ruggedmarlin15 said:1.Nah. I don't want to end up looking like that's how I view art.
2.Honestly, I think the opinions of people who walk out after 15 or 20 minutes—just because the movie is clearly garbage—are just as valid as the people who loved it. But they actually have to back it up. In this case, the arguments are definitely on the side of the haters, since saying "it left a good impression" is kind of a weak take—you'd expect more juice after sitting through 140 minutes of film. The point of those who walked out can basically be summed up as "this left me with nothing." Those people won. They didn't waste two hours of their lives on nothing.😉
P.S. I wasn't even making a judgment on the movie itself. I just jumped in expecting some explanation regarding the scale of the film. Still waiting... 😉
1.But I gave at least four examples that totally debunk your point.
2.Well, it doesn't work for me.
Take "Ulysses," for instance—I wouldn't call it a bad novel just because I didn't have the drive to get past page 70 when I was 19. It was just way too heavy for my headspace back then. Once I actually read it, then I'll have an opinion.
At the end of the day, everything comes down to personal impression. Sure, I dig the long takes, the metaphysical vibe, and the meditative feel of this film—how Reygadas navigates such an indescribably demanding poetic style. People often don't realize how hard it is to master directorial minimalism.
The fact that most people were raised on modern Hollywood isn't my problem.
P.S. No matter what I say, you're gonna stick to your guns. And that's fine—it's legitimate and totally fair since you aren't infringing on anyone's freedom by choosing to do so.