Posts by Arthur Smith15

briskmason18 said:(...)

Joseph Clark95 said:(...) And there is almost not a single person in this entire PDF who isn't pro-Ukraine! (...)

Jerry Robinson56 said:Look, let’s get one thing straight right out of the gate: this isn't about me. This isn't a vanity project, nor am I looking for a pat on the back. My personal involvement is entirely secondary to the actual substance of the matter at hand.

Jerry Robinson56 As I have previously observed:
(...) I’m going to hold you accountable for this (...)

Jerry Robinson56 said:(...) study what the expression actually means (...)

(...) because the sheer scale of your ignorance is massive (...) your manufactured arrogance is nothing but exclusivity (...) you will eventually realize (...) and merely cherry-picking snippets from other people's writings does not create the illusion of actual knowledge. (...)

Larry Walker24 said:I’d personally award 25 points just for that one sentence (...)

rowdymaker17 said:So, this individual is handing out negative points for things that defy all common sense; because if they simply dislike a user's perspective or their findings, they will strip them from the conversation and issue an infraction for trolling.

Shouldn't moderators be objective and actually adhere to the forum rules instead of using their position to project their own neuroses?! Does this mean that if a Muslim comments on a thread about Jesus and provides a link to an independent news outlet to form an opinion—without attacking or insulting anyone—they should receive "PENALTY" points just because they dared to say something that doesn't align with the moderator's personal narrative?!

I believe if that is indeed the case, please confirm it, as I intend to file a formal complaint against this person with the monitor and submit a report to the FCC regarding their conduct, since this is clearly discrimination based on opinion. I could understand it if I had insulted someone, but I merely provided a link and drew my own conclusions based on what an independent news source reported.

I am calling for sanctions against this trolling moderator; specifically, fifty points should be stripped from my account and added to theirs to motivate them to follow the forum rules and stop abusing their moderator authority to troll and manage their neurological issues. My only conclusion is that this individual is a Nazi whom my comment offended; there is simply no other explanation. However, if this individual is a Nazi, how did they even obtain such a role in the first place?! And does this imply that this person gives an infraction to anyone who criticizes Nazism, as well as those who protect and promote it?! It is sick. Hmm... or perhaps this person is a shill for some of our media outlets that have been promoting Nazism in recent months?! Hmm...

This is the comment for which I was penalized:

Original post:

https://www.helleniscope.com/2022/04...owed-to-speak/

Quote:

With Russian forces besieging Mariupol, in which 120,000+ ethnic Greeks live, SKAI news spoke with a Mr. Kiouranas Who lives in The City and exposed that Ukrainian “fascists” are killing people for trying to leave the city. When asked by SKAI news if he planned to leave the city, Kiouranas responded “how can I leave? When you try to leave you run The risk of running into a patrol of The Ukrainian fascists, the Azov Battalion.” It is interesting that our media outlets have been lying about everything up until now. But absolutely everything; there isn't even ten percent of truth in anything our media writes. All those videos where "Russians" are allegedly liquidating civilians were clearly the Azov Battalion. For God's sake, how sick can someone be to twist the narrative like this?! I believe we should implement new laws regarding the criminal liability of media outlets that intentionally create fake news and misinformation; this is pathological. Why would our media protect Ukrainian Nazis and fascists?! It is sick.

Thx. 👍

Alex Edwards4 said:(...) Cryptocurrency is a fictional, non-existent product being presented to the public as if it were real. Of course people buy it, just like when someone buys a phone on Craigslist and ends up receiving nothing but an empty box. In these crypto schemes, instead of an empty box, you receive a number. They claim this number represents actual wealth or physical assets. It’s an online scam. The moderator banned anyone from describing this fraud, and I am still waiting to hear if that is the official stance of this forum.

Arthur Flores2 said:(...) this war (...) was prophesied in the Mariana Trench revelations (...)

Tyler Garcia69 said:You are the only pathetic ones here—hypocritical consumers of fake news and nothing more than mindless drones for mainstream media propaganda.

The subject matter itself isn't even my primary concern here. My issue lies squarely with the shepherd-like management style and the overall conduct of the moderators. One would expect a mod to exhibit at least a shred of impartiality and work toward maintaining a civilized level of discourse within these threads, rather than letting things devolve like this.

Tyler Garcia69 said:You absolute moron, save that kind of attitude for your own mother. I’m not the one you need to be taking this crap with. I didn't spend all that time out there working my ass off just to deal with your nonsense. Honestly, I couldn't care less about what you have to say.

Alexander Thompson said:Cobanov’s primary objective is simply to keep the masses under control. 🤷

Tyler Garcia69 said:(...) This complete moron doesn't even realize that first of all, I am not some kind of Putin fan (...) I have never once justified civilian casualties in any conflict, anywhere (...)

(...) Forget about Putin; he is simply defending the periphery of the great Russian motherland. (...) Russia just wants to act preemptively, practically on its own soil (...)

lonetrucker4 said:Once Anthony Nguyen81 starts publishing those geographical maps of his, you all are going to regret it real fast! 😁

Jonathan Wright2 said:Forgive me if I'm being a nuisance; I wasn't sure if you were actually following along... (...)

(...) I am a fraud and a counterfeiter in your world, be aware of that. (...)

Jonathan Wright2 said:I would suggest that (...)

silverwolf88 said:Doesn't that Council have access to all my data? I fail to see how they could possibly claim they had no way of verifying whether I personally submitted my work to various American mathematical journals.

...In that case, I'd much rather skip uploading my presentation altogether.

silverwolf88 said:Is it actually reasonable to expect psychiatrists to possess any level of competence when it comes to peer-reviewing work within the realm of mathematics? It seems like an absurd proposition to me.

silverwolf88 said:We're dealing with nothing but trolls here.

I make it a point to ignore Arthur Smith15, especially after I submitted my research to several American mathematical journals—which I've already linked


I honestly feel bad for those folks from alternativa who still bother engaging in debates with them, completely unaware that they're just playing with trolls.

silverwolf88 said:(...) You can try to act like an expert until you actually take a look at my derivation for kinetic energy

silverwolf88 said:Why are you all trying to hide your manhood? Is there something wrong with it, or are you actually hoping to transition into women?

silverwolf88 said:Do you truly possess a female mindset, and would you genuinely prefer being a woman if it weren't for those testicular arteries? (...)