Posts by wanderingcanyon3

frozentinker432 said:hahaha, where did you even come from? man, I love these superior little kittens popping out of nowhere like some deus ex machina to settle a whole ten-page debate with one single post—basically hitting the nail on the head by stating the long-ignored truth that I’m just not "historically educated" enough to go into detail about what happened in 1991, 1945, 1102, or 1671. give me a break. nobody was even trying to do that, so your pretentious, stuck-up, arrogant comment is totally useless. if you actually followed along, or maybe had the ability to draw smarter conclusions, you'd see I wasn't being a chauvinist at any point. unless you consider defending your own people chauvinism. and as for nationalism, that word doesn't have a negative vibe in my dictionary if it's about loving your homeland and the people you belong to. that sentence you're using as proof of my "primitivism" is also taken out of context just so you can dump your wisdom. honestly, it's pretty logical that I won't debate someone from another nation about whether they value my people enough; that would be a waste of time. no chauvinism or putting anyone down here, just a mild observation you'd make to an Italian, a German, a Mexican, a Georgian, an Angolan, a Bhutanese, a Chinese, or a Cambodian.

Girl, I was right here in this thread since the beginning, 🙂so:, you just didn't read and now you're acting salty. This thread moved to the asylum ages ago. You're lagging behind, and no, your stupidity isn't about your age—you'll still be stupid when you grow up, it's just a permanent trait.
And your sentence wasn't taken out of context. It was literally the only thing there, standing alone. Get it? Just that one sentence. With the idiot smiley face.
Also, there's no such thing as a "personal" definition of something. I mean, sure, it could exist, but then I could say math is the science of living organisms. Nationalism was defined way, way before both of us, and I specifically mentioned its meaning earlier in this thread. Pretty sure even Klaić would agree with the definition. What you're talking about is patriotism, but unfortunately, you didn't stick to that.

So, I am NOT the deus ex machina. To your great misfortune, I am the condicio sine qua non of this thread, reacting to blank slates like you, cum grano salis.

Now go look at a dictionary!! And check the definition of nationalism while you're at it!!

End of discussion!

👋

frozentinker432 said:🤣 🤣
lol, I'm over here talking about patriotism with a Mexican woman. Should I have put a trigger warning on first?

The point is, you aren't a patriot. You're just a chauvinist and a nationalist who’s clearly lacking any actual substance or culture. Trying to have a real conversation with you is a total waste of time, even when I've got nothing better to do. Look, it's not about your opinion—plenty of people out there are obsessed with nationalism or hold bigoted views, but at least they know how to talk and handle basic facts. But you? You're just completely uneducated on this stuff, which explains that primitive little comment of yours.

SOUTH KOREA said:First impressions? If someone works hard to leave a good one, my take is they’re usually just highly educated types playing a part. They intentionally craft this persona to feed their own ego, acting like they're experts on everything. It’s how they build their own legend. They spend years chasing that sense of importance, constantly moving on to find a new audience or follower rather than sticking around and wasting precious time with just one person. You can't change that behavior from the outside—it actually backfires. They aren't being self-absorbed; they're just always looking for the next person to impress.......ps. they don't pull inward, they just pivot to someone new......

Man, that was a struggle to read. The punctuation, the word order, and the fact that it's just one massive run-on sentence...