Jessica Gonzalez said:I guess that loss wasn't just a fluke. It's not the first time he's let two match points slip away against Federer. Sure, he was incredibly close to winning, and maybe if an ace hadn't clipped the net (hehe), he would have shut the door, but those following points were a perfect example of why he's number one. When he's on the brink of losing, he plays these tough returns, almost like he flips a switch. He stays calm, hitting them flat and deep near the line without any nerves at all. After facing those two match points served by a super confident opponent, he responded with four straight points, flipped the game, and totally broke his opponent's spirit—all in about two minutes. I think things like that aren't accidents; that's why he's the best. It's similar to what happened at the US Open when Federer also had two match points and then turned the tide with that legendary return before taking three games in a row. Maybe Federer just lacks that specific edge when he gets into a tight spot against the absolute best players. He has everything else, but I guess he's missing that one thing.
Man, you are idolizing him to a ridiculous degree, because if you actually look at it, Federer spent his entire career showing that exact "clutch" factor, but then these players showed up who could actually go toe-to-toe with him, and once they started getting inside his head, his physical game started sliding bit by bit because of age, and we all know how much even a tiny 1% drop matters in top-tier sports.
When you're playing someone who is also claiming the throne of the Greatest of All Time, having a six-year age gap after you've already crossed thirty is a massive, massive deal.
Seriously, the guys in that final were 37 and 31 years old, so I'm genuinely curious how Djokovic, being 37, would have even stood a chance against a 31-year-old Federer in a five-set Wimbledon final.
It feels to me like you're the one among us who views these superstars like they're actual gods 🤣