CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › goldenfalcon7 › Posts

Posts by goldenfalcon7

8 posts shown.

Michael Ramos4 said:Nathan Turner3It’s not about being in a rush... I’ll make things right with everyone eventually.

Looking at these posts, it’s pretty obvious everything is aimed right at me... even though goldenfalcon7 is out here claiming her post had nothing to do with me. If it's not about me, then who exactly is she talking about?
Look, I already said I’d apologize... provided she wasn't actually aiming those shots at me and her whole post and those GIFs weren't meant to be about me.

That's just not true. If you look at goldenfalcon7's other post, it's obvious she spends way more time dealing with me than just focusing on Holly. Honestly, most of the people posting on this thread are pretty much obsessed with me anyway.

It all kicked off because of my post in that thread where they flagged my comment as trolling and making stuff up—even though I proved I was just repeating exactly what happened in the show (that controversial GIF). It’s the exact same vibe as this topic right here, where most of the discussion has basically turned into everyone just picking on me as a user.

Who am I even supposed to talk to about this? This is the second time I’ve been dragged through the mud and targeted over the PZK. And honestly? Not a single person has reached out to apologize—not one forum member, not even a moderator. Nothing.

Do you honestly think I have any grounds to apologize to anyone?

I’m honestly wondering where people get the right to debate me like this... my opinion on the show, my perspective, my own personal take... all on this specific thread. Is this even allowed? Is it actually normal practice here on this forum?

And all this drama just because someone doesn't like my take on a character or how this show is going. Look, I’m not out here on an island by myself—my opinion is shared. If you have a massive problem with someone else's perspective on a topic, honestly, why do you even care? We're all allowed the same thing here: to watch a show and call it like we see it, based on our own vibes and point of view. What am I supposed to be, some kind of liar? I’m just saying Feriha is a manipulator and she’s aggressive. I don't get the attitude. That's just how I see her. Someone else can look at the exact same person and see a sweetheart, a total angel, or a girl with a heart of gold who loves without limits. To each their own.
What kind of scenario am I supposed to be making up about a plot point that didn't even happen in the show? What did I invent? Whatever happens in a series, regardless of the situation, I’m just sharing my thoughts and how it hit me personally... that's it.

And don't even get me started on all the nasty garbage and total nonsense Dana Nelson wrote about me... claiming I'm promoting hate speech or supporting violence against women. That is straight-up sick. To go after a random person on a forum you don't even know... and then her little fan club jumps in to back her up. Honestly, I doubt you even see this kind of stuff in the moderation queues for other soap operas. It's unbelievable that you let one user talk about another like that, especially on a thread that probably has tons of people reading it. On a thread about a soap opera, no less. It's awful. In my opinion, this whole thing is an embarrassment to Forum hr. It drags down the reputation of the entire site and its whole purpose, not to mention the users and you moderators too.

I don't see what there is to understand here.


In that second post by goldenfalcon7 that you quoted (and only took one little slice out of), it’s crystal clear she isn't even bothering with you, and she actually pointed that out. Here is the whole thing:

goldenfalcon7 said:I only quoted this specific part because we've already seen the rest of what was posted and people have complained about it plenty of times. Whatever, I honestly don't even bother paying attention to her (Michael Ramos) or the nonsense she makes up anymore.

But something else is bothering me. The moderator deleted a post where I was quoting another user who was commenting on what happened in tonight's episode (specifically the main character's outfit). I was just adding to the conversation about what we saw. A third user even asked for pictures of what was shown, but once she realized the posts were being wiped, she had to 🙂 go back and edit her own post because she couldn't figure out what she was allowed to say or who she could quote anymore.😕

If the moderator is going to go around deleting things, why isn't she being careful about what she removes so she doesn't confuse everyone else? People might actually start thinking they didn't see what they saw (or that the moderator doesn't want them to see it 😁).

Looking at her "blue" warnings, I've pulled out a few things that I'm apparently not allowed to do—things I thought were fine, but apparently aren't 😢:

1. - I'm not allowed to comment on what other users write (even though I've always exclusively commented on their thoughts about the show before). 😕

2. and here she says to comment on what we saw, yet when we do, she deletes our posts. 😕

Could someone besides her finally tell us exactly what we can and cannot write? Her warnings have left us totally confused (at least I am 😕 🙂).

In the end, I just explained it to myself like this: write only what you saw, and when you do, expect to be deleted. It seems like it's better to write about things you *didn't* see, because practice shows you won't get deleted then. 😳 I might have overcomplicated that last sentence, but then again, that's exactly what the moderator does with her warnings 😳.


goldenfalcon7 clearly stated she isn't paying you any attention, and the rest of her post is just her venting about her own deleted post—which she thinks was unfairly removed—plus some confusion regarding moderator warnings. Read it again and try not to take things out of context. ☕

@Larry Lee97, since you're already here, would you mind telling Michael Ramos4 to clarify that you were the one imageasking for this image to be posted on the thread today.

If goldenfalcon7 actually wanted to deal with Michael Ramos4 and everything she writes (bless her heart, she should just ignore her), she would have done it last night by quoting her on the main thread and slapping this image and that gif right there.

@Larry Lee97, I think you owe me this—not even because I cropped and posted this image and gif at your request, but as a moderator, because I'm just an "ordinary forum user" who shouldn't be caught in the middle of this mess. Plus, she emphasized that she doesn't deal with Michael Ramos4 or her writing and that she ignores her on the main thread. Thanks in advance!!!
Michael Ramos4 said:image

I think it’s pretty obvious from these posts who’s lying and just making stuff up. It’s glaringly clear.

And this post alone shows there's zero need for a public apology..because I'm right when I say you're obsessed with me and my writing, and that this was directed at exactly who... m e . at River. So much for "civilized" communication.


How much longer is this going to go on?! 🙂 🙂

Larry Lee97 said:I have to agree with that, but primarily, the people who can't stand Feriha were the ones who backed off.

And now I'm saying it publicly: Dana Nelson this is the forum hr discussing the series Feriha airing on CNN. There are different translations online; you can't lie and claim someone is trolling just because they posted a line exactly as it was aired on CNN. I just watched the rerun and saw the moment when Emir said verbatim, "Feriha doesn't execute facts." I hope someone makes a GIF today so we can finally put this to rest.

goldenfalcon7 said:If we’re really going to split hairs here, he didn't (literally) say: Feriha, don't you dare execute that. Just facts. He already said it: Feriha, don't you dare carry that out. The situation. I guess I could post a picture or a GIF to this thread if it’s really that much of a big deal. 😁

Bea? I don't even know if she's even there. 🤷Jay. 🙏

Yeah, I guess they didn't actually answer me. 🙂I'm still trying to figure out what exactly was so controversial about my post, where I just shared exactly what I saw: Emir looks like a total mess. His shirt is half-tucked into his pants and sticking out from under that half-raised sweater. I guess he just couldn't be bothered. That’s basically how I wrote it. Maybe the word order was a bit off, but I was just commenting on what I actually saw. Can someone tell me what exactly was controversial here? I'd rather know so I don't end up posting more nonsense about the main characters in other threads. 😁.

I don't care about Michael Ramos4; I only care about this and how it affects me and my post.

By the way, it was also written that it was Feriha. She looks totally neglected—hair like tangled noodles and bloodshot eyes... And that wasn't even deleted. I guess. 😕🤷

Michael Ramos4 said:Oh, come on... that wasn't even directed at me. And yet, just because of what Emir said, they're accusing me of trolling and making stuff up. They're even throwing around "facts" now. I guess I'm sorry if I misunderstood, but it would be fair if you actually specified who you were talking about.I guess that someone should just speak up... so I can publicly tell them off.😉

Larry Lee97 said:Thanks for putting in the effort on that GIF. I'm glad you posted it; you're right, I was actually looking for it because of this post


Can someone please just come and lock this thread? 🙂 This level of twisting the truth is basically an insult to our intelligence at this point, and it’s clearly drifted over from the main thread (where it doesn't belong anyway).
Michael Ramos4 said:I’d like to ask the moderators to make all the posts I've reported public on the PZK for review. Honestly, since joining this forum, I haven't reported a single thing until now.

And I have never seen communication like this on a forum before... it's honestly bottom-of-the-barrel. It's terrifying. What's the actual goal or motivation behind attacking me? That's what I want to know—how a single sentence or word from mine turns into this massive uproar where everyone starts mudslinging and throwing out ridiculous accusations.
That's just crazy.

Seriously, what is this thread even about? What's so controversial? Me, Warren Buffett, the Secretary, the moderators, Americans, or even someone's grandma.
I honestly can't believe what I'm reading. I don't know about the other users or the lurkers, but personally... I don't know whether to laugh or cry. This whole situation is as pathetic as it is hilarious.

In my opinion, with all due respect to them, the moderators are letting way too much slide.

That is exactly what people here are complaining about—the constant whining plus the deletion of posts that don't even insult anyone and just discuss things actually shown in the series. ☕

You told me directly on the thread that you would issue a public apology if the person who requested that controversial gif and image spoke up. Well, moderator Adam stepped in (so thanks to him), but I haven't seen your apology yet. So much for decent forum etiquette. It's awful.

Anyway, let's stop escalating the debate because there's really no point—let the admins handle this whole soap opera mess, and we'll just wait things out in peace. ☕
Larry Lee97 said:Nathan Turner3 made a good point: things aren't fully moderated yet, so just hang in there—the decent posts will be restored. Whether you realize it or not, you're overlooking one thing I said, which was basically, "With Nathan Turner3's blessing, three moderators agreed to clear out everything starting from that first problematic post by Dana Nelson (which was reported), and all the subsequent posts that were just piling onto her nonsense instead of sticking to the topic."

I'm no lawyer like Michael Ramos4, but she and those other few people who can't stand Feriha have as much right to their opinions as you do to yours. As long as you stay on track, feel free to praise or bash the characters all you want, but let the people who disagree have their say too.


Well, I've uploaded visual proof to the thread showing that Emir was half-ready 😁 So if that doesn't count as being relevant to the topic, then I really don't know what does. Suppose I had written that on the Suljin topic, the BBO topic, or whatever else... 🤷 Right now, I just have this feeling that they were targeting specific users rather than looking at the actual content of the posts 😳 With all due respect ☕
Larry Lee97 said:I have to agree with that, but primarily, the people who can't stand Feriha were the ones who backed off.

And now I'm saying it publicly: Dana Nelson this is the forum hr discussing the series Feriha airing on CNN. There are different translations online; you can't lie and claim someone is trolling just because they posted a line exactly as it was aired on CNN. I just watched the rerun and saw the moment when Emir said verbatim, "Feriha doesn't execute facts." I hope someone makes a GIF today so we can finally put this to rest.

If we’re really going to split hairs here, he didn't (literally) say: Feriha, don't you dare execute that. Just facts. He already said it: Feriha, don't you dare carry that out. The situation. I guess I could post a picture or a GIF to this thread if it’s really that much of a big deal. 😁

Nicole Palmer4 said:I find myself in agreement with these complaints.
From what I’ve observed, my own posts haven't been deleted, yet the contributions of users who simply share their honest opinions on the show seem to vanish. These aren't trolls, nor is there any off-topic rambling or anything of the sort. Meanwhile, Michael Ramos4, who trolls in nearly every single thread, remains untouched and unpunished. We are instructed to report such behavior, so we do, yet nothing ever comes of it. It feels as though this particular user is being shielded by the moderators; if I, or anyone else here, were to post such provocative nonsense and terrorize an entire thread and its participants, we would have been banned long ago. One gets the impression that we are all expected to step back just so Michael Ramos4 can continue trolling, provoking, and fabricating details that weren't even in the series. I have never seen such blatant distortion of the plot; someone who hasn't watched the show but only reads those posts would walk away with a completely warped perception of the story and its characters. Having watched the series three times now, reading certain posts makes me look like this: 😕 when was that actually shown?
Furthermore, I agree that while there are dissenters in other threads regarding AFK, it has never resulted in tension or arguments.
As for Jay and Bea, I have no complaints whatsoever.

Bea? I don't even know if she's even there. 🤷Jay. 🙏

cosmicorca5 said:And what about all those other trolling posts from Michael Ramos4? How is she actually allowed to get away with lying like that, let alone blatantly misrepresenting the facts?! 😲 😕 🤷
Why does she get a free pass to lie? 🤷 The thread explicitly states who said what, making it crystal clear that she twisted someone's words—which is just a fancy way of saying she lied. That is textbook trolling, yet it hasn't been deleted or resulted in a ban. Why is that?

Also, why have some of the posts here gone completely ignored? 😕

Yeah, I guess they didn't actually answer me. 🙂I'm still trying to figure out what exactly was so controversial about my post, where I just shared exactly what I saw: Emir looks like a total mess. His shirt is half-tucked into his pants and sticking out from under that half-raised sweater. I guess he just couldn't be bothered. That’s basically how I wrote it. Maybe the word order was a bit off, but I was just commenting on what I actually saw. Can someone tell me what exactly was controversial here? I'd rather know so I don't end up posting more nonsense about the main characters in other threads. 😁.

I don't care about Michael Ramos4; I only care about this and how it affects me and my post.

By the way, it was also written that it was Feriha. She looks totally neglected—hair like tangled noodles and bloodshot eyes... And that wasn't even deleted. I guess. 😕🤷
Dana Nelson said:Dear rustydrifter10,

We have a massive problem on the girl named Feriha thread.

Moderator Adam is out here deleting perfectly normal discussions about the show and its plot—while simultaneously letting Michael Ramos4 run wild on the forum, trolling everyone and making up her own fan fiction scenarios for the series.

I’ve already reported her for trolling—honestly, I couldn't help myself—and now I'm hearing from other women on the forum that, even though I'm still pretty new here, she's been flagged by plenty of others too.

There are several AFK threads floating around here—one of which features a pretty controversial female user who seems to turn that specific thread into an endless battlefield. She’s even dropping profanity in her posts. And honestly? Aside from Jay, the moderators are just letting it slide.

We don't run into these issues on the other AFK threads where that one controversial female user stays away. Honestly, you could have 100 women all holding completely different opinions—it wouldn't matter—because the vibe is just pure banter and total harmony.

Plus, this forum user is openly supporting violence against women.

I just reported her post where she says all that—but honestly, since moderator Adam is letting it slide, I’m not buying her plea for sympathy for a second.

Please read my application to the moderators.

I'm reporting this post for hate speech.

This forum user is openly advocating for physical violence against women. That’s a straight-up criminal offense under Article 325, Paragraph 1 of the Penal Code—inciting public violence and hatred.

I don't need to remind anyone that Warren Buffett ended up behind bars and is currently facing trial because of this mess. Honestly, if someone like him can be taken down, I feel like I should actually put in some effort to figure out who Riva really is.

Please, stop allowing this—just ban her from participating in any discussions regarding women or any other female-centric topics where she clearly has nothing of value to contribute.

Ovo je originalni post forumašice

Posts: 2,519
slap
If you ask me, that slap was exactly what Emir was going to do—just a predictable reaction to Roman’s provocation, which, as Roman already pointed out, was totally over the line and completely out of pocket. Honestly, now is really not the time for that kind of pushing and playing games. It’s just interrogating something that makes absolutely zero sense at that moment—honestly, what's the point?
Look, just to be crystal clear—I’m not trying to justify a slap in the face here, so let’s not get ahead of ourselves. But honestly? You reap what you sow. If you go looking for the devil, don't act surprised when he actually shows up. In this specific case, that slap is the devil coming to collect.
Shoving things in someone's face without thinking—and testing Emir's patience like that—is just plain rude and arrogant. Emir tries to shut it down, telling her, "Let's not go there, Feriha; we’re going to end up regretting this." He’s angry, understandably so, given everything he's dealing with—Riva, his father, the Yilmaz family, having his funding pulled—it’s a mess. It’s not like he has all the answers figured out yet, but instead of helping, Feriha keeps pushing Levent on him. I mean, if she had mentioned some random guy, fine, but it's *Levent*. Doesn't Feriha realize how much just the mention of Levent sets Emir off? Has she learned nothing from their history? It's like she doesn't know him at all. She promised she'd stand by him through everything, then went back on her word. She isn't offering any actual help or support during this shared crisis; honestly, she's just draining the life out of him, which is pretty much her specialty. To me, that isn't love. Feriha isn't showing any real affection here—when she needs to be his rock, she fails the test time and time again.

Aysun gave her a serious lecture—I'm honestly not even sure if Fer caught the drift of it. For the most part, she just kept staring at the floor or looking off to the side. And honestly, what I found most irritating was how Aysun tried to throw her off balance; it was such a cheap shot, totally in Fer's own style. Aysun actually handed her a perfect opening to prove her wrong, but Fer just doesn't know how to read between the lines. She can't prove anything because, well, the slap was followed immediately by her running away—who knows how many times now? You can't just run away from everything. You can't run away from a marriage or the hard stuff. You have to carry that weight and stand by the person you love.
@Akif, I’m with you on this one—your post hits the nail on the head. A marriage built on zero foundation, made without any real thought and for all the wrong reasons, is exactly why we’re seeing this mess unfold. Honestly, it’ll probably stay this way too, as long as Feriha refuses to trust Emir. She spends all her time running away from everything, and frankly, her behavior toward people—especially how she treats Emir—means she isn't going to achieve a single thing. The way she communicates is just... grating. It’s irrational, totally lacks tact, and shows zero consideration for anyone else. She’s so hyper-focused on her own interests and avoiding any kind of hardship that it always ends up blowing up right in her face. And let's talk about Emir—he definitely can't carry the weight of the world alone. In my opinion, he’s basically fighting these life battles and marriage struggles entirely by himself. He's lonely in that relationship. As for Feriha, it’s like she never developed a moral compass to begin with. She just wanders aimlessly through life, refusing to learn from her mistakes, somehow convinced that everything will just magically work itself out. She’s constantly at odds with everyone she meets. Where is she supposed to go? She feels suffocated by those massive buildings, cramped in her apartment—everywhere feels too small for her. But if you ask me, she’s most uncomfortable in her own skin, trapped by that cluttered, chaotic mess inside her own head.
Michael Ramos4 is online now Report inappropriate post
Reply with quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message


I only quoted this specific part because we've already seen the rest of what was posted and people have complained about it plenty of times. Whatever, I honestly don't even bother paying attention to her (Michael Ramos) or the nonsense she makes up anymore.

But something else is bothering me. The moderator deleted a post where I was quoting another user who was commenting on what happened in tonight's episode (specifically the main character's outfit). I was just adding to the conversation about what we saw. A third user even asked for pictures of what was shown, but once she realized the posts were being wiped, she had to 🙂 go back and edit her own post because she couldn't figure out what she was allowed to say or who she could quote anymore.😕

If the moderator is going to go around deleting things, why isn't she being careful about what she removes so she doesn't confuse everyone else? People might actually start thinking they didn't see what they saw (or that the moderator doesn't want them to see it 😁).

Looking at her "blue" warnings, I've pulled out a few things that I'm apparently not allowed to do—things I thought were fine, but apparently aren't 😢:

1. - I'm not allowed to comment on what other users write (even though I've always exclusively commented on their thoughts about the show before). 😕

2. and here she says to comment on what we saw, yet when we do, she deletes our posts. 😕

Could someone besides her finally tell us exactly what we can and cannot write? Her warnings have left us totally confused (at least I am 😕 🙂).

In the end, I just explained it to myself like this: write only what you saw, and when you do, expect to be deleted. It seems like it's better to write about things you *didn't* see, because practice shows you won't get deleted then. 😳 I might have overcomplicated that last sentence, but then again, that's exactly what the moderator does with her warnings 😳.
Meet Feriha, aka Feriha Sarrafoglu in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Carl Barrett11 said:It isn't really about whether someone holds a negative or positive opinion regarding the protagonist; rather, it's about the manner in which they express it. In certain instances, the delivery is nothing more than an overt provocation, which is precisely what triggers this kind of conflict.


Exactly. It isn't even about having a different opinion; it’s about how she goes about making her claims. She makes everyone else look like absolute idiots just by trying to prove them wrong. Like, this: Your screenshot doesn't prove anything. You're totally taking things out of context, because my TV is showing me something completely different... 😕

Or when that same troll posts something completely baseless, and even after someone proves them wrong—because they literally twisted a fact we all saw with our own eyes on screen—she just responds with: I didn't say that.So, then you just go back and use her own damn post against her to prove that this was always the pattern all along. I guess.

I guess maybe we should just stop pretending that anyone actually cares about what this guy thinks. It’s honestly exhausting. 🤷

How are we supposed to actually analyze a series if we aren't going to comment on what everyone else is saying about it? I guess that's just how it works, maybe. 🤷.

I guess Nica is just being Nica. Honestly, maybe she should just pipe down. kaže:
I'll look into why this thread was locked and when it might be reopened, but please, just have a little patience.

Thanks. Honestly, I don't think there's even any point in arguing here anymore. People should just go back through this thread and see for themselves: who’s just trolling, who actually has a point, and who among the mods is failing to manage this topic properly. That's all I have to say.
Meet Feriha, aka Feriha Sarrafoglu in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Closing this thread was pretty much predictable; I guess it was just a matter of time. ☕

Whenever (we all know who) a troll gets backed into a corner by their own lies and twisted logic, it always leads to deleted posts or, even worse, a warning. Like @Min says, it’s not actually the frequent posters who feed the trolls—though we've seen that staying quiet works best (even if I realized that a bit late myself, better late than never, I suppose 😁)—it's always some outsider who just can't shut up and decides to jump in... ☕

And regarding the whole deleting posts thing... 😛 Specifically: one of my posts from last night was wiped out. I was just venting, quite calmly and politely, about how I hate it when people comment on Fidelity's (which basically insults the actress H. K. who played her) physical appearance—talking about her looking unkempt, hair hanging everywhere like spaghetti, bloody cuticles, and all that. So, my post gets nuked, while she gets to keep posting and obsessing over the lead character's looks😕.

Btw, I will never understand why her other post wasn't deleted (even though it was reported), where she told everyone who disagreed with her to "chill out" because they were being annoying for asking for proof for her claims😕. I mean, what's the point of writing stuff if you can't actually back it up😲?

Bottom line: now we all just need to "chill out" and wait for the thread to be unlocked. Once it is properly reopened with actual arguments, we can continue the discussion without giving a single thought to someone who only watches the series just to be provocative.