CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Taylor Campbell4 › Posts

Posts by Taylor Campbell4

597 posts shown.

Anyone still running Windows 7? in Software ·
I have all my drives indexed—though honestly, I’m thinking about pulling the C: and F: drives from the index entirely just so it focuses on subtitles. My main file stash is sitting on the D: drive.

The problem is, I have a mountain of PDFs on D:, and whenever I type a keyword—even if it's just part of a filename—the search results are a mess. It spits out a massive list of PDFs where that word appears in the content, followed by a bunch of HTML files, and then maybe finally that one specific file I was actually looking for by name. It’s pretty useless.
Maybe I'll just uncheck the D: drive from the index settings and see if that clears things up.

Searching through file contents feels like a waste of time anyway.
If I actually need to search inside something, like a PDF (which you can do on macOS or basically any other OS), I just use Adobe Acrobat Reader. It works perfectly—you just pick the folder you want to scan, and it handles the content search flawlessly...

I really don't get why they didn't just include simple toggles like "search filenames" or "search content."

PS: It’s the same old story—searching with the index is slow, searching without it is slow. I guess it would only be fast if I only had ten files to deal with... 🙄
Anyone still running Windows 7? in Software ·
I've been staring at my computer screen for literally half an hour trying to dig up a few files. Honestly, back when I was using Windows XP, I would've found them in seconds—even if I had just clicked through the folders manually. But hey, Windows 7 search, yay...
Anyone still running Windows 7? in Software ·
Man, how did they completely mess up the search function in Windows 7 compared to XP? It feels like all those useful options just vanished into thin air.

Now, whenever I try to find a specific file, my results are cluttered with a mountain of .doc and PDFs—basically any document where the word I typed shows up in the actual content, even if it isn't the filename. It doesn't even bother sorting by relevance anymore...
The reason being...

Is there actually an option to search *only* file titles? Where did all those settings go? It’s driving me absolutely insane. Can you actually turn off searching through the file contents altogether?
Everything felt so much cleaner and more intuitive back in XP—it's honestly frustrating to see something that was working fine being "upgraded" into something this clunky.

I don't know if it's just me, but I have thousands of PDFs and a good amount of .doc files on here, and this search experience is genuinely terrible—I can hardly believe how bad it is.

I've been using Windows 7 for over six months now, and I've scoured every setting related to searching, no matter how disorganized and scattered they are (though I hope I haven't missed anything obvious).
It’s a mess—some options are tucked away near the search bar, some are at the bottom of the results, and the rest are just lost somewhere else entirely...

Not to mention, it’s still showing me stuff I deleted two weeks ago as if it were still indexed and part of the search results. Just four letters: u z a s.

And don't even get me started on having an external drive; I can never tell if I'm searching through that drive or not, even though I indexed it...
mistyscout2 said:For the most part, it’s just not possible. That’s basically why humans went through the trouble of inventing the television, and later on, the internet. Before all that tech existed—and really, only in certain other civilizations at the time—some people would eat all sorts of strange mushrooms and plants, and then they’d claim they were somehow in two places at once. Then again, you also had all those storytellers and bards who loved to "show" people different lands through their tales and folklore, essentially using the magic of language to guide them into entirely different worlds...

What is the point of listing all these obvious things? 🙂

Quotation:
But physically? I highly doubt it.
Well, it's great that you're skeptical—though it seems to me you're skeptical of much more than just this, Hlupec (but then again, he does have his own blog over at the jutarnji Portak 😁 )
I'm weighing in because I think that distinction you made is important.
The crux of the matter, as I see it, is the ongoing debate regarding what actually constitutes something "physical" or material...
There are so many questions here, and frankly, it's because of contrarians like Hrupec that science struggles to provide answers. Of course, in esoteric circles, these answers have been known for ages; that knowledge is passed down from those who possess these abilities and understand them through direct experience. But no—they aren't going to hand these truths to science on a silver platter when a scientist can discover them independently. If they did, it would undermine human will and the capacity to learn. And besides, a scientist might just reject the tray entirely—dismissing it as a trick and claiming it isn't worth investigating. Who knows where that leads... maybe forcing the tray into their hands? It doesn't work that way. Science has to reach these conclusions on its own terms and remain open-minded, which is starting to happen—but most of those people are working tirelessly from dawn to dusk, drawing inspiration and staying out of the spotlight instead of writing silly blogs.
dustyskipper3 said:In this morning's paper, I was reading about how scientists Dr. Saša Ceci and Dr. Dario Hrupec from the Roger Bošković Institute are challenging Dr. Davor Pavuna’s claim that "judge Zlatko can levitate according to the laws of physics," and his suggestion that he might "soon, much like Jesus, pass through walls."

Regarding judge Zlatko’s perception of reality, Dr. Hrupec—speaking as someone who views him as a charismatic and passionate believer—noted: "That is his reality, and the reality of his followers. In his own mind, he is levitating, existing here and there simultaneously. We skeptics, perhaps, cannot perceive this, but then again, who are we to blame if our minds aren't quite as open?"

Pavuna, however, counters by saying that "science is merely the poetry of living nature’s creation." When addressing testimonies of levitation and descriptions of similar paranormal events, he suggests that "Nikola Tesla understood this perfectly, as did Roger Bošković, each within the context of their own era."


As for the actual physics, I suppose there are some explanations floating around the internet. Some mention the example of Paramahansa Yogananda, who reportedly witnessed the bilocation of his teacher, a family friend and yogi named Swami Pranabananda.

The discovery of "biophotons"—this coherent light, almost like a laser, stored in and emitted by all living cells—suggests that quantum states of coherent photons at a macro level could produce resonant, collective wave effects, such as telepathy or even teleportation. Swanson mentions that the human body could be viewed as a "quantum system, with a set of quantum states vibrating together." Essentially, the human body might function as a coherent oscillatory system where every electron synchronizes with the others in a shared phase, mutually stimulating one another to vibrate. When the human body builds up a reservoir of coherent energy that takes on a spatial pattern, it increases the probability that such a structure or pattern will manifest in real life. This power of coherence and synchronization might allow for extraordinary phenomena, like people being able to teleport or exist in two places at once.

So, I guess a theoretical basis for this kind of thinking does actually exist. But it makes me wonder... why would people even want to bilocate in the first place? For telepathy or teleportation, the reason seems obvious—it saves time and makes communication or travel more efficient. But bilocation, from what I understand, happens when someone has an intense, overwhelming desire to be somewhere else. Maybe they want to be with a loved one to help them or just to see them, but they are physically stuck elsewhere due to their location or perhaps certain obligations and duties that prevent them from traveling. In that case, maybe that intense feeling creates this coherence and synchronization—this resonant quantum effect. It's as if the electron vibration triggered by that initial feeling somehow transfers via resonance to every single electron in every cell of the body, allowing the person to be in two different places at once.

😍What do you all think about that?

I actually read a column by this Dr. Hrupec in The New York Times just a couple of weeks ago. Honestly, I haven't encountered this much sheer backwardness in quite some time.
He brags about his "critical thinking," but to me, his reasoning feels entirely unscientific—he clearly rejects certain ideas outright simply because they don't fit his personal worldview. That kind of behavior is fundamentally incompatible with science; in fact, it’s the opposite of science and serves only to stall scientific progress for centuries.

I’d much rather see a scientist make an honest mistake during research than see them reflexively dismiss any phenomenon that deviates even slightly from their established paradigm...
The truly great scientists were never like that—if they had been, they never would have discovered anything at all...

Personally, I find his blog to be pretty low-quality, and I honestly don't understand why he's given a platform at all. (I certainly won't be reading him anymore—I really don't see the point...) But hey, I suppose that's just how things work in a smaller country.

I genuinely wonder how these people will handle themselves—what they'll say or do (or if they'll just try to lay low)—when the things they mocked and insisted were impossible finally start being proven true. History always repeats itself, but someone blinded by their own perceived omniscience fails to notice. With him, you don't see any sign of him doubting what he thinks he knows (which should be the hallmark of any true thinker...) It would be fine if they just admitted when they were wrong, but I highly doubt that will happen.
Anyway.
Beyond that, I didn't appreciate how he was throwing accusations at others (Pavuna, if I recall correctly, or perhaps Paar) in that blog post—calling them arrogant or egotistical. From every single article he writes, it's blatantly obvious that he suffers from those exact same flaws—if not to a greater degree, then at least equally. So, it isn't right, purely on a human level, and it shows the man isn't self-aware regarding his own shortcomings.

Moving on from the topic, it seems fairly clear to me—and I have a decent grasp of how this works—that things like levitation and bilocation are possible... just as much as telekinesis, telepathy, materialization, and so on. There is a mountain of documented cases and testimonies, not to mention scientific research involving things like zero-point fields that support these phenomena.

As for Zlatko sudac, I can't speak to his levitation or bilocation (I know for a fact he had authentic stigmata, but many people do. In fact, a friend of mine is heading to Damascus, Syria, on my recommendation to visit a woman there who also possesses authentic stigmata—they appear every Good Friday, year after year, and she is a very famous and successful healer...) so, regarding Zlatko sudac's levitation and bilocation, I don't know; perhaps it happened spontaneously once early on when he first had the stigmata, but I seriously doubt he has those abilities under conscious control or displays them frequently.

A person would need to be much more balanced to consciously wield such abilities.
As far as I know, even Francis of Assisi didn't command his levitation...
With Jesus, it's a different story...
Anyone still running Windows 7? in Software ·
Personally, I think this is a great idea—just pin the Windows 3 D flipper directly to the taskbar http://on10.net/blogs/sarahintampa/A...ws-7s-Taskbar/. It really should have been a standard feature in Windows 7, right next to that "show desktop" button.

That said, even with that addition, I’m struggling to see much practical use for all these flashy Aero effects and flipping animations beyond them just looking fancy. I rarely find myself using those features, and I doubt having them on the taskbar will change my habits; I'm pretty much strictly a mouse user whenever I'm not typing away at something.
Without that shortcut on the taskbar, I'm stuck reaching for the mouse just to hit a bunch of keyboard combos—which is honestly just a hassle.
Anyone still running Windows 7? in Software ·
Code:
shell:sendto

Just type that into your Start menu and you're good to go.
http://on10.net/blogs/sarahintampa/W...-Tordquo-Menu/

If only we had a "Move To" version of this menu.

I've already set up some custom functions for "Copy to..." and "Move to..." via the right-click context menu—but honestly, I'm not thrilled with them. They aren't true menus; you have to manually browse to the destination every single time... and it doesn't even remember your history. If you're sending something to a specific folder, it won't save your last selected path—it's pretty frustrating.

Does anyone know how to build a "Move To" menu (essentially just a "Send To" that actually relocates the file)? Or maybe there's a little utility out there that can replicate this functionality?
Anyone still running Windows 7? in Software ·
Olivia Watson46 said:It works, but I have to go through the whole file transfer process—browsing for the file, selecting where to send it... it's such a hassle. It used to be so simple; just a right-click and then "Send to Bluetooth."

There might be a quick fix for this. Try holding down the Shift key while you right-click the file; that should expand the "Send to" menu and hopefully show you more options—maybe even Bluetooth.

Also, instead of saying "Bluetooth," it might actually list your phone's name, which does the exact same thing.
I can't seem to find that "Send to folder" option in Windows right now—I don't have much time to dig around—but there are plenty of little utility programs online that let you customize those menus. Just give it a quick search on Google: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&sa...+to%22&spell=1
Anyone still running Windows 7? in Software ·
Just grab VLC Media Player and you'll be all set—otherwise, you could spend some time digging through the Windows Media Player 12 network settings, or honestly, just uninstall it and roll back to Windows Media Player 11.
Anyone still running Windows 7? in Software ·
Olivia Watson46 said:How can I get the "Bluetooth device" option to show up again under the "Send to" menu when I right-click a file or an image? It used to be there, but after I unplugged the USB dongle and plugged it back in, it just vanished. I'm running Windows 7.

Did the Bluetooth actually start working again once you plugged it back in? Did the device pair successfully?
Anyone still running Windows 7? in Software ·
Susan Ward4 said:I have a Sony VAIO laptop with a Memory Stick Pro Duo slot.
It worked perfectly fine when I was using Windows Vista.
Now that I've moved to Windows 7, it won't recognize the card at all.

Any advice or help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks so much for any assistance you can provide.

Head over to the official support pages for your specific laptop model and look for updated card reader drivers that are compatible with Windows 7. (Unless there’s some built-in manufacturer app that handles driver updates automatically—which, judging by this, clearly isn't the case here.)

It also wouldn't hurt to run a Windows update first—just in case it hasn't already grabbed the necessary drivers in the background.

You can find more details on this via Google http://www.google.com/search?client=o...utf-8&oe=utf-8
Anyone still running Windows 7? in Software ·
wearyangler76 said:Hey there! I’m running into a bit of a headache... I recently finished installing Windows 7 64, and I just picked up a wireless Trust mouse and keyboard combo, but I can't get them to play nice. When I plug the receiver into the USB port on the back, everything works for about a minute before it just goes into sleep mode and stays dead. If I try the front USB ports instead, the keyboard works fine, but the mouse won't respond at all. A buddy suggested it might be an issue with my Windows installation—has anyone dealt with something similar or found a fix? Thanks!

Try switching the mouse into device mode and checking its properties; you might find a setting under the Power Management tab causing this—it's likely just a power-saving glitch...
Anyone still running Windows 7? in Software ·
Emily Kim said:I have a quick question
I actually really like my Windows 7 (64-bit), but I clearly don't have all my drivers installed—my laptop won't go into sleep mode because it keeps throwing an "unexpected shutdown" error. On top of that, Java and Adobe Flash have been crashing lately... any advice? Also, some songs and videos won't play; could that be missing drivers too, or something else?

That sleep issue might not actually be related to using the 64-bit version or your drivers. You could try using hibernation instead of sleep to see if that works better.

As for the Adobe Flash issues, I don't think the 64-bit OS or the drivers are the culprit here either. Hopefully, someone else can weigh in with a better idea.
Anyone still running Windows 7? in Software ·
Microsoft software update (or whatever they're calling it these days—it should really be happening automatically), Windows updates, and things like that.
Anyone still running Windows 7? in Software ·
Keith Bennett38 said:Or even better:

http://www.sysprobs.com/language-bar...ista-windows-7

Thanks so much—I actually had it set to "hidden" in those deep settings and totally missed it. It used to be easy enough to just right-click the taskbar to fix things, but now that option isn't even there.
Anyone still running Windows 7? in Software ·
Keith Bennett38 said:Right-click on the Taskbar - Toolbars - Language bar (check it) 🙂

Heh, I don't even have a Language bar showing up—not sure why that is.
Anyone still running Windows 7? in Software ·
Where can I find the Language bar in Windows 7?
Anyone still running Windows 7? in Software ·
I wouldn't attempt any kind of manual repair myself. Just start a thread over at the PDF Help Service—someone there will walk you through it—but make sure you follow their instructions to the letter to clear out those viruses.

PS: Honestly, one thing that really bugs me about Windows is their supposed "speed." I’m trying to move about 7 GB of photos from my laptop running Vista over to my desktop running Windows 7, and the transfer speed over my Wireless local network is a pathetic 1.1-1.2 MB/s. At this rate, I could probably just burn them to a DVD twenty times instead.
Anyone still running Windows 7? in Software ·
I honestly don't get why Windows Photo Viewer in Windows 7 lacks image editing features—it was such a solid function back in Vista. Or am I just missing something obvious here?

Well, in Vista, you actually had Windows Live Photo Gallery, which works essentially like the Viewer but includes the Fix tool—great for quick crops or minor touch-ups—and it’s incredibly handy.
How can I get that same functionality back in Windows 7?

(And really, how is this considered an "upgrade" over Vista? 😕 )
PS: It turns out Windows 7 changed things up; I realized you have to download it separately if you don't already have it. From Microsoft's side, it's called Windows Live Photo Gallery.
Here is the link for a free download: http://download.live.com/
Anyone still running Windows 7? in Software ·
Maybe try using compatibility mode when you install the driver 😕—if you're running them through some kind of installer program, or maybe I'm just overthinking it