CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › granitecrane2 › Posts

Posts by granitecrane2

112 posts shown.

wanderingbison9 said:Fine, I'll give that Philips the thumbs up. Besides, Blender actually lets you scale up the UI elements, like the text and icons, if you need them larger.

Even Windows users have those options (as do Linux and macOS). It’s never really been an issue. Huge monitors come with their own set of headaches, too—you end up constantly cranking your neck just to see everything in your field of vision. And if you push the monitor back to compensate, you might as well just be using a smaller screen that happens to be closer. Honestly, it feels unnecessary unless you're someone who needs to stare at very specific sections of the screen all day. That's why most editors stick to a dual or even triple monitor setup.
To be honest, this screen size is a bit overkill for my taste. When I picked up that Philips, I didn't realize quite how massive it actually was. If I were doing it again, I'd go for something smaller but with much higher pixel density. My eyesight is pretty sharp, so I don't need the extra real estate.
mellowcyclist3 said:What do you think about this one?
https://www.pcmag.com/reviews/philips-brilliance-279p1

I actually own a similar model (though an older version) in WQHD resolution (2560x1440). It features 10-bit color and an excellent IPS panel. Honestly, I haven't found a better monitor yet—I've never been much of a fan of Dell products. This one looks identical to the model you linked and is the exact same size. If the build quality is just as solid, I’d say go for it. My main advice? Just make sure that in today's market, you insist on 10 bits per channel (Hi Color / True Color). That's a total MUST. Even MacBook laptops come standard with that now thanks to the P3 wide color gamut.
Plus, it’s fully ergonomic; it swivels on all three axes and even has height adjustment.
mellowcyclist3 said:Man, you’ve totally talked me into it. So, if I want a 32" 4K IPS monitor, it absolutely has to be 😁 ?

Give me a Best Buy-style solution if possible, where the rest of my rig actually matches the quality of the screen. I'll bump my budget up to 18000, but that is the absolute limit!

Don't do it. Build the PC first; you can always grab the monitor later. Honestly, they told me not to even attempt video editing—let alone 4K—on this setup.
wanderingbison9 said:The only thing he doesn't need a workstation for is video editing and compositing...
There goes Blender again... what exactly is being rendered in there? What is the actual workflow?

In Blender, you can handle just about everything you'd do in Max or Maya. It covers 3D modeling and rendering, but it also handles video compositing (similar to After Effects) and even non-linear editing (like Premiere or Avid). Since he brought up Blender specifically, I assumed he was doing video editing as well.
https://www.shopify.com/blog/best-fr...iting-software

Here is a rundown of some of the best free video editing applications out there:
Lightworks
VideoPad
HitFilm Express
DaVinci Resolve
VSDC Free Video Editor
OpenShot
Shotcut
Blender
Movie Maker 10
iMovie
Vimeo Create
WeVideo

As for 4K, honestly, he might be better off waiting for microLED monitors rather than settling for an IPS panel right now—assuming he even needs 4K in the first place.
mellowcyclist3 said:Greetings everyone,

I've been using a laptop for over 15 years now, but it’s getting slower and slower, and honestly, working on it is becoming incredibly frustrating. I’m thinking about switching back to a more powerful and durable desktop PC setup.

I don't even need to mention that I've fallen out of the loop and haven't really followed the scene lately. I think I picked a bad time to start looking, too—graphics cards have skyrocketed in price. I was hoping prices for desktops would be much lower now that most people seem to prefer laptops or just their smartphones.

Basically, my primary needs for this machine are:
1. Working in Photoshop and Illustrator (2D art, vector art)
2. Working in Blender and ZBrush - 3D modeling
3. Gaming; I want to run Red Dead Redemption 2 at very high settings—I absolutely love Westerns.
4. Good speakers are also a must so I can listen to music without needing headphones.

So, I'll likely need a pretty high-quality monitor since I deal with visual arts and design. Is aiming for 4K resolution asking too much?
From what I understand, gaming at that resolution requires extremely powerful machines that even $5000 might struggle with for pure gaming purposes. I'd probably drop the resolution down to a high HD setting; hopefully, a solid build will be enough for that.


You are definitely going to need a dedicated graphics card because modern editing software (like Adobe Premiere, not to mention After Effects) relies heavily on GPU acceleration and specifically asks for things like an Nvidia Quadro RTX (a consumer gaming card might work, but I can't guarantee it).
It doesn't have to be a monster, and it doesn't need to cost you $17 $0.00; you can find them starting from $500, but realistically, you'll want something from the $1333 line. Graphics cards are expensive these days.
I'd suggest a PNY Quadro P2200, 5GB GDDR5X, PCIe 3.0 x16, 4x DP, $1533 available at Home Depot.

Motherboard: It is actually quite difficult to find a good motherboard in the US these days because everything is marketed toward gamers, so you end up paying extra for features like Crossfire and similar tech that you objectively DO NOT NEED.
It is vital that it has SATA ports for "old school" magnetic drives (HDDs) because you are going to need them. Therefore, picking up some NAS drives is highly recommended (they can run 24/7; I just picked up a 12TB Ironwolf), but when setting up a NAS, it's best to have multiple identical drives for configuration.
Also, an NVMe SSD is a given because your OS needs to boot fast, and your apps need to launch quickly. I recommend 1 TB; they are everywhere now. However, do your video editing on magnetic drives—even if they are slower, they won't wear out from constant overwriting like an SSD might.
As for the motherboard... maybe something with a Z590 chipset and a 1200 socket. You won't get any advice on AMD from me; I'll leave that to the others (including all the capacitor debates that used to drive that guy who used to hang out here, known as Western). Given how much everything in the US market is geared toward gamers, look for an ASUS ROG Strix 590-F or E (if you can track one down) $900 at Best Buy. Don't let the "ROG" branding throw you off—it stands for Republic of Gamers, so yes, it's a gaming board, but that's just how the market is shaped today. $823 You can find it at Best Buy.

And the processor: the more cores, the better. I'd suggest an i9 with 10 cores. As for those 'K' and 'F' designations, well, it varies depending on what's available in the US. Ideally, you don't need one that's overclockable, so you don't necessarily need the 'K' in the name. 'F' means it lacks integrated graphics. Personally, I think it's good to have that extra bit of insurance, so go without the F. The 'K' does signify a desktop processor, so check the pricing to see what fits your budget. Why 10 cores? If you are doing video work, running Adobe Premiere or After Effects, and editing 4K video (you can use proxies, of course, but the final render will demand full CPU power), those extra cores will provide the necessary headroom so your whole system doesn't freeze up while you're trying to do something else. Macintoshes now have 8 cores—4 fast ones and 4 efficient ones in their laptops—which is why they feel so smooth (though in reality, an M1 isn't anywhere near the speed of a true desktop i9, especially when paired with a decent GPU). Sometimes smoothness matters more than raw speed. Because if you can't edit video without constant stuttering, none of the power matters. I'd suggest an INTEL Core i9 10900KF BOX, lga 1200, 3.7GHz, 20MB cache, Deca Core (no integrated graphics) or an INTEL Core i7 11700K BOX, lga 1200, 3.6GHz, 16MB cache, Octa Core (not 10 cores, but it has the integrated graphics). 3700/$1263 at Best Buy.
P.S. Regarding whether you actually need integrated graphics on your desktop—someone is bound to jump in my inbox just to lecture me about it. It’s always the same story; they won't let it go until they try to use some kind of social media engineering tactic to get me banned. The same goes for the advice claiming AMD is better and that you'll get more bang for your buck (if that's your thing). However, when it comes to GPUs, do NOT buy a Radeon, no matter how much they tempt you. That isn't just an opinion; it's a rule.
Keith Ward2 said:They look great—it’s a nice change of pace.

It’s a bummer that unnamed doesn't support 16000x8000 resolutions. That's actually the scale I usually work at for my panoramas. Since I have to downsize them to 10000x5000, they end up looking a bit blurry.
Hartera and other high-end panoramas
https://www.kuula.co/share/collectio...&info=1&logo=1
https://www.kuula.co/share/collectio...&info=1&logo=1
Jacob Lopez51 said:Who is this "Zaw" guy everyone keeps bringing up? Is he even a real person?

Nah. Never heard of him.
Alexander Walker8 said:Lately, there’s been one specific car in my parking lot that is driving me absolutely insane. Every single morning when I head into the office, the entire lot is empty—except for this one damn Golf. And wouldn't you know it? It is parked across two spots. Every. Single. Time. What is so incredibly difficult about just walking back to your vehicle and moving it over?

He's just saving a spot for his buddy.
I’m looking at this from a 30,000-foot view. I've also picked up a few more projects from some industry professionals.
hiddenmarlin14 said:Seriously people, learn how to knit, cut fabric, sew, or even just darn a pair of socks🙂

I basically stitch together panoramic images. I can fit 26 of them into a single sphere.
I prefer to take in the view from high above. Much like Aslan does.

Hugin really works wonders.