CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Amy Long5 › Posts

Posts by Amy Long5

72 posts shown.

10 Song Challenge (Vol III) in Music ·
Is longer always better? Not necessarily. It’s a common trap. We fall for the fallacy that more time, more duration, or more quantity equals higher quality. Usually, it just means more room for error. More time often leads to diminishing returns and unnecessary complexity. Sometimes, brevity is where the real strength lies. Efficiency beats endurance every single time.
We moved past the songs with five words. Now we’re looking for tracks with at least six words. It can include "love," but there's no requirement.
No one should repeat the word count someone else already posted. ;-)

The Cure - Edge of the Deep Green Sea

Depeche Mode – I Sometimes Wish I Was Dead
10 Song Challenge (Vol III) in Music ·
Topic: People

01. Belouis Some - Some People
02. Depeche Mode - People are People
03. Arrested Development - People everyday
04. The Doors - People Are Strange
05. Barbra Streisand - People
06. Patti Smith - People Have the Power
07. R.E.M. - Shiny Happy People
08. David Bowie - Cat People
09. New Order - People On The High Line
10. Empire of the Sun - We are the People

Theme: "The longer, the better?"
We moved past the 5-word limit on love. Now we're looking for tracks with at least 6 words. It can include "love," but it isn't mandatory.
Don't repeat any word counts already used. ;-)

1.) The Cure - Edge of the Deep Green Sea (8)
10 Song Challenge (Vol III) in Music ·
Topic: People

01. Belouis 、som

02. Depeche Mode

03. Arrested Development

04. The Doors

05. Barbra Streisand

That one song with the female vocals keeps looping in my head. Just "People" over and over. I can't pin it down. ;-)
10 Song Challenge (Vol III) in Music ·
Topic: People

01. Belouis Some - People 02.

02. Depeche Mode - People 03.

03. Arrested Development - People everyday
10 Song Challenge (Vol III) in Music ·
Unexpectedly... a five-word title about love.

01. Joy Division - Love will Tear US Apart
02. Bee Gees - How Deep is Your Love 03.
03. Elton John - ara you Ready for Love
04. Whitney Houston - i will Always Love you

05. Amy Winehouse - Love is a Losing gama

06. The cura - Friday I'm in Love 07. 10 CC - I'm not in Love 08.

07. 10 CC - I'm Not in Love

08. The Beatles - all you need is Love
10 Song Challenge (Vol III) in Music ·
Topic: punishment (in the title or text)

01. Johnny Cash - Why Do You Punish Me 02.

02. Cassandra - Punishment

03. Biohazard - Punishment

04. Ramones - Punishment Fits The Crime 05.

05. Mark Knopfler - Punish The Monkey 06.

06. OMD - The Punishment of Luxury

07. The Glova - Punish me with Kisses The Glova - Punish me with Kisses

08. Bronski Beat - Punishment for Love 09.

Bronski Beat - Punishment for Love (1986)


Absolute freedom.
New moderator Mr. Smith is on a power trip in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Amy Rogers6 said:The trial in Germany starts on September 11, 2021.

An important date for a right-winger... November 9th. Some Germans will be shamed by whatever unfolds that day, while others will celebrate it just like they do every single year.
New moderator Mr. Smith is on a power trip in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Nicholas Watson said:Hey, Amy Rogers6, while we're all just sitting around waiting for October 27th, did you happen to get an update on what's actually happening with that legal case over in New Jersey? Like, has the trial even kicked off yet?

Those deadlines will fall through just like Amy Rogers6's predictions. She kept posting about how everything would wrap up by late January or mid-February 2021... It was constant terrorizing with false claims and math errors. Now she’s just stubbornly repeating the nonsense of her new messiah, Füllmich.

The lawsuits against the PCR tests have already been rejected in Canada and the USA...

It’s all just a way for lawyers with names like Füllmich to line their pockets. Translated? "Fill me up." This guy took roughly $800 from about 1,600 people because he promised to sue a German virologist in the US—a court that doesn't even have jurisdiction over a German resident. A year later and there isn't even a lawsuit in sight.

It’s suspicious. Why wouldn't a lawyer demand an expedited trial for something supposedly this urgent? And if he hasn't even started the case against the virologist yet, how has he already raked in $1.3 million?

He's taking us for fools. Name is destiny. Or, more accurately, a tax for idiots.
War profiteers in Feedback & Suggestions ·
mistyotter35 said:Look, people share opinions here. Some are wrong, some lie, but this is a forum, not a courtroom. You don't need ironclad evidence for everything. The whole point of a message board is the exchange of ideas, not enforcing a single, forced consensus.

There is a massive difference between an opinion and a lie.

If someone claims a policy is stupid when that policy isn't even active—and never was—then their opinion is moronic. But claiming a nonexistent policy actually exists? That’s a lie.

Listen, I've sent him links and explanations more times than I can count. Others have too.

He pulls outdated info from articles from last April or December and insists it's current law. He’s inventing regulations out of thin air.

The guy clearly has some issues; he's blatantly spreading falsehoods and exaggerating everything.

He even posted a link to a video claiming "no vaccine, no food," treating it as gospel when the video is obviously fake. Once you see what kind of links someone is sharing, you know exactly which corners of the internet they frequent.

Saying something wrong once might be ignorance or a mistake. Repeating a lie constantly is incitement or trolling, and that’s against the rules.

If you claim A and I claim B, we drop a link, and one of us is proven wrong. Someone will make an excuse, someone won't, but that's how it works 99% of the time.

But this guy? After being shown that it's A and not B, he pivots to C, then D, then comes back to B a few days later. That isn't an "exchange of ideas." It's pure moving the goalposts. It's trolling, it's lying, call it whatever you want.
War profiteers in Feedback & Suggestions ·
mistyotter35 said:And where did he get it wrong? The New York Times; New measures in Germany starting at midnight: No entry to shops without a negative test

If you only read the headline, you’ll never understand anything. Here is what your own link actually says:

"Retailers—with the exception of grocery stores, pharmacies, and drugstores—may only admit customers who present a negative coronavirus test and have a pre-arranged appointment."

Now he's pivoted to claiming you couldn't even go to a drugstore without a test and an appointment... which is just as much of a lie as the first claim.
War profiteers in Feedback & Suggestions ·
war profiteer said:A local shop means where you grab bread, milk, beer, deli meat, or salad—something like a CVS or a Trader Joe's.
You couldn't even step foot in those places without a negative test and a pre-booked appointment.
Why are you lying again? This constant dishonesty is exhausting.

And the circus just keeps going...
War profiteers in Feedback & Suggestions ·
This user has been stirring the pot for weeks now, peddling lies and exaggerating the situation in Germany regarding COVID politics.

Every report I’ve filed has gone nowhere. His lies stay on the thread, and I haven't seen him banned once.

Take his claim from this morning...

My response is right after that post. It shows his information is outdated and, therefore, false—something I’ve already had to explain to him several times before.

It’s clear the guy is either intentionally trolling, playing dumb, or just straight-up trying to spread misinformation.

This isn't the first time I've given him a detailed breakdown of the situation in Germany. He could understand if he actually wanted to. Instead, he just wants to incite people and throw around labels like Hitler or fascist. He doesn't want reality; he wants lies and hyperbole.

As far as I know, trolling is against the rules, and so is playing stupid.
I’ve actually taken a warning from the moderators for trolling myself.

Check out the thread in the link above. You'll see he just blindly asserts his lies, ignoring every link provided that proves him wrong.

Why is this being tolerated?
Should we bring back lockdowns? in Coronavirus ·
Gary Cooper3 said:That is precisely why I have never, in my entire life, left my personal details when walking into a bar or a Club... and frankly, nothing has changed now.
Even when I head to Starbucks, I won't even give them my real name to scribble on a cup.

Personally, I find it absolutely staggering that Germany used to quite literally allow clubs to operate freely—to be perfectly honest—whereas today they are pivoting toward measures that make it feel as though the Gestapo is patrolling the streets, monitoring whether children are wearing masks and how they wear them.
Why such extremes? Personally, I was never a fan of open clubs except during the summer months (though, granted, it was still quite warm in September, even if autumn was already starting to peek through).

There is no way I could have been infected. Between the fact that I’ve already had COVID, and my general stance against those unreliable PCR tests—which I refuse to take unless absolutely forced to—it's a non-starter. I am not foolish enough to end up like that soccer player from Barcelona, testing positive 27 times in 27 weeks because of some dead virus.

Generally speaking, this pandemic would have wound down ages ago if people weren't so... well, let's just say "difficult"... and if people didn't insist on getting tested for every minor sniffle or slight symptom. I will state quite responsibly that we wouldn't have seen more than 100 total cases a day across Europe this summer if we had focused EXCLUSIVELY on the truly sick—and by that, I mean genuinely ill people (for the record, diarrhea is not a disease; pneumonia is a disease).

The Germans kept things open as long as they could manage the tracking. They even called me once, and my test came back negative.

They tracked contacts while incidence stayed around 30-35. It worked fine until certain municipalities hit trouble and had to bring in the National Guard for assistance. They managed to push it to 50 or 70 in some places, but once it crossed that line, closures were inevitable.

And that Club was probably registered as a cafe, since nightclubs have been closed since last summer.
Should we bring back lockdowns? in Coronavirus ·
Amanda Diaz said:Personally, I think this whole phone thing is stupid, especially since not everyone owns one. Wouldn't it be simpler to just have a numbered ID on your hand to solve the problem? Or in this tech age, maybe a QR code on the skin or some kind of chip?

I’d suggest the German folks design something like that; they actually know how to get things done.

They have something similar in Singapore. And if someone doesn't have a phone, the government provides them with a device for free to handle everything.

And let's cut out the nonsense and the ad hominem attacks about chips or QR codes on your skin.

These are temporary measures. You download the app for a month, then you delete it. If another COVID-19 wave hits, you just reinstall it.
Should we bring back lockdowns? in Coronavirus ·
Matthew Jackson2 said:It’s the same story here in the States and across the entire USA; the whole app concept just tanked because it was fundamentally broken. You could end up stuck in mandatory self-isolation based on a single digital contact trace that lacks any actual substance or detail. Even worse, you face this kind of emotional blackmail where people pressure you to stay home without providing a shred of official paperwork, leaving you totally stranded when you try to explain to your boss why you can't show up or when you're trying to claim sick pay and benefits.

The idea of testing contacts and letting them go about their lives once they test negative actually makes sense to me. People shouldn't be threatened with isolation just because their phone happened to be near an infected person's device, even if they were just in adjacent rooms.

Adjacent rooms are handled via check-in and Check out.
Use QR codes at the entrance to shops and apartment buildings.
That way, it isn't just about being in Store A while someone else is in Store B. And if we were only a meter apart, there’s still a wall between us.

If used correctly, the app and system should keep numbers low enough that only a tiny fraction of people are newly infected. If we had 35 new cases a day—which would be our maximum for 10 months if we had the same infection-to-population ratio as Singapore—we’d be looking at maybe 20 contacts on average. Right now, we're seeing 700 tests and isolations daily. That would mean a maximum of 10,800 people in isolation over 14 days. We have more than that today. Just look at how many we had back in November.

And all of this happens while stores and cafes remain open.

With only 35 new infections a day, you can overlook minor inaccuracies. With 700 mandatory tests, you run into immediate queues and chaos.

Some countries have much more experience with this. Fortunately, we don't.
Should we bring back lockdowns? in Coronavirus ·
Gary Cooper3 said:What exactly do you mean by "tracing"?

By the way, that whole narrative about South Korea being successful because they weren't in lockdown—it was just another myth served up early on to suggest their low numbers were solely due to massive testing volumes.

Luxembourg, for instance, provides maybe ten times more free tests than South Korea does... so it's hard to argue that the testing alone accounts for such stellar results.
Some estimates suggest it reduced transmission by roughly 30%, which isn't exactly groundbreaking...

The only thing one could reasonably discuss is the low mortality rate, but even that is likely tied to the fact that Luxembourg possesses a world-class medical staff. Much like in Germany, for that matter.

When discussing mortality rates, people far too often overlook the quality of the medical professionals involved. You simply cannot compare outcomes when elderly patients are being treated by elite hospital teams versus less specialized staff.

On a side note—regarding a later post—that idea of contact tracing in German pubs is a complete joke. I was in a pub in New York City back in September—well, it was essentially a club with zero restrictions, really—and I made sure to write "Peter Pan" on the sign-in sheet. I'm certain my "tracking" was handled with extreme precision...

I’m talking about contact tracing via an app.

The kind of app you’re required to have.

The app doesn't care who you were with.
Whether it was a mistress or a dealer. You’re just a number, and you stay a number until you test positive. Even then, once you go for a test, that's it.
Basically, if you test positive, you notify the app, and the app notifies everyone you were in contact with so they can get tested (which should be free by then).
But the app won't tell you exactly when that contact happened. If you were only with one person, you won't know who they are, and nobody else finds out either.

Only if you fail to get tested within 48 hours does the app send your ID and location to health authorities.

In reality, when you use a smartphone today, Google is already tracking you anyway.

The amount of data you'd be sharing is negligible compared to all the other apps out there.
If keeping cafes and shops open an extra week was the trade-off, that’s a small price to pay... especially if it saves even a single life.

As for your Peter Pan stunt, you could have been fined starting in October. It’s just that the owner wasn't obligated to check.

I have to ask: what was your motivation for writing down Peter Pan?

You could have caught it and never been notified if you were in a club with someone positive. Since you don't even live in Germany, the info wouldn't have mattered to you anyway. I don't see the logic. If no one infected had come forward, the owner would have tossed those sheets in the trash after three weeks and nobody would have known.
Should we bring back lockdowns? in Coronavirus ·
Tyler Garcia69 said:Let's stop splitting hairs here. The bottom line is that Seehofer was being crystal clear when he demanded his experts cook up some absolute worst-case scenarios just so they’d have an excuse to roll out those heavy-handed, repressive restrictions. We're talking about actual surveillance—basically tracking citizens via their location data. It looks like that whole document was just a roadmap to bring those old-school FBI tactics straight to our doorstep under the guise of a "emergency" (total Corona-dictatorship vibes). Even if you ignore everything else, this is a textbook case of weaponizing a crisis for political gain.
And honestly, the fact that the original article was "manipulated" by the author of this piece? That's the least of our worries right now.

Surveillance works incredibly well in places like South Korea or Singapore.

But you can't pull that off under German data privacy laws.

In Germany, they don't even have a unified social security number because those privacy laws make it impossible.

What actually happened in Germany was this: when you ate at a cafe or restaurant, you left your data behind. The owner was required to hold onto it for 21 days before disposing of it. Most people used an app for this, handled through QR codes.
Should we bring back lockdowns? in Coronavirus ·
Gary Cooper3 said:Ugh, I can pull some screenshots together—I can make them myself if needed—but honestly, the easiest thing would be for you to just head over to Macan's LinkedIn profile; that's where he was going back and forth with him.

Macan was being called out by Djikica, who basically popped up out of nowhere, and then Macan started hitting him with all those nonsense arguments he made at the start—like claiming this was somehow a milder illness than the flu, which he’s insisted on multiple times alongside Rudan...

I might be able to grab those screenshots later tonight, but right now, things are a bit too hectic...

If it's true that 180,000 people died without any lockdowns, I'll have to dig through some German news outlets to verify that. Though, I find it hard to believe there was actual manipulation involved... purely because the "zero-covid" and "no-covid" crowds are just delusional groups who genuinely believe a virus can be wiped out entirely.

Thanks, I Googled it but couldn't find that specific news story.

But if that 180,000 figure was stated back at the start rather than today, then it doesn't matter.

I took it as a new claim.
Should we bring back lockdowns? in Coronavirus ·
bluerider63 said:https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschl...ftler-ein.html

Which part of this is actually problematic or supports that whole "they're just stalling" theory? 😁

They were asked to run the numbers on a worst-case scenario where over a million people might die, just so they could justify slapping everyone with lockdowns and heavy restrictions. If that isn't straight-up manipulation, I don't know what is.

That group of lawyers who hunted down those private emails just to leak them should be suing every single person involved for fear-mongering and inciting mass panic.

Developing multiple scenarios is standard procedure.

Politicians use them as tools, picking whichever one fits their agenda. That’s the job.
They were elected for that purpose; they'll lose power or keep it based on those choices.

The media was flooded with endless expert opinions back when the pandemic first hit.

Let them sue. That's what lawyers do.

As long as they aren't the same ones running around the US collecting settlement money later...

https://www.tagesschau.de/faktenfind...orona-119.html

https://www.anwalt.de/rechtstipps/us...co_180315.html

Everything is a business these days. This is no different.

It's like a bus company owner organizing protests against Corona restrictions while still charging passengers for tickets. ;-)