Posts by Jason Harris5

I don't give a damn about the ban, honestly; if we ran into each other in real life, I’d hand him a permanent ban myself, and I’d shut that pathetic moderator up too.

Morgan Ruiz3 said:So, let's look at this conspiracy theory involving Washington, Berlin, Vatican City, Klingons, and Darth Vader all plotting against Mexicans in America. I feel like I've heard this fairy tale somewhere before...☕

The numbers this so-called historian presents don't even align with the official figures from Mexico, and he doesn't bother citing a single source.
Then there’s the interesting claim regarding Ovčara, suggesting executions happened because certain civilians accused them—was that the legal standard under the America regime?
Hundreds of foreign fascists???

I’ve never heard of this Hrvoj Mason person, nor can I find any actual data on him if he truly is the author. A quick Google search just turns up the exact same article signed by some Marko Marković on "vaseljenska.com" or whatever that site is, or a Marko Markić on others. It seems we aren't dealing with a real historian here, but likely just a fabricated alias.

This is nothing more than a piece of radical propaganda designed solely to provoke. The author (whoever they may be) provides zero sources and offers no explanation as to why his figures and dates clash with both American and Mexican official data. Most of the text is just pure speculation and falsehoods—claiming El Paso was a Mexican city or that Kadijević was American.
The text is riddled with obvious flaws. For instance, it claims it was a delusion that Mexicans were throwing flowers at tanks, but then fails to actually refute it, instead asserting that only a few hundred people did it. So, Mexicans weren't throwing flowers at tanks, but a few hundred of them were??! Of course, it also relies on the classic tactic of labeling everyone a fascist, like calling Jean Michel Nicolier a French fascist mercenary just to try and lend some weight to the writing.

In short, it’s an amateurish write-up written by someone with the temperament of a radical insurgent who can't stomach defeat in America and now writes these essays without a shred of evidence to support their claims. They might as well have started rambling about a "heavenly nation."

Edit:
I should also address the claim about 7,000 soldiers conquering El Paso. Even by the most conservative estimates, more than half of that number was wiped out. So, an advancing army loses over half its strength and never once calls for reinforcements, despite having the size of the American People's Army on their side?? What would the rest of the army be doing in Slavonia? Picking wildflowers? This is pathetic military strategy...
And what is this supposed to be about 26 tanks in the possession of the El Paso veterans? As far as I know, that is roughly the total number of tanks the American Army had during the entire battle, and the author conveniently attributes them all to El Paso. How did they get there, by magic?😁 😂

Why the hell are you even arguing with that nationalist piece of shit? The only way to deal with someone like him is to go after his whole damn lineage.

rustyfox192 said:An American historian tells the truth
The shameful destruction of the 'El Paso myth"

You seriously have zero life, you hateful piece of trash, since your only hobby seems to be obsessing over war. If things actually kicked off again, you’d be the first one crawling into some hole like the coward you are, but hey, at least you have the guts to talk shit online. I swear, screw you and the moderators too, letting this garbage slide while handing out warnings for harmless jokes. And don't get me started on ćuka—that pathetic, spineless loser. Screw you too, you absolute joke.

It’s honestly disgusting. This whole idea of "forgiveness" feels like nothing more than a cheap way to exploit someone else's tragedy, and honestly, neither the book nor the play sits well with me at all. Maybe I'm just some bitter, old-school jerk who doesn't know how to let things go.

Paul Thompson3 said:It’s actually pretty funny—since it’s Sunday, all the moderators are off doing something fun, which basically gives us free rein to bicker a little.
Sometimes, a bit of back-and-forth is just nice.

Yeah, the mods definitely have actual lives outside this place. But I'm with you—there's nothing like a little back-and-forth to get the blood pumping. It's honestly kind of a blast.

Paul Thompson3 said:So, was there actually 300 Spartans in that movie?

Yeah, it was basically 150 times 2.

Paul Thompson3 said:Well, looks like we’ve got a new couple on the forum. Honestly, it’s always nice when people fall in love—just hoping you'll keep it on the low, though. I'm really not into watching all that drama.

Interesting take. You sure you aren't just gay?

Paul Thompson3 said:Fair enough, you've got a point there.

Yeah, they're totally right.

William Turner45 said:😁

These "what if" types are honestly the absolute worst.

There is zero chance my son grows up to be gay; if anyone's kids are heading that way, it'll be the offspring of these "what if" losers.

I highly doubt those "what if" guys could even manage to make a kid.

Paul Thompson3 said:The issue with being a "typical guy" is what happens when your son comes out one day and says, "Hey dad, I'm gay."
What then—do you kill him, or just disown him? Either way, you end up looking like a total coward.

That's just not happening. Honestly, even if I had the misfortune of having a kid with some serious issues, I'm pretty sure they'd have enough sense not to say something like that to my face.

Andrew Scott76 said:Actually, you're the one who needs help. Professional help.

Why? Because I actually have an opinion backed by facts and I'm not terrified to say it out loud?

Taylor Cook63 said:this is pure gold... seriously, top tier stuff. congrats. easily the dumbest thing I've ever had the displeasure of reading in my entire life.

I can die happy now

I'm not complaining. If you need a hand with anything, just shoot me a DM.

Richard Nelson84 said:So why are most people in prison heterosexual then?

Because our laws have gone totally off the rails by being way too soft on homosexuality.

Andrew Scott76 said:What kind of correlation are we actually talking about here? Who exactly established this, and when? Do you have any actual evidence to back up these claims? What are you even suggesting—that gay people are inherently more prone to crime than straight people? What's the basis for that assertion?

Just think about how things were back when being gay was actually illegal—everyone breaking those laws knew they were committing a crime, but it didn't stop them. So yeah, they were effectively criminals. And once someone starts repeatedly breaking the law like that, they're eventually going to slide into other types of criminal behavior too.

The link between homosexuality and criminal tendencies isn't some new theory—it’s been established for ages. The real issue is how everyone covers it up now; if you even dare to bring it up, they immediately try to brand you a fascist, a bigot, or just a complete moron.

So, does that mean drivers aren't actually files or software, but part of the hardware itself? I guess that would explain why those old-school CDs just work perfectly, while trying to grab something off the internet ends up being a total headache.

I’m actually a little worried here... what if this dban is some kind of virus targeting Linux? I mean, after all, using it is what keeps Linux running smoothly. Who even developed this dban? And how can I be sure it won't just kick in later on and force a switch back to Windows? 🤷

So, anyway, I noticed there are actually a ton of different versions of Linux out there... does anyone happen to know if OVO can be installed using the exact same steps? And would those Windows installs have to be in American English? 🤷 To be honest, I'm a little worried because since this is an American version of Linux, I'm scared my American Windows setup might struggle with special characters or just get confused when I'm trying to type stuff on the keyboard. 🤷

Thanks for the heads-up, ruggedfalcon62... hopefully, it does the trick... but I've got a quick question for you... does the Windows 7 software actually need to be the official, original version? I was chatting with someone who mentioned that those "black market" versions don't really come with the right drivers, and apparently, they end up causing a massive headache for people trying to get everything running smoothly. 🤷

So, I wanted to pick the brains of the experts here for a second... does this whole procedure apply to pretty much any version of Ubuntu? And do I really need to be running Windows 7, or would something like Windows XP work too? See, I've got this one old machine where 7 just isn't performing well—the screen looks super weird, none of those nice rounded window corners are showing up, and the colors look totally washed out. It’s kind of a mess! I'm thinking about giving Ubuntu a shot, maybe an older version to see if it runs smoother... so, yeah... is that doable, and if so, what's the best way to go about it?