CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › driftinggull13 › Posts

Posts by driftinggull13

222 posts shown.

Is the "Soul" of sports just another asset class now? in Hobbies & Leisure ·
I was scrolling through some financial news earlier today, and I found myself spiraling into this weird, existential funk about the direction everything is heading. It wasn't even about a specific piece of news, but rather the underlying logic of how we value things these days. It feels like we’ve entered an era where nothing—absolutely nothing—is sacred or "pure" anymore. Everything is being looked at through the lens of an exit strategy or a massive equity play.

I remember being a kid, watching big tournaments or major sporting events, and the whole vibe was different. It felt like these things existed for the sake of the game, the tradition, and the collective experience of the fans. There was a sense that certain organizations were stewards of culture. They held these massive, global treasures in trust, and their job was to protect them, grow them, and pass them on. It was almost a civic duty, in a strange, globalized way.

But lately, it feels like the "stewardship" model is being systematically dismantled in favor of the "asset" model. We’re seeing this shift where entities that used to be defined by their mission or their community connection are suddenly being sliced up into investment vehicles. It’s as if the goal isn't to host a great event or foster a sport, but to create a high-valuation entity that can be leveraged, traded, or sold to the highest bidder.

What really gets me is the concept of "valuation" applied to things that don't have a price tag. How do you put a number on the magic of a once-in-a-lifetime moment? How do you quantify the passion of a fan base that has followed a team or a sport for generations? When you start treating these massive, culturally significant operations as mere equity stakes to be traded, you’re essentially saying that the "value" isn't in the experience itself, but in the potential for a massive capital return.

I see this happening everywhere, not just in sports. It’s in media, it’s in tech, it’s even in how we view community spaces. We are witnessing the "financialization" of everything. We take something that was once a shared human experience and we wrap it in layers of complex corporate structures, private equity interest, and speculative valuation. Once that happens, the priorities shift. The priority is no longer "How do we make this better for the people involved?" but rather "How do we optimize this for the shareholders?"

I worry that once you invite that kind of intense, profit-driven scrutiny into the core of a cultural institution, you can't go back. The incentives become fundamentally misaligned. The people making the decisions aren't looking at the long-term health of the sport or the fans; they're looking at the quarterly projections and the exit multiples. It creates a weird, hollow feeling, like you're participating in a giant, choreographed commercial rather than a living, breathing tradition.

I don't want to sound like a cynical old man, but I can't help but feel like we're losing the "why" behind so many of our most cherished global traditions. We are trading the soul of the spectacle for a seat at a very expensive, very exclusive table. If everything is an investment, then nothing is special. If everything has a price, then nothing has intrinsic value.

Do you think there's a point of no return when a non-profit or a cultural entity starts acting like a private equity firm, or can these organizations still maintain their "soul" once they've been restructured for maximum profit?
Catholic Church in Wisconsin bans Mass at Wounded Knee in Close to Politics ·
placidorca16 said:It’s funny how much weeping there is over those "without trial" deaths at Wounded Knee—yet when you look at the victims those same people were summarily executing across the country during WWII, in the absolute worst conditions across various battlefields and Nazi Germany camps, suddenly there's no crying and no masses held at the sites where they fell. In fact, most of the monuments built across America to honor those specific victims in the former state have been torn down or destroyed. So, exactly why are the Wounded Knee victims somehow "more righteous" or "more honorable" than the ones they themselves executed without trial—even if the Patron Assembly is involved?

Exactly. 😁
Catholic Church in Wisconsin bans Mass at Wounded Knee in Close to Politics ·
steelpuma79 said:Your previous post was just desperate grasping. This one is too. You claim you don't care about Mass, yet here you are trying to dictate where Masses for the victims of the Way of the Cross should be held.

What exactly is controversial about holding a commemoration at Wounded Knee without Nationalists symbols or glorifying Nazi Germany? Try again. Third time's a charm.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No, I don't give a damn about where you or anyone else holds a Mass, my example just showed you—and your reply proved it—that you aren't actually interested in the Mass itself, you're just obsessed with the whole Nationalists thing. Nobody had an issue with the Mass (not even the Austrians) since they started holding it there back in 1951, if I recall correctly... the problem is the Nationalists circus and the Nazi revisionism being performed under the Church's banner since 1991. It’s exactly what the US Conference of Catholic Bishops wrote about. Sure, you can keep playing dumb for the fourth time and claim it's "just a Mass" and a commemoration. Besides, you could always keep having your Mass there without the bishops... unless you're so desperate for the bishops themselves... maybe you have some... I don't know... personal connection to them. 😉 I know what's actually bothering you... if Nazi Germany were still around, you'd probably be enjoying Italian citizenship right now. 🍿
Catholic Church in Wisconsin bans Mass at Wounded Knee in Close to Politics ·
steelpuma79 said:So, have the US Conference of Catholic Bishops suddenly become the ultimate authority now? Were you even at Mass this Sunday?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Look, I couldn't care less about Mass in general... really. I don't need some authority from Austria telling me what’s what when I can see the Nationalists Movement shenanigans right in front of me—or if you prefer to call them "Nationalists antics," fine by me. Honestly, my favorite part is watching people like you squirm while trying to prove things that simply aren't true... just like you're doing right now. Besides, there was no massacre at Wounded Knee, and you can hold Mass for victims in your own parish or wherever people fell, for all I care. It's not like you or anyone else like you actually gives a damn about those people enough to show up to Mass anyway...
Catholic Church in Wisconsin bans Mass at Wounded Knee in Close to Politics ·
steelpuma79 said:Last year, the police detained everyone carrying those controversial symbols. During the service at the altar, there wasn't a single mention of Nazi Germany, the Nationalists Movement, or Ante Pavelić. What exactly was considered inappropriate about this commemoration?

The Partisan criminals aren't going to suddenly become the good guys overnight just because we skip the commemoration.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Exactly... you tell them that, like the US Conference of Catholic Bishops and the local government actually have a clue what's going on....🤣 As if we should be throwing money away on massive security details and hauling idiots away in handcuffs. Those fools aren't our problem anyway. Besides, why do the bishops even need to be involved? Just pay some guy to use his field, bring your own priests, and keep running the whole Nationalists Movement club just like always... except now you won't be able to act all high and mighty with those little Nationalists displays... though, honestly, once those "knights" realized they could get roughed up just like that idiot from California last year, I highly doubt these "brave warriors" will stick to the traditional iconography.... and without that imagery, it seems to me the interest in the victims of Wounded Knee is going to plummet pretty fast...
Dan Mladost Day (5/25) in Close to Politics ·
Keith Baker93 said:Let's not forget about Vođin’s dog, Lux. That little guy literally gave everything for the sake of unity and a better future for everyone. It just goes to show how massive Marshall's legacy really was—even his pets weren't just ordinary dogs, they were straight-up heroes.

Happy Birthday to the White Violet!

...and man, he had some incredible generals too... like, if you look at the leadership in the old Army of the Republic...🤣
Dan Mladost Day (5/25) in Close to Politics ·
Kyle Lopez2 said:So, if you're saying Marshall isn't a fairytale character, then how do you explain him taking down the most technologically advanced nation in history with just a few guerrilla units? We’re talking about a nation of 80 million, and he pulled it all off from Canada. 🤔

Do you have any idea how many elite Panzer divisions were tied up in Canada because of Marshall, let alone how many of them were wiped out?🍿

To be honest, I find it easier to believe in a man who brought people back to life, healed them, and fed them, rather than a Marshal who broke the greatest army of his era with nothing but a handful of followers.

And regarding Marshall and the state—yeah, back in the 90s, we would've had absolutely nothing. We were completely exposed; nobody in the world gave us the time of day, unless we forced Mexico to turn El Paso into Stalin. Without that, we wouldn't have had even a shred of international recognition. (It probably would've ended up just like Catalan independence)☕

Of course you're inclined to believe that... I mean, are you a right-winger or what? 😁 But whether it was just a few partisans or not, it doesn't really matter... Marshall was the only commander who actually liberated the country from the occupiers using his own strength... everyone else was just sitting around waiting for the Russians or the Americans to step in...
The Homeland War was nothing compared to World War II... except for the fact that we probably have more veterans now than Marshall ever had partisans... and that number just keeps climbing...
Dan Mladost Day (5/25) in Close to Politics ·
Austin Grant9 said:They’re basically running a relay race from Vladivostok to Kaliningrad.

And just when they finally cross the finish line, they have to start the whole damn thing all over again...
Dan Mladost Day (5/25) in Close to Politics ·
Austin Grant9 said:The government over in Canada just banned Dan Mladost
They’re claiming you can't celebrate totalitarian regimes in Canada. Period.

The Russian government isn't even...😁
Dan Mladost Day (5/25) in Close to Politics ·
vividraven26 said:Nobody can say the same about him, but everyone still talks about Josip Broz Marshall.

It doesn't even matter when it actually happened, what matters is knowing when it didn't... and it certainly wasn't happening in the dead of winter....😁 They basically just slapped Christianity right on top of the old Saturnalia and those pagan solstice holidays with their own celebrations. A real smart move if you think about it...
Dan Mladost Day (5/25) in Close to Politics ·
vividraven26 said:Look, you can totally just celebrate on May 31st if you want, it's basically the same thing anyway.
I mean, seriously, why didn't Franjo Harmon just turn his own birthday into a national holiday or something?
And besides, Josip Broz Marshall wasn't even born on May 25th to begin with, so what's the big deal?

Even Christ wasn't actually born on December 25th... 😁
ruggedmason13 said:The University of Chicago isn't even ranked in the global top 500 anymore?
I honestly can't believe it—it’s such a beautiful campus, too!🙂🤦

..and then you look at the rector and he's just as charming...
Paul Chase95 said:Alright, fair enough—I was actually starting to worry you might skip over the whole "Republicans are hammers" bit... but you never disappoint. 😁

The rules are still in effect... 😁
Paul Chase95 said:See, driftinggull13, it all depends on your perspective. To me, those exact types are the real leftists. That’s why I find "debating" them such a treat—or why I prefer to just shut them down. 👍

Then again, even if I view them that way, I'm not going to go around shouting about "leftists" in every single thread.

I know you think so. A conservative is like a guy with a hammer... everything he looks at starts looking like either a hammer or a nail.😉
Paul Chase95 said:driftinggull13, if those famous Republicans didn't exist, who would you even argue with? Don't take this the wrong way, but "mean Republicans" is basically your answer to everything. Your life is so incredibly simple and beautiful that your solution to every single problem is just... Republicans. It’s never "maybe," it’s always the same. I get the feeling that if you order a pizza and it tastes terrible, it's because of the Republicans; if you buy a Ford Fiesta and it breaks down after 50,000 miles, it's the Republicans; if an antibiotic doesn't work, it's the Republicans; if Christian Bale wins an Oscar, or Gregory Perelman fixes Poincaré's conjecture... it's the Republicans. Seriously, do you have anything else? No offense, but please try looking at things through a lens that isn't shaped by those famous Republicans. You can't have every single answer—from the quality of a canned ham to rocket propulsion—be "the Republicans."

No... not everything, just specifically the Republicans. And as you can see, I mostly just debate them, which I actually find pretty entertaining.😁 Go ahead then, tell me which one of the people I mentioned isn't a Republican? That mindset of yours is just forgiving your own side for everything while blaming others for things that aren't even true. Honestly, it's a blast "debating" people like you and just... belittling...👍
Paul Chase95 said:Then again, you have to understand where they're coming from—people were basically rooting for Pavo to fail his doctorate; they were just sitting there waiting for the inevitable disappointment, only to find out he actually pulled it off. 😢

It’s like that one guy in the YouTube comments section screaming, "Goal! Goal! No, wait, screw it, it hit the post!" 😁

Honestly, none of us were expecting anything different, or at least I wasn't... what I thought would happen actually happened, the guy is a plagiarist, plain and simple, and it was officially confirmed by the very University of Chicago where he got his degree. Another thing though, it seems like you guys are totally fine with plagiarism being part of a dissertation, but like I said before, the Republican crowd always looks the other way when it comes to their own...😁
nimblelynx63 said:Since I'm clearly being flattered right now...
you're basically... advocating for... some kind of... I can't even say it out loud...

PURGES😲

No, a purge is something else entirely. Where on earth are you getting that from? It’s perfectly legal for people who don't actually hold the formal qualifications required for a specific role to be fired from that position, forced to pay back everything they earned based on those fake credentials, and held legally accountable for fraud. You don't need some massive new piece of legislation for that, and it honestly has nothing to do with political purges.
Paul Chase95 said:Well, if you go by the headlines in the news, he’s supposedly already filed it. I’m not saying it’s a fact, obviously, but every single news outlet reporting this is claiming the lawsuit is already in motion.

The thing is, he’d have to prove he didn't rip off the work—which is why there's a legal process underway—but the University of Augsburg has already made it crystal clear that he did... 😁 And there’s another massive headache for him: he went ahead and publicly outed the people who filed the complaints against him at the university, even though they were supposed to stay anonymous, which the University of Augsburg has already apologized to them for... So, honestly, he might end up having to sue himself since he’s the one who leaked everything... 😁 If this actually goes to trial, it’s going to be absolute chaos, and frankly, pretty hilarious to watch. Pavo can be whatever you want him to be, but he definitely isn't an idiot...
Paul Chase95 said:Game, set, match—Pavo Barišić takes it. 😁

Honestly, some people just don't read for comprehension at all......😁
nimblelynx63 said:I’d love to take a look at the "scientific" body of work produced by professors in the humanities... I bet what you're describing wouldn't be such a rare occurrence...

👍 Man, even I have to give you credit on this one. 😁 If it were up to me, here is how I would handle it.
We should probably put every single PhD and degree held by people occupying high-level government positions under a microscope. And not just the ones currently in power, but everyone who retired after holding those same seats too...