Jonathan Perez88 said:How can you be so sure? Is this based on actual experience? And what exactly makes them so special?
Exactly. And will they actually do anything eight months post-op? What’s the damage on price?
113 posts shown.
Jonathan Perez88 said:How can you be so sure? Is this based on actual experience? And what exactly makes them so special?
Ronald Hall4 said:I'm 43. I have surgery scheduled to remove uterine fibroids. They’re taking my uterus and one ovary. If everything goes according to plan, I want to know what happens to my sex drive afterward. Has anyone been through this? Can someone explain how it feels? 🙂
Brenda Ramos2 said:Honestly, I just don't feel right going out when I know people are staring at my scar. To be fair, I grew up by the coast, so being near the water was always just part of life—I’m not "addicted" to it or anything. But lately, I actually find skipping a swim more comfortable than having to deal with everyone's eyes on my scar.
And I’m struggling with the same thing ruggedscout91 mentioned; it’s this constant, nagging reminder of everything that went down, and frankly, I can't even stand looking at it myself.
ambermason822 said:Thanks everyone for the input. I’m calling my OB-GYN first thing in the morning, and I already have an ultrasound scheduled at a private clinic tomorrow. I'll update you all once I know more. Thanks again.
placidjackal36 said:And why on earth would anyone bother rotating a mattress? What's the point? Connections. What are they really worth? Is there anything left to say? 🙄
ambermason822;27320902 said:Scott Allen10 said:😂..
I am not entirely clear on whether you actually had a pulmonary embolism or if it was just a suspicion. A high CRP might be explained by inflammatory processes following an embolism... or perhaps some infection at the surgical site, though that doesn't seem particularly convincing to me....
No, I didn't have a pulmonary embolism. All my test results came back normal. My CRP was elevated at around 40 while I was in the hospital, even though I was already taking Augmentin twice a day at 1g doses.
Your OB-GYN surgeon is the one person you absolutely need to follow up with. There is no need to panic. The cardiologist did their job, but your gynecologist holds jurisdiction over your care until the incision heals. As for the ultrasound, your surgeon will know best what might jeopardize the healing process.
My opinion? That CRP and sedimentation rate are linked to your surgery. It would be wise to get checked out by your surgeon immediately.
silvereagle22 said:Of course psychological help and support isn't just "needed," it's essential!!!
I went through all those struggles right alongside my mother, so I know exactly what you mean... my advice is to go out and find it yourself. Get a referral from your primary care doctor and go see a psychologist—you can't do this alone, or maybe try looking into some support groups...
With diagnoses like this (cancer), your mental state is truly the most important thing... both for the treatment itself and for your quality of life.
Just keep pushing forward... stay in the fight. 👍
silvereagle22 said:I’m with you on this. I fully support Minister Milinovic’s move.
1. Regarding those maternity wards—they aren't even real hospitals. Aside from a delivery chair and some midwives, what else is there? A woman could basically give birth at home. If something goes wrong, where is the anesthesiologist? How are they going to perform an emergency C-section? They can't. And just like that, two lives are lost... for what?
They were given a deadline to upgrade and equip those birthing centers, yet they haven't spent a dime or improved anything. Honestly, you have to wonder if that money just ended up in someone's pocket...
2. They really need to cut the supplemental benefits for people on unemployment.
With those benefits, they get everything handed to them on a silver platter, just like me—except I actually work and set aside my own money every month.$43 They get free checkups, braces... everything. Meanwhile, most of them are just sitting at home doing nothing.
I think it’s high time we made some smart cuts in healthcare to stop the bleeding of funds. This is a solid start.
For instance, instead of wasting money maintaining those "maternity centers" in Sinj and Supetar, they could open an oncology department or even just a few pediatric rooms for kids and their parents.
Donna Turner8 said:I don't know what you were looking at, but I definitely saw a difference.
My face cleared up completely; it’s smooth as a baby's bottom now.
The catch? My chest broke out in an allergic rash and a bunch of pimples.
So, there is clearly a difference. When I was eating sweets, pastries, and all that junk, my skin was a disaster. As for what those specific "supplements" were, I couldn't tell you, but I noticed the shift between then and now.
@ruggedscout91/">@@ruggedscout91,
I didn't say you overdosed on Vitamin C, and I don't think any of my posts gave anyone reason to suggest that.
Excess is always dangerous. Whether you're gorging on chocolate all day or swallowing spoonfuls of undiluted Vitamin C powder.
placidjackal36 Asks:
The idea that you need to drink two liters of water every day is just another myth. Is there any actual science behind it? Not really.
Sure, the body needs about two liters on average. That’s just an estimate, though. The actual amount fluctuates depending on your metabolism, how quickly you process fluids, and all that other nonsense. But that doesn't mean you actually have to hit it. To drink? Two liters.
Those two liters are replenished by moisture from food, water produced through metabolic chemical reactions, and whatever else we drink. It’s a simple cycle. Is there really any mystery to it?
Overhydrating is a mistake. You end up forcing your kidneys into overdrive, and you flush out essential electrolytes in the process. Is it really worth the trade-off?
It’s decent advice to start eating normally again, I suppose. However, I have a few corrections to make. I simply cannot sit by and let these myths continue to spread.
Coca-Cola isn't dangerous. It's perfectly healthy. Within the daily recommended limits.Nothing about it is dangerous if you follow the instructions. That whole "Coca-Cola destroys your liver" nonsense is nothing more than old wives' tales from back when it first hit pharmacy shelves. People saw the fizzing and got spooked. They noticed the effervescence—a standard reaction caused by CO2—and I suppose they somehow associated it with acid eating through a concrete floor. The myth was born, and clearly, it refuses to die.
Restricting access to Coca-Cola isn't exactly a brilliant move, given the risk of hypervitaminosis. But let's be realistic. To actually reach those dangerous levels, one would have to go out of their way to consume it—I'm talking about eating the powder straight from the spoon, in massive quantities, on a regular basis. Is anyone actually doing that?
Women today have longer lifespans. In the past, they lived significantly shorter lives on average. Back then, reaching forty was a feat in itself. If some old woman managed to hit 100, it was nothing more than a statistical anomaly—just like it is today.
Preservatives, emulsifiers, and all that other stuff aren't just permitted here; they are permitted everywhere. They serve a vital purpose. Without them, food would be far more dangerous, much harder to source, and significantly more expensive. It might sound strange to some, but these additives actually play a role in extending human life expectancy. Why make things more complicated than they need to be?
Mindset isn't a cure-all for physical ailments. Most illnesses have a tangible, biological cause. You can maintain the most positive attitude in the world, but if you're exposed to tetanus, it’s over. Or an HIV virus. Biology doesn't care about your mood.
placidjackal36 said:Why don't you try eating normally? You know... real food, specifically the kind meant to actually build cells?
Detoxification is a myth, a very stupid myth that can end badly. What purpose do the liver and kidneys serve if not to metabolize and flush out toxins?
If your organs are healthy, just eat a varied diet and leave it at that. Carbohydrates, proteins, fats, water, fiber. Period.
A healthy body (though "healthy" is a flexible term here; you don't need to be 100% superhuman) is a self-regulating system. It will purge toxins on its own, faster or slower depending on what they are. The worst thing you can do is deny it the fuel and materials it needs to clean itself.
Your liver might want to flush out all that nonsense, but the poor thing can't because you've suddenly put your system on a restrictive crash diet. Now your systems are struggling to hold onto everything they can because they are evolutionarily programmed to fear starvation.
Forget these idiotic detox myths and start eating properly.