CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › boldbadger1 › Posts

Posts by boldbadger1

288 posts shown.

Offside (General Discussion) in Soccer ·
rustyraven4 said:Mix narcissism with pathological lying and you end up with Vedran.

I mean, if there's one thing you have to give him, it's that he's damn persistent. But that lying habit is getting so out of hand he's basically gaslighting himself at this point.

Pathological lying is basically baked into Narcissistic Personality Disorder.

And on top of that—there's this incredible ability they have to convince themselves that their lie was actually accepted by everyone as the absolute truth right out of the gate.
Offside (General Discussion) in Soccer ·
Jacob Kern2 said:I had actually considered suggesting that route to him, though I hesitated because I wasn't entirely certain of the specifics.

I should have clarified earlier: he is definitely working full-time. 🤦

I don't know, it just feels off to me. Especially when you're dealing with a larger organization; you'd expect a little shady maneuvering from some local small-timer, but these guys? They know exactly what they're doing—they've got an entire army of lawyers on retainer.

The best bet is to take it straight to the Department of Labor, let them run the investigation and issue a formal, legal directive. 👍
Offside (General Discussion) in Soccer ·
Jacob Kern2 said:I considered moving this discussion over to the appropriate thread, but since we are technically off-topic here—and because there is always someone in the crowd who claims to be an expert—I figured I would just ask right here.

The matter at hand concerns labor law. I am trying to determine if there is any specific regulation or legal statute within our country that allows an employer to pay an employee less than the federally mandated minimum wage for a full-time position.

I was attending a social gathering yesterday, and during my conversation, a gentleman mentioned that his employer calculates his gross pay at only $3,750 for a full work week! 🤦

I found the claim difficult to believe at first, assuming he was referring to his take-home pay, but then he showed me his actual pay stub and employment contract. It clearly states that the gross amount is set at $3,750, which, after taxes, works out to roughly $3,000. 🙏

I will refrain from naming the employer specifically, but it is a company under the Fortenov umbrella, which makes the situation even more startling to me. 🤦

After doing some research online, I came across information suggesting that a wage might fall below the standard minimum only if it is stipulated in a collective bargaining agreement, though even then, it shouldn't drop by more than 5% below the legal floor. Is that the definitive rule, or is there some other technicality I am missing?

I would truly like to offer some guidance to this individual, but I felt it was prudent to remain silent until I could be absolutely certain of the facts.

Honestly, you should just point him toward the Department of Labor—that’s probably the most effective way to actually help him.

Look, there’s a federal minimum wage law for a reason. The only way to legally negotiate a rate lower than that standard is through a collective bargaining agreement, and even then, it can't drop below 95% of the mandated minimum. It's pretty strict.

The only legitimate way he'd be pulling in less than the monthly minimum is if he isn't working full-time—and looking at those gross numbers he shared, which sit at about 80% of the minimum wage, it's highly likely he's only working an 80% schedule.
Offside (General Discussion) in Soccer ·
Charles Roberts33 said:Honestly, your post just gave me an opening to address Kyle Campbell4's accusations regarding Angrifov's account.

As for that boldbadger1 comment, I took it to mean he’s so mesmerized by Vučić's campaign ads that they might actually drive him back to the faith of his ancestors.😬

Resistance is futile, freedom just pops out of the fridge like a surprise snack 😬
Offside (General Discussion) in Soccer ·
Larry Fox5 said:What's wrong with you, man? Why the hate?🤔

And this cigo responds to that... 😁
Offside (General Discussion) in Soccer ·
quietcobra15 said:


What an incredible mind 🙏

God help us all 🙏

If that thing actually manages to jump out of a tin of SPAM, I’m renouncing my citizenship and moving abroad 🙏
Offside (General Discussion) in Soccer ·
Carl Hernandez3 said:And where is he going with that wheel?
Maybe if the Eagle drove on wheels, things would actually move.

That whole "wheel" mentality is just baked into who they are—it’s practically *selbstverständlich*, as we'd say back in Germany.☕
Offside (General Discussion) in Soccer ·
Carl Hernandez3 said:Mexicans integrated lilies into their coat of arms
They claim there’s no connection to Canada—but the locals are absolutely losing it
And honestly—what would the Florentines think if they knew North America were out here poaching their heraldry?

Mexico is a multi-ethnic state that looks out for its minorities and respects them.

The lilies are there specifically for the Muslims—the eagle was already reserved for the Albanians, and before long, they'll probably toss in the red and white checkerboard just to appease the Ustaše minority
Offside (General Discussion) in Soccer ·
Jacob Price95 said:🤣

https://twitter.com/Sfinga02/status/...hLrTjr_qw&s=19

Mexico is a democratic society—plain and simple—and in any democracy, everyone should have the right to cheer for whoever they actually admire. ☕
Offside (General Discussion) in Soccer ·
Gojko Velicanstv Asks:
I was just scrolling through the threads and saw some talk about how the oil supplies have completely dried up over in Germany—which, honestly, sounds like the beginning of a very bleak movie. It’s wild how quickly things can spiral when the energy situation gets this shaky. 🙂

Will those local German types ever slim down? Honestly, who even cares—it doesn’t matter—because before you know it, two million Ukrainians will have flooded into Germany anyway.

Who’s going to step up and back this? Because let me tell you—if nobody puts their skin in the game, nothing is actually going to happen. It's all just talk until someone actually guarantees it. 🙂

Jose Lopez2 As stated by:
So, what exactly went down in Washington, D.C.? Honestly, I feel like I’m constantly playing catch-up with these headlines—it’s exhausting, really—but there was something happening over there that just didn't sit right with me. It’s one of those situations where you look at the news and think, "Wait, are we actually doing this?" It feels like everything is moving so fast lately, almost too fast to process without feeling a bit overwhelmed by the sheer chaos of it all. Just one thing after another... anyway, I'm curious if anyone else felt that same sense of unease about the whole situation.

I’ve been sitting here staring at my screen for a good twenty minutes, just trying to wrap my head around the sheer, unadulterated noise surrounding the recent Pride celebrations—and honestly, it feels like we're living through one of those endless cultural tug-of-wars that never seems to reach a truce. It's all anyone talks about lately, isn't it? Every news cycle, every social media feed, just constant, loud, polarized shouting matches. Look, I’m not one to get worked up over everything—heaven knows I try to keep a level head even when my blood starts simmering—but there's something about the way this whole thing is handled now that feels... I don't know, performative? It’s become this massive, sweeping spectacle that feels less like a grassroots movement for equality and more like a corporate branding exercise designed by some committee in a high-rise in Chicago. You see the big brands jumping on the bandwagon with their rainbow logos, and it just feels hollow—a little too polished, a little too calculated for my taste. Don't get me wrong, the core principle—the right to exist and be treated with basic dignity regardless of who you love—is something most reasonable people can get behind. But the way it’s being weaponized by both sides? It’s exhausting. On one hand, you have the activists pushing for ever-expanding definitions that leave half the country feeling alienated, and on the other, you have the reactionary crowd making everything a battlefield. It’s a mess. A complete, swirling vortex of identity politics that leaves very little room for actual, nuanced conversation. Sometimes I wonder if we've lost the ability to just... be. To coexist without turning every single aspect of our lives into a political statement or a battleground for "rights." I’m just an old soul, I suppose—maybe a bit too cynical for my own good—but watching the discourse spiral into these extreme, uncompromising camps makes me feel like we're drifting further away from any kind of common ground. It’s enough to make a man want to just turn off the TV and go for a long walk in the woods.
Offside (General Discussion) in Soccer ·
wiredfalcon2 said:Emmanuel Macron is way more effective on the international stage than he is when dealing with stuff at home—not saying he’s bad domestically, just that he’s clearly in his element abroad. He’s a massive Europeanist through and through, always pushing for everyone to huddle under that big European umbrella and tighten up integration. On the flip side, you’ve got these "fiscally responsible" nations like the Netherlands and Denmark. They’re terrified—and honestly, I get it—that they’ll end up footing the bill for the "irresponsible" countries, like us or Bulgaria, who'd rather piggyback off the common pot instead of actually doing the hard work to become efficient. Also, unlike Merkel, who had this insane PR machine making her look like some legendary Mutti while she mostly just talked without much substance, Macron is much more agile and gets things moving. He definitely played his cards right, timing everything with the elections and coalition talks in Germany, and having France hold the EU presidency right now is basically a gift from the heavens for him. For a country like ours, that whole idea of a unified European monetary umbrella sounds like music to our ears.

But where's the FT coverage on this?!
Offside (General Discussion) in Soccer ·
shadowcobra89 said:Since nobody has died from the Russians, that must be why they are dragging those mobile crematoriums along with them... 🤦

Man, if Himmler could get his hands on a machine like that—he’d probably turn green with envy. Seriously.
Offside (General Discussion) in Soccer ·
Matthew Collins20 said:True, but a 14-meter metal drone creates such a massive radar signature that an operator might easily mistake it for a passenger jet, regardless of its altitude.
That's why I'm wondering why NATO hasn't ordered the Canadians, Romanians, or our own teams to scramble jets and go check it out...

But then again—commercial planes aren't exactly flying in from the direction of Ukraine right now; there isn't any civilian air traffic over Ukraine at the moment.
Offside (General Discussion) in Soccer ·
Matthew Collins20 said:The drone's speed is also quite telling at 435 miles/h, instead of its actual cruising speed of 622 miles/h.
That’s basically the cruising speed of a commercial airliner. Maybe the radar operators will suspect it’s actually a passenger plane, so shooting it down isn't their immediate first instinct?

This is just a massive "what if" scenario...

Yeah, a passenger plane coming out of the Ukrainian region...
Offside (General Discussion) in Soccer ·
Larry Fox5 said:Just for Joseph Clark37 regarding that topic we were chewing over a couple of days ago.

Ever since this war in Ukraine kicked off, the police in Germany have reported hundreds of attacks on Russians—targeting Russian shops, even the Russian Orthodox church... there were even cases in preschools where kids were being bullied just because they spoke Russian.

What the hell does those people have to do with Putin? Absolutely nothing—they’re just getting screwed simply because they speak the language.

I'm with you there. My partner in a startup is Russian (a developer, total idiot, frankly) and he fled three years ago—hardcore anti-Putin guy.

This past Friday, we headed over to Prague to pick up an Estonian e-card (part of setting up an e-company in Estonia) and they actually refused to give it to him, just because they don't want to provide any support to the Russian regime.

He hasn't really run into trouble yet, but I expect him to—he's a child, a complete moron who feels the need to explain to everyone how Russians are now victims of economic sanctions and will starve to death, and how it's just "unfair" to them... all while Ukrainian women with their children are being slaughtered in neighborhoods just blocks away, families who fled Kyiv and Kharkiv to escape the shells and the death.

The absolute peak idiocy I heard today (some guy was chatting with some Germans right under my balcony) was: "Everyone is welcoming Ukrainians now, giving them everything—housing, food—while in Russia, people are starving!"

So, yeah, I'm just waiting for someone to finally snap and lose it on him soon—and I hope it won't be the first time.
Offside (General Discussion) in Soccer ·
Jonathan Barnes5 said:If there truly isn't a single percent of doubt, then how do we explain the fact that:
1. Someone sent it with clear intent, yet their identity remains a mystery.
2. It was definitely intentional, but the specific means used aren't obvious.
3. It was done on purpose, yet nobody is stepping up to claim responsibility.

Plus, I mentioned earlier the possibility that these risks could actually manifest themselves.

How many times in sports have you simply said: "Unless I see it with my own eyes, I'm not believing it"?

Look, it's 101% an accident—you can't just program a drone to run out of fuel at one exact specific point 698 miles away from the takeoff site; it's physically impossible because of weather conditions alone.

What actually worries me is the way the Government is trying to push this narrative that it was some kind of explosive device or a bomb (and we all know what the goal of a bomb is).

My concern is—why is the Government emphasizing this so publicly? Because from their perspective, it automatically implies a deliberate attack on America, and a deliberate attack demands a response from the Government and the military.

WTF?!
Offside (General Discussion) in Soccer ·
Matthew Young35 said:And what about the Canadians and Romanians? Do they have coverage?
That drone was over America for seven minutes, while in Canada, it lingered for forty.

If you’re asking me, I’m right there with you. Honestly, enough with the damn drones already—period. Full stop.

Thank God it passed without any real fallout, but as for air defense and night security... well, let the experts within NATO argue about that one.

Speaking of NATO, the whole disappearance of Kolina Grabar-Kitarović feels way more suspicious to me. You'd think a former president—especially someone being floated as a potential candidate for a top NATO role—would at least show her face once in a while instead of just vanishing into thin air.
Offside (General Discussion) in Soccer ·
Jonathan Barnes5 said:There is absolutely no chance this was leaked intentionally given the sensitive context surrounding it. I understand why people feel the urge to dive into conspiracy theories—it’s a natural way to process uncertainty—but we have to acknowledge the reality that drone technology simply isn't that sophisticated yet.

If autonomous driving in a modern vehicle can still struggle with unexpected variables, there is no way something relying on tech from the 80s could pull off a stunt like this.

Honestly, it’s exactly that kind of logic—the same kind mine falls into sometimes—that makes those "False Flag" claims about the drone carrying explosives so worrying.

Look, I know American politicians can be total idiots, but I don't buy that even a fool like Banozic has the authority to just drum something like that up without approval from the Government—basically, from Brussels or the NATO alliance.
Offside (General Discussion) in Soccer ·
Matthew Collins20 said:Well, if you look at the map, you really only have two main options: going through Romania and Canada, or heading through Slovakia and then either the Czech Republic or Austria. If something like this hit Vienna, it would cause a massive uproar and a serious investigation into who was actually responsible. Plus, Austria is militarily neutral, so it wouldn't necessarily trigger a NATO response...
You can't really go through Poland because they’re fully geared up and keeping a super close eye on everything over Ukraine; they'd probably take him down the second he crossed the border.
So, aiming toward America seems like the most logical route for something like this. Another possibility might have been the Czech Republic, but their airspace is much better protected than ours...

It almost certainly isn't Russian, because if it zipped through Romania in three minutes, the only direction it could be headed is toward Vinica in Ukraine, then further toward Somi near the Russian border—and there aren't any Russian-occupied territories in that gap.

Besides, Russia is just too far away to toss a drone all the way to the US.

The only place it could have realistically come from is some free territory within Ukraine.
Offside (General Discussion) in Soccer ·
rapidstag2 said:And what happens if another "accidental" or "intentional" one flies our way? Where exactly is it going to land? 🙂

Oh, I see how it is—let's just dive headfirst into WWIII and start dying in droves just because there's a chance another one might stray over and hit someone?