Complaint against moderator Adam regarding issues in the girl named Feriha thread
in Feedback & Suggestions ·
I was wondering... 🤔 do regular forum members not see deleted posts?
Home ›
darktinker12 › Posts
Posts by darktinker12
4 posts shown.
Complaint against moderator Adam regarding issues in the girl named Feriha thread
in Feedback & Suggestions ·
I didn't feel the need to weigh in since those specific deleted posts didn't really affect me, BUT... 🙄
Several posts were reverted last night. I assume you weren't the one who reverted them, assuming they were already deleted. I suppose that means one of the other three must have been reverting the posts—does this imply they suddenly disagree with having them removed?
Do you actually have any idea what that term even means? And I suppose the others too—things like off-topic, chat, or trolling—which seem to be incredibly popular among the online population these days.
Well, hello there. I can certainly see them all being quite active on this thread. All five of them, I suppose. 😁
That sounds excellent.
Let’s approach this differently. This was just one conversation among many in the series: http://postimg.org/gallery/bag2rq6y/
13:34 #6394 Michael Ramos4 Taš EV avatar registration : July 2012. CLICK (I would suggest reading the final paragraph.)
Following that, cosmicorca5 replied to her and ended up getting a warning: I suppose there isn't much to say regarding this specific matter. It seems quite straightforward.
After that, there were at least two more pages—though I have my settings adjusted to forty posts per page, so others might see even more—filled with endless, tedious arguments over who "they" was actually referring to in that scene involving Feriha.
By the way, I suppose your friend has already seen the series anyway. I looked it up online using that Google Translate feature..
Is he also experiencing those posts disappearing from the PZK forum? 🤔
In the same vein, I believe you should also allow those who disagree with them to respond to their posts. It shouldn't be the case that every post contradicting their views is constantly deleted or flagged, nor should there be warnings issued whenever a certain user is cornered and forced to admit they were lying or twisting the truth. On the previous thread, she laid everything out on PZK Holly. You didn't step in there. ☕
Well, I suppose that's all there is to say. 😁
Do you even understand what it means to moderate? Whether it's a forum or a specific topic? Based on how you handle the soap opera threads, I would say you haven't the slightest clue.
Perhaps the administration could take some time to look into all those deleted posts and profiles you shared—everything from the off-topic discussions to the general chat threads.
It is interesting to note that about a month ago, you also decided to ban my account for a chat discussion (which you were forced to rescind). As a justification, you claimed it was an accident—that in a sea of posts, you just happened to click on my case by mistake. However, I suspect that might not be entirely accurate, as only two posts were actually flagged that evening: mine and I believe one from Tina. At least, that is what is visible to me as a user; I suppose I will leave it to the administration to correct me if I am wrong. Furthermore, if your intention truly was to issue a ban regarding a specific chat, it is quite curious that you chose to target me while leaving the person I was actually arguing with untouched. I don't feel the need to mention their name. 😁 ).
I recall certain posts that were deleted from the "How Time Flies" thread, which were ultimately categorized as mere chat. This happened because one female forum member commented on some trivial nonsense, and then another user chimed in, stating she would never want anything like that anywhere near her.
I suppose one has to wonder how many other similar cases exist that have gone completely unnoticed by anyone.
Yes, let's just sterilize the entire PDF so we can stick to nothing but profound analyses. We should exclusively comment on the show's plot and characters, ensuring that absolutely nothing from real life can be brought up or used as an example, because apparently, that's all just way too much. My apologies, chat. That was a bit much.
By the way, Sara mentioned her own post, which is interesting—hers was flagged as trolling just the morning after Riva went on ban for the second time 😁 Right away?
Both these two posts were flagged, yet the posts immediately before and after them, which distort and mock the series plot in the exact same way, weren't flagged at all. I don't necessarily think they should have been sanctioned, but then again, neither should these have been.
Now, I’ll pull this from the archives, but since it's relevant (I can't recall any more recent examples):
Such an interesting take on the series and a certain way of highlighting: "Oh, look at me, I'm a moderator, part of the special elite".
And it seems quite evident that warnings about "what the author intended to convey" aren't just limited to the AFK thread.
That's all. Please, feel free to continue in this review-style tone. 🙂
Larry Lee97 said:After an agreement between the three moderators and Nathan Turner3, every single post has been wiped out, starting from that very first one everyone was replying to.
Only the bold text actually relates to the show; everything else is just someone targeting another user and trying to flame them.
Next.
With all due respect to your grandmother, I really don't see how this matters to the plot of the show. 😁
I deleted the subsequent post from cosmicorca5 because it violated the rules,
which also had nothing to do with the topic. Other deleted posts were either just piling onto this one or were completely off-topic as well.
You're new to the forum, and even though you've been asked a few times to read the rules, you seem to think they don't apply to you.
You posted a private message on a public thread; you only got 30 points for that, even though you could have easily faced a 30-day ban. Out of all your warnings, that was the only one I personally issued.
No matter how much you doubt me or think I'm biased, I treat every single member of this forum exactly the same under the same set of rules.
The only mistake I'll admit to is that I used to send almost everyone private messages, asking them to edit controversial parts themselves or deleting things that might cause conflict. I should have been tougher and just issued warnings immediately, but it's never too late to change. As far as I'm concerned, there are no more warnings—just direct penalties, followed by a notification. You don't get a heads-up just for having a post deleted.
Several posts were reverted last night. I assume you weren't the one who reverted them, assuming they were already deleted. I suppose that means one of the other three must have been reverting the posts—does this imply they suddenly disagree with having them removed?
Larry Lee97 said:After an agreement between the three moderators and Nathan Turner3, every single post has been wiped out, starting from that very first one everyone was replying to.
Only the bold text actually relates to the show; everything else is just someone targeting another user and trying to flame them.
Next.
With all due respect to your grandmother, I really don't see how this matters to the plot of the show. 😁
I deleted the subsequent post from cosmicorca5 because it violated the rules,
which also had nothing to do with the topic. Other deleted posts were either just piling onto this one or were completely off-topic as well.
You're new to the forum, and even though you've been asked a few times to read the rules, you seem to think they don't apply to you.
You posted a private message on a public thread; you only got 30 points for that, even though you could have easily faced a 30-day ban. Out of all your warnings, that was the only one I personally issued.
No matter how much you doubt me or think I'm biased, I treat every single member of this forum exactly the same under the same set of rules.
The only mistake I'll admit to is that I used to send almost everyone private messages, asking them to edit controversial parts themselves or deleting things that might cause conflict. I should have been tougher and just issued warnings immediately, but it's never too late to change. As far as I'm concerned, there are no more warnings—just direct penalties, followed by a notification. You don't get a heads-up just for having a post deleted.
Do you actually have any idea what that term even means? And I suppose the others too—things like off-topic, chat, or trolling—which seem to be incredibly popular among the online population these days.
Larry Lee97 said:I have to agree with that, but primarily, the people who can't stand Feriha were the ones who backed off.
And now I'm saying it publicly: Dana Nelson this is the forum hr discussing the series Feriha airing on CNN. There are different translations online; you can't lie and claim someone is trolling just because they posted a line exactly as it was aired on CNN. I just watched the rerun and saw the moment when Emir said verbatim, "Feriha doesn't execute facts." I hope someone makes a GIF today so we can finally put this to rest.
Well, hello there. I can certainly see them all being quite active on this thread. All five of them, I suppose. 😁
I am stating this publicly. Dana Nelson This is the forum. hr Regarding the series featuring the girl named Feriha that is currently airing... CNN
That sounds excellent.
Let’s approach this differently. This was just one conversation among many in the series: http://postimg.org/gallery/bag2rq6y/
13:34 #6394 Michael Ramos4 Taš EV avatar registration : July 2012. CLICK (I would suggest reading the final paragraph.)
Following that, cosmicorca5 replied to her and ended up getting a warning: I suppose there isn't much to say regarding this specific matter. It seems quite straightforward.
After that, there were at least two more pages—though I have my settings adjusted to forty posts per page, so others might see even more—filled with endless, tedious arguments over who "they" was actually referring to in that scene involving Feriha.
By the way, I suppose your friend has already seen the series anyway. I looked it up online using that Google Translate feature..
Larry Lee97 said:Nathan Turner3 made a good point: things aren't fully moderated yet, so just hang in there—the decent posts will be restored. Whether you realize it or not, you're overlooking one thing I said, which was basically, "With Nathan Turner3's blessing, three moderators agreed to clear out everything starting from that first problematic post by Dana Nelson (which was reported), and all the subsequent posts that were just piling onto her nonsense instead of sticking to the topic."
I'm no lawyer like Michael Ramos4, but she and those other few people who can't stand Feriha have as much right to their opinions as you do to yours. As long as you stay on track, feel free to praise or bash the characters all you want, but let the people who disagree have their say too.
Is he also experiencing those posts disappearing from the PZK forum? 🤔
Larry Lee97 said:Nathan Turner3 made a good point: things aren't fully moderated yet, so just hang in there—the decent posts will be restored. Whether you realize it or not, you're overlooking one thing I said, which was basically, "With Nathan Turner3's blessing, three moderators agreed to clear out everything starting from that first problematic post by Dana Nelson (which was reported), and all the subsequent posts that were just piling onto her nonsense instead of sticking to the topic."
I'm no lawyer like Michael Ramos4, but she and those other few people who can't stand Feriha have as much right to their opinions as you do to yours. As long as you stay on track, feel free to praise or bash the characters all you want, but let the people who disagree have their say too.
In the same vein, I believe you should also allow those who disagree with them to respond to their posts. It shouldn't be the case that every post contradicting their views is constantly deleted or flagged, nor should there be warnings issued whenever a certain user is cornered and forced to admit they were lying or twisting the truth. On the previous thread, she laid everything out on PZK Holly. You didn't step in there. ☕
Larry Lee97 said:Everyone’s pushed things too far at some point, mostly just to dodge getting deleted or banned. The rules were laid out clearly with those moderator warnings—it was explained multiple times in the messages how stacking up enough strikes could land you a permanent ban. After the warning, the expectation was simple: just get back to regular posting without all the friction we saw before. And look, it isn't "trolling" just because a few moderators decide to review reports; it’s not just me making that call.
Well, I suppose that's all there is to say. 😁
Do you even understand what it means to moderate? Whether it's a forum or a specific topic? Based on how you handle the soap opera threads, I would say you haven't the slightest clue.
Perhaps the administration could take some time to look into all those deleted posts and profiles you shared—everything from the off-topic discussions to the general chat threads.
It is interesting to note that about a month ago, you also decided to ban my account for a chat discussion (which you were forced to rescind). As a justification, you claimed it was an accident—that in a sea of posts, you just happened to click on my case by mistake. However, I suspect that might not be entirely accurate, as only two posts were actually flagged that evening: mine and I believe one from Tina. At least, that is what is visible to me as a user; I suppose I will leave it to the administration to correct me if I am wrong. Furthermore, if your intention truly was to issue a ban regarding a specific chat, it is quite curious that you chose to target me while leaving the person I was actually arguing with untouched. I don't feel the need to mention their name. 😁 ).
I recall certain posts that were deleted from the "How Time Flies" thread, which were ultimately categorized as mere chat. This happened because one female forum member commented on some trivial nonsense, and then another user chimed in, stating she would never want anything like that anywhere near her.
I suppose one has to wonder how many other similar cases exist that have gone completely unnoticed by anyone.
Yes, let's just sterilize the entire PDF so we can stick to nothing but profound analyses. We should exclusively comment on the show's plot and characters, ensuring that absolutely nothing from real life can be brought up or used as an example, because apparently, that's all just way too much. My apologies, chat. That was a bit much.
By the way, Sara mentioned her own post, which is interesting—hers was flagged as trolling just the morning after Riva went on ban for the second time 😁 Right away?
Both these two posts were flagged, yet the posts immediately before and after them, which distort and mock the series plot in the exact same way, weren't flagged at all. I don't necessarily think they should have been sanctioned, but then again, neither should these have been.
Now, I’ll pull this from the archives, but since it's relevant (I can't recall any more recent examples):
Such an interesting take on the series and a certain way of highlighting: "Oh, look at me, I'm a moderator, part of the special elite".
And it seems quite evident that warnings about "what the author intended to convey" aren't just limited to the AFK thread.
That's all. Please, feel free to continue in this review-style tone. 🙂
Meet Feriha, aka Feriha Sarrafoglu
in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Adam Miller2, I suspect the topic has likely been locked just to prevent everyone from migrating over there. 😁
Meet Feriha, aka Feriha Sarrafoglu
in Feedback & Suggestions ·
cosmicorca5 said:👋
Which posts actually caused all the drama yesterday? I’m completely lost here. 🤷
Maybe there was just too much trolling going on and they had to lock the thread? 🤔
It seems someone has once again cornered a troll (if you'll excuse my little wink at the moderators). 🥳
It is quite interesting how posts within this thread—or rather, throughout the entire PDF—seem to vanish without a trace; one moment they are visible, and the next, they are gone. ☕ One could receive a warning for any minor off-topic chatter ☕ regarding certain "untouchable" users who feel entitled to invent plotlines for the series, contradict themselves constantly, or post incoherent nonsense; indeed, one could write volumes on that subject alone.
Heaven forbid you should actually confront a troll by pointing out, through their own words, that they are merely posting nonsense and intentionally provoking others. In such cases, the moderation tends to either delete your entry 😁 or issue a moderator warning (which itself often requires interpretation) while implying that the general public is being unreasonable, even when a single individual is clearly ruining the discussion while the mods pretend not to notice.
Naturally, the penalties for fabricating plots or trolling seem to be reserved for those who engage in lighthearted banter, rather than the individual who persistently disrupts the entire topic. ☕ Unbelievable.
I am not entirely sure if it is just my perception, but perhaps the issue extends slightly beyond the mere locking of this specific thread. 🙂
Oh, and everyone, please don't worry... once this topic is unlocked in seven days, we can probably expect at least that many consecutive pages of complaining. After all, I suppose that is what we deserve. 🤣