crimsongull20 said:Publicly sharing the contents of private messages is rude regardless of the circumstances, and frankly, it isn't allowed here.
I hear you, but then how are we supposed to categorize these claims where my workplace is being explicitly and indirectly called out—even though I haven't mentioned it publicly anywhere recently?
The claim:
"What’s the reason behind this dirty insinuation and setup? Trying to discredit the competition?!
Since I've spent most of my life struggling with sinus issues and have seen plenty of ENT specialists before him, I can use that experience to judge the difference in approach, specifically regarding his treatment compared to others who didn't even bother with proper diagnostics, let alone actual care—including the folks over at the Vineyard, where the peak of their therapy was just some nasal drops, though they did try with the diagnosis. I hope things are better there today."
Since questions about privacy are being directed at me regarding data shared via PM—which clearly and indirectly implies an affiliation and a defense—I’m asking for a public response. I also want to point out that while I could unofficially write glowing tributes to my recently mentioned colleague, I won't, because that would be unethical, even though from my perspective, I could describe his work much more effectively through direct observation of his procedures.
Secondly, labeling an entire institution without naming the specific doctor, while simultaneously glorifying another by using their full name, is highly questionable. This isn't just about what jumps to mind first; it's about the much more important issue of personal accountability for medical decisions. To put it bluntly: there is a massive difference between being treated by a resident and being treated by a seasoned expert. None of the unconscious actors in this story need this kind of forum drama, which is why I felt the need to step in.