Posts by Walter Jones8

Brainfear2@—man, that’s wild—Krpan sold out Zebbin’s tunnel 😂 and then the Bulla just poured it on—no mercy at all. (I can't say for sure how much it actually looked like that in person, though I can picture it pretty clearly—to me, that game sticks in my mind because the energy from the crowd was just insane, the whole stadium was going nuts, even if they absolutely crushed me and pushed me way back to the far end of the East Stand😂—but I probably shouldn't push my luck too hard by being stubborn about my take, just to avoid any unnecessary drama🤣.

Well, honestly—the Pantheon crowd structure changes over the years more or less everywhere you look; it’s just inevitable.
Basically, your positive progress has been visible for years now—even to someone just driving down the highway from Mobile, through Santa Monica and beyond—thanks to all those new murals and messages for the Kansas City Chiefs. (They really break up that monotonous drive with their "subtle" charm, haha). I think that one mural in Comin is actually one of the longest ever made.
Plus, you guys have had a pretty consistent crew for a few seasons now, both traveling away and at home, if I’m not mistaken? (Though we can usually spot many of them by sight alone)😍.
It’s no exaggeration to say you have a unique mentality—two good games in a row and the whole squad comes back to life instantly. Seriously. Especially during European matches; it feels like the entire city is celebrating some kind of international holiday.
And what matters for a full stadium is that you have—at least in my book—two great things to boost an already fanatic atmosphere: that legendary vibe we all know, and that "California" song. Like I said, when I swung by the Rose Bowl while visiting Majorca😂, it felt like one of your most epic displays in my memory.

Oh, you are just being so sweet 🙂

Yeah, exactly.
But what actually happens next for someone dealing with an illness like that?
How does it work for a legal guardian—what kind of criteria are they looking at?
Is it strictly necessary for it to be their own child taking care of them?
And if someone is declared incompetent, is there a way for that to change after a year or two—say, if symptoms fade or the condition recedes (though that’s rarely the case here)?
How long does it take before a medical board reviews the situation again?
I mean, is a person in that position basically stuck under lock and key forever?

So, I was actually thinking about forensic psychiatry, okay? Could you please clarify things a bit? If you can, I’ll give you a specific, recent example to work with.

I mean, I know it shows up in cartoons sometimes, but a friend of mine lives alone with her mother, and it’s obvious the woman needs a legal guardian to live an independent life. She constantly needs reminders to take her meds—she’s already been diagnosed with schizophrenia or has psychotic episodes—but she just fights back with these delusions, claiming that other people "already took her medicine."
The whole incident likely happened because she wasn't following her prescribed treatment plan. (Either she forgets because of the illness, or she thinks, "I feel much better now," and decides on her own to just stop taking them.)
She started spiraling, locked herself in the apartment, and left all the faucets running until water was flooding through the doors and into the hallway. A police patrol was called—though who knows what she actually saw during her episode—but the reality is that she used a knife in some sort of perceived "self-defense" and seriously injured an officer.
Now, my guess is she’s been involuntarily hospitalized and sent for a psychiatric evaluation, since she’s actually been under observation at a facility near a Small town in the Midwest for a few years now. I don't quite get what this current "observation" entails (at least according to her daughter), because to me, it seems pretty clear that the evaluation resulted in a court order for mandatory treatment—but I don't want to upset my friend, because living with a parent like that is incredibly draining.
Could someone please explain how this works?

So, if an involuntary hold gets extended beyond that initial 30-day mark—I’m assuming the attending psychiatrist has to officially confirm the diagnosis and provide valid medical grounds for keeping them there? Or does the director of the psychiatric facility have to step in, lay out the reasons for the detention, and sign off on it?
For instance—say someone, while in the middle of a mental health crisis, commits a serious disciplinary infraction, like an unprovoked physical assault on someone else. If they haven't reached remission yet—meaning they're still unstable, aggressive, or delusional, and there's legitimate concern that they pose a danger to themselves or the community—is their hospitalization legally extended under those circumstances?
Also, what happens if there's a criminal case pending against them, or if they've undergone a competency evaluation in the meantime? Does that create enough justifiable suspicion to warrant extending their treatment or stay?
Or...? Thanks.

When someone is dealing with severe mental health issues—the kind where they’re genuinely putting their own life, health, or safety at risk (or honestly, everyone else's too)—it isn't just a random decision. A licensed physician has to issue an official referral along with a formal written explanation detailing why involuntary commitment is absolutely necessary after an evaluation. (See Section 22, Subsection 1,
Section 23, Subsections 1 and 2). In that explanation, the doctor covers more than just the patient's basic info; they have to note the location and time of the exam, who called the doctor in, and the people providing collateral history. They also include a quick rundown of the patient's psychological, physical, and neurological status, their findings, the diagnostic impression, and the specific reasons why staying in the facility is required. This document is then authorized by the Secretary of Health.
Hospitalization referral.
Proposal for discharging someone under involuntary commitment?
...

ruggedowl71 said:They actually let me set up a payment plan back then—mostly because I explained how rough things were at home and why I couldn't work, plus we hadn't even finished high school yet. They even dropped my fine from $333 down to $700 and let me pay it off in monthly installments $33 but... well, I totally blew it. That was about two years ago. Last year I got what I thought was just a warning about the unpaid balance, but now this year, it looks like they’re actually coming for me. 😁

et, look😁
Just be careful—you don't want them picking you up again for the same thing, because honestly, they probably won't budge on the amount this time.

Walter Jones8 said:I don't know, man—if something’s listed wrong there, why don't you help me out with some actual logic? —you know, like when every pot needs a lid to work properly.

They only cleared up the misdemeanor stuff—there wasn't any talk about the criminal charges at all. Honestly, Jacko basically just got his PhD in criminal law at this point.

And yeah—it looks like everyone's getting worked up over the whole debate regarding alcohol limits at sporting events.
Technically, the law says you're fine up to a 0.5 BAC—but let’s be real, how things actually play out is a different story. Take hockey, for instance; you can easily knock back seven beers and still be totally fine—provided you’re staying chill and not acting like an idiot—so I don't see much reason why anyone would go looking for trouble or get hauled in.

Jesse Campbell said:Folks, you ABSOLUTELY need to get a lawyer. If anyone’s wondering why—hey, feel free to ask anyone who’s ever dealt with a year or two of being banned from stadiums. It is worth every single penny. ☕

Sorry, but I was actually expecting a real suggestion when you tagged me—not just some baseless trolling, which seems to be your only Joker argument, honestly. That goes for the other guy too.🙂
I was talking specifically about the appeals process for a misdemeanor—I'm definitely not trying to wade into criminal territory.
I get what you're trying to say, but when it comes down to money and paying up—well, obviously everyone is going to look out for themselves, trying to get the best outcome and pay as little as possible.
So, if someone's appeal has already been granted, why try to scare people with lawyers? Why would anyone even answer for anything else when everything is decided by evidence? Just like in a regular courtroom, without proof, there's no guilt—you can't just use empty, tired clichés. What's the point?
One more thing—this might actually be helpful for someone.
Section 17, Subsection 1 of the Law Enforcement Officers' Bill of Rights
Section 17, Subsection 3—a police officer MUST identify themselves.

Article 120-
1—Decisions, summons, and other written documents are generally sent via mail. Service can also be handled by an official from the court or the body overseeing the misdemeanor proceedings that issued the decision.
2—The court or the administrative body handling a misdemeanor case can also give a summons for a main hearing or other notices verbally to the person present, along with instructions regarding the consequences of failing to appear.
A summons given this way will be noted in the record, which the summoned person will sign—unless that summons is already part of the main hearing transcript.
In that case, service is considered valid.
3—Written documents are served to individuals in person at their home address, their place of employment, or another location where they are highly likely to be found.
Article 116-
1—Any person who is a Victim of a misdemeanor, or believes they are, and the proceedings aren't being moved forward based on their specific complaint, is a participant in the misdemeanor proceedings (I won't bore you listing them all, like traffic violations, disturbing the peace, etc.).
2—The Victim has the right to submit a request to the court for the conclusion of the proceedings...
3-..
4-..
5-..

Article 184-
Subsection 1—A published verdict MUST be written and sent out within one month of publication.
2-..
3-..
4-..
5-..
It’s pretty clear that Laura Mitchell87 mixed up the rules for misdemeanor and criminal proceedings—where hiring a lawyer would actually make sense (though clearly, some guys here can barely afford a fine, let alone a lawyer... though it's a different story if a supporters' group has its own counsel). Anyway, it all depends on what kind of trouble we're talking about. Not to get too philosophical, but that's the gist. If anything is unclear, feel free to ask.🙂

swiftmarlin72 said:Last season was definitely all about the booze—there wasn't a single non-alcoholic option in sight.

Bud Light is being pushed hard—they’re practically flooding the place with ads on every billboard around the arena.

I'm not quite sure where the error lies—could you walk me through it with some solid reasoning?
(Besides, you've got the PDF right there—check out the appeals process if you need to)
They only clarified the misdemeanor side of things, but there wasn't any mention regarding a criminal charge at all, right?

Alright, just to circle back via mail—here’s the simplest way to handle an appeal for a misdemeanor case at a municipal court.
Typically, you'd put your name and address in the top left corner, then the date and city on the right side, and about four fingers down, center the title: APPEALS PROCESS (ALL CAPS).
Then, just keep it short and sweet in plain text: "I disagree with the court's decision because of [reason], and I am requesting a new hearing." Or, if you're struggling with the cash flow for the fine ($0.73), you could ask to set up a payment plan or suggest community service instead.
((Honestly, they're usually more open to a small fine or doing some manual labor in a crowded city park, since jail is supposed to be a last resort according to the rules)).
Thanks in advance!
Bottom right, put the date and your signature.
And hey, even if you miss that initial 8-day window, in practice, they'll often give you some leeway for up to two months—just make sure to explain why you were late, like being sick or looking after a grandparent.
That’s really it. Just keep in mind, a criminal case is a whole different ballgame.

Scott Gonzalez18 said:Back in September 2009, I got hit with a thousand-dollar fine for some misdemeanor from back in 2007 or 2008. I haven't paid a cent since then, and I haven't heard a peep from them either—nothing. Does a statute of limitations exist for stuff like this, and if so, how long does it take to kick in?

Just file it away—honestly, don't go paying it for nothing unless they come knocking. I'm not totally sure if the police still pull people out of bed for things like this anymore—it's been a minute since I've dealt with social services—but anyway, don't bother; it’s probably been at least two years since the report was even filed.😍

Scott Gonzalez18 said:I got hit with a thousand bucks in fines back in September 2009 for some violation from 2007 or 2008. I haven't paid a cent since then, and nothing else has shown up. Does this stuff expire—like, is there a statute of limitations—and if so, how long does it take?

If we're talking about a misdemeanor, yeah—there’s definitely a statute of limitations. Back before everything was networked at the Kennedy courthouse, people would just pay the first installment of an installment plan and that was basically it. For actual criminal charges, though? Not for those kinds of offenses, not yet.
Or—look, if you were a broke student back then with parents on social security or retirement, you could try humbly asking for community service instead of a fine. But honestly, word is the system is such a disorganized mess right now that things just get lost in the shuffle—so there's actually a decent chance that option might eventually dry up too.
Just a heads-up: that's strictly for MISDEMEANORS. Don't even attempt that with CRIMINAL charges, because once the judge pulls up your file, they can see your whole life story. They’ve already implemented "probation revocations" for those cases quite a while ago. It really comes down to judicial discretion—what kind of impression can you leave? Things like showing respect to the court, admitting your mistake, being genuinely remorseful, and not acting like a tough guy go a long way. Also, make sure you stand up when giving your statement without being prompted—it sounds trivial, but believe me, judges are surprisingly old-school about that stuff. Doing those little things might actually convince them to lean toward the minimum legal penalty. If that doesn't work, you still have the right to appeal a criminal ruling within about 8 days of getting the official report. At the very least, you can use that to stall for time.

Look, the law is what it is right now—there’s just no changing it overnight.
Just a quick side note regarding the advice being given: if you can't cough up a massive fine all at once, ask the judge for a payment plan. They’re usually pretty reasonable about it. (For instance, if you're hit with a $0.00 fine that needs to be paid by a certain date, you can ask the officials to break it down into monthly installments—say, splitting $167 into four manageable payments). Obviously, if you're going through an appeal process, it makes sense to bring up things like extreme financial hardship or being a single parent supporting a child.

I’d also be curious to know—what kind of actual, tangible benefits have we really seen since joining the EU?

Man, honestly, everything sounds good to me—but I have to ask, are you actually inviting the forum crew to your birthday bash?😁