wiredpanther10 said:Thanks so much, 1138.
I'm in.
706 posts shown.
wiredpanther10 said:Thanks so much, 1138.
cosmichound10 said:and? who actually lowered it?
Jeffrey Wilson67 said:I see you're playing nice now, but that’s a pretty weak example. I don't buy it. Even if they aren't in the same league, acting is either good or it isn't. You can't really split hairs based on whether someone is a lead or just a supporting player...
I don't see that at all... That would imply that that washed-up lawyer from Carlito's Way and the ex-con from Mystic River are basically just forced versions of the same trope. Doesn't make any sense to me... unless they're just leaning hard on the "mostly" part... 🤣 ?
Linda Lopez80 said:...it's some movie (can't recall the title) where he plays a supporting role, like a ship captain, and some Japanese guy flees Japan for the US to find his father, only to discover he's a blind American soldier......

Raymond Palmer8 said:Look, I was actually sticking to something I didn't explicitly say in my last post...
I don't have some weird obsession with Penn; I just reacted to that comparison for a totally different reason:
Comparing him to a heavyweight actor just feels off. I can think a player from a lower league is super likable or undeniably talented, but comparing them to an All-Star is just tacky. The math doesn't add up.
Once Roth carries a high-quality film as the lead, then maybe he’ll be worth comparing. Until then, he’s just a supporting guy...
To some, he’s charming; to me, he’s barely there...
Raymond Palmer8 said:plus, comparing some amateur to Sean Penn is pretty rude, at least in my book.
Susan Mendoza71 said:he's terrible 😢 . I mean, the guy is awful, and TR nailed it 😍 .
you definitely have to watch the movie 👍
Nicholas Chavez70 said:Ugh, such a typical slimy British type. He really grossed me out in Rob Roy (Liam Neeson)