CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Amy Rogers6 › Posts

Posts by Amy Rogers6

102 posts shown.

Why was the COVID-19 thread locked on the politics sub? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Hey admins and mods, quick question. Why was the thread about COVID-19 locked under the politics category? Is it because some guy mentioned you guys are being funded by the government to moderate COVID threads? Isn't that just public info released by the Department of Health and Human Services?

Let's be real here—it's a public announcement. It clearly states you're getting a financial stimulus to "better" monitor topics related to the coronavirus... ☕

Anyway, here are my actual questions:

1. Is it against the rules to mention that Reddit received money from the government to moderate COVID-related threads, even though it’s an undisputed public fact?

2. Are we allowed to start a thread about this so users can share their thoughts on it?

I'm asking for clarification because it isn't right if someone—whether it's another user or maybe even me tomorrow—gets a strike just for being uninformed. If it's off-limits, just say so publicly so everyone knows the rules. At least that would be consistent with how things have been handled regarding what's allowed and what isn't... ☕

Thanks in advance.
Amy Rogers6
Wobbie etc. in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Morgan Peterson said:@Amy Rogers6, I got the reports.

But look, the whole point of moderating isn't for mods to play judge and jury on who’s right or wrong,
it's just to keep the discussion civilized—or as my late grandma would say, smooth.

I put it in the warning: keep the communication civil and stop throwing around accusations of being trolls or liars.
Also, if some part of a post gets under your skin, just skip it and move on to something else where you can actually tear their arguments apart (doesn't even have to be facts; rhetorical or logical hits work too) since that's just how this topic goes.
Your "truth" is someone else's lie and vice versa, but that doesn't mean we can't talk.

It'd be a waste to just delete everything and hand out bans because you've written long, interesting posts, so I'm just asking you to dial down the tension.

This isn't MY "truth"—these are official FACTS. That's the issue here: people trolling over stuff that isn't even up for debate, and then Woobie tries to spin it as my personal opinion... When I corrected the slip-up about the modified vaccine launching in 2018 instead of 2016, they used that tiny error to try and negate undeniable facts. And the facts are....

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and their team rolled out the new modified vaccine in 2016.

By 2017, his team already knew there could be issues due to field mutations using all three variants to find space—that space was found in the type 2 variant they dropped from the modified vaccine, but they kept pushing forward for the next 3 years regardless.

The WHO is publishing lies about defeating the field in Africa—it looks like that happened in the second half of 2019, not 2020 (which had already vanished in 2016 thanks to the Sabin-2 vaccine application), just so seven days later they could face total meltdown once the info leaked to independent media and even hit the mainstream stuff like the Guardian and others....

Then the WHO admits the mess and even suggests bringing back the Sabin-2 vaccine to fix the disaster—and that "disaster" translates to hundreds upon hundreds of children dying every year in dark corners of Africa....

And for this entire clusterfuck, nobody has been held accountable....

These are facts, not opinions—every single one is backed up by the numerous links I've posted from both independent and mainstream sources. At the end of the day, you can even find the damage control on the official WHO website; it's phrased as a statement saying, "Hey, it happened, now we're cooperating with health ministries in the affected countries to fix the mess."

https://www.who.int/csr/don/29-novem...can-region/en/

So when someone denies the connection between the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and this modified vaccine—which is indisputably their product—denies that they waited three years, and claims the entire scientific community is responsible for the oversight, that isn't a debate. It's straight-up trolling, and it should be sanctioned....!!!!!!!!
Wobbie etc. in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Alright, I’ve officially had it. This thread has turned into a total circus of trolling while we're out here trying to hunt down actual theories. Why the hell aren't you guys moderating this? It’s constant. The whole debate is about the polio vaccine—just look at the thread. You've got woobie constantly trolling, dodging key facts, or straight-up lying by claiming the vaccine can't be linked to the Gates Foundation. I’ve dropped all the links right there: who actually created the vaccine, the fallout, and even the WHO's own admission back in 2020 that this is true—that polio is resurfacing in Africa because of this specific vaccine after being totally wiped out by 2016.

I’m demanding an answer from the mods or the admins. Either I get banned, or woobie gets banned. Depending on what you choose, a lot of things are going to become very clear. It's either me or woobie, because one of us is definitely lying, trolling, and derailing the entire conversation. There’s no way we’re both right. So let's see how much you actually care about enforcing the rules that the rest of us are forced to follow....

Look, this is a private forum. You can push whatever agenda you want, but if you do, why even bother posting rules about how to discuss things here? Just be honest: tell us the rules only apply to us, while you guys just do whatever you want to suit your own agenda. That would be fair and transparent. Instead, I'm stuck here playing games like an idiot against a paid troll who won't shut up, and nobody does a damn thing. I know for a fact one of the moderators has read this thread....

Looking forward to your response.
Amy Rogers6
Wobbie etc. in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Dennis Hall41 said:I haven't received them from you—well, I think—but I'm pretty sure you'd hand them over (rightfully so) if I decided to crash the Corona side effects thread on the Corona subforum and start grilling Amy Rogers or whoever else about the Great Reset.

Alright, let's not fight about it.

Dennis Hall41, forget it. No one is touching the woo, and that has absolutely nothing to do with Chris Myers....☕
Wobbie etc. in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Chris Myers said:What if the turbulence is just getting started?
☕

Are you talking about your lot specifically? Or just generally? Over there, turbulence is basically a guarantee, but that’s mostly just your own internal mess. If that spills over globally—meaning if this economic meat grinder keeps grinding—then we're looking at pure anarchy. I doubt they're actually that stupid, though; those people are more sociopaths and psychopaths than anything else. They've already pushed things close enough to the edge. In two months, the whole thing will be teetering on the brink. It's going to get dangerous as hell, both for them and for us...☕

Total degenerates. They're losing their bearings and losing their grip on power—and by "they," I mean the corporate degenerates. There's major nerves at Davos because things are starting to stall out. We'll see, but I'm expecting them to retreat to their fallback positions soon and just keep simmering like they have been—slowly playing the game until the next "opportunity" rolls around...☕
Wobbie etc. in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Chris Myers said:All-powerful Biden is in charge and he’ll wrap this whole corona thing up by September at the latest.

Just hope he doesn't forget about it—you know, actually listening instead of all those conspiracy theorists! 😉

I know plenty about this stuff, some pretty interesting things too, but I can't say... 😁

I'm not really buying it, though.

Anyway, Capital One—the big one with the big K—they don't think things are getting better anytime before 2024 at least.

Certain sectors are gonna need a massive lifeline to bounce back, like the airlines (which you probably know more about than I do)—I'm betting they won't see the red turn to black until 2024. But our non-existent economy could snap back fast if this shit disappears quickly. Otherwise, if the crisis in hospitality, tourism, and services spills over into the rest of the US economy, there won't be anything left. Thankfully, like I said, their window of opportunity is closing. They're just patching up holes in an agenda that's already falling apart now. This can't last much longer; the risk of chaos and total anarchy grows every single day. Let them play their games, but I doubt they'll be able to pull their asses out of that absolute power seat once they find themselves standing on shaky ground like the rest of us.☕
Wobbie etc. in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Larry Walker24 said:this madness isn't happening before September 2022 (if you're being super optimistic)

It’s gonna crash this year, manchild—trust me...☕

The momentum is gone and the support is drying up. You can't pull this off without the people who finally decided to stop burying their heads in the sand...🕺
Wobbie etc. in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Chris Myers said:Amy Rogers6, care to define what "the truth" about COVID-19 actually looks like? 😉

I promise I’ll get to it, but once this madness dies down—maybe by late spring or sometime this summer when the world stops spinning for a second—I’m doing a deep dive. We’ll look at the 2016 *Fourth Industrial Revolution* book and then *The Great Reset* from 2020 (both by Klaus Schwab). After that, I’ll break down COVID-19, which was really just a tiny cog in the machine—or maybe the spark used to trigger a calculated economic crisis (especially considering the timing right before the US elections).... ☕

Since you guys in the USA are feeling the brunt of this more than anyone else, you'll probably be the most receptive to the analysis...😁
Wobbie etc. in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Chris Myers said:It's funny how both sides usually think we're being unfair to them while being way too soft on the other side.

Basically—wrong. There's been bans and penalties all around.

🤣🤣🤣 intermezzo, you're sweet, but we'll take the truth over you any day...☕
Controversial signature in Feedback & Suggestions ·
neonwalker95 said:After getting reported, he just made an even stupider

It’s funny how most people against Russia and/or Putin are basically just ******* and ******* 😉

heh, you actually managed to outsmart him—and stayed within the forum rules too...
😁
COVID-19: Bilderberg, Masons, and the Deep State in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Sam Alvarez4 said:basically, COVID was an experiment. 🤦

but shhh.
you aren't allowed to mention the Masons, Bilderberg, and all that.
instead of those guys, just use the term 'deep state'.

And that’s really everything you gathered from that and the other posts? Saying it was an "experiment" is just one possibility brought up in the discussion—honestly, you probably shouldn't have even read it, because this comment makes it look like you were banging your head against a wall instead of actually reading with some comprehension...

It's the same deal with your comments about beloved Macron—yeah, Sam Alvarez4, we all know what Macron said—we are at war! A sanitary war! (or however our people on the forums translated "at war with the virus")—your narrow perspective prevents you from seeing that the issue was specifically the terminology he used to describe something that should be treated like a natural disaster. Even announcing the military coming out onto the streets is totally inappropriate for the situation. That's the issue with Sam Alvarez4—maybe since you're French, you're used to seeing the military walking the streets and dealing with heavy-handed bans (thank God we've seen enough of that lately), maybe that feels normal or justified to you—but this is America, Sam Alvarez4. We aren't used to that, it isn't normal to us, and we don't intend to get used to Napoleon-style tactics...

Get it?

Or did you just feel personally attacked by my description of Macron being a little Napoleon? You shouldn't do that—that's not popular here either—we don't do idol worship, Sam Alvarez4. I'll say it again: this is America...

And yeah, Sam Alvarez4—the idea of the deep state acting through the virus was dismissed in the thread—because the core of Kissingerian population control doctrine isn't based on controlling a virus (since you can't control a virus) but on controlling food...

There was joking and fiction in the thread too, which is fine. That wouldn't ruin the topic. Plus, there was geopolitical terminology used that clearly still confuses you, making it hard for you to follow or understand certain posts.

Regardless, the thread was unfortunately killed. The moderator cleaning things up ended up shutting the whole thing down in the middle of the chaos—obviously, they didn't have the patience to let the topic evolve, nor do they have a basic grasp of the geopolitical vocabulary used in the PDF to shorten complex ideas. Also, the demand to track everything with links is ridiculous, because this kind of geopolitical analysis is inherently opposed to posting links—otherwise, it wouldn't be analyzing the unknown, it would just be posting established facts....

For instance, I don't agree with a colleague who wrote that the virus was used for population reduction (if I remember correctly, since the post was deleted), and I explained my disagreement to him. But mocking a colleague for veering into "alternative" territory is way too much, because the connotations of population control are undeniably present in all the synchronized measures being taken. In that context, mentioning the deep state is perfectly legitimate for discussing centers of power... just like asking for a link to such a claim is absurd. What was the colleague supposed to provide? A link to a Kissinger statement saying "whoever controls the food controls the people, and whoever controls the money controls the world"? Or quote Mackinder and his 1904 Heartland theory, which is basically official Anglo doctrine to this day?

Have you even read Mackinder? We told you to read it for a reason...☕

Let's tackle the geopolitical side of this thing with one specific question—just to see if we're talking actual geopolitics here or just diving down an alt-history rabbit hole.

So, Sam Alvarez4, do you think the whole setup where German troops dressed up in Polish uniforms to hit that border outpost back in 1939 was the real spark for the war, or is that just some conspiracy theory nonsense for the fringe crowds? ☕
The next global COVID-19 recession? in World ·
Kyle Nelson2 said:If we were living under the thumb of the Chinese instead of the Anglo-Saxons, I guess we’d all be walking on eggshells right now. We'd probably be watching every single word we typed on this forum, terrified that our social credit score would tank if we said something even slightly off. Maybe then we wouldn't even be able to pull off buying a train ticket or a flight.

First off, let me be clear: I view anyone pushing an agenda for this country—or anyone trying to wedge themselves into our business through some association—as a hostile force. To put it bluntly, I couldn't care less about the Americans, Russians, Chinese, Germans, or French. It’s obvious that in the global geopolitical game, a small nation like ours has to lean on someone to survive, but I can't wrap my head around this collaborator-style dependency on powers that give us nothing while taking everything. If I have to pick a side, I’m picking whoever tilts that balance back in our favor. That’s where the story starts and ends. Plus, there's this blatant servant mentality here, where people choose their "masters" based on an inferiority complex rather than actual national interest. Honestly, half these people don't even know what our real interests are...

We need to scrub that mindset out of everyone's heads and turn it into one single mantra: America First, always.☕
The next global COVID-19 recession? in World ·
Timothy Nelson5 said:🤦

The Petrodollar? Hmm... was that before or after the gold standard? 🤔 Probably after mercantilism... I guess...
😁
Anyway, it's just some historical term...

My suggestion? Maybe wake up to the 21st century and realize the USA is now the biggest producer and net exporter of oil and gas. Plus, the IT industry is basically the engine driving everything.
The whole Petrodollar concept is fifty years old, and nowadays, the only people still obsessing over it are those salon-dwelling blowhards spinning their little fantasies. It's as if certain cultural Marxist economic theorists—which is an oxymoron if you ask me—have elevated it to some kind of cult object, the ultimate scapegoat for all the world's problems. And now, they just can't cope, so they keep seeing this phantom threat in every nightmare.

If you look at how the economy and the global financial system have shifted since it was created, the petrodollar actually covers way more than just "petro." Half of all trade transactions and two-thirds of all global securities are denominated in dollars, making it the absolute backbone of modern currency—but let's be real, it's being eroded. China is offering its own currency as an alternative, and we're seeing a massive trend of countries trading in their own local currencies instead. If dollar volume drops significantly, people are going to start asking what's actually backing those dollars, and that's where the USA runs into huge trouble. Look at the gutted manufacturing base compared to the 60s, the massive infrastructure decay, and the elephant in the room: the US national debt, which has blown past every limit and gone straight to the moon (I stopped tracking the exact number, but it's somewhere north of $34 trillion). That should be enough problems for one conversation...

So, I wasn't even going to mention oil and gas. Maybe I should have just said "the dollar," but "petrodollar" is still the go-to phrase in geopolitical circles and carries enough nuance that I wasn't wrong—even if you didn't catch my drift. Geopolitics is a discipline that goes way beyond the rambling of liberal salons. The petrodollar transcends your narrow view, and honestly, don't limit yourself like that; it makes you look like a quasi-Marxist, whether you mean to or not... or do you?.....

By the way, just so you know who you're talking to: by definition, I'm a salon-style American nationalist and conservative. Just thought I'd give you a heads-up so you can skip the whole "Red Scare" lecture with me.....

Given the geopolitical reasons I mentioned earlier and the current state of the petrodollar, it's obvious the Anglo-American establishment is going to trigger a crisis as a response. It’s the only logical move. They still control global finance, and through that, they can throw the heaviest punches at their rivals—they did it plenty of times during the 20th century, like during the Great Depression era, to hit their targets or hold their ground. But doing it today will be harder than ever, and I'm not even sure they'll pull off their long-term goals. In fact, I think once the initial shock wears off, total Anglo dominance will become a thing of the past, ushering in a true multipolar era. Just look at how much gold China, Russia, and everyone else have been hoarding over the last 15 years—everyone is just waiting for this move to happen.
The next global COVID-19 recession? in World ·
fadedtinker36 said:The media is getting louder by the day about a looming global economic meltdown during the COVID-19 recession.

Everyone remembers how the 2008 crash absolutely decimated global balance sheets.

Now, they’re claiming the COVID-19 recession will hit even harder.

Even the water levels at Lake Mead suggest the same thing, pointing toward an inevitable collapse.

Do you actually buy any of this?
Is a global crisis actually coming, or is it just noise?

Total Trojan Horse move here—crises don't just "happen," they’re manufactured. They’re one of the most powerful geopolitical levers used to grab power and exert control. So, to answer your question: yeah, crises are coming. The driver? Defending the Petrodollar, which is getting seriously eroded along with Anglo-Saxon dominance. Honestly, the Anglo-Saxons need to trigger an economic crisis ASAP; they still hold all the cards when it comes to controlling global money flows, and since things are going south for them on the front lines (basically, they're in total shambles), they’ll pivot to their last resort—a tactic they’ve perfected many times before. If that doesn't work, get ready for a major conflict—something way more intense than the typical proxy wars we've seen over the last 25 years.

Bottom line: the geopolitical landscape makes a crisis inevitable. But whether it hits in a year or three, or which country gets hit first and how they pull the trigger, is anyone's guess right now. You’d have to be sitting at the high table to know for sure... 😁My personal speculative bet? The crisis kicks off within 12 months of Brexit being finalized...☕

Basically, once you see some random commodity price like copper tanking in some obscure market, you'll know the wheels are officially in motion...☕
Turkey - TR in World ·
mistywalker16 said:The NATO ring is tightening—and it looks like they might actually kick Turkey out:
First it was Germany, now France has also banned arms exports to Turkey

Tightening? Give me a break. At this rate, poor Turkey is gonna get squeezed right in half....☕
Turkey - TR in World ·
Emily Fox2 said:So, it looks like Germany and France have decided to sell weapons to Turkey at a slightly higher markup. 🤣

Right, because those pathetic Turks don't have any weapons or an army, so they desperately need supplies... 😁—I can always ask which crate of ammo they're using in Idlib if things get hairy... 😁
Turkey - TR in World ·
Hey, anyone got an update on the Sultan? Did Istanbul hit him hard? It’s been pretty quiet on that front lately...

Someone get Amy Rogers6 back in here to break this down—honestly, he's the only one crazy enough to waste his free time obsessing over this kind of stuff...☕
Turkey - TR in World ·
Chloe Nguyen21 said:I mean, you can tell how much those Chinese radars actually matter by the fact that the USAF flies through Iran without ever getting picked up by those supposed wonders of Chinese or Russian tech. Besides, maybe you could enlighten us... where exactly is the US going to screw up?
And yeah, while we're at it, explain this whole partnership with Russia where Turkish proxies are fighting against Russians and the Assad regime in Syria? I guess Erdogan is playing some weird game that nobody really gets—probably even him.

They’ll screw up if they force Turkey out of NATO—if you can't wrap your head around that, grab a map and take a good, long look at the world...

It doesn't matter how good the Chinese radar is—all the Turks care about is replacing their manufacturing and finding someone to foot the bill...

Of course the Sultan is playing games in Syria—that’s been obvious for ages. That’s why we say he’s a player who basically spits in everyone's face... ☕
Turkey - TR in World ·
Chloe Nguyen21 said:Oh yeah, super easy. I mean, they'll probably start cranking out parts for the F-22 Raptor by tomorrow morning at this rate. 😁 I guess the Russians and the Chinese are just dying to share all their top-secret tech with a certain unreliable leader whose economy is basically sliding toward a total meltdown. Honestly, Americans don't even need to lift a finger. The Turks will probably handle Erdogan themselves... the flag is getting pretty close.☕

Why would you even think we need an F-22 Raptor? We can bridge that gap with other tech. For example, the Chinese love building radars in Tehran...

It’s pretty much this: either Americans take down Erdogan through the elections and all those scandals, or they're going to get absolutely rolled. That's how the cards are sitting right now.☕
Turkey - TR in World ·
Chloe Nguyen21 said:Yeah, I guess it’s pretty likely those engineers and high-end technicians will pivot to manufacturing famous Turkish goods pretty fast... you know, peanuts, sunflower seeds, pistachios... though I suppose the real peak would be moving into baklava production.☕

Look, you’re totally overshooting it here. Sure, Turkey isn't exactly Germany when it comes to high-end engineering and tech, but you're exaggerating big time. If China, Russia, or anyone else gives them the green light to develop new tech in those plants, they'll bridge that gap in no time. Knowing Erdogan's political track record, you can bet your ass he’s already dangling some bait in front of potential future partners. The guy's a damn judo master—not that I like him, far from it—but you have to admit, he’s a hell of a player.

I think the safest bet for the US is just taking out the Sultan. Things are sliding downhill fast for them—I’d wager they try something within the next year. Only this time, a coup won't work; they’ve bled too much strength over the long haul to pull that off. They'll have to play the opposition card and lean heavily on Erdogan's blatant corruption.☕