CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Andrew Kim87 › Posts

Posts by Andrew Kim87

11 posts shown.

Richard Wilson4 said:Zombies look pretty gross, but honestly, they can only jump-scare you if they pop out of nowhere. A stray cat could pull the same stunt...

Nowadays, vampires are just hot guys meant to appeal to teenage girls, and those chainsaw horror flicks feel more like a butcher shop festival than actual scary movies...

The Japanese directors had some decent ideas once in a while, but even they get a bit boring for me. Plus, their American remakes are usually total garbage...

What are your picks for new horror movies, and what actually gets under your skin?

That feeling when you know you’re totally screwed and there’s nothing you can do about it. Just pure, raw helplessness.
People who are just plain difficult in Psychology ·
Dana Morales64 said:Does anyone else deal with people you just can't stand? I mean, no matter how hard they try to be engaging, they just grate on your nerves—to the point where you wouldn't want them anywhere near you under any circumstances. For me, it’s those high-strung types—people who are constantly wound up, living in this perpetual state of tension where every single move and every little step has been meticulously calculated beforehand. I've even got relatives like that... it's exhausting. Why can't they just be chill? Just relax and be spontaneous—letting things happen naturally instead of overthinking every word and every gesture. I've realized that people who are actually laid-back and spontaneous don't struggle with making or keeping friends. I've met plenty of spontaneous folks—usually out at a bar or a concert—and honestly, hanging out with people like you is such a breath of fresh air.
Why is it that certain people get under our skin just because they're different from us? It’s a simple lack of compatibility, sure, but why does it feel so irritating? I can't be the only one feeling this way.

Of course you aren't the only one. How could you be? Just look at this forum—90% of these people are idiots. 🤣
Help! I think I lost my brain! in Psychology ·
What a total joke of a thread. Can we just lock this thing already?
The Unborn in Movies ·
Man, I totally screwed myself by watching that trailer. Almost every single scary part was packed into those few minutes, except for maybe one or two bits... So now, it’s not even really terrifying to me anymore.
Unrealistic movie tropes and plot holes in Movies ·
Robert Wilson said:It's really just thinking out loud. I do it all the time, and it’s totally normal—pretty much everyone does it at some point.

Facts.
Unrealistic movie tropes and plot holes in Movies ·
Yeah, I talk to myself too. It actually made me wonder if I’m losing my mind or what. Most of the time it happens while I'm gaming, or more often when I'm just tearing the whole world apart in my head, arguing about how things should actually work. One major upside, though? You can't ever really get into an argument with yourself 😁
Unrealistic movie tropes and plot holes in Movies ·
Anthony Roberts2 said:I didn't say anything about all the technical stuff being taken into account🙂

What I'm saying is they shoot for the head because I've actually seen it happen. There were videos online showing a Canadian sniper taking out American soldiers by aiming right for the head—sometimes even the neck—simply because that was the only exposed part of the body left.

What do you mean "shoot to kill" 😂?

Is there a specific part of this that isn't making sense? Do you need a dictionary? 🤷

Look,

The Canadian guys are aiming at Americans in the head because Marines are wearing so much gear over their body armor that a bullet barely does anything to the torso. You can find videos on YouTube where a Marine gets hit in the chest by a sniper and just stands up and runs for cover. Instead of doubting me, maybe ask how many of those head or neck shots actually land, besides the ones you claim to have seen. If the target is staying still, sure, you might be able to aim for the head with some certainty.
Unrealistic movie tropes and plot holes in Movies ·
Anthony Roberts2;18464374😕 That bolded part is nonsense. If it's shoot to kill said:

Nah, you're actually the one talking nonsense here. What do you mean "shoot to kill" 😂? The guy is literally listing all the variables a sniper has to account for. Let's be real—the head is a tiny target that can move at any second, so you aim for the torso. Plus, there's always the chance to finish the job while the target is down. Nowadays, we have sniper calibers that can punch straight through walls and brick, so it doesn't even matter where you hit; a shot from those rifles is lethal anywhere on the body. So, maybe stop talking trash.
goldeneagle2 said:If I can jump in here, dear Woody—*Gladiator* is absolute garbage because it completely butchers how people actually acted back in ancient Rome. Take that opening battle between the Romans and the Germans, for instance; it’s a total disaster. The Roman army looks less like a disciplined force and more like an undisciplined mob of street thugs. If you actually want to see what military discipline looked like, go watch the HBO series *Rome*. The Roman legions fought shield-to-shield; nobody was allowed to just break formation and charge out into a field to fight one-on-one against the enemy without permission. What were they, musketeers or something? In a real unit, their own centurion would have taken their head off after the battle for that, and during the fight, the line of legionary shields would have just closed up over them—they’d be written off as dead, and a soldier from the second rank would just step up to fill the gap. And then, after the fight, they’re all dancing around and rolling on the ground with joy? What is this, some kind of festival? It’s like watching a chaotic riot break out in Memphis. That level of breakdown in discipline would have been met with death. They should only have been allowed to celebrate if they were actually permitted to, not every time a soldier gets a little rush of adrenaline. And that’s just the first few scenes—after that, the Hollywood stupidity just keeps piling up for the rest of the movie. For a real look at Rome, watch *ROME*.

Listen to this 😂. Why are you bringing up those thugs so much? About 90% of the audience expects a massive historical spectacle when a movie about old battles gets made. Those 90% don't care about historical accuracy; they just want to have a good time watching the film. Then you've got that other 10% who act like amateur historians—including you—claiming the movie is garbage because it depicts certain customs incorrectly. That’s not even the point; you shouldn't take it that seriously. The movie won a ton of awards and praise, and then a few years later, some "historians" show up🤣😂 spitting on the film just because it portrays the Roman army "wrong." I wouldn't be surprised if you imagine the Roman army as some group of soldiers in polished, shiny armor, looking exhausted and bloody while still trying to maintain perfect formations against hundreds of barbarians🙄
Never Forget St. Louis in Movies ·
When I saw those three guys at the start of the movie trying to break out of St. Louis with just one single handgun (one pistol to escape an entire city!!!!!!!!🤣), I knew exactly where this was heading once the clash between those thugs and the reporter kicked off. It felt cheap and half-baked, and honestly, I couldn't help but laugh when that woman started acting all high and mighty. At the end of the day, like I said, St. Louis deserves much better than this.
John Cruz4 said:Hip Hop🤣
Yes, Hip Hop
But he listens to metal, techno—honestly, everything, EVERYTHING.

The issue isn't whether he picked this up from a band or some online trend; the real problem is that he genuinely seems malicious. He goes out of his way to act evil, even if it's an act, because he wants to destroy any sense of goodness. And yet, occasionally, he can be quite decent himself! Perhaps he lies, but when someone makes such claims about their own character, doesn't that suggest there might be some underlying psychological issue at play?

Nah, he's just being fake.