Posts by Amy Rogers6

I can't get anything to show up in my signature—can someone please fix this? ☕

Mark Cruz15 said:Yeah.

You couldn't have even if you tried—they haven't even put me in the history textbooks yet. Still, glad to hear you actually finished school; hopefully you’re actually absorbing this stuff instead of just memorizing it for a test.

I aim to please. #nohomo

🤣🤣🤣 thanks for the reply, Einstein—let me let you in on a little secret: you aren't the first one I've run into, I've met plenty of 'em...☕

Mark Cruz15 said:When it comes to what's going on in the world right now, I’m not just talking about people who have some common-sense concerns regarding those COVID-19 vaccines. [Link].
I don't hang out on the COVID-19 Forum that much, but I’ve noticed a ton of anti-vax zealots running wild. They’re either totally unhinged or just exhausting crusaders, and honestly? They’re doing massive damage to people who actually have legitimate fears and real questions. Look, don't get mad at me if I call you a total anti-vax nut—blame the people making you look like one.
Like I said, I’ve been tracking anti-vaxxers long before this pandemic hit, and let me tell you: they’re nothing but pests. They’re dangerous to everyone around them just by spreading panic and misinformation. Some people—if you can even call them that—have no clue that someone actually reads their idiocy, and that kind of nonsense literally kills people. Others? Yeah, they know exactly what they're doing.

So you’re telling me your opinion is the gold standard for common sense? Must’ve missed that lesson in school—probably skipped class that day. Glad you decided to grace us with your wisdom now, though. I definitely need to catch up on the curriculum.

Man, that was deep. I don't think I've ever read anything more eye-opening in my entire life...☕

coppersailor28 said:Fine, you see rule-breaking where I see logic.

I distinguish between

a user account used as an 'administrative tool'
(where multiple authorized staff members log into one single account)

and

a personal user account
(one person using the account for discussion, moderation, or admin tasks),

which is a completely different matter.

Yeah, I get it now. You’re basically calling rule-breaking "administrative adjustments." If you're gonna do that, just put it in the actual rules so people know what kind of minefield they're walking into when they join Reddit. Right now, it feels like a total scam—everyone signs up under one set of rules, only to find out there's a whole different set of "admin tools" used to screw them over in practice.

Now we just have to see if this actually holds up legally...☕

coppersailor28 said:It’s on the
FIRST page,
SEVENTH post,
right in YOUR thread:

If that clone is also posting under their original handle, they're breaking the rules—get it? It’s clearly stated in the forum guidelines—hang on, let me jump over there, grab a quote, and show you...☕

Here——look at rule 9. Actually, now that I'm looking closer, using clones isn't even allowed at all, is it?

Plus, I don't see anything saying moderators can just ignore the forum rules. Care to enlighten me?

coppersailor28 said:The core of your posts is simple: you just refuse to accept it. Loud and clear. The answers are there. Or maybe you just don't understand them—but honestly, that’s becoming your problem alone.

Regarding that nickname. Don't use it. Exclusively.It’s always the same person.It’s been explained.
Whether anyone actually buys that explanation or not is irrelevant. It's all the same thing.
Personally, I find that explanation acceptable. Logical. Rational. As for what constitutes an "operative" on any given forum...

So, anyone can just "show up" under a pseudonym. (WATCH OUT!)
In the case of that exact username, An administrative tool. (i.e., in the form of) korisničkog imena @bluelynx52)
...Sure. It’s been approved. Access to that. (Again, Watch out.)In the case of that specific username, An administrative tool..

Where exactly does it say that, and since when? Look, smart guy, I don't care about what makes sense to you personally. I want to see the actual rules or some legal basis explaining why this doesn't apply to the forum owner. And yeah, I want an explanation on whether they’re actually required to notify users via the written rules upon joining the forum... Is that clear enough for you?

Morgan Peterson said:Oh. I see. Is it just me, or does it ring a bell that the date was actually September 11, 2021, rather than November 9? But then again, I can't be too sure when I'm constantly tripping over the difference between American and European date formats. :barbie:
Still, surely we aren't going to start playing fast and loose with dates, as if we were Jehovah's Witnesses obsessed with the apocalypse?
No... certainly not. 🙂

First off, regarding the Israeli lawsuits at the ICC against apartheid in Israel—there are a ton of cases starting up or about to kick off, I can't even keep track anymore. For instance, I don't know if the one against Fauci has officially started yet, but if it hasn't, it will soon... (Reiner Fuellmich filed the suit back in July, but it doesn't actually start until November 9th—but hey, it's finally confirmed).

On the other hand, the Indian lawsuit against the WHO over Ivermectin has already launched, and that’s gonna be wild. If they get convicted, we're talking life in prison or even the death penalty...☕

Anyway, is the goal here just to troll the thread so coppersailor28 won't answer my questions?

bluelynx52 said:Why would anyone think I need defending? 🤔

As an unbiased observer, I’m just looking at who actually contributed here. There are more of you than there is Casey Bennett. And that’s not even counting the guy who asked me the same question four times—asking why his own ego got deleted. 🙂 Like Casey Bennett would say: "Start your own thread, what are you doing crashing our party?" 🙂

You guys are being way too serious and repetitive. This whole thing was settled on page one. If someone's playing dumb (hopefully they aren't actually dumb), then they're just looking for a laugh. Which is clearly what this thread is for.

Here's a little secret: COVID is over.

(For those who took the shot. Bu-h!)

No, the topic wasn't finished on page one—it was wrapped up in this specific post on page three or four—

The crux of the issue is that you're showing up as a clone on a thread where you already posted under your original handle, which flies in the face of the rules you personally wrote... and that's a technical issue for which Casey Bennett offered an answer—but since I didn't hear that answer from you, I'll repeat the questions:

Is it true that as the owner, you can just do whatever you want, breaking every single rule you established that we all joined this forum to follow?

Do you consider this a scam against the people who signed up for this forum—especially since nobody was given any notice about the rules changing?

Do you think this is even legally valid?

Nicholas Watson said:Hey, Amy Rogers6, while we're all just sitting around waiting for October 27th, did you happen to get an update on what's actually happening with that legal case over in New Jersey? Like, has the trial even kicked off yet?

The trial in Germany starts on September 11, 2021.

Casey Bennett said:Interesting. Has anyone actually informed the French about this new vaccination ban? 😁
Then again, who wouldn't want to be in those shoes? You seem to have lost yourself in a bit of a fever dream.

Just so you know, there are over 300,000 medical professionals in France right now refusing to vaccinate people—and they’re facing the axe any day now. I’d love to see if Macron actually follows through on those firing threats. Like I said before, the clock starts ticking on October 21st. This isn't some made-up story either; Carl Albert is leading the lawsuit, and he’s a top-tier attorney, not some amateur. If I were you, I wouldn't be mocking this. The whole agenda is going to fall apart by summer due to basic reality, and then the fallout begins: politicians, the media... ring the bell.

Hallucinations? Please. That’s definitely not my problem... so I think I'll just leave that one alone.☕

Don't sweat it. It’s probably just all in my head anyway. Might as well sing while we still can.

What a blast—honestly feels just like 1945 Berlin. Between the heavy-handed censorship and you guys self-censoring until your brains turned to mush, you haven't the slightest clue what’s actually happening globally. https://staronormalno.com/u-francusk...kolovoza-2021/ In France, they’ve got court-ordered vaccine freezes happening right now, and the trial kicks off on October 21st, led by Charles Albert Bruce...

Meanwhile, over in Germany, the lawsuit filed back in July by Reiner Fuellmich is finally moving forward. It starts November 9th, 2021. The target? PCR testing. Once that falls, everything else follows suit... I wouldn't want to be in your shoes when it all hits home here in the States, and trust me, the media platforms are going to get their comeuppance too....

But hey, clearly you don't give a damn. 😁 You're out there dancing like Eva Braun in a bunker scene from *Downfall*—it's honestly impressive how clueless you are. Are you really that incapable? We'll talk again late spring or early summer—I'm dying to see how you're all breathing then. My guess? Through a straw. We'll see.....☕

Goebbels was definitely a weird one.....☕

But seriously, do you actually have something useful to say about the rule violations, or did you just drop by to grace us with your profound wisdom?

Casey Bennett said:Yeah. We are completely and utterly divided. 😬

Just keep going, you're doing fantastic....😁

Casey Bennett said:@Amy Rogers6 about our dear Milica. It’ll get better, believe me. 🙂

I know.....☕

Casey Bennett said:I scrolled back through the thread for a bit and noticed Amy Rogers6 is back at it again, obsessing over reading private messages and all that nonsense.
So, this is exactly what I was talking about. Just plug your ears and shout your own truth. Even sash told you guys right there that those messages aren't even readable—you absolute morons.
It’s pointless; jellyfish have more proven brainpower than people whose minds have been completely fried by conspiracy theories.

What "nonsense" is Amy Rogers6 mentioning? — Are you even capable of quoting someone properly? Maybe try using the quote button? You were just claiming the forum owner can do whatever he wants and break any rule because "he owns the place," right? And now what? Another pathetic attempt at damage control? You really think any regular users are actually buying this? 🤣 🤣 🤣You guys have completely lost touch with reality. Dropping jokes like you're sitting around some tiny little social club? As if nobody’s reading this, as if you aren't being watched—you look like Berlin in 1945. That's exactly how this is going to end...☕

Casey Bennett said:Amy Rogers6, I honestly don't know how else to say this to you without being gentle, especially considering the sentiment I currently hold toward you. I truly believe you aren't to blame for your situation, so just take things slow regarding your needs; I actually feel bad for the bluntness I likely showed you earlier.

Let me lay it out clearly so there's no more confusion:
The forum owner doesn't owe anyone an explanation about whether they have clones, which ones they are, or why they're using them—besides the fact that a massive amount of users here run heaps of clones without facing any repercussions whatsoever.
And as for whether that moderator is actually Anderlon? Maybe they are, maybe they aren't. I don't know, and frankly, I don't care. It shouldn't be anyone else's concern either.

Regarding the bold part—thanks for the reply, truly—even if it was pretty blunt. Message received: the owner can do whatever they want, break every single rule in the book, run clones, throw insults, read private messages... the picture is crystal clear.

It’s just as obvious that moderators can basically do whatever they please, as long as they have the owner's blessing. Actually, maybe they don't even need permission for trolling, insulting people, or using alts; maybe they only need the green light for the big stuff, like snooping through DMs or leaking personal info.

There’s just one tiny issue—when users joined this site, they were presented with the rules. Everything allowed and forbidden was laid out clearly. They agreed to those terms when they signed up, even if they didn't bother reading them. But nowhere in those rules does it mention what you just told me. That means users had no way of knowing this, nor were they notified that the rules had changed. Essentially, they've been played.

Thanks again for the answer—I got exactly what I was looking for. As far as I'm concerned, you can close this thread now.

Later,
Amy Rogers6...☕

Casey Bennett said:The topic is... let me check the title... the tyranny of the new moderator bluelynx52>

And yet, we are all still sitting here, impatiently waiting for an explanation regarding this unprecedented reign of terror. 🥱

still waiting on a reply—if you're bothered by the complaint title, feel free to change it—

here's a suggestion: The Reddit owner is violating the site rules that regular users get slapped with massive, harsh penalties for!

waiting for an answer....☕

Casey Bennett said:Amy Rogers6

Look, you’re more than welcome to join in, but please—keep it brief. I'm asking for new content only if possible. Thanks! 🙂

Here’s the short version:

The whole point of the complaint is that the owner is breaking one of the main Reddit rules—you aren't allowed to post on the same thread or sub using both your main account and a clone at the same time!!!!! If regular users do this, they get a permanent ban on the clone and a suspension on the main account. If they do it again? It's straight-up permanent, permanent...

I don't have the power to decide who moderates what, and I've got nothing against coppersailor28 moderating the COVID sub under their own handle—honestly, I think that's a great idea.

If the "new normal" means moderators can just do whatever they want and ignore the strictest rules on the site, then we should probably just update the rules so everyone knows what this "new normal" actually looks like.

There, kept it short.

Casey Bennett said:I see Amy Rogers6 is back at it again, trying to explain everything in such sweeping, grand terms. Honestly, I’m just not in the mood. There is nothing more tedious than wading through endless walls of text when you have no idea what the actual point is going to be.
driftingtinker, give me the short version.

come on driftingtinker, summarize it for her...😁

Casey Bennett said:Do I seriously have to draw you a map to explain that you shouldn't care who the mod is? It doesn't affect you, and it certainly isn't your job. As a user, you just need to follow the rules of the Reddit community; anything else is none of your damn business.
Is that clear enough for you?

Look, let me explain this one last time—because it clearly hasn't sunk in yet, so I might as well just draw you a diagram:

First off—the way you just went after one of the moderators isn't exactly "professional." It’s giving more "angry guy at a dive bar" than actual moderator vibes. Not a crime, obviously, just an observation.

Second thing—and this is the big one for you—you jumped right into the middle of an argument between me and Anderlon, using my own quote against me like... She completely missed the point of the discussion. To be more precise—Anderlon basically told me to my face that I’m not nearly as smart as I think I am. So, I gave him a taste of his own medicine by explaining that the situation is actually the exact opposite: I let him know, in a much more subtle way, that he isn't quite as brilliant as he imagines himself to be. Hopefully, that exchange of verbal jabs makes sense to you now.

What's even the problem here? It’s your trolling. Sidestepping the actual discussion just to hype up other irrelevant nonsense is textbook trolling according to the Reddit rules. Honestly, you should probably go read them—I definitely did, mostly because I was forced to after getting hit with a few warnings myself. Usually, that kind of thing gets you docked 25, 35, or 45 points, depending on which moderator you run into and how long you decide to be a nuisance...

Look, the real issue here is that you’re acting like a moderator but breaking the rules and trolling instead. Then, when you finally lose your cool because you don't want to answer a direct question, you just pivot and dodge the topic with those lame sentences.

Quote : Modesty b Do I really need to draw you a map to show you that you shouldn't give a damn who that mod is? It’s got nothing to do with you, and it's definitely not your business. As a user on this Reddit, just stick to the rules and mind your own business. Everything else is none of your concern.

I don't even know what that looks like, and honestly, I won't get too deep into it—but let me tell you one thing: Reddit is a business. These forums have owners, and usually, when there isn't any political drama going on, they live off clicks and ad revenue. They aren't making money by insulting users or preaching about "watching your mouth" and following rules that the moderators themselves break. That’s how they pay their salaries, too. You know that, right?

Everything you wrote, plus the whole reason why this is just pure trolling, can basically be boiled down to the core of this debate—and here it is:

Why is the forum owner breaking one of his own damn rules? You aren't allowed to post from your main account and a clone on the same thread. Usually, that’s an automatic death sentence—the clone gets a permanent ban, and the original account gets banned too. If you keep trying it, even the original account is headed for a permaban. Do you get the problem here? Pretty sure I just drew you a map. I'm certain everyone else sees it too—the users, the other mods, and yeah, even the owner himself.

Look, I don't have any say in who moderates a thread, and I definitely don't have any influence over how they handle things. I'm not even talking about that. I'm asking why one of the fundamental rules of this Reddit is being broken—and what exactly the goal is behind breaking it.

So, does this mean the owner and the mods can just do whatever they want while the regular users have to watch every single word? Are these the new rules of the game? Is this the "new normal"? Because if it is, it’d be pretty classy to actually write that down in the rules so anyone joining the Reddit knows exactly how the game is played...

P.S. Just like I don't have any say in who gets picked as a moderator, I honestly don't care if Anderlon handles the COVID subforum—actually, quite the opposite. I totally get it. This topic is heavy, times are incredibly intense right now, things are basically at a breaking point, and it only makes sense for the forum owner to roll up his sleeves and jump into moderation himself. Using his own handle to punish people on the forum whenever he decides they’re saying something he doesn't like? Honestly, wouldn't that be just great and totally fair!!!!!