Posts by Kyle Campbell4

Steven Fox37 said:My brain is working perfectly fine, thanks. That's exactly why I can see they clearly didn't expect the attack—or maybe they thought NATO and Europe would actually have their backs, whether through troops or a no-fly zone. Now they realize all that NATO support was just empty talk. They completely misread the situation.
And again, those videos aren't an actual argument.
Talking about "Mother Russia," the USSR, and getting off on dictators? You’re the one obsessing over the biggest dictators in the world: America and Britain. You really don't have any room to talk on this one.

And in those messed-up, unstable states, you find people who manage to exploit those divisions, only to end up taking a bullet from some general funded by the CIA, MI6, DGSE, or Mossad. Or the IMF and similar outfits wreck their economy, or they get hit with sanctions, or a "spontaneous" color revolution gets triggered, or extremists from a neighboring state start shelling towns and villages with weapons provided by the Americans, and so on and so forth.
The region stays unstable because whenever there's a chance for stability, the bombing starts—whether it's literal or figurative. And the reason? Because stability and development mean unwanted economic and geopolitical competition.

Give me a break... whaaaatttt? 🤣

Those individuals are called dictators. They don't transcend those divisions; they exploit them by applying brute force and favoring their own ethnic groups, which actually deepens the divides rather than overcoming them. They seize power through military strikes and violence. It is truly staggering how warped your perception of the world has become. You have constructed your own little version of alternative history and are now stubbornly insisting on these self-made fabrications. I would compare this mindset to a low-level street gang that views the West and the USA as the ultimate evil. Furthermore, suggesting that the greatest dictatorships are pools of free thought is something one should never identify with. For them, it’s easy to understand since they are nationalists, but I honestly cannot believe a young man from Miami thinks this way.

Noah Roberts46 said:He had to be removed if the country was ever going to move forward. 🙏

Just look at the state of the country now. 🤣

Are you even reading what you wrote?

There is absolutely no debate on my end regarding the condemnation of this aggression, and frankly, it’s disgusting that you’re implying I’m justifying anything. I’ve said this multiple times, but clearly, you lack basic reading comprehension. It’s the same deal with Saddam—you can’t grasp my point because you refuse to connect the dots. You have to look at the timing and the context. Saddam was taken out right at the start, yet the USA pulled its troops out eight years later. As for the oil, I already provided a link that seems to be way over your head.

So, you’d want to take out Assad? Just because things went so well in Libya? Honestly, you haven't offered a single concrete answer to anything; you just spout total nonsense. You love talking about propaganda while it’s blindingly obvious that your brain has been washed by pro-American rhetoric. I don't subscribe to any specific propaganda, whether it’s Russian or American. Both nations do terrible things—some more than others. You paint one side as modern-day Nazis while conveniently turning a blind eye and searching for excuses for the other. There is zero point in trying to have a real discussion with you on this topic. LP

Under Saddam, Iraq was a nation stifled by sanctions and embargos. That madman could only be controlled in that manner. Food shortages and famine were commonplace occurrences. Today, Iraq is a country that trades freely with the entire world. Hunger and scarcity are merely grim memories from the era of that dark dictator. The security situation has also improved following the end of the civil war and the defeat of the Sunnis. If they can manage to overcome their tribal divisions, Iraq could actually transform into a functional state. This stands in stark contrast to Syria, which under Assad will never evolve into a healthy society. Your tiny intellect is even worse than the Nazis, who were actually sophisticated, urban players for their era. You are stuck somewhere in the 18th century.

Steven Fox37 said:I know you think none of this matters because, in your eyes, the saintly Ukrainians would never do something like that.
How do you actually know the Russian minority in other areas is fighting the aggressor? Is it because you watched a few clips served up to you by the Ukrainians or the Mainstream Media and decided that's the whole story? This seems to be the pattern with everything you write here. Whatever the Ukrainians say is 100% truth... until a few days later when it turns out the video was actually from a video game, or those "brave fallen heroes" are actually still alive, and so on. And then your new allies—the New York Times reporters and those purple-haired Twitter libtards—write about how we shouldn't criticize such lying because it's "good" propaganda.
The Soviets, the empire, the Tsar, the little guy you're obsessed with... you're basically just copy-pasting the same lines from post to post now. 🤣

Well obviously they aren't. In one case, our guys are fighting, and in the other, it's the bad Russians.

I ordered for the first time about a week ago (I resisted as long as I could, DoorDash was doing the job fine) and the geniuses added a "bad weather surcharge" of $4-$1.75 And there isn't even a single drop of rain in sight.

Of course they wouldn't do that if there is an aggression and an invasion by another global power hanging over their heads. Use that damn brain of yours and start thinking logically. How do I know they are fighting an aggressor? Look, everyone has a smartphone these days. People risk their lives to film the bombing of a family home or a building. Protesters themselves filmed the protests, even in areas where you claim they are just dying to be annexed by Russia. Shame on you, you war dogs. It isn't my problem if you are a classic old-school leftist looking back at Russia with nostalgia because it reminds you of the former USSR. God, you people are obsessed with every dictatorship that exists in the world.

feralcanyon73 said:Putin’s got a tiny little 5'6" frame, yet Zelenskyy is out here making himself look like a damn giant at 5'7"

You just don't get it; you never will. One is a midget, the other is a stud with massive balls. Now, think about how that🤔

Justin James10 said:Whoa, look at this! Dežulović just dropped a massive piece that seems to be doing a lot of relativizing when it comes to the war. 🤣🤣🤣

There isn't much difference between him and those thugs at the pro-Russian protests. It's exactly the same thing.

Steven Fox37 said:The fundamental problem with these countries is that whenever it looks like someone might actually take power—or does take power—who could bring real stability and a better future, everything falls apart. We’re talking about actual progress, where a nation builds itself up to compete globally instead of just being treated as a bottomless pit of cheap resources for the West. As soon as that happens, the Americans step in. Whether it's the Brits, the French, or the Saudis, they jump right in to sabotage the process. They do it through covert means using the CIA, the Mainstream Media, or the IMF... and if those tactics don't work? Then they go in wide open with bombings, full-scale invasions, or by bankrolling puppet leaders to keep things under control.

The fundamental flaw of these nations is that they are utterly grotesque and artificial constructs. Their borders were drawn solely to satisfy the strategic interests of the French and the British. In these newly formed states, people who had never shared a common life were forced together—groups that fundamentally despise one another. This is precisely why the region remains so volatile and perpetually locked in internal conflict. It is also exactly why we see a continuous cycle of dictators emerging, men who ruthlessly suppress and trample every other ethnic community just to maintain their own grip on power.

Noah Roberts46 The user states:
Look, I am fully aware that Saddam Hussein was a dictator and a criminal, but that doesn't provide any justification for the invasion. I have to ask: would so many people there have died if the invasion hadn't happened? Just because one segment of the population welcomed the USA as liberators doesn't mean anything at all. I could make the exact same argument regarding how some Russians in Ukraine viewed Vladimir Putin as a liberator. The criteria being used here are nothing more than pure hypocrisy. We all know the true motivation was economic interest, much like what we saw later in Libya and Syria. It is the same pattern we see now with the Russians in Ukraine, specifically targeting areas where new energy resources have been discovered—resources that would give Russia a massive economic advantage if the Ukrainians were able to utilize them, especially with their integration into the EU. Trying to find moral justifications for that war is laughable, and honestly, most Americans already agree with that sentiment. It is just as ridiculous to try and justify this current war.

The intervention was driven by the hunt for weapons of mass destruction and alleged links to Bin Laden following 9/11, even though those factions were constantly at each other's throats. In the end, it became glaringly obvious that none of those justifications held any water. If we are going to justify intervening in every single nation where there is an insurgency based on human rights violations or dictatorships, then why aren't we seeing similar action in Saudi Arabia? It is pure double standards. Who is going to answer for the millions of lives lost? Where are the sanctions? If you refuse to hold the West accountable, then who exactly do you think is to blame?

I find myself increasingly convinced that the whole "heart of Europe" argument is nothing more than a laughable distraction. It also deeply irritates me when people engage in that performative mourning following a terrorist attack in France, where everyone starts waving flags without having the slightest clue how the tragedy actually unfolded. To be perfectly honest, I feel exactly the same way about the French and Ukrainians as I do about the people in Syria and Yemen. In other words, I feel absolutely nothing. A human life is a human life, and everything else is just mindless posturing.

You have churned out a mountain of nonsense, recycled from those old anti-American talking points you picked up on the internet years ago. You are completely contradicting yourself here. In one post, you claim he should have been left alone, yet in another, you argue his removal was entirely justified. For heaven's sake, pick a side and stay consistent. Let’s get one thing straight: Americans didn't arrive to a welcoming committee of liberators; they were met by the majority of the Iraqi population. And keep in mind—the Sunnis are actually the minority in Iraq. Yes, sure, the invasion happened because of the oil. If that were the case, Iraq would still be under occupation today. I am a firm believer in democracy, which means any dictator like Saddam Hussein deserves to have his regime dismantled. If you actually valued human life the way you pretend to, you would have condemned this aggression from the very beginning. Instead, you are just attempting to relativize the situation. Furthermore, let's correct the record: Americans did not kill the majority of civilians in Iraq. Most of those deaths occurred during the internal sectarian fighting between Shias and Sunnis.

Noah Roberts46 said:You people have no clue. The invasion of Kuwait happened in the early 90s—how could that possibly be a reason for an invasion in the 2000s? We are talking about actual motives here. I know the history of Iraq and Iran well enough. I have zero issues with Saddam being taken down since he was a criminal, especially if it had happened back in the early 90s. But should they have occupied territory thirteen years later and slaughtered so many civilians just for that? To grab their oil? Don't give me that bullshit.

What I'm saying is that the US intervention in Syria, where they claimed Bashar al-Assad used chemical weapons on his own people without any real proof, ended up being proven wrong. The USA even admitted to arming ISIS, but you all conveniently ignore that. It seems to me that some people only bother with geopolitics when something relevant is happening in Europe, without having any grasp of global affairs because, frankly, they don't give a damn. This is a perfect example.🤦

So, was it actually a good thing that Saddam Hussein was finally dealt with? Honestly, you need to pick a side and stick to it. George W. Bush made the decision to finish what his father, George H.W. Bush, couldn't quite wrap up. The truth is, the entire narrative was just a manufactured lie used as a pretext. The cold, hard fact remains that Saddam had to be removed if the country was ever going to move forward; otherwise, it would have remained perpetually held hostage by him.

I was never fully clear on how the Americans actually executed their strikes against Assad. I am aware, for instance, of the specific arrangements made with him regarding airspace freedoms, all under the guise of assisting the Kurds in their fight against ISIS. While certain factions were busy shelling ordinary green vegetables, ISIS was being left entirely alone in the east. It is a stark reality: they effectively armed ISIS, only to have those same weapons turned back against their own soldiers later on. To be clear, I am all for seeing Assad removed from power, but I refuse to support any move that results in his replacement by Islamic radicals.

Unlock the offside rule

By the way, am I really the only one who wants to scream whenever some politician shows up in front of those staged cameras, wearing that manufactured expression, acting as if they're utterly devastated or teetering on the edge of clinical depression—as if someone actually forced them out of bed just so they could start huffing and puffing about their "deep concerns" in that low, slow, performative voice? 🤣

He is just a mix of Assad and Saddam. He hasn't the slightest clue about the Kurds or chemical weapons. Everything from the invasion of Kuwait for oil to the prior attack on Iran—he dismisses all of it as if everything Assad did was merely propaganda 😁 when the reality is that every single clown tries to meddle in affairs where they don't belong, but since the topic is trending, he feels compelled to offer his "insight."

fadedridge903 said:https://www.reuters.com/world/europe...ts-2022-02-18/

MOSCOW, Feb 18 (Reuters) - Ukraine announced the evacuation of its breakaway region's residents to Southeast Russia on Friday after an increase in shelling.

You haven't explained a single thing. We all remember that evacuation. It was heavy shelling coming from both sides; the separatists struck first, and the Ukrainian side responded in kind. You people are being truly tragicomic in your pathetic attempts to justify this absolute garbage triggered by that midget. I can honestly say nothing more than to call you domestic Chetniks. The only possible excuse for you is that you were born in the 90s and have no memory of the Homeland War or the identical propaganda used against us back then. Regardless of who wins, Ukraine is already a ruined state. Cities have suffered catastrophic destruction. Bakhmut is effectively gone, and Mariupol isn't far behind. Kyiv and Kharkiv are just waiting for their turn to be leveled. They are fighting with VBRs in civilian neighborhoods. These are the kinds of actions that trigger international war crimes tribunals. Millions of people are displaced. You can't even tell if it's worse for those fleeing or those left behind. We are talking about millions of lives destroyed—people who will live with war trauma until the day they die. It will take two generations before their society can undergo a complete reset and become functional again. That is why I sincerely hope the West does not waver in its positions. I want to see even stronger economic strikes against Russia. I want to see them brought to their knees for what they have done to their peaceful neighbors. I will personally open a bottle of wine and enjoy watching their economy collapse while those poor souls face total bankruptcy. It should set them back some 200 years.

Noah Roberts46 said:What a parallel. 🤣

Obviously, I feel worse about Ukraine because it's closer to home and culturally similar to us. I'm just saying the moralizing is ridiculous; back then, I don't recall seeing signs everywhere calling Obama a war criminal or a psychopath, or Bush for that matter. At least not to that extent. And I didn't see all this whining about sanctions either. You can't lecture others on morality when you're doing the exact same thing. A human life is a human life, period.

The situations are completely incomparable, and that isn't just due to geography. In Iraq, Americans were welcomed as liberators by the Sunnis and the Kurds. You likely belong to that generation born in the 90s, so you have no real grasp of the devastation Saddam caused. This isn't the same as a global intervention against a dictator, nor is it the same as a powerful neighbor in the heart of Europe deciding to invade a weaker neighbor out of pure spite, especially one structured as a democracy. Let me put it bluntly: it is not the same thing when a midget bombs people in sandals as it is when someone launches an invasion on their immediate neighbor just because they’ve developed a massive ego and think they're the new Czar.

Steven Fox37 said:It’s honestly hard for me to take any Ukrainian claims at face value when they've already shown how willing they are to twist the truth and play games. Of course the Russians disagree too, but they aren't the only ones, and the Russians aren't the only ones being backed by the entire Western media mainstream that prints every single lie as gospel across a million newspapers and sites.
The whole "fake state" thing isn't really relevant here because nothing would satisfy those Chetniks except a "Greater Mexico." A better comparison would be Americans living in certain parts of the country who have been getting pushed around by local factions for decades.
If Americans reacted tomorrow the same way people in Donbas and Luhansk do, I highly doubt anyone would call them "Chetniks." In fact, it would probably be the exact opposite—people would likely be talking about signing up for a volunteer militia, and suddenly nobody would care about "internationally recognized borders" anymore. Isn't it funny how easily "the right to self-determination" and other lofty terms get tossed in the trash the moment someone we don't like uses them? It’s the same deal with Catalans, Basques, Scots, or Irish; we support them even though their goals don't align with official borders.

I find it quite easy to believe, because I seriously doubt the Ukrainians would be the first to start raining artillery fire on separatists while expecting a massive invasion of their own country any day now. There is absolutely no connection there. But you, however, choose to blindly trust the Russian dictatorship. Naturally, everyone stands on the side of the one who was attacked and invaded. The comparisons to the frontier are entirely appropriate. They were the majority population in occupied territory, pushed out the dissenters, and seized the narrative that they were being threatened by the majority population. Just like the Russian militants in Donbas. It is strange how the Russian minority in other parts of Ukraine isn't feeling threatened; in fact, they fight heartily against the aggressors and consider Ukraine their home, yet this group of militants in the east suddenly finds itself under threat. This is cheap propaganda that only fools fall for. Realize once and for all that there is no Soviet Union, there is no empire, and there is no Tsar. Those eras are long gone. The little guy you idolize so much will ultimately become a victim of his own people. The only question left is whether they handle him quickly or throw him in a cell.

Steven Fox37 said:Just like how Zelensky was sleeping soundly while the Donbas was being shelled. 🤷

Yeah, I actually have that series sitting right there on my hard drive, but I just can't seem to find the time to sit down and actually watch it. Honestly, when am I ever going to get around to it?

How? Yes and no. There was a ceasefire in effect until the separatists started the provocations and the shelling themselves, all just to give that midget an excuse to bring the army in. And even if they did what you claim, they still have every right to liberate their own territory within internationally recognized borders, rather than letting those Russian chetniks carve out some kind of frontier.

I honestly don't get all this crowding in every single city. People have become incredibly spoiled, just coddled by their own comfort. And yet, we never stop whining about how hard life is. We should just walk a bit more and be more active; it's really nothing extraordinary.

Another general has been killed on the battlefield. Apparently, some big shot. Finally, the Ukrainians are defending the skies. You can clearly see the impact of that Stinger shipment 😁. In a single day, about ten aircraft and helicopters were taken down. The days of easy low-altitude flying for the occupiers are over. Down south near Mykolaiv, three columns of Orcs have been crippled. Desertion is also surfacing, with abandoned equipment and vehicles being found everywhere.
Intelligence assessments suggest that the Russians have thrown everything they had stockpiled on the border—both manpower and armor—into the fire. Putin announced he won't be sending new Russian forces into the war, though he is reportedly lobbying his allies to send their own troops. There is talk of Syrians. Imagine the chaos if Assad sends his people into Ukraine. Arabs versus a European army? That is a massive handicap for the European forces, because those poor souls will first freeze to death trying to adjust to an Eastern winter, and secondly, fighting someone else isn't the same as fighting among yourselves. If the Midget thinks Syrians are going to be the ones saving the day, then the entire invasion narrative has seriously hit a wall.

There are far too many reasons why these hypocritical double-dealers are failing us:

- They flirted with Ukraine while simultaneously pressuring them to pivot toward the West and abandon their ties to Russia.

- Imposing sanctions just for the sake of having them is utterly pointless unless you actually target the areas that cause them the most pain. Beyond that, we are essentially telling brave Ukrainians to just hold on while their country is turned into a wasteland, all while we continue to fuel Putin's war machine.

- What is needed is concrete military assistance, not empty applause and shipments of 5,000 helmets. If they are going to keep buying Russian gas, then they should at least have the decency to arm the Ukrainians properly.

Larry Fox5 said:Just imagine if he actually lived in Bijesov's neighborhood... what a nightmare.

I can see him hanging from a flagpole; I guess I’m just a bullfighter at heart.🙂

I'm just sitting here waiting for Vekjo to jump back in and explain once again why the current sanctions are essentially nothing. I’ve told him this before: there is absolutely no chance they will ever hit where it actually hurts or force any real concessions, because European nations are far too dependent on Russian energy. It is pure hypocrisy and double standards in politics, plain and simple.

Justin James10 said:It’s absolutely wild how that guy can just wander around wherever he pleases without a second thought. And then you hear people making all these comments about people from the West Coast or how folks in Southern California are being treated—as if they wouldn't be walking around just like him! ☕

The guy claims to be a historian, yet he’s actually just some obscure theologian.

Well, he did finish his history studies under Miroljub. That explains why he keeps spouting such ridiculous, imperialist nonsense.

It is truly fascinating how that certain pro-Mexican individual can wander through San Francisco without anyone batting an eye. It is certainly a tolerant environment. That local sympathizer living abroad has somehow established himself as an absolute authority on all things historical, despite the fact that his credentials come from Miroljub Petrovica, who was supposedly his history instructor. In short, he has integrated himself perfectly into their little social circus.

Send those photos over via DM, along with a full review once you've had a chance to process everything. Do it for the sake of America 😁

I remain deeply skeptical about the defense efforts, despite how much urban warfare typically favors the defenders. It isn't even a matter of human willpower; it’s purely a question of technical capacity. A friend was telling me last night that they have hauled in massive amounts of hardware. That is precisely why they are acting with such nonchalance toward their equipment. He believes there is absolutely no way the Ukrainians can afford to lose all of this, regardless of how much resistance they've shown so far.

Well, damn it.🤣🤣 Honestly, I’m starting to think this is a full-blown kidnapping, and I’ll probably end up getting hunted down and torn to pieces.🤣

Matthew Collins20 said:1. **Bold:** That stuff from a few months back? There was that rumor about them accidentally getting shot down by Mexicans during a military exercise, which honestly... 🤣
If we're talking about something new, it'll come to light because you can't really hide this kind of thing. There are plenty of aviation enthusiasts watching every single move, and they'd definitely notice if a plane went missing. Romania doesn't have thousands of planes; they have about 40.

2. **Bold:** How did they enter Canada? Through Western Ukraine? That sounds like a fairy tale.

They violated Swedish airspace a couple of days ago by flying over some small island, but they've done that before. Besides, Sweden isn't in NATO yet, so people feel bolder flying over them. When they first flew over Turkey, Erdogan shot one down the very next day.

How would a regular American soldier even know things like that? It seems more likely that a soldier willing to gossip like that isn't exactly high up in the chain of command and wouldn't be anywhere near the sensitive data, let alone talking about it out loud...

Man, he can see everything happening over Europe right on his radar, and you're asking how he'd know. Sure, he probably doesn't know the top-secret stuff reserved for high-ranking officers, but they get regular briefings where they receive reports and projections. All member militaries are on standby. He didn't say a war is definitely coming; he just said things are getting dangerously heated and all options are on the table.

Thomas Hayes said:That’s true, but there’s a massive difference between what you see on screen and how life actually works—I mean, the stuff they pull on each other during a freaking football game? It completely ignores every single rule of civilized society.

Fan violence is basically a walk in the park compared to places like Juarez or Tijuana and those other cartel-controlled wasteland regions. Out there, they actually murder their drug rivals and hang bodies from bridges just to send a message to everyone else. It’s a tradition that’s been going on since the early 90s.