CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Taylor Campbell4 › Posts

Posts by Taylor Campbell4

597 posts shown.

Why do atheists... in Philosophy ·
I don't really see any relevance in whether someone is an atheist or a believer when we're diving into these kinds of debates—it honestly hasn't crossed my mind as a factor at all, though I've been dwelling on why that is for the last hour or so.
I have this habit of using phrases like "what do I know?"—which, looking back, might have come off a bit too personal—so I often default to saying things like "you know" instead. Perhaps "one knows" would be more appropriate, but I suppose that’s just one of those communication quirks that remains a mystery to me; it all depends so much on how the other person perceives you. Anyway, tact isn't exactly my strongest suit. 😁
(I actually ended up deleting my first post from earlier today because it felt pretty redundant)
Why do atheists... in Philosophy ·
Taylor Campbell4, you took all of this much too personally, though there was really no need to go that far. I might circle back to this later.
(And if you feel like a discussion is turning into an ad hominem attack—or if you think it’s happening to anyone else—I truly believe it's best to just step away rather than engaging with it.)
Why do atheists... in Philosophy ·
mistyscout2 said:Again, if we're only looking at this from a single angle, it’s a small thing that we won't get a truly credible picture of the matter.
__________

Yeah—I just hope you're actually trying to approach this with that same level of fairness, because otherwise, this feels more like you're just venting—which is pretty destructive rather than constructive.

Because if we’re going to be consistent about it, you can't really speak for believers since you aren't one; you don't have that state of consciousness or even the experience under your belt. But honestly, the sheer amount of nonsense in these recent posts on this topic really shows how absurd things get when people start deconstructing everything in this specific way.

mistyscout2 said:Ultimately, none of them are certain—meaning they don't have absolute knowledge, just an opinion—so one person might choose to believe, while another might not find it particularly important.

Following that logic—if we were being strictly consistent with your grievances—one could ask why you framed the question this way in the first place? It seems even more obvious: because it suits your narrative. It’s the same deal with almost everything else.
The real crux of the matter is whether a person is open to new experiences and, if so, to what extent. To what degree is their mind free from preconceived molds and their thoughts liberated?

That is the essential part. And the more someone dwells on things in a specific, narrow way (it reminds me of a kind of tunnel vision, if you will), the more they—almost as a rule—fall into various illusions disguised as mental or emotional concepts. It isn't a problem with the concepts themselves, but rather how much a person clings to them, effectively closing themselves off to new experiences.

But thank God, the world we live in is persistent 😁 and constantly showering us with experiences.

Maybe that sounded a bit too personal—who knows, maybe it was...

So, to sum it up: I think it's vital for a person, whether atheist or theist, to remain open to new experiences. Beyond that, it's all mostly trivial.

And it's interesting—as I've mentioned before on other threads—how often the more educated a person is, or the more "knowledge" they possess, the more material they have to build those illusions. It happens all the time.

So, that idea of Platonov's—or whoever's it was—about how the more you know, the less you know, holds true in a different sense as well. 😁

You made a good point that it might be important to distinguish between God and god in this debate—we could certainly discuss both. But even that is somewhat secondary, and I'm not sure where it would lead us, since everyone's concepts differ so wildly that we might never truly reach an understanding.
Why do atheists... in Philosophy ·
I suppose I would say I DO believe that God exists.
Spiritual experiences that changed your life in Spirituality ·
Adam Ross4 said:isn't that just matter too...
isn't your body actually spirit...
so why even bother with the separation?

it's all spirit and all matter at once... ☕

From an absolute perspective—sure—but that doesn't really apply to us, except maybe in theory. Someone might grasp the concept intellectually, but that isn't the same as lived experience. If you truly experienced that, you could, say, travel at the speed of light and pop in and out of existence whenever you felt like it.

Besides, if that were part of your actual reality, you'd have total control over your emotions, thoughts, and everything else.
Why do atheists... in Philosophy ·
So, Živko Kustić—if I’ve got the name right—wrote a piece about this today in his column over at USA Today.

To be fair, the guy admitted he might have misheard what Kuljiš actually said (he even offered an apology for the potential slip-up in the article), but honestly, the piece isn't half bad. Usually, I find his writing a bit dry and narrow-minded, but this one's different.

Here’s the link:

Look, I’m not saying I agree with him 100%, but after skimming through it, I think there might be some merit to his point—it should definitely spark some interesting debate.

That said, I actually find myself siding with Kuljiš, at least given the context of how he phrased things when I saw him on TV during that program.
Force-feeding? in Philosophy ·
Superskeptik said:So what are they, if they aren't people? 😕

This kind of logic is exactly where so much trouble starts—it gives parents total control over their children, simply because adults have "human rights" while kids don't...

Haha, you really should have been skeptical about whether I actually meant what I wrote.

I was just messing around. It reminded me of a scene from One Hundred Years of Solitude—if I recall correctly, Holden Caulfield makes a similar claim about children not being human.

Still, it’s an interesting topic to explore. From my perspective, it seems like kids' rights are often diminished, and honestly, they probably shouldn't be so limited.
Why do atheists... in Philosophy ·
I don't see how anyone could actually help you with that.

Look, I'm not asking because I need someone to put a label on me—honestly, please don't try to categorize me at all! 🙂—but rather to spark a decent debate. As I mentioned before, I view classification as an objective fact, not just a matter of opinion.

Cheers to the unclassifiable! 😁
Why do atheists... in Philosophy ·
oceanic said:😕



Well, that’s a decision only you can make.

I don't see how anyone else could step in to help you with that.




I believe that being human means possessing freedom—the capacity for self-determination and self-creation.
The bare minimum of freedom is the right to define oneself.
So, just be who you are, and don't be afraid to say it out loud.

Personally, I view this more as a matter of objective fact rather than just labeling oneself or relying on subjective perception.

As for me, why would I feel the need to pick a side?

Human beings are inherently free creatures—provided they actually tap into that potential. But let's be honest, very few people truly break through to realize that full potential, which makes us all somewhat unfree in a general sense.

So, just be who you are, and don't be afraid to say it out loud.

He-he, sounds like you're religiously committed to everything and nothing at once. I'm holding out for a scientific religion; then maybe I'll commit. 😁

Religion is really about tradition—it's not necessarily about whether I choose to be Christian or Muslim, for instance. Right now, I don't formally belong to any faith, and I don't think I ever will, even though I find the traditions and the cultures of Islam quite fascinating.

There are many paths one can take, and religion can simply be one of them—that's my perspective.
Why do atheists... in Philosophy ·
swiftcobra15 The user said:

No worries at all—it's all good! 😉 I have no desire to take anyone's God away from them.



Phew, thank God I don't have to go on another jihad trip... 😁

To be honest, I don't really have a clue when it comes to God. And when I say God, I'm not necessarily picturing a person—more like an absolute concept. There are different levels to it, I suppose, including that one specific level we try to grasp, which is basically the closest representation of the Divine we can manage. I tend to see that particular version as a single being, but I won't bore you with the details right now—my own thoughts are a bit muddled on the subject, and honestly, trying to type out how messy it all feels wouldn't do it justice.

I wouldn't dream of questioning the existence of God—it's simply part of your own consciousness.
And honestly—even those "private" biographies can be quite charming to me.
To be honest—whether we're talking about the Christian God or the Islamic God—the whole concept just feels a bit absurd to me.


It really depends. What exactly defines the Muslim God? What is Islam versus what is Christianity? If we’re talking about the fundamentalists within Islam, Christianity, Hinduism, or Buddhism—then sure, you could make that argument. However, one has to realize that these organized religions are essentially constructs—systems built by people based on the teachings of great figures like Jesus and Muhammad. Because of that, their specific interpretations can be quite ridiculous—as someone once put it. So, while their interpretation of God might be laughable, I don't think God Himself is anything remotely funny in that sense.
I’m fairly certain that both Jesus and Muhammad possessed a truly great sense of humor. 🙂

I honestly believe that only atheists—those who don't align with any specific faith—can engage in a truly impartial discussion about God.

And, of course, spiritual experiences are—by their very nature—essentially incommunicable. 🙂


I have to say, I can't quite bring myself to agree with that.

First off, how can you claim to be unaligned? You aren't just sitting on the sidelines—by refusing to pick a side, you're effectively siding with the other. It’s one single system, not two separate ones.

Furthermore, if an atheist is considered unaligned, where exactly would I fit in to ensure everything remains logically consistent and follows a coherent framework?

That simply can't be right—it wouldn't hold any sense of integrity or fairness if we were to categorize things that way.
Force-feeding? in Philosophy ·
When everything else fails, a hunger strike can be seen as a final, justifiable act of resistance.

Suicide is one of the seven deadly sins!

Honestly—and this is just my gut feeling—I don't buy the idea that a hunger strike, which is essentially a slow suicide, is ever truly the best way out. I’ve always believed that life doesn't work that way; there is almost always another path forward. It just seems to me that our ego—or that stubborn sense of pride we all carry—stops us from seeing those better options, driving us toward something as extreme as a hunger strike instead.
Why do atheists... in Philosophy ·
adriatic said:

I’m an atheist—well, more accurately, I don't fit into a category. I can't subscribe to Christian, Muslim, Shaivite, or any other concept of God, simply because none of those doctrines hold up under intellectual scrutiny.
Atheism is always specific: it’s a denial of certain concrete deities or concepts.
I can't claim to be an atheist toward some unknown God X that I know nothing about.



I don't belong to any group of atheists, nor do I subscribe to any "atheistic" ideology or "faith."
I refuse to be lumped into any collective labels
so, frankly, asking me questions about "atheists" as a whole feels pointless.


I am neither an atheist nor a theist who could meaningfully fit into a predefined box. Categorizing someone would be a mistake—unless you possess the exact same level of understanding as I do, and even then, there isn't much point in labeling people like that.

I’m an atheist—more accurately, unclassifiable. I cannot accept the Christian, Muslim, Shaivite, etc., versions of God, since none of those teachings survive rigorous mental critique.

If I’ve understood your point correctly, I have to disagree. These concepts certainly can withstand intellectual scrutiny; perhaps you just haven't encountered anyone capable of showing you where your critiques fall short—or maybe you haven't made those flaws apparent. (Or both.)

I wouldn't call myself an atheist, yet I'm not a believer either. While I believe God exists, and that Christ, Buddha, Krishna, and Muhammad exist too, I don't view them as "gods"—at least, not in a way that distinguishes them from the rest of us, other than how we manifest our own divine potential.

As for God, saying He doesn't exist seems absurd, though naturally, I don't mean a personified entity with or without a beard. It sounds silly to deny His existence, yet I'll admit I lack the capacity to defend that position intellectually. What I mean is, *I* personally am unable to provide that defense, which doesn't mean it's impossible for someone else.

I don't define God through dogma, but through my own experience, however thin it may be. My personal experiences—on an intellectual and spiritual level—seem to diverge from both modern physical theories and established spiritual teachings alike.
Force-feeding? in Philosophy ·
It really comes down to this—either a society is just, or it isn't.

Think about it: an individual might go on a hunger strike for one of two reasons. Either they feel the system is fundamentally unfair and they're fighting for justice—making it a moral stand—or, quite simply, the person is struggling with their mental health.

Now, if we're looking at the latter—where someone’s perception of themselves and their role in the community is skewed due to illness—I actually think it's ethically sound to intervene forcefully to save their life. It's about preservation.

But here's the kicker: if the society truly *is* being unjust to them, and that injustice is what drives the hunger strike, shouldn't the state remain consistent? Should it not prevent the strike by force to avoid being unjust again?

So, we have these two distinct scenarios. Just some food for thought—nothing more than a bit of musing (don't quote me on this 😁).

Personally, I believe every hunger strike is a unique, individual situation. We shouldn't be shoving people into rigid categories or applying blanket rules; each case deserves its own scrutiny. Who should handle that? Well, doctors, certainly—perhaps a specialized medical board including specialists like psychologists. In fact, I remember reading about those psychologists in the States a few years back who actually integrate philosophy into their treatment methods.

Ultimately, hunger strikes are just symptoms—indicators of much deeper issues, systemic flaws, or even a lack of humanity within our social fabric.
In my view, unless a person has committed a violent crime—someone who poses a genuine threat to others—there is no reason for them to be behind bars. In this high-tech era, there are plenty of ways to prevent recidivism, whether it's fraud or drug offenses, without resorting to incarceration. Prison is often just a form of vengeance, and let's be honest, vengeance is rarely productive or good. It just creates a cycle where people leave prison looking to get even with the society that punished them.
The death penalty follows a similar logic, where the flaw in the system is even more glaring.
Spiritual experiences that changed your life in Spirituality ·
Kyle Nelson2 said:let's exchange experiences..
what exactly happened to you all from "the other side"—those moments where you started seeing the world through entirely different eyes?

One of my earliest experiences dates back to when I was about 12 or 13—memories of a past life...
it smelled like the impending end of a war... train cars... us being moved somewhere... death felt imminent... I was young... but also Jewish... memories of the agony of dying...
but also insights into why things happen... why certain patterns just keep repeating themselves...

How do you perceive it from that side? From which side specifically?

Who knows, maybe everything has happened to me at some point. I wouldn't say I'm one of those hyper-sensitive types, but for some people—the ones who are incredibly observant—every single moment can be something that hits them hard and changes them forever.

In my case, if I had to pick the most striking things—the ones that truly shifted my perspective—it would be visiting Sai baba—that experience with Sai baba,
followed by the several times I had the chance to feel the blessing and energy of Maitreya, which is most palpable during the lectures of Benjamin Crem, along with equally powerful energies from other masters. And lastly—though not any less significant or intense—transmission meditation has been changing me. Specifically, the energies flowing through me during image. I really wish I could participate in that more often than I currently do.

There are other bits and pieces in my memory—various incidents and experiences—but I'll save those for another time.

Those are the main energetic shifts (since everything is energy, after all), though there was plenty of other stuff too—like that time I went to a lecture in Washington, D.C.; there were massive crowds everywhere, just a total sea of people. It was actually quite wonderful 😁

PS: Kyle Nelson2, how can you be sure a dream you had is actually from your own past life and not someone else's?
Faxing via software? in Software ·
If it makes you feel any better, I’m also still rocking an all-in-one unit with a built-in fax machine.

Are we talking a full printer/scanner/copier/fax combo? Or just a dedicated fax modem?

I bet Mike would have plenty to chime in with on this one.

He mentioned that you really need to tell Verizon specifically that you want the fax service activated. Did you get a chance to handle that yet?
Faxing via software? in Software ·
What kind of fax modem? You must mean the Xfinity Gateway... I haven't heard anyone call that thing a modem before (unless you're referring to something else entirely, my bad).

Oh, that reminds me—I actually have a modem built into my computer too (a fax modem), but I don't really have the bandwidth to hook it up and test it right now. Given that I went through all that trouble last time and still couldn't get it to work—no clue why, honestly—I'd rather wait. I'll let you know once I give it another shot.
Faxing via software? in Software ·
I honestly have no clue—I tried doing that before, but I could never get it to work. (I don't even use a modem anymore, just an Xfinity Gateway now—would that still work?) I went through the whole installation process, got all the way to the sending stage, and then... nothing. I think I actually attempted it twice, though the specific details are a bit fuzzy.

Does anyone happen to know which specific settings usually cause the fax feature to glitch out?
Faxing via software? in Software ·
So, you’re saying I actually need to have a fax machine installed—not just some software, but an actual physical fax? Is it impossible to do it without one?
What counts as "trolling" to you? in Psychology ·
I read a portion of what mistyrider7 wrote, and I find myself agreeing. This whole idea of "living it up" wouldn't even be a thing if our lives were actually okay—if we were in some kind of balance, for instance. I mean, is everyone supposed to sleep around once just to check a box? That’s nonsense. I say this even though I went through my own phase of "living life to the fullest"—doing things my own way—but I’m still here, or at least, I’m trying to live with both lungs full.

If you look at the semantics of the phrase, everything becomes a bit clearer. It’s like saying you "live it out" for a certain period, and then, once that's done, it's as if you stop living entirely. You "live it all out," and then for you, life is over; there's nothing left but—I don't know, what?

Actually, I recently had a thought about a guy telling a girl—or vice versa—that they aren't ready for a serious relationship because they haven't "lived enough" yet. 😁

I see many people pushing this thesis regarding "experience."

However, that argument is mostly meaningless in this context, because the core of this supposed search for "experience" really boils down to searching for a "feeling of being alive."

The only "experience" one truly gains from all these pursuits is learning that life isn't found there.

Or, perhaps one doesn't gain anything—especially not finding the "source of life"—but simply grows weary of the futile attempts and eventually "settles down."

Most of those experiences are complete nonsense. Is getting wasted and being hungover the next morning really a great "life experience"? Doing stupid things a hundred, two hundred, or a thousand times? Or maybe just five times, for the more intelligent—or rather, wiser—people. 😁

I maintain that I am much more stable now than I would have been if I hadn't gone through those things.

My take is this: If I had been more stable, I wouldn't have spent so much time "living it up" in the first place.

@mistyrider7
For most, however, the cultural factor is vital; if the entire culture is sick, it leads to a frantic searching that usually yields poor results, producing only an initial explosion of misguided seeking, followed by a frequent sense of numbness.

Yes, so I think you're quite right. For example, I always look at—not that I dwell on it constantly, mind you—but I think of young people drinking. Everyone says, "Look how reckless they are," or "Look how they act," acting as if things weren't this way before. The cause lies precisely in the environment, or as you put it, the culture or society.

Education is a mess, completely unsuited to the essence of young people; the family unit is struggling; and honestly, our society as a whole has been pretty much a disaster over the years. And so on. Well, you're looking at this from a more philosophical angle, but there's truth in it. After that misguided search, for the vast majority, comes a state of numbness.
vecomes a sort of stagnation.
Everyone seems to be just trying to survive until tomorrow, moving from one vacation to the next, from one paycheck to the next, working jobs they hate (the result of that misguided search), and so on.

I don't know how many people actually work jobs they love. Maybe 20%, if that. But then again, "loving a job" is a very broad concept.

@EGO
"Wise people learn from the experiences of others; everyone else has to learn from their own."

It’s not just about learning from other people's experiences—it’s specifically about learning from their MISTAKES. That’s the real truth, though such people are incredibly rare, mostly because truly wise individuals aren't exactly common. (And even they weren't always this way—not necessarily in the life they lead now)
Of course, we all progress and grow by overcoming obstacles through experience, and life itself is an ongoing lesson—if I don't veer too far into the esoteric side of things.

But surely we possess discernment—a sense to distinguish right from wrong—so we aren't necessarily condemned to stumble through every single possible experience one by one. Besides, one really ought to differentiate the core essence of an experience from its superficial qualities.

I completely disagree with you. You can have such incredible hallucinations or trips from smoking a joint that they actually force you to view certain things differently—they don't necessarily have to be unpleasant or bad experiences.

Well, you make a fair point—you can certainly have good hallucinations or "trips," and I suppose you could call them pleasant illusions, but those things aren't inherently valuable or desirable on their own.
You won't gain any real insight into reality, yourself, or your surroundings (aside from perhaps recognizing some of your own negative traits—though that’s a whole other complicated issue that just occurred to me)—that's my firm stance. Certainly, anyone using marijuana might feel like they're receiving profound revelations, but objectively speaking, they usually aren't; it's mostly just a heightened *feeling* of having gained insight—it's largely just the "high" talking.
Saddam Hussein: Hanging or firing squad? in Philosophy ·
I wonder how many millions of hungry people in underserved American communities could have been fed with those billions of dollars poured into the war in Iraq.

And just how many tens of thousands of lives might have been saved if that conflict had never happened in the first place?

That’s actually a conservative estimate—we aren't just talking about tens of thousands, but hundreds of thousands. Independent American researchers have studied this and concluded that from the start of the invasion through October of this year, one out of every forty Iraqis died—that's 700,000 people—and honestly, that number is likely much higher given the specific complexities of the combat methods used.