Posts by Kimberly Gomez34

Other competitors have also started hiking their rates, now asking for a 60-70% markup 😁

I see an ASUS ROG Strix RX 480 on PCPartPicker without a box or any warranty—$600 and it’s just sitting there...



Look, I don't have any plans to buy anything this year, but things could definitely go sideways if I wait too long.

Word on the street is that most motherboards have already received their latest BIOS updates.

All the Gigabyte motherboards from MSI and ASUS—every single one of them—already have the latest BIOS updates available.

Unless the retailer is sitting on some old inventory.

Futura has all their boards APU-ready.

You didn't really need to go with the slower 5400 rpm HDD, but I suppose it'll get the job done for now.

Ideally, you should look into a larger SSD or pick up a motherboard with four RAM slots. Once you eventually realize you need more than 8GB of RAM for a build like this, you’re going to hit a wall since you've already filled every available slot.

VRAM sensitivity really kicks in when you're running memory-intensive titles at high or ultra settings; I've seen usage spikes up to 30-35% in those cases, whereas if you aren't pushing the limits, it's barely noticeable—maybe 5-10%. The 6GB model is definitely more future-proof (it also packs a few extra cores), and since the 3GB version is already trading for over $667, I’d strongly suggest going for the 6GB if your budget allows. Bottom line: prioritize the GPU for gaming; it matters much less whether you pick an Intel Core i5-8400 or a Ryzen 5 1600. Keep in mind that with the Ryzen refresh coming in April, I don't expect the Ryzen 5 2600 to drop below the price of the Intel Core i5-8400, but we might see a price dip on the Ryzen 5 1600
.

It’s definitely a possibility. You could almost call the current selling market for mining rigs a total panic mode. Used 580 8GB cards aren't even moving for $700 anymore—though let's be real, prices haven't hit the sweet spot yet. Between the news about a new Ethereum ASIC making GPU mining basically obsolete and the rumors of a new NVIDIA generation dropping in July, there are plenty of reasons why we might see a dip in prices soon.

That said, seeing a GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB priced at $2700-$933 in stores isn't actually that crazy. Historically, specific models have never really dipped below the $2400-$833 range anyway.

Honestly, I don't see any point in buying a new 24" IPS monitor with just a 60Hz or 75Hz refresh rate if you're replacing what you already have.

From what I can gather, you're really looking for something with a high refresh rate and potentially G-Sync support. If you take those two requirements off the table, there's absolutely no reason for you to upgrade your monitor.

Your middle ground would be those two options I linked earlier. Since they aren't TN panels, you get a VA panel instead—which offers better colors and viewing angles than a TN, though it won't quite hit the levels of an IPS. On the flip side, VA panels actually provide better blacks and contrast than IPS does. They don't feature G-Sync or FreeSync, but as we discussed, that shouldn't be an issue, and it keeps them significantly more affordable than those TN models equipped with G-Sync.

velvetskipper8 said:So, let's say you already have an Nvidia card sitting in your rig. If you were shopping for a new monitor right now, which would take priority for you: having an IPS panel for those better colors, or having sync capabilities to match a TN panel?
I honestly think we’re going to end up pulling the trigger on G-Sync, even if we have to stick with a TN panel. From what I can tell, Tim Cook's hardware actually offers much faster response times anyway.

Maybe something like this?
I’ve been looking into this monitor, and honestly, it’s a solid choice if you need something versatile for your workspace. It features a pivot function, which is a total game-changer if you’re someone who spends all day scrolling through long documents or coding—being able to flip that screen vertically makes a massive difference in productivity. It’s got a clean, professional look that fits right in at an office in Chicago or a home setup in Austin. If you're hunting for a reliable display that doesn't break the bank but still offers that essential ergonomic flexibility, this is definitely worth adding to your shortlist.

https://www.nabava.net/monitori__90/...-led__25385251

Check out the feature list for the BenQ XL2420G here: http://ap.benq.com/product/monitor/XL2420G/features/

The Nvidia 940m is simply not built for gaming at 1440p resolution. Trying to push that much detail is a losing battle, and frankly, having a high refresh rate monitor becomes completely pointless when the hardware can't actually hit those frame rates. You’re better off sticking to a standard 1080p setup on a 24" screen.

Brenda Walker75 said:Hey everyone, I just stumbled upon this thread, so I think I might have unnecessarily started a whole new one... moderators, please feel free to punish me! 🤦

Basically,
Any recommendations for a new monitor?

I’m currently working with an iMac 21.5 and a small MacBook Air, though I’ll be upgrading that Air to a larger model very soon. My work revolves around graphic design, which means I need reliable gear. To be honest, I am completely lost when it comes to the world of PCs; I have no idea what specific monitor specs I should actually be looking for to get the job done.
The size of my iMac is actually perfect for my workflow. I don't mind using the larger models, but honestly, a massive monitor just gives me a headache. 😛
I’m thinking about picking up an extra monitor just for when I visit my parents. Since I usually only travel with my MacBook Air, having a larger screen to plug into would be a lifesaver whenever I need to tackle some heavy-duty work.

Color accuracy is my top priority—I need colors that actually look like they do in real life. While a Mac usually handles this beautifully, I frequently run into PCs where the colors feel completely blown out or totally unrealistic. Is there a specific way to verify color fidelity within the technical specifications?

So, we're looking at a 24-inch monitor—1080p resolution, IPS panel. It’s that awkward middle ground where the screen size feels either slightly too large or just a bit too small depending on your desk setup. Given that there aren't any massive "best buy" deals out there right now, how much would you all be willing to shell out? What's your budget looking like for something like this?

True, but I wasn't actually recommending those upper-tier monitors because of AMD FreeSync—it was more about everything else, like getting away from those cheap TN panels for better color accuracy and hitting that 144Hz sweet spot. Unlike G-Sync, AMD FreeSync doesn't drive up the price tag, so it shouldn't be an issue for you. On the flip side, G-Sync requires a dedicated hardware module inside the monitor and extra design tweaks from the manufacturer, which is exactly why you see such a massive jump in cost.

Think of it as automatically syncing the game's frame rate with your monitor's refresh rate. The end result? You won't deal with screen tearing, micro-stuttering, or those annoying visual glitches. It works similarly to V-Sync—that setting you find in almost every game menu—which locks the FPS to a specific value to eliminate tearing.

If we weren't talking about G-Sync, these would be perfectly fine options.

https://www.newegg.com/p/gaming/119762?

https://www.amazon.com/s?k=ED273Awidpx

Only the high-end monitors actually feature G-Sync 😁

This one would be the most budget-friendly option. It boasts a 1ms response time, though that's more of a marketing gimmick than a real necessity, and it packs a 144Hz refresh rate, which is the gold standard for competitive gaming

Have you tried doing a completely clean uninstall and then reinstalling it from scratch?

BTW, what are your system specs (you can pull all that info using Speccy)? If you're running at least a dual-core processor with 2GB of RAM, it might actually be worth just installing Windows 10.

I was watching this video where they argue (Wendell and guys like him) that price hikes aren't being driven by individuals picking up 4, 5, or even 6 GPUs at a time, but rather by massive corporations snapping up batches of 1,000, 5,000, or even 15,000 units at once.

Well, that's just how their rules work.

Look, I'm telling you the prices aren't great; there's just a massive surplus right now. They've finally started hitting the market, so maybe things will balance out eventually.

Both of those integrated graphics options are actually going to be a bit stronger than an HD 7770.

You’re definitely going to want fast RAM paired with a dual-channel setup to get the most out of that integrated graphics; if you were running a dedicated card instead, you wouldn't need to worry about it nearly as much.

Looking at the PCE data, it’s clear there's a massive surge in people offloading everything from full mining rigs to individual GPUs. That said, prices haven't really stabilized yet. It'll likely take a few months before we see things actually return to a normal baseline.

Charles Campbell8 said:Hi there,

I’m looking for an ultrawide monitor with a 2560 x 1080 resolution. I'm leaning toward a 29" instead of a 34", mainly because the pixel density feels better at that size and it won't break the bank. My main uses will be gaming, office work (lots of PDFs and Excel spreadsheets), and general browsing. I might also need it for some SolidWorks work down the road. Since my budget is around $667, I'm torn between two Samsung models:

http://www.lg.com/hr/monitori/lg-29UM69G which is listed at Best Buy for about $667

and

http://www.lg.com/hr/monitori/lg-29WK600-W which I can only find on an obscure site for $627. I know buying from sites like that can be a gamble, especially if I ever need to file a warranty claim.

The second one is a newer model; it offers better brightness (300 cd/m² vs 250 cd/m²) and better colors thanks to HDR support. The only thing it lacks compared to the first one is motion blur reduction.

The one thing I'm unsure about regarding both models—is it possible to play games at 75 fps when Adaptive Sync is enabled? Can anyone help me with this or recommend which one to pick? Also, how noticeable is that motion blur reduction, or rather, the lack of it? I'm not a pro FPS player; I just play casually. I mostly plan on playing flight simulators like Microsoft Flight Simulator (if my hardware can handle it—I'm running an IdeaPad 3 with a Ryzen 7, GTX 1650 Max-Q, and 8 GB of RAM...).

Thanks,

You hit the nail on the head; that online shop is garbage. Dealing with returns or warranty issues could be a total nightmare or take forever.

Regarding motion blur reduction, it really comes down to whether you'd actually notice the difference. It’s often more of a gimmick, similar to what they discuss here: https://www.blurbusters.com/faq/lcd-...ive-artifacts/

As for your other question, yes, your FPS will lock at 75, provided your graphics card is actually capable of hitting those numbers. Just a heads up though—some users report that on these types of IPS monitors, the image can look a bit less sharp or slightly grainy at 75Hz.

What would a "lower price range" actually imply in this context?

Should I be budgeting for a monitor and other peripherals as well?

In my opinion, he doesn't even need those games click, click (standard stock)
He could actually grab a 2200G and save some extra cash; honestly, 4 cores versus 4 cores/8 threads won't make a lick of difference in titles like those. Plus, once you overclock that integrated Vega graphics on the 2200G, you see a pretty significant jump in performance

Then, down the road, if he decides to get serious about AAA gaming, he can just pick up a dedicated GPU. Once the market volatility settles down, he might even be able to snag something significantly beefier than a gtx 1050 Ti for the price of $500 today

Look, if I were you, I’d start by nuking Windows and doing a fresh install. It’s the best way to rule out any software glitches. Try to grab a version that’s already mostly updated so you aren't stuck waiting a lifetime for updates to download and hogging your CPU cycles.

As far as just swapping out your graphics card goes, honestly, that dual-core setup is going to bottleneck you in pretty much any demanding title released over the last year or two. Regarding Battlefield 4, the single-player campaign should run just fine— click—but multiplayer is a whole different beast that demands much more from your processor. Long-term, you're definitely going to need to upgrade that CPU. That said, in the short term, if you pick up a decent used GPU for maybe $400-$233, you could actually have a blast with plenty of great titles, especially single-player games or anything that isn't overly intensive.