you guys made.

Though, we could probably skip all the extra labels like "You have no clue" or just calling people "Trolls"... I mean, what's the point? 🤷

I suppose I should paraphrase my Mother here: Server, I curse you to Christmas 2010! 😁
gentlebadger88 said:I haven't actually sat down with the original yet, but this version really worked for me. That whole setup with the lightbulb and that twisted "deadly game" was just intense. And then that ending 👍. Definitely worth a watch 🙂.

Honestly, you should check out the original, because 13 Rue Noir is arguably the superior film (which wouldn't be surprising). In that one, Vince is played by Sebastian, and he’s portrayed by George Babluani—the director's brother, who was actually pretty great in the role.
The Irishman (2011) in Movies ·
Anthony Smith3 said:The movie definitely has its own specific theme, but honestly, it feels like we've already seen this exact story told a dozen times before...

Well, I disagree. 🙂

I mean, seriously, look at that cast! 🙏

It's about the Irish mafia—because who doesn't love a good, bloody tale about the Irish mob?

image
Bring Oak Tree back to the politics !!! front page! in Feedback & Suggestions ·
dustypuma5 said:No, you guys are just acting like some kind of faulty litmus test. You just write a post, and if Adler109 disagrees, then that's the end of the story.
And don't even get me started on The Family. If Anderson were to actually quote him and give him a real response, he’d probably frame it and hang it above his bed. He even went so far as to specialize in monitoring the forum's Uptime just to get some attention, but clearly, that didn't work out for him...

Once you finally learn how to communicate without trolling, maybe we won't have to put up with you forever.

OT:

Let me say it one more time: my take is that topics regarding non-governmental, quasi-right-wing parties (which apparently just got their registration confirmed yesterday) have absolutely no business being on the Politics front page. Furthermore, the admins and moderators haven't actually voiced any opposition yet (there you go trolling again). Besides, the moderator who moved the thread to the Politics section already gave you all an answer—Hitrec and the crew from Oakley can dance around in the Politics section all they want, which is exactly where they belong in the American political landscape (honestly, it's no wonder none of them are chiming in).
Bring Oak Tree back to the politics !!! front page! in Feedback & Suggestions ·
-1

Looking at that unfortunate mess on the cover of the Daily News PDF, you could basically expect to see enough PR fluff to represent every single registered political party in the US (and trust me, there are hundreds of them). To put it in Jarnjak's terms: We aren't going to be watching this movie.

In my humble opinion, if you're a parliamentary party, you might earn a spot on the Daily News cover, but for everyone else? Absolutely not.

Maybe Hitrec (🤦) and his crew should just hang tight for a bit, actually clear the election threshold and get themselves into the US Congress, and then they can talk about being on the front page of the Daily News. 😬
The Beaver (2011) in Movies ·
Anthony Smith3 said:Man... I know it's Mel talking... but once he actually starts speaking like a total pro at the 0:47 mark, he sounds exactly like Ray Winston. I can't be the only one who caught that; there's a whole crowd of people online pointing out the exact same thing.🙂

I think you might have missed the point or misclicked, because this isn't even a link to the actual trailer—it's just a mashup treatment.
The Beaver (2011) in Movies ·
ruggedridge22 said:You can't hold everything against Mel Gibson. Art and personality are two different things, and anyone who can't tell the difference is probably just making their own life harder than it needs to be.

Mel Gibson is a fantastic actor, but honestly, he’s even better behind the camera. I have no doubt this is going to be a great movie, but I’m really hoping it gives him enough momentum to jump back into directing more projects. Sure, he’s a conservative, right-wing guy with a temperament that's... let's say, challenging, but we had Ford and Milius, and they still managed to churn out absolute masterpieces.

God Bless you, mr. xax233. 🙂

Anthony Smith3 said:By the way... did anyone else notice that when "The Beaver" finally speaks, he sounds exactly like Ray Winston?

Hmm, to me, it sounds like Mel Gibson.

Take another listen:

VIDEO: Mel Gibson's 'Beaver' Puppet Has rage Issues - http://t.co/io3dCPk

😍
I started swearing practically right after the opening scene (Géla Babluani mentioned he was going to tweak the American remake 13 Tzameti, but I really wasn't expecting such a slap in the face). Everything about the beginning of this thing screamed disaster: I just couldn't get used to the color, since so much of the original's atmosphere relied on that black-and-white cinematography, which worked perfectly; then there's Riley as Sebastian, who was totally lackluster (please don't even get me started on that sappy little sentimental family drama crap)... and then everything just ground to a halt about ten minutes in. It was all wrong from the jump. Jason Statham was great, Mickey Rourke actually rose to the occasion (and I was honestly terrified they only hired him to play some background extra), and Ray Winston (playing Statham's lightning-fast brother) was excellent too... but then I started getting annoyed with Michael Shannon. Michael Shannon, man! As an arena moderator, what a role! He’s basically Agent Nelson van Alden from the FBI. I absolutely love that actor. All that's left to see is whether they messed with the lightbulb. The bulb is the main character in 13 Tzameti, so if they ruined that, they ruined the whole movie. Luckily, they didn't, and the rest of the film works really well. And most importantly, they didn't change the ending. Thank God!

My rating?

Géla Babluani should be proud of himself, truly proud—he did an excellent job with this film (and he remains one of my favorite directors).

Go watch 13, highly recommended.
The Beaver (2011) in Movies ·
Don't pack up on 🙂
.
I really did try to tell him, quite clearly, back when it mattered: Get away from that woman before you lose your mind. But no point in talking when someone's determined to be stubborn. 😁

We live in a strange society. Somehow we all got it in our heads that we are judge and jury of celebrity behavior. Maybe not even just celebrity behavior, but any kind of behavior that is publicly exposed. Perhaps it is just human nature. Either way, what will it take for the public at large to let go of the dirty laundry we’ve just witnessed — actually, witnessed is probably a nice way of saying that we marinated in it, didn’t we? The Beaver trailer has just hit, revealing what looks to be Mel Gibson’s best performance.

I am beyond excited for The Beaver. Seriously. Thanks for the heads-up, it actually made my day. Love it. It's Foster-Gibson (and having Jodie in the director's chair too). 🙏 I have a feeling this is going to be a great movie.

Well, I feel compelled to paraphrase user Gilberth, I really do: 'December is a special month for the entire Western world. The year wraps up, everyone's waiting on the holidays, and if there's any extra cash lying around, it gets spent on the people you love most. Of course, none of that really fits the original spirit anymore; commercialization has gone overboard and you could argue the whole thing has turned into one massive business. We aren't Americans, and I think we can all agree how much things have been flipped on their head, because giving should be about love and attention, not just grabbing stuff from a shopping mall. Maybe instead of buying your better half an aromatherapy lamp or some new earrings, you should take them for a walk in a local park and have a long talk, or maybe write them a poem? Maybe we should also look for ways to show goodwill, signs of affection, and a chance for a fresh start, rather than just handing over gifts?

In that same spirit, I want to ask you all for one such gesture. Please, forgive Mel Gibson. We need him.

🙂

p.s.

Translation (English > American)

beaver

noun
1. beaver
2. female genitalia

😬
Snuff in Movies ·
coastalcrane76 said:For those who aren't following, we're talking about actual documentary footage of murder, torture, rape...
I was actually thinking about reviving this thread recently and posted a link to a Snuff film that's been sitting on some forum since back in mid-2009. Within minutes, I got slapped with a warning and a temporary ban from the site.
So, how is it even possible for a film like that to stay online for so long? Is it even legal, and who is actually responsible for scrubbing this kind of filth? Who am I supposed to report this to?

Look, you’re honestly lucky a kid didn't stumble onto your last thread and click that link. Are you out of your mind? And then you have the nerve to wonder why your post got nuked. image
Search Engine Help in Feedback & Suggestions ·
shadowseal41 said:Can someone walk me through this? What’s the deal with search engines constantly serving up everything except what I actually typed in?

If you want the absolute gold standard of searching, try this:

shadowseal41 site:reddit.com

🙂
Jack Nicholson Giveaway!!! (Oct 25 - 28) in Movies ·
I think he pretty much covered everything I was going to say. 😛

If anyone feels the need to lodge future complaints, throw out accusations, or engage in those little provocations—you know, the "he’s clearly cheating because he’s better than me" or "he’s just doing this for attention" types of things (which, let's be honest, are worlds apart from actual constructive discussion before or after a prize game)—there is a designated spot for all that: the Film Complaint and Suggestion PDF.

@Dragonrage

Keep up the good work. 🙂
The Way Back (2010) - new Peter Weir film in Movies ·
While we sit here waiting... just a little chat about Master and Commander:

The Way Back>, directed and co-written by Peter Weir:

image

Ultimate Spoiler:

For Your Consideration: Peter Weir's screenplay.

The Way Back (Peter Weir).pdf
Horror Movies: The Last Decade in Movies ·
nimblemarlin6 said:I wander over to the "Cult of Personality" site and stumble upon an article that some random guy just ripped off wholesale... I click the link, and before I know it, I've ended up here in the States..

There really ought to be some kind of way to penalize this level of blatant theft. Ghoul is basically an academic at this point, yet this guy just signs his name to the work without a second thought.

I mean, what is the point of even posting on forums if you aren't going to contribute anything original—especially when none of the decent long-form pieces belong to him? Not that he can actually make a dime off stealing content either, since everyone here is hiding behind a handle.

Honestly, it feels like we're looking at some sort of unidentified psychological disorder...

🤣

Word travels fast around here, and it looks like Powerbeat’s global "fame" isn't going anywhere anytime soon.

Maybe it wouldn't hurt to drop this text here too, just to give the Film subforum a little extra love and get that link back out there.

If you’re going to steal, you might as well learn from the absolute best.!

So, I just stumbled upon this absolute clown who somehow had the audacity to swipe my entire list of the best horror films of the 21st century—you know, the one that originally dropped on Popculture and then got expanded for my blog—and basically "translated" it into some weird regional dialect before posting it on a forum like he actually came up with it himself.

So, this is where they posted it—honestly, I’m surprised more people didn't just jump on it and claim it as their own work. Luckily, the Cult of Personality has been established as the gold standard for horror stability around here for quite a while now, so it was really only a matter of time before someone noticed that this entire list, along with the intro, the comments, and everything else, was straight-up stolen.

Some people actually claim that stealing is just another way of paying someone a compliment.
Well, thanks, really, you shouldn't have.
It looks like Ghoul is really out there trying to win everyone over.
I’m basically a one-man army at this point, since my ideas are bound to be echoed by a whole crowd of people anyway.

Here’s to the little guy and that classic Powerbeat!

🙏
Horror Movies: The Last Decade in Movies ·
Drew Wright5 said:When did he get back?

This is pure chaos; by next month, this will have become...

But 🤣🙏 cheers to yet another instance of busted copy-pasting.

@ briskhound2—how did you even stumble upon that text and remember Power's version? Were you maybe out there Powerbeating yourself? 😁

He got back after Inception (he got totally caught up in some "unrequited love" melodrama, and that was right when the movie was playing exclusively in San Francisco), so he was gone for about a month.

He’ll be back. 😁

Let's stop the off-topic rambling here; maybe he'll actually send some sources to the mods (this thread is incredibly informative, just like every other one he opens, if only he'd remember to cite his sources for once).