Soccer Club Kits, Vol. 1
in Soccer ·
Honestly, I'm mostly happy with our Nike kits—not that we all loved this current set either, but I won't sit here and complain since the squad is killing it. 😁
113 posts shown.
blueridge32 said:This is how they should’ve done it, period. I can't find the photos right now, but Cambiasso was rocking that jersey when they won the Champions League. What is this nonsense with a vibrating kit and freaking snakes? 🙄
analogmaker14 said:Hey placidfalcon4, you’ve been quiet on the spam thread lately. You’re looking to go retro now? Just a heads-up: don't go too far back—maybe the '90s at most, if only for your own sake. 😛
On a more serious note,
what happened with the Spaniards? Weren't they supposed to have that blue away kit with the red, yellow, and red Adidas stripes on the sleeves? 🤷
I always thought that one looked great. 😢
Ronald Brooks75 said:ExxonMobil pulled their sponsorship. They ought to release a retro jersey without any sponsor logos on it.
Ashley Martinez6 said:
Uploaded with Imgur
The snake appeared in the Inter Miami CF crest four different times, so it’s definitely woven into the history of Interov...😉
mistycyclist51 said:it's a snake..
Peter Reed70 said:Honestly, that look isn't even that flashy, so there aren't tons of them... Totij comes to mind immediately, but they usually wear dark blue shorts.
If you want to "browse," just hit up Wikipedia and search for various leagues, like the Premier League or La Liga, then click through club by club. Usually, on the club's Wiki page, you'll find the kit designs on the right side.
for example:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FC_Dynamo_Stavropol
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FC_Alania_Vladikavkaz
loneridge23 said:Then just stop showing up to the games—period. If you do, don't act like you have any right to lecture us on what the Armada should or shouldn't be doing.
boldhound8 said:Look, what you're doing is textbook trolling—but honestly, who gives a damn?🙂 This whole thing is just going to end with some moderator handing out a few more bans and closing the thread with some punchline that's about as funny as these "arguments" we're stuck listening to.🙂 In the end, it’ll just look like we're the only idiots here—meaning "me," since I'm the one who didn't get my 500 points.😍
Hannah Davis18 said:Give me a break—I’ve had enough too. It isn't just one controversial post and then we're done.
And granitefox16 with that little fairy tale about "what the hell are facts"—as if that actually helps anyone when they're trying to write a formal complaint. ☕
feraltrucker5 said:Yawn, how boring. ☕
hollowtrucker77 said:Let's walk through this step-by-step: you start a pointless thread just because you don't like some smiley face
you get a warning because the thread is useless
which part of that isn't crystal clear??
then you start insulting people and get a strike for being abusive
then you open yet another thread acting confused—and finally, you get banned
So, what's left to explain? How much time should we waste explaining the obvious, and how long does someone have to play dumb before the permanent bans actually start dropping??
From where I'm sitting, the group mentioned above should be grateful for the patience shown by the local moderators and admin staff here.
Linda Rodriguez38 said:😢
Strile, Mod Vader is calling—get back down to earth!
I'll put it simply
it's just like when a cop robs a convenience store
they lose their job right then and there 😁
mistywolf17 said:The issue here is that you can't just take someone else's interpretation of a situation and present it as an absolute fact. Doing that is essentially spreading misinformation. As for Slafk, he was banned from a completely different subforum, so that really has nothing to do with what you originally wrote.
On another note, what exactly is bothering you?
The lack of moderator presence in the women's corner? From what I can see, things are actually improving. hollowtrucker77 is making a real effort to get back to everyone. If there truly becomes a need for specific mods to step in, don't worry—it would happen.
So, what’s the deal with the moderation over at LJES?
Are you even aware that you would have received three times as many warnings if the moderation there were more active or stricter? It isn’t that you didn't deserve them, per se. Every time you start an on-topic discussion, you somehow end up veering off into something completely irrelevant. You demonstrate this pattern with every single post you make. So, I suppose you don't really have much ground to stand on when complaining that September was unfair with those warnings. I mean, how could any of this possibly be considered on-topic? What was the actual subject of that thread?She completely shut me down because:
I guess I mentioned earlier that, according to my horoscope, I'm a Libra.
I asked one of the ladies on the forum how she did her hair color.
velvettiger10 wrote that I don't like fighting.
Then again, you’re bringing up the Recreation forum and all its issues, even though you’ve never actually set foot in there. Why bother? Sure, things weren't perfect, but the problem wasn't with the moderator, Lyl—it was an absolute infestation of trolls and spammers. You aren't really clued in on the situation, yet you're still sticking your nose in.
Alex Cook said:As for Offside—I don't know, man. We're just too tough for you. 😁
reddrider35 said:
Not happening! I started this thread because I actually want it to be useful.
Cut the trash talk—stop dragging everyone else down.
If you actually have a specific example involving that moderator—go ahead and lay it out.
Don't come over here acting all high and mighty just to stir the pot and start a fight.
Look, I’m telling you again—I'm not looking for a fight here. I just want a solution. 🙂
The Housing Finance Agency? Please. Just another layer of bureaucracy. 😁
P.S. A compliment is fine—but there's really no need to start sucking up. 😬