Posts by ironbear34

Steven Allen9 said:The Republican Party wasn't the only game in town back in '89 or '90. I was just a kid then, so my memory is a bit fuzzy, but they weren't the only ones pushing for independence.
Between the Grand Coalition and the Liberal Party... honestly, the Republicans absolutely gutted this country’s industrial and intellectual potential. They lured us into the mud with some pretty smooth talking, but in the end, it was all just empty rhetoric.
If someone with half a brain had been in charge instead of Franjo Harmon, we might actually have a functioning state right now—regardless of his little deal with Slobodan.
The Republican Party is just a toxic collection of thieves, small-time crooks, and total lowlifes. Oh, and let's not forget Bebić's party of idiots, too.

That describes you perfectly. You haven't changed, though it seems you've lost your mind along the way. Not that I blame you; recognizing leftist demagoguery requires a certain level of cognitive function. But then again, who would ever bother voting for the left?

Not at all!

Morgan Rodriguez57 said:There are, but they’re either totally naive or written strictly from a Republican Party perspective... because honestly, it's either incredibly gullible or politically sneaky to think—or suggest—that the International Criminal Court isn't allowed to investigate and prosecute the very things it was actually created for, just because some state handed them a scrap of paper that basically says "no-no"...😁

So, what? They passed the Declaration on cooperation with The Hague, recognizing unquestionable jurisdiction (unlike what the Constitutional Law states), back in April 2000 simply out of boredom? Not because they wanted to give The Hague free rein over Operation Storm? Especially when that dishonest trash over at The White House handed over state archives—files that most countries guard like state secrets for decades. All those documents wouldn't have meant a thing to The Hague if we had actually stuck to the Constitutional Law. That's precisely why those leftist vultures pushed through that Declaration.

Ultimately, the damage they caused during their less than four years in power is immeasurable compared to all the wreckage left by the Republican Party, including the stuff the anti-fascist lefties just make up and pin on them.

driftingdriver said:- Age isn't some direct measurement of intelligence, nor does it serve as a reliable proxy for actual, substantive knowledge.
- What age actually tracks is experience, and if you really think about it, experience is its own vital category of expertise—that specific kind of practical, hard-won wisdom.
- In that same vein, how many months or years someone has been registered on this forum matters, because it reflects their seasoned ability to navigate online discourse, which is just another form of experiential knowledge.

If people could just grasp and accept what you’ve laid out here, things would be much better. We probably wouldn't even see posts like this:

The absolute worst thing is when someone assumes I'm smarter just because I'm older. They can never actually prove they have more intellect; they just assume age automatically grants it. Yeah, right.
I've certainly learned here that a 40-year-old can be just as clueless as a 12-year-old, and vice versa, of course.

It seems this person simply can't wrap their head around the fact that stupidity doesn't age, while experience—and often intelligence—certainly does.

Edward Howard2 said:These Gallup numbers are pretty wild so far... 🤣 It’s obvious the die-hard Dick Cheney supporters haven't jumped in yet to try and massage the stats a little bit.

What could those die-hard Republicans possibly say to you when this place is already crawling with clueless leftists who have been peddling lies for over fifty years?