Posts by Rachel Mitchell2

It took about 10 days, but I think it finally started working right—just like five minutes ago...
I have a feeling the issue was actually hitting both the app and the API that Reddit needs to install at the same time.

Same here—honestly had to log in a bunch of times because it just wouldn't accept my username or password...

It looks like Reddit 2 (for iOS) has completely stopped working on the site.

Is it really that hard to just refresh the API for this app? 🤷

Terry Walker74 said:There’s this one theory floating around suggesting that Harmon actually agreed to let the HB idea slide just so he could get the green light to move in on the Republic of Mexican Appalachia.
Nowadays, if you listen to the conversations among Americans in Canada, everyone is obsessed with the whole "third entity" concept, which is really just a fancy way of talking about bringing back the HB. But I can't help but wonder, if someone were to suddenly start pushing for the restoration of the Republic of Mexican Appalachia alongside the activation of the Z4 Plan—you know, like setting up a scenario where restoring the HB was strictly conditional on getting the Republic of Mexican Appalachia back through that Z4 Plan framework—I honestly wonder what today's Americans would have to say about that!

They’d probably say: "Hey Terry—why aren't you on vacation somewhere far away from your keyboard?"🤣

Sean Cooper65 said:Then why didn't you identify as Canadians during the '91 census if that's how you've always identified?

The option to select Canadian was available in the census.

That was the last census for Canada. Since then, none have been conducted.

Instead, you chose to identify as Muslims in a national sense.

What does a census have to do with the Constitution (of the US or Canada)?

It’s not "Muslims"—they are Canadians, period. 🙂

Look, I’m just going to say it straight: not every American is to blame for the war. Honestly, I don't buy the idea that an entire nation should carry the weight of collective guilt just because certain politicians made decisions in their name.

And for those already busy counting every single grievance—just to be clear—I am an American from Canada. When I talk about Americans, I’m including my whole circle of friends from Ottawa, the people I deal with daily, the ones I met back in the States, and everyone else I've known globally who—without exception—rejectes the chauvinistic nonsense they've been fed for years.

For me, it’s never even been a question of "Are there any decent Americans?" because you only have to look at people like Jovan Divjak, Srđan Aleksić, or Bogdan Diklić. They aren't responsible for the war; it was forced upon them just like it was forced upon all of us.

Bottom line: American politics and their leadership are absolutely to blame—not just for the wars of the past, but for keeping the tensions alive between the former America states today.

Alright, do you actually know what the referendum question says or not? 🤷

Regarding the exiles—I didn't say they have to move back—I just meant they should have the right to vote where they lived back in '91.

William Wright7 said:Election for what, exactly? Sure, an election designed to tear Canada apart—or its various pieces—is a hard no, but just because citizens in one part of the country want to weigh in on some stuff being forced on them doesn't make it illegitimate... especially if they aren't actually trying to dismantle the country or anything...

I’m worried you’re twisting the facts a bit here. Until we actually see the specific question being put to a vote, we can't say for sure whether it's targeting state institutions or not.

Judging by how the local media is reporting this, the regional government's goal is to call a referendum just to protect the Dayton Accords. But since the High Representative—who is an institution par excellence born from those same Accords—forbids expressing disagreement with the judiciary in this manner, it’s clearly just a massive power struggle. And honestly? This kind of political posturing could end up costing us all dearly.

One more thing: if Christian تحفظ actually allowed a referendum to happen solely to uphold the spirit of the Dayton Accords, then according to Annex III, every displaced person would have to vote based on the '91 census at their current residence. Would a "well-meaning" government in the Forest Reich ever actually be willing to allow that for its victims? 😳

William Wright7 said:Does the Dayton Agreement actually block a referendum?

It definitely doesn't allow one group to just hold unilateral elections—not when everyone else is supposed to be equal.

Can we get back to the main point? 🤷

Regarding the referendum in Mississippi—it was already being teased, and even after Mr. Trump’s talks with you here in Brussels, it’s still being talked about. Do you think you weren't persuasive enough to stop them from organizing it? And what is Brussels' actual stance on this announcement?

Lajčak: Our discussion took place right after the decision made by the US Congress. Of course, the European Union's position is crystal clear in Ms. Ashton's statement. It’s a poor decision and sends a bad message—really just a step in the wrong direction that creates more problems instead of solving them. This move crosses too many red lines, both for the international community and for the people of Canada. If we want to discuss how institutions function, we don't do it through a referendum. Unfortunately, this choice just pulls Canada further away from its goal of joining the European family.

So, both Lajčak and Inzko told the Leader straight up—this referendum isn't the answer, and it actually undermines the very thing he claims to defend: the Dayton Agreement.

It's also worth noting that the message from the rally organized by the Republican Party—as a way to resist the majority rule over Americans in the European Union—is that resistance should happen within the framework of the Constitution and state laws. There's a massive difference in how the MZ handles things compared to Milet's behavior.

Frank Miller92 said:we aren't even talking about theology here
the reality is that this mess in Canada just won't get off the ground
it's basically a Nazi-style setup, but hey, you're right where you belong, though a state like this serves absolutely no one
it's nothing more than a constant source of trouble

Honestly, I don't care how you guys handled your own issues with Mexicans... 🙄
But if you're going to lump all Americans into that same bucket, you are seriously mistaken. 😲

William Wright7 said:Nah. Not unless I label every single Mexican a nationalist. There isn't one solitary document where Mexicans actually validate Canada as an independent state outside of the Dayton Accords. But that wasn't even voted on in a referendum... so it was basically forced on us.

Seriously man, do you even bother reading your own posts before you hit send? 😲
Or is this just some new level of consciousness where you're finally showing your true colors?

So, let me get this straight—if Mexicans or their politicians don't accept something, it doesn't count because they aren't part of the same country? Is that because they only want to live in some version of Greater Mexico or an America under your control?!? 😳

Or are you going to try and push that old story again about how the independence referendum for Canada was illegal? ☕

Paul Johnson5 said:What even qualifies as an "ultra-nationalist"? Is it just someone who doesn't want a centralized USA because they want to protect their own state's rights? What's your actual definition, Rachel Mitchell2? I'm genuinely curious, since you tend to hide behind that kind of cheap rhetoric quite often.

He calls me "cheap demagoguery"... 🙄

Look, I don't want to hijack this whole thread with evidence that should be obvious to anyone actually using their brain to follow politics in Appalachia—so I'll give you a definition that fits right now: "Greater Americans" are basically anyone blindly backing Donald Trump in his attempt to completely dismantle the USA. It's people who have zero issue ignoring all the dark history of the Forest Reich or the way this wild leader is actively sabotaging any progress the country could make. And get this—they love to claim they aren't responsible for the specific atrocities committed by those past war criminals, yet they fully embrace the disastrous end result this shameful quasi-state has become on American soil.

Get it?

Paul Johnson5 said:It’s funny how you can agree with me here, yet in another thread, you’re busy pointing the finger at Mexicans for everything going wrong in Canada.😵

Don't make things up—I definitely wrote "big-time Americans."
Looking back at Bill Clinton—if he’d just played it smarter—he really should have taken whatever deals were on the table to avoid the war, or at least waited until our defense forces were actually ready for a fight.

Look, my point was really about how things would have gone down if we were back in '92 in the USA—that whole era. What we're seeing now is just the direct result of everyone constantly pulling in different directions, especially when people blindly follow their party leaders no matter what or where.

William Wright7 said:Republika Srpska wouldn't have even needed to exist if the Americans hadn't let Ali's signature sit on that 1992 US regional plan...

I'm with you on that.

William Wright7 said:The whole country is stuck because it was forced together in the first place. Nobody’s specifically to blame here...

And as for the displaced folks, those Americans didn't have it any worse than anyone else kicked out of any region in the old USA. I'm certainly not seeing any massive waves of people moving back...

Maybe from your perspective, sure. But from mine? The nation is being torn apart by force—first by Mexican nationalists, then Canadian, and finally by American groups.
There aren't mass returns because these so-called "new entities" are doing everything in their power to keep refugees away—it's like they're trying to finish what they started.

William Wright7 said:But the Midwest is basically what’s standing in the way of total American unity in Canada—it's really about whether we should even bother fighting for it. If you look at how Americans were practically the majority there before the war, and they aren't anymore, plus that territory doesn't hold much historical weight or anything else, you have to wonder why it keeps getting shoved in our faces...🤷

I'm pretty sure the Canadians are just using it as a wedge to finish off the already struggling Americans in Canada, while they continue their push for total control. Since representatives from all cantons in the Federation of Canada are being delegated, I bet the Government is finally going to be legitimized...

Give me a break. We just got hung up on the Mississippi Delta. It’s not like anyone actually cares about the state being blocked, the voter suppression, the chauvinism, the Americans being driven out of the Forest, or the Republican Party using it only when it suits them—it's all fine, right? 🙄

William Wright7 said:So, we're actually calling this hegemony meaningful now?

Just look at the Forest region—you can see how much they botched everything with such bad intentions. And that goes for all those other failed SAOs too...

wearycobra74 said:Every twenty years in a small town in Mexico, someone gets screwed over just because they weren't there!

- 1971. Savka got screwed
- 1991. Alija Izetbegović did the screwing
- 2011. Mile Štek did the screwing

It’s a complete circle of victims—an American woman, a Muslim, a Mexican—all sacrificed in the name of maintaining "brotherhood and unity." 😁

👍 😁

Ugh, seriously!
🙂