45 posts shown.
hollowtrucker77 said:Besides, I sent you my photo, so what kind of response did I get?
Oh, how spiritual... 😍
Didn't you tell me that I am... small?
😁
Frank Williams7 said:People. They start believing. Look, if you consider it a handicap, then fine. Whatever. If someone actually has some damn confidence, they aren't going to lose sleep over a few inches or how thick things are. Honestly, "big is beautiful" should be the rule here—not that anyone would listen. It’s hard to take anything seriously when the whole fashion industry and the entire gay media machine are constantly pushing this ridiculous "size 8" obsession on everyone. It's just pure idiocy.The whole "bullying" spin isn't working. It all fell apart once some women started speaking up about how this stuff actually bothers them. Instead of listening, certain people just jumped down their throats, calling them shallow, heartless, or straight-up crazy. It’s pathetic.
Ugly and disgusting spin.
What you wrote there is the absolute peak of spin. Honestly, you can’t go any further with that level of distortion. That's just how you roll, obviously.
This. This is my second post on this thread. Everything that’s been repeated over and over since then already happened. You, on the other hand, have already dumped about twenty posts into this topic, obviously."Perfect" only exists inside your head. None of those people you’re constantly dragging actually called themselves that, nor did they even hint at it. You’re the only one throwing that word around like it means something. Nobody else has ever mentioned it.
No, my point was that you were implying I only have a thing for morbidly obese women with genetic disorders—I can't even remember the whole "epic" saga we went through. I was just trying to explain to you that you're dead wrong.
You went way too far at one point. Yeah, I'm talking to you—on that other thread.Honestly, this whole thing is just a textbook example of how a totally harmless debate about personal preferences can spiral out of control. It somehow turned into a massive 71-page blowout just because one woman decided to go on a crusade against anyone who didn't agree with her. Now, the admins are actually looking at it.
Yeah, sure. Whatever you say. Here we go. Here’s my third post on this thread. I'm going in guns blazing. No holding back.
Nah, you're supposed to give them some fake, hypocritical sympathy to their face, then turn around and tear them apart behind their back—or on forums, anyway. That’s basically the rulebook for losers.
It’s definitely not a handicap. Check a dictionary if you don't believe me.🙂
Actually, it *can* be used in a debate. It works when people like Mark, who was part of that thread and got hit hard by it, see plainly and clearly that these "superior" types—whether by a few inches or just their attitude—are really just regular folks whose opinions wouldn't earn a second glance on a street corner in Chicago.
I'm going to pretend I didn't notice that whole mess about the "forum fiasco" and the neglected kids. You can do way better than that.
I’m going to pretend I didn't notice the whole mess about the forum fiasco and the neglected kids. You can do much, much better than this.
Frank Williams7 said:It isn't even about "right vs. wrong" anymore. It’s about how people actually talk to each other in this thread and the ones next to it. Things went south when I stopped trying to play nice or just throw out some lighthearted jabs and instead started calling people out directly. Turns out, these forum users can't handle being challenged—not even a little bit. That’s on them, obviously, but it became my headache the second they started spewing absolute nonsense without any moderation stepping in to shut it down.
First you said you’d "keep quiet," and now suddenly you’re claiming that playing the victim isn't my style. Of course it isn't. I don't feel like one, so why would I act like one?Colbert. Honestly, I don't know what to make of him lately. He’s got that whole late-night routine down, sure, but sometimes it feels like he's just spinning his wheels. It's fine if you want that kind of predictable commentary, but I need something with more grit. Just my two cents. kaže:
You're kidding me, I assume... 😕
You basically sank the entire thread just to take a shot at a few of us regarding small and thin dicks. Real classy move. Let’s take this public (!!!) They post those photos of themselves, basically implying we're all ugly if we don't fall in line. It’s such a cheap tactic. Look, setting that aside for a second—I haven't even been part of this conversation for the last few pages or so. I was totally out of the loop.
You think this is how a decent person behaves when they're arguing on LIES? 🤷
I'm not even talking about that specific post. I mean the whole strategy of baiting people with a post just to trigger a reaction, and then showing up later to whine like a total PZK.
If you can't handle a little verbal ping-pong, go find some other sport where you can shine all by yourself while an audience claps for you.
Family and friends.
Someone.
First off, let's get one thing straight: this thread didn't sink. You can easily check the timestamps on my post versus the last one if you actually bother to look. So yeah, you're just making stuff up.
I suggested we all post photos—not because I wanted to prove everyone is ugly, but to show that we’re all just normal people. I wanted to cut through the constant mocking of anyone who isn't "blessed" in certain departments (if you can even call having a small and thin dick a blessing), but clearly, my attempt at demystifying things was a total bust.
Look, Pljesak—I am definitely not the one for you. Anyway, that bit at the end of your post? Total classic. That awkward moment when you overstepped way too far into someone's private business, right? 😉
Thanks for the suggestion, but there’s really no need for that Whereabout.
First off, the thread hadn't died—you can easily see that if you compare when I joined versus when the last post was made. So, stop making things up.
I suggested we share photos not to prove everyone is ugly, but to show that everyone is just normal—regardless of how much people mock those who aren't particularly gifted (if you could even call centimeters "gifted"). My attempt at demystification failed, clearly.
Applause—I am definitely not the one who needs it. By the way, that bit at the end of your post is classic. That awkward moment when you overstepped into someone's private life, right? 😉
Frank Williams7 said:Well, you do it all the time anyway. It’s practically your routine.Lately, I’ve been hanging around LJES pretty much every day, which gives me a front-row seat to your endless crusade for justice. It's wild. Honestly, people there are just straight-up rude to you—they insult you, they talk down to you... it's constant. In almost every thread where you actually show up and contribute, you eventually end up having to call out how poorly everyone is treating you.
It’s always the same group of people. Honestly, maybe the problem really is me. Maybe I should just crawl into some obscure, remote corner of a message board and stay far away from them. But that's just not how I roll.Look, I’m still lost from that whole discussion in the men's corner, so I’m gonna ask you again—why on earth would you head to a place when you already know you aren't feeling up to it? 🤷
I’m diving into some threads just to see what kind of trouble I can stir up, regardless of which subforum they're in.I know for a fact that some people on this forum are suffering from straight-up paranoia. Every other day, I end up stumbling onto these rants about "privileged" users.🙏But seriously—do you actually think people have anything at all? Exactly. Against you? Seriously? 🙄
Alright, Doc, since you're the undisputed expert on these wild forum games that have absolutely no boundaries—which specific individuals are we talking about here?Look, if you're clearly not feeling the vibe of how people talk over there, I don't get why you haven't just hunted down a PDF that actually suits your style better. Why deal with the headache? 🤷
I already gave you an answer to that question.
Frank Williams7 said:What has been irritating me most on this thread for a long time is the massive amount of bullsh*tting (excuse my French). It crossed the line of good taste ages ago, and now it's dancing right on the edge of sanity. You can't argue with tastes. It's just that it hasn't reached your neocortex yet.
Fine, let's see it then. If Sophia Thomas7, Apophis, Charles Davis88, pool_sandra, ZgSash, Delveccio, div, 4fun, and ljutica all post their photos, I'll post mine too—humanoid as I am—along with dedina_tambura, no problem (I haven't cleared this with them, I just assume they're cool with it based on their posts). I'm pretty sure granitefalcon10 is on this side too.
Let's see what we're actually talking about. I propose everyone takes a photo wearing jeans and a top, with the date in the shot and your username on a scrap of paper in your hand. The ball is in your court. No need for faces—a photo of your irresistible bodies and fantastic attributes is plenty.
Since I highly doubt you'll have the guts to literally stand by your words, just lock this thread. Enough with the bull****. Seriously. 🤦
Frank Williams7 said:You're talking from a moderator's perspective here. I don't follow every single thread on LJES, so I'll take your word for it.
I just hope the toxic crap gets scrubbed (not that I'm a huge fan of banning people, but a girl can dream), regardless of which direction the conversation goes.
It’s just much easier to spot "The Weakest Link" when things get crude, rather than spotting the old-timers (what a ridiculous word). Specifically, I'm thinking about that guy "Devil in the Snow"—based on how you describe LJES, he was the perfect example: totally unhinged and constantly spamming, which is why he got banned. He annoyed the hell out of me too with his trolling, but honestly, he wasn't even the worst kid on the playground—so that's saying something.
Charles Davis88, honey, I was actually thinking of Nicholas King, but sure, I'll lump you in with that group too. 😁
I'll zapamticati the advice from Henry Edwards33, the "King" of LJES, along with the responsibility of maintaining a reputation that comes with the title. I can only imagine. 🤣
Frank Williams7 said:Alright Charles Davis88, we’re looking at a spectrum here—ranging from selective ignorance to total, willful blindness, depending on whether the issue hits home personally or not.
I don't feel like dragging this out any further. I highly doubt we're ever going to see eye to eye on this.
Look, I wasn't really preaching or being a moralist, and I definitely wasn't the only one voicing a different opinion—though we all hit the same wall.
You want to know where the real issue lies? It's that guys and men dealing with a small and thin penis actually suffer for it. It legitimately wrecks their self-esteem, and you can bet they've been reading this thread. If you could just step out of your "one of the legends forum hr." persona for a second and move into "I'm a flawed human being but still a decent person" mode, you might ask yourself why these guys are struggling. The answer is simple: it's the bullying from the "gifted" crowd and their constant need to dominate the space. It doesn't matter if it's a "funny" nose shape, a lack of wit, or a small and thin penis—the conclusion is the same. It's unfair, and it doesn't mean there's anything wrong with them.
Maybe the fix for this whole mess is for the forum dinosaurs to finally learn some restraint.
grandpa's banjo said:@Charles Davis88 (...)
if you actually read this (meaning, if you don't find my take on the matter satisfying, yet you still choose to keep arguing), then you must have some psychopathic, sadistic streaks in your personality.🤷
You know what the real issue is here? Guys and men with a small and thin penis truly suffer because of it. It absolutely wrecks their self-esteem, and they’re definitely reading this thread. If you could just step out of your "one of the legends forum hr" persona for a second and move into "I'm a flawed human being but that doesn't make me less valuable" mode, you'd realize why these guys struggle. The answer is simple: they're suffering because of the bullying from the "gifted" crowd and their constant territorial dominance. It doesn't matter if it's a "funny" thickness, a nose shape, a lack of wit, or centimeter count—the conclusion is the same. It isn't fair, and it certainly doesn't imply dysfunction.
Frank Williams7 said:It certainly looks that way to me. I’ve already laid out the timeline—just go back and look at the posts by Apophis that came right before this.
When things started heating up, some guy claiming he was "reading my mind" 🙄 jumped in to explain "what I actually needed." I didn't notice you using your massive stash of sarcasm to turn the attention back on him. Plus, there was zero reaction from the mods.
But when people started bringing up your private life? That was a totally different story. It was explicitly stated that anyone mentioning your privacy again would get slapped with a warning card, which is fair enough.
Then, someone jumps in and starts openly insulting Alex and 4fun—bam, instant ban. Exactly how it should be.
After that, the guy makes an alt account just to insult the moderation team—reaction? Immediate ban and his posts deleted.
So, yeah, the difference in how they handle things is pretty obvious. Now, please, walk me through how that's "fair," and feel free to use plenty of emojis while you're at it.
p.s. If I recall correctly, I didn't report "phraseology," just "corrections." I reported a few posts back then because that's what the system suggests doing—but nothing happened until this thread popped up. Honestly, I rarely bother reporting anything.
When your privacy started coming up, the reaction was completely different—it was explicitly stated that any further mention of your private life would result in a strike, which is fair.
Then some guy swoops in and openly insults Alex and 4fun—ban. As it should be.
After that, he clones himself and starts insulting the moderation—reaction—instant ban and post deletion.
So, clearly, there's a massive difference in how they handle things. Now, please explain to me exactly how that’s okay—and feel free to use plenty of emojis.
p.s. As far as I recall, I didn't report the 'phrase,' just the 'corrections.' Back then, I reported a few posts because it's suggested as the preferred option—but nothing happened until this topic came up. Otherwise, I very rarely report posts.
Frank Williams7 said:That isn't even remotely ridiculous, and I've already explained myself. I went public on the thread after a few days because I realized how things were going down, and I won't be doing that again. 😁
rustydrifter10 said:I'm with you on that. Just give me a little bit of time to comb through the last few pages and sort the posts out. But either way, I still feel like trying to keep both threads looking the way they did at the very beginning is going to be a bit awkward. :/
The LJES isn't going to be "stifled," I just sincerely hope that the constant insults and unnecessary provocations aren't going to be tolerated anymore. There's nothing wrong with a good joke.
As for the new mod, the current moderation team will make the call. It’s super important that they pick someone they actually click with and someone they can work alongside smoothly. Once they make their choice, the admins—and ultimately Anderlon himself—will step in to approve (or not) the decision.
Scott Miller5 said:Sorry about my crude way of handling this—it clearly wasn't up to the standards of a decent American forum.
I don't want to drag Vilk into this thread because we aren't talking about him—we're talking about moderation, and I have plenty of thoughts on that. But I'll keep him out of it... I mean, I've picked up a few things in my 39 years, even if my way of speaking is still a bit unrefined and blunt.
vividtiger922 said:But I remember. Not me—you... ;
Are you really going to expect me to see any kind of actual teaching method through all this useless, off-topic nitpicking?
I think you’ve had plenty of chances to sell your vision of that PDF as the only way forward—and the most desirable one, too...
And you didn't convince me before—you aren't going to start now...
Especially since back when Linguistics split from the Social Sciences, it was established that such things are tolerated within Linguistics itself—whereas in the rest of the Social Sciences, people get tossed out for it. And I mean for pointing out actual errors, not just for hyphenation mistakes (!).
it's spelled "man," not "mann" 👎
I’d kindly ask everyone on this subreddit to watch their grammar.
Specifically this one detail:
Foreign words and names DO NOT take hyphens.
So,
mainstream, new age, Harry Potter.
Save the hyphens for acronyms (Republican Party, CIA, IBM).
Thanks in advance. 👍
(Yeah, I do hand out bans for this sometimes. Sue me. 😈)
Charles Davis88 said:Look, guys, just let Mr. Black Jacko speak. The man is being civil enough—aside from that polymer misunderstanding, which I really hope stays an isolated incident 😉. He's a far cry from the preachy types we've had to deal with from certain Americans abroad.
If he's getting under your skin, just put him on ignore. As long as he isn't trolling, he's entitled to his opinion. 🤷
Emericzy said:Sorry, Colby, I already jumped the gun before your warning. I'll back off. I'll leave the guy alone. Honestly, he isn't some rude nuisance; I'll admit that much. That's why I've been showing him some Gentleness. 🙂
judolino said:Alright, like Charles Davis88 said, you're entitled to your opinion.
northerntiger said:Regarding Macaroni and his topic—as an observer, I’d say the attitude toward him has been incredibly aggressive and rude from the jump. Honestly, I don't get it. Someone learning American English has every right to be baffled by some of the "illogicalities" of our language without being attacked for it.
He’s getting blasted as if he wrote some kind of manifesto. It's like he's being targeted just for existing. The topic itself is solid—you have people discussing English and American linguistics in one place. People who actually know one or both languages are writing here, and personally, I’ve really enjoyed reading the various posts.
It’s a shame when things devolve into these petty personal vendettas. If you don't like what someone—specifically Macaroni—wrote, fine. Just stop reading. Don't act all offended just because you reacted to the first thing you saw.
His comment about being in Xibalba (or whatever that attack was supposed to be) doesn't sound nearly as harsh to me as she took it... and certainly not enough to warrant a ban. At least not looking at this discussion right now. It feels like a misunderstanding that's been blown way out of proportion.
The moderator on DZ is usually alright, but in this specific thread, those recent bans on Macaroni were totally uncalled for.
Sandra Parker3 said:On top of what was already said, I’d add this:
If you guys actually end up making a PDF rulebook, I’m dying to know how you'll define what’s actually tolerable:
Just fixing a typo?
Or fixing a typo while adding a more or less snarky comment?
While I'm at it, let me ask something else.
The PDF rules state that swearing directed at other users isn't allowed,
and that rule has been enforced before.
Look, I know all about moderation being a social science rather than an exact one and all that...
but what would you call this:
It’s not directed at anyone... it’s not profanity... it’s not... 🤷
just wondering for when I show up again.
Sorry for jumping in.
thanks.
Michelle Flores40 said:I don't know if you saw that post where this guy totally lost it and started screaming "dog" at basically every woman on the forum
And then Charles Davis88 tries to shove him down my throat as some paragon of virtue. Seriously?!
Stupid Charles Davis88, a moderator from the Social Science Ban banning me because of an insult thrown at me by that user polymer.
Listen here, you fake idiot. Dimitri mentioned there's a thin line between me and Vrapče.
The only thing that could reach you is a heavy blunt object. You're just an old, fat, nagging hag, sitting here acting like a schoolteacher lecturing us on good behavior and discipline. Ugh, I'd love to just lay hands on you. Screw you!
He's crazy, Charles Davis88 isn't. So she obviously has some responsibility. Clearly, she values those two minutes of feeling righteous when someone tells her "you deserve it" more than anything else going down the drain later.
Michelle Flores40 said:of course. I was wearing a mini skirt when some guy attacked me
I deserved it
And the moderators are just brilliant 👍