bluecyclist64 said:And what about your attempt to smear Jews and egg others on to sanction them? Not to mention how your own crowd effectively banned them—or rather, permabanned them—during the thirties and forties?
Man, what "smearing Jews"? We’re talking about banking cartels, powerful Zionist lobbies, and organized crime syndicates. We're talking about the people at the absolute top who have basically seized control of government positions, tech giants, Big Pharma, and the massive mainstream media outlets. And all of them, wouldn't you know it, are pushing this whole pandemic boogeyman narrative. My comments were strictly focused on those specific individuals, which you can clearly see if you actually bother to read my posts. Honestly, it doesn't matter if they're Eskimos, Aborigines, or Jews. Like I said before, I’m all for calling things like they are; let's name the suspects. It’s just common sense. If we call out certain groups when they hold power and engage in shady dealings—like how we'd call out corrupt politicians back home—are we suddenly "anti-group" just for pointing it out? If there are hundreds or thousands of them in those positions doing the exact same thing, and you point that out, are you suddenly crazy too? Or is there actually a grain of truth and reality in what I'm saying? Your mindless accusations are totally off base and, frankly, pretty bold and rude. But hey, I guess that’s what I should expect from you.
As for this person rambling on about an antisemitic frenzy, she obviously hasn't a clue what's going on. She just skimmed the surface and jumped straight to a sweeping conclusion. If there were even a tiny shred of truth to the nonsense some of you are blathering about, you might actually find it somewhere in my hundreds, maybe thousands, of previous posts. But you won't. Because this is nothing more than the perception of your closed-minded heads, reacting to whatever that little GoB snitch posted here. That seems to be her only talent—it fulfills her somehow... because she didn't actually write a single word about the actual topic itself. Instead, she comes running in here trying to file baseless complaints against others just for her own selfish reasons.
And I wasn't even complaining about that. This whole thing is completely off-topic, sparked by that agitated whistleblower, but my issue is with what was in the title and my introductory paragraph. Read what it's actually about first, and then give me your commentary.
cosmicgull52 said:It’s like I’m looking through a thick fog trying to remember this one specific moment, but I distinctly recall Sky coming out swinging, making this super bold, almost fearless claim that "only" a million Jews were lost during the entire Holocaust. Then, fast forward about ten posts later—once she realized she had totally overstepped—she tries to backtrack, claiming she was actually only referring to what happened at Auschwitz. But man, it was way too late for that. The crowd there, those "useful idiots" for Zionism as you guys always love to label them, jumped all over her and slapped her with a ban before she could even finish her explanation.
Look, I don't think she was trying to downplay anything or play fast and loose with the facts. From what I gathered, she was just attempting to set the record straight on some details that might have been historically shaky or just plain wrong. Honestly, there’s a chance that making those kinds of tweaks is actually necessary if you're aiming for total historical accuracy. Now, from a purely moral standpoint? Absolutely not. If we're talking about the weight of human life, whether it's 600 victims or 60, it's still a massive tragedy. There's zero relativization happening there. Personally, I'm not going to get dragged into an argument over specific numbers like that—it's exhausting, and frankly, it's not even the point of this discussion. Honestly, I don't think it's fair to go around slapping the Nazi label on someone unless they’re actually being malicious about it. If someone says something out of line but there wasn't any real ill will behind it, calling them a Nazi feels like a massive stretch. You've gotta look at the intent, you know? I've seen people get canceled over total misunderstandings, and it just feels wrong to jump straight to the most extreme accusation possible if they weren't actually trying to be hateful.
cosmicgull52 said:Man, I’m telling you, if you started spouting that kind of wild fantasy nonsense in most civilized parts of the US, you’d be looking at some serious jail time. Seriously!
Are we talking pure fantasy here? Prison time? Give me a break—that’s a massive stretch. Look, if you’re hinting at that whole topic everyone was just tearing into, let’s be real—it’s not some deep-state mystery or some wild fantasy about who the heavy hitters are in this global game. Everyone knows exactly who is pulling the strings; people just don't like talking about it out loud because it's uncomfortable. It’s an open secret, man. Seriously, these aren't just crazy theories; they are straight-up facts. We're talking about the elite, the inner circle, the handlers, the protégés, the whole damn lot. When you look at what they’re actually doing to the economy, to the world, and to us regular folks... honestly, in any sane, functioning society, they’d be behind bars right now. But we all know how that works—in a real civilization, this kind of stuff would be treated as high-level crime, but here? They get a pass.
P.S. Honestly, I’ve ended up stuck deep in the off-topic weeds myself because you guys have gone absolutely wild with the spamming lately. It feels like we can't even have a real conversation without the thread veering completely off the rails!
After that, you just kept going with those baseless accusations and insults, acting like everyone on this forum is some kind of Nazi or antisemite, and then cheering when they finally banned me. It’s honestly pathetic—just some wet, wannabe moderator fantasy where you get to play sheriff or whatever...
Look, if you want to join the discussion on a topic, fine. If you think I'm wrong about something, say why. But lurking in the shadows just to throw false accusations at people and invent motives that aren't even there? Like I said before, it's just sneaky and spineless.
Man, I just couldn't help myself—the devil was on my shoulder and I had to click 'view post'... because GoB just won't stop spamming and derailing the thread.
Look, I didn't even call him a Nazi. I said he’s being antisemitic. It was Sky7 I called a Nazi. What he’s typing here is basically nothing; it’s the kind of stuff that just slips through the cracks without getting flagged.
I know exactly what was said. Specifically these words: "you Nazi and your ragazzi" (and yeah, that "ragazzi" part was aimed at Sky7).
So, total lie. Out of nowhere, I got slapped with the Nazi label.
My personal favorite is this one short post (can't remember who wrote it now) that's basically implying that something tried to happen in Germany during WWII, but hey, it didn't work out.
And you're making that up too. You can't find it because a post like that doesn't even exist. It's super obvious what you're trying to imply here. If Aleta were here as the moderator for this thread, she could easily confirm that no such posts exist—not even a trace of them—because nobody in this group is a Holocaust denier or holds any neo-Nazi sentiments. Everything we discuss here, especially when we're talking about banking cartels and the global mafia, is light-years away from the stuff you're desperately trying to suggest. This is just another one of your slimy attempts to smear people and bait others into getting sanctioned or banned. Honestly? It's just greasy and underhanded.
cosmicgull52 said:But honestly, isn't violence and suffering basically the salt of life? Think about it—without those low points, we wouldn’t even have a baseline to know how happy we actually are when things are going well. You can't truly soak up joy with both lungs full if you haven't felt the sting of the hard stuff first. It's all about that contrast, right? 😢
Seriously, go ahead and tell that to the people who’ve already been hit with heart attacks and strokes—and even more so to the ones who are sitting ducks for them down the road because they were injected with that massive, experimental gene therapy mess.
cosmicgull52 said:Man, just take a second and really think about it. What would your life over the last few years even look like if it wasn't defined by standing tall and bravely pushing back against that whole Zionist conspiracy? Honestly, without that fight, what kind of purpose would there even be?
Yeah, I gave it some thought. And honestly? What now? You’re still just sitting here spamming the thread.
Honestly, seeing a moderator jump in here feels exactly like being asked to sign an informed consent form right before they jab you with some experimental gene therapy—it’s basically non-existent. Just total radio silence.
Honestly, all these narratives and spins being pushed by media mouthpieces from these various interest groups have led to nothing but violence and suffering for us. I don't care who they are—they could be Eskimos for all I care. It’s not about where someone comes from; it's about the facts. If a Native American commits a crime, that Native American needs to face the law just like anyone else. Doesn't matter if they're a multi-billionaire, some massive media mogul, or a big-shot businessman.
You can keep cluttering this thread with your sarcastic comments all you want, but at the end of the day, it's still just spamming. The real issue here is the moderator ego and his blatant censorship regarding the mask topic and generally on the Coronavirus PDF.
bluecyclist64 said:Wait, did she actually call you a Nazi? Is that because of this post and stuff like it?
Only a total Nazi could write garbage like that. So, Bradley White73 is spot on here.
And I wasn't even talking to you. I’ve seen your mindless posts before—like that time you parachuted into the meme thread just to trollly insult anyone posting something you didn't personally approve of. It was pure troll activism, honestly, just like this GoB nonsense.
Secondly, that's not even the point here. Like I said, there's no sense trying to make excuses when we're talking about facts (or when people try to play word games with names like YouTube or Google). Everything I mentioned is just reality: the fact remains that people of that specific ethnic background hold all the key positions; from the U.S. administration straight through to Google, which by extension means YouTube (which brutally censors absolutely everything related to shots against Corona—something I've dealt with personally). Then you've got the Google Health department (and Mr. Fuellmich actually confirmed that WHO has its own propaganda wing specifically tasked with managing Google/YT), then all the CEOs of those pharmaceutical companies making these so-called "vaccines," then Zuckerberg himself along with his inner circle of CEOs, and the director of the CDC, and so on. I am not some Nazi. Or a neo-Nazi. God forbid. I’m just stating facts. Facts aren't "garbage." Since when did pointing out facts become Nazi or antisemitic? I'm not falling for your traps.
That was definitely an insult and should have been sanctioned for it. She isn't even participating in the actual discussion; she's just playing the role of the self-appointed internet cop. She belongs in a little chatterbox corner where she can run her mouth. And now you're jumping in too, trolling and spamming this thread. bluecyclist64, bluecyclist64...
I finally clicked on this 'view post' thing and saw the very first troll post here:
This guy complaining here should've been hit with a permaban already.
Look, I’m gonna say it again—to you or whoever else is lurking underneath—who even asked you a question? Who were you even talking to?
Check this out: they're logging posts and playing some kind of self-appointed sheriff, throwing baseless accusations of 'hate speech' at people. And then they have the nerve to try and stir up a permanent ban against others? You're just a straight-up troll.
@GoB Seriously, back off. You're being like an annoying tick. As far as I'm concerned, you deserve a permanent block for trolling this thread and for those insults you threw earlier (on that same thread where you basically haven't contributed anything and shouldn't have been flagged anyway). Honestly, I think you're the one who needs a massive ban because you had the audacity to unprovokedly call me a Nazi. Like I told you before, go ahead and call your friends or your family Nazis if you want. It doesn't cross my mind to justify any of the valid points I made in my quoted posts, nor am I going to defend my own comments or views. Quote whatever you want, it doesn't change anything.
Stop spamming the thread. Your very first post here was pure provocation and has absolutely nothing to do with the actual topic (masks and the arbitrary removal of posts in this thread). If nothing else, it deserves a yellow card.
Did anyone actually ask you two anything, or were you even talking to me?
On a side note, I can’t even see what Bradley White73 is commenting because I permablocked her after she called me a "Nazi" once. Honestly, she should have been hit with a long-term ban for that—insults like that really ought to be strictly sanctioned. As far as I can tell, she didn't get penalized at all.
Look, if you don't have anything smarter to contribute to this open thread than just spewing trash, then feel free to pack up and beat it. You aren't welcome here if that's all you've got.
I’m more than happy to hear from anyone posting constructive comments that actually stay on topic and relate to the title.
I’ve got a serious bone to pick regarding the arbitrary deleting of comments in the Corona PDF—specifically under the Masks topic, though this really applies to pretty much everything in that document. It's being done by the moderator going by the handle ego.
It seems like any comment expressing criticism, whether it's about masks or "vaccinations," gets wiped out regularly. About a month ago, I posted a piece under the Coronavirus Vaccination thread regarding informed consent, citing a Swiss doctor and providing a link to the original foreign source. Everything was totally verifiable and transparent. Well, it vanished in record time. Since when does he have the right, or what possible grounds does he have, to just scrub posts like that? That was a text from a doctor about informed consent. That’s just information, man. It’s not misinformation, and it definitely doesn't break any rules. There is zero justification for deleting it. To make matters worse, I had to repost that exact same text under the Conspiracy Theory thread, which has absolutely nothing to do with conspiracy theories. Honestly, it makes no sense. Can you guys please give him a warning to stop doing this? Or at least have him leave a reasoned note if he actually thinks there's an issue. What he's doing is straight-up censorship.
Then there’s the latest incident from yesterday, where he nuked two of my posts in the Masks thread. I was just replying to a previous comment that pointed out the supposed hypocrisy of V. Sinčić’s representatives—how they don't wear masks in stores, yet were "caught" wearing them on a plane flying out of Brussels or wherever, because, you know, they have to follow the rules there. I commented that this is actually the fundamental purpose of those little scraps of cloth over our mouths: training us to be obedient. I argued that actual protection against whatever we're constantly being lectured about via mass media and politics would be protective gear—like a full suit with a proper mask similar to a gas mask—and I even attached a photo to prove my point. That post, along with another one right after it, got deleted and I slapped with a one-day ban. I’m telling you, this is ridiculous; it feels like pure spite and blatant, arbitrary censorship. I wasn't even spreading falsehoods; first off, it's my personal opinion, and second, it's completely grounded in facts. Those breathable rags serve no purpose other than conditioning us for obedience (which even the so-called crisis headquarters admitted in black and white), all while restricting the breathing that is absolutely essential for life and preventing the expulsion of carbon dioxide, which is vital for our functions. This has already been proven and backed up by plenty of scientific studies, both old and new. And when you write a comment like that, he just deletes it and punishes the person who wrote it. Is this considered normal or acceptable to you? If it is, then something is seriously wrong here. You can't just shove everything into the Conspiracy Theory thread! Not everything is a "conspiracy theory," and what I mentioned certainly isn't.
So, I’m asking you to tell him to dial it back with this self-appointed censorship and baseless deleting of posts. It’s not right. Please take this as a sharp and legitimate critique of the actions taken by moderator ego. As for the other moderators in the PDF, I could actually give them a shout-out for doing a good job. Thanks in advance.
Casey Bennett said:That’s simply not possible. You really ought to go back and read the original post.
Already did.
Here’s what it actually says:
Changing a handle from something like Mark to John isn't allowed. The only exception for a total name change is for accounts with fewer than 50 posts.
Look, I totally get the "under 50 posts" rule mentioned in point one, but I’m asking you guys to please just make an exception here since I’ve never once changed my handle in all this time. If I missed the window to do this while my post count was low, I’d really like to exercise that right now. Honestly, I don't see any objective reason to deny this. We aren't talking about swapping out a legal name (like changing Mark to John), we're just talking about adjusting a forum handle. Plus, I already laid out some perfectly good, valid reasons why the new one would work—one of the options I suggested is basically wide open and hasn't been claimed yet. Please, just consider my request. It’s not even a massive overhaul since part of the old handle stays the same, and more importantly, I haven't touched my username in 11 years! I feel like anyone who meets these criteria should be able to use that exception. So, I’m officially resubmitting my request to have my handle updated. Thanks.
Any chance I could swap out my username? I'm really feeling the name Mr. X. Now, looking at the system, I see there's already a handle like that, so I'm guessing it might be a no-go since that user hasn't logged in for three years. But hey, if you can make it happen, I'll take it!
If that's totally off the table, maybe a version without the space would work? I noticed there's another username out there too, but honestly, they haven't touched their account since 2007 and only have about 15 posts. Seems pretty inactive to me, right? If we could go with Mr.X instead, I think that would definitely meet the criteria.
Casey Bennett said:There isn't actually a formal request process for this. If you want your post to go live, just submit a civil complaint through the usual channels. As for your other question, you won't get an answer here—only the user who was actually banned can get clarification if there's any confusion regarding their account status.
Casey Bennett said:Does that mean you can't even get into the ban corner at all? What kind of error message are you getting?
I can pull the page up, but I'm totally locked out from actually typing or leaving comments.
The message popping up is basically the same thing as before (just without the actual ban notice):
you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
1. Your user account may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system? 2. If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
lonebadger6 said:I'm guessing it's just because his appeals were being rude or something. Since he's saying "it's impossible to type anything."
Like people have already pointed out a few times—you can't just post automatically in the ban corner anymore; your appeal actually has to be approved first. Any decent, polite appeal gets the green light.
Man, I had no idea you couldn't just jump in and post right away and that you had to wait for an approval on the appeal first.
To be fair though, my very first appeal about two months ago—back when I got that two-week ban—was definitely pretty rude (the reason for the ban really set me off). My bad on that one.
Got it now, though. In the event of a ban, I need to 'submit a request' to get back into the ban corner. Thanks for the heads-up.
p.s. I'd still love an answer to my other question if anyone has a sec
wearybison63 said:Look, if you're banned, you can't post in the ban corner. That's just how the rules work for everyone except the mods, supermods, and Admins. Everyone else is locked out, like I said before.
But my point is, I can't actually post *while* I'm under a ban. That's what I was getting at. Technically, when you're serving a ban, you should still be able to access the ban corner to talk about it, but I haven't been able to get in once. Something definitely feels broken here. That’s why I asked for someone to look into this and fix the functionality so we can actually use it.
Hey, I’ve got a couple of questions for the mod team.
1. Why can't I get into the ban corner? Every single time I've been banned in the past, I haven't been able to access it, and it's the same story now—I'm totally locked out. I can't even type a single thing in there. Could you guys take a look and see what's going on? Also, if you could just double-check and maybe reactivate that feature for me, I'd really appreciate it. Thanks in advance!
2. Can someone clarify exactly why and for how long Sky7 was banned over on the CDC site?
Tyler Lopez98 said:I don't have children yet, but if I did, they would be vaccinated.
Every parent carries the weight of ensuring their children's well-being—and in my view, disease prevention is a fundamental part of that responsibility. It is simply the responsible thing to do. I have full confidence in the safety of vaccines; I chose to get vaccinated myself, as did everyone in my family, and I would certainly extend that same protection to my children should the time come.
To be honest, I find it difficult to wrap my head around those who oppose vaccination—people who cling to absurd conspiracy theories while disregarding medicine and science in an era as advanced as the 21st century.
Do you even realize that what they’re injecting is straight-up poison that wrecks your body? Those spike proteins are proven to cause damage. Even the manufacturers are coming clean—AstraZeneca admitted their shot could lead to capillary leak syndrome and those well-known blood clots (microthrombosis), and that goes for the mRNA stuff too. You’re seriously willing to risk your life over some hyped-up version of the flu?!
Actually, it’s probably a good thing you don't have kids...
I’d consider it a massive stroke of luck if I didn't have a freaking naive parent like you looking out for me...
Just listen to this... "believes in medicine"... as if there isn't a giant Big Pharma machine pulling all the strings... gee... 🙄
Man, listen to this. A German epidemiologist and expert on all this stuff, Dr. Sucharit Bakhdi (who, by the way, has actually dropped two books on this exact topic since the pandemic kicked off), said—and I am quoting him here—that anyone claiming [vaccines] against C19 are necessary for kids belongs behind bars [in prison]. That is a massive statement to make... he definitely didn't just say that out of thin air.
Those worrying 9.5% from the poll really ought to sit with that for a second (assuming the results are legit and those people are being totally honest about where they stand).
Let's stop splitting hairs here. The bottom line is that Seehofer was being crystal clear when he demanded his experts cook up some absolute worst-case scenarios just so they’d have an excuse to roll out those heavy-handed, repressive restrictions. We're talking about actual surveillance—basically tracking citizens via their location data. It looks like that whole document was just a roadmap to bring those old-school FBI tactics straight to our doorstep under the guise of a "emergency" (total Corona-dictatorship vibes). Even if you ignore everything else, this is a textbook case of weaponizing a crisis for political gain. And honestly, the fact that the original article was "manipulated" by the author of this piece? That's the least of our worries right now.