Posts by electricbison21

mistyseal8 said:I'm just sitting here waiting for a reboot. 🍿

🤣🤣

Richard Wilson4 said:Man, J.J. Abrams is basically just Michael Bay with a better reputation!

I honestly don't get what everyone's deal is with Michael Bay.

Armageddon, Hrid, Bad Boys, Transformers—they're all great movies for just chilling out and unwinding. I love them! Same goes for Roland Emmerich; most of his stuff is fantastic.🤷

Richard Wilson4 said:Not trying to derail things, but the new Spider-Man is terrible. For him, Tobey is the only real deal.

The old Spider-Man was awful, and honestly, Tobey is a subpar actor.

So, what now? Are we actually going to respect different opinions here? 😬

Jeffrey Brown3 said:He says it and lives to tell the tale. 🙏

It’s just better. That stuff with Tobey was total garbage. Honestly.

Hand on heart, we aren't talking about groundbreaking, original cinema here in any scenario. :ne znam: What part of that is hard to grasp?

Richard Wilson4 said:I’m pretty sure nobody turning 15 today even realizes there was a Spiderman before Garfield, or what Tobey Maguire’s deal is.

Or am I totally wrong?

If you ask me, that theory doesn't hold water. I mean, I shouldn't even be expected to know any of the James Bond actors prior to Pierce Brosnan, right?

Especially when we're talking about massive literary icons and comic book legends—there's just no way people aren't aware of the older movies.

And yeah... the new Spiderman definitely beats the old one.

Fast and efficient! Awesome! 😁

It’s been 20 days already and still nothing 🤷

Whoops! I didn't even realize until I checked my profile that the question I posted over at Chat only... (keep troubleshooting questions out of here!) had been moved to its specific thread. I was wondering why it vanished! @moderators

@adelon Thanks! I'll give that a shot! 👍

What an idiot. What kind of face is he even making? Is he trying to live out the movie or something? Such a pretentious hack. Everything about him is just way too much.

I think this might be the biggest disaster of the year! 🤣🤣

Seriously, Kim Kardashian's backside during the Rosetta comet landing was nothing compared to this mess, which is way more intense. ☕

I’ve got this nagging feeling someone is trying to break into my laptop physically. Like, they’re turning it on while I’m away and attempting to brute-force my password. Now, since guessing a password isn't exactly easy, I'm still curious: Is there any way to rig the webcam so that every time someone tries to type a password and hits enter, it automatically snaps a photo of them?!

This movie is terrible.

Twister still holds the number one spot for me.

Looks like it's closed now too. Got it, thanks!

@Astronomy enthusiasts

Hey there,

Why aren't we allowed to hotlink images on the Astronomy and astrophysics PDF subforum??

Honestly, having to rely on links instead of just seeing the photos makes discussing anything pretty difficult.
Can we find some kind of workaround to fix this?

Yikes. What a disaster. Seriously terrible. 2/10 (the only thing saving it from a zero is a steamy Milla Jovovich)

shadoworca3 said:...

You're new to the FBI forums, so you probably don't know how our moderators handle things here.
Topics like this belong over in the Alternative sub-forum; they actually get traction there. Over on the FBI side, stuff like this just sparks arguments, gets people red-carded, or ends in bans...

...

The bottom line? There isn't a single peer review scientific paper out there proving telekinesis or telepathy exists. If one ever gets published, I promise you it’ll be a sticky thread on the FBI forums immediately.
Until then, it's all just

Fair enough regarding the peer review thing! 🙂

But wait... if that's the rule, why are threads like: Nibiru, Time travel via black holes, nlo zg 9 4 2013,...still sitting right there in the Astronomy enthusiasts section without being locked or moved!?

Are you guys going to do anything about that?

Hey there,

I’m honestly pretty baffled by how this PDF is being moderated, and I’ve got two big questions:

1. Just how qualified is the moderator handling this PDF anyway!?

2. Why on earth would a topic like paranormal activity, after ten years, suddenly get moved over to the Alternative PDF?
Why am I asking? It feels like common sense that things like telekinesis and telepathy are automatically dismissed and labeled "paranormal." But check this out. I jumped into the thread today after seeing this post, and here’s what happened... a few members start diving into some serious unorthodox science, even bringing up the controversial scientist Rupert Sheldrake. And then, almost immediately—you know the drill—the whole thread gets dumped into the alternative section. I’m requesting that we rename this thread THE BRAIN and move it back to the

FBI PDF
.
Seriously, is it actually possible that in the 21st century, some people still act like we're living in the Middle Ages? Is this skepticism? Or just straight-up ignorance?

The bottom line is that this is just a way to disqualify and mock real scientists.