Posts by Henry Baker

Robert Cooper60 said:Does anyone know
when tickets usually go on sale at US stadiums?

06:15 🤣

Nicole Hill2 said:Basically, you have to roll over your total account balance 7 times at the specified odds—or higher (it should be in the terms somewhere, check again). Once that's done, you can withdraw whatever is left (good luck with that 😁).

So, you need to wager that $58 seven times (totaling $408). Not all at once, obviously. You could do ten bets of $122.50 or a hundred bets of $12.25...

And why on earth is DraftKings located right next to so many other sportsbooks?? 🤷

Got it. Thanks 🙂

Why DraftKings? 🤷
🤣

Edit:
"To request a withdrawal, you must wager the initial deposit amount at least 1 time, and the bonus amount at least 7 times through one or more bets exclusively on DraftKings (within two months of receiving the bonus). Otherwise, the bonus expires. Additionally, using this promotional bonus on other products in the DraftKings lineup (Casino, Poker, Electronic Arts) is prohibited."

There it is.
Meaning I have to wager what I deposited $25 at least once, and this $33 bonus 7 times.

I have a question regarding the casino bonus.
I just received an email about a "friendship bonus," so I deposited $25 and received $33 in bonuses.
The withdrawal requirements are unclear to me. It seems to suggest I need to wager the amount seven times over 🤷
I've been reading through the terms, but nothing is clicking.
Does this mean I have to wager those $33 seven times before I can actually withdraw any winnings?

blueridge32 said:I would kill for this pattern on a jersey

let's party like it's 1993

🙏
I have one just like it.🙏

That’s all from me. Thanks for watching. Goodbye.🤣

rapidtiger19 said:Does anyone have a $5 bonus for Bet365?

I just realized everyone who signed up for the ski challenge got a bonus sent via email. I went looking for mine, only to find an old inbox from two years ago. The offer expired ages ago. 🤦
If there’s a kind soul out there willing to hook me up, 😬

The date in this text is simply incorrect.🙂

Spitka said:No, the fundraising runs until June 6th, then we head to Memphis for the match against Ukraine. The plan changed; the organizers coordinated with all the groups, and this new schedule works better for everyone.

I’m not as deep into the legal discussions as others here, but feel free to ask me anything else.

Supporter groups will be selling shirts soon. The campaign logo looks sharp, and they won't be expensive, so grab one or just donate if you can.

We were actually discussing today how to sync everything up with the Indianapolis trip the following day.😛
Understood. Thanks for the update.🙂

16. 5. 🙂

silentsurfer19 said:just look at who actually shows up to support the national handball team...
So now the leadership gets to decide if ZDS stands for patriotism or fascism. Why wasn't anyone making a fuss in the early 90s when our people were out there defending towns and cities wearing those very symbols on their uniforms?
Those flags with the first white field—there were thousands of them in Times Square during the major speeches and inaugurations back then. They were everywhere, from the front lines to the rallies, and now suddenly they're undesirable...
In twenty years, they’ll be shutting down anyone who calls the liberation operation what it was, trying to equate it to Srebrenica or Vukovar as if it were ethnic cleansing...

Take a look at Times Square🙂

spitka said:I’m in favor of a hybrid approach. I would definitely boycott one match and use the media to urge grandmothers with grandkids and mothers with children to pack our stadiums.

Great idea. I like it.🙂

spitka said:More effective than a full boycott is refusing to cheer for part of the game. We did that during the Hajduk match back in '94, and it looked terrible. My memory is that we stayed quiet until the 30th minute, then there were 15 minutes of pure chaos, and then we just left the stands. There are plenty of ways to tell that story.

It was similar during Varteks vs. Dinamo in '03; neither side cheered during the first half. The second half started with everyone chanting "Screw the Law" and holding up banners on the fence, which caused you guys to clear out around the 60th minute. 🙂

What they are doing to us now is simply inhumane. If they succeed, it will be a disaster. It might be easier for the massive groups, but smaller crowds like ours are already feeling the repression. For instance, this season after the Slaven Belup game, five of us were detained by the police because of a controversial banner— http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=euisnn&s=5
What exactly is controversial about the banner? An American flag...
That is just a trivial example. They target us like this at every single match.

Nicole Jackson3 said:Sure, but they mask everything by focusing on the fans, dealing with hooligans, or handling UEFA penalties. What happens when the fans aren't even there to provide the distraction? It would be far more dangerous if the clubs themselves started an initiative—if they actually turned against the USSF or the first division association. As it stands, we are fighting this alone while they slowly dismantle us.

Anyone paying even minimal attention knows that hooligans aren't the reason for poor results; it’s strictly the players and their lack of performance.
Regarding turning against the association, there was a meeting in Columbus involving northern clubs opposing the "Loving Soccer" broadcast. We shall see how that plays out.

Nicole Jackson3 said:True, but more than half the audience would stop watching if our top league looked like a local semi-pro circuit. That is exactly what would happen if those few fans actually staged a boycott.

Honestly, games in the second and third divisions are often more interesting than our current "Fliđan" league. Sad, but true.

Nicole Jackson3 said:Matches would be played in front of half the crowd. You’d hear every kick and every shout echoing through empty stadiums. All the grit and ugliness of the sport would finally be exposed, debunking the myth that "hooligans" are the root of everything. The whole "Loving Soccer" project would collapse because nobody wants to watch low-quality matches. Ultimately, the USSF and the rest would realize they can't function without fans—their business model depends on it. I wouldn't bet against the clubs revolting either, especially teams like Liverpool FC or San Francisco. Of course, the guys over at Real Madrid wouldn't lift a finger.

The reality is, the ugly side of the sport has already been fully exposed by recent seasons, like getting knocked out of the UEFA preliminary rounds by Cypriots or Albanians.
And people watching "Loving Soccer" aren't tuning in for the stadium atmosphere; if they wanted that, they'd actually go to the game.
As for the USSF, they couldn't care less about the MLS as long as Markan from Canada stays in charge alongside that tabloid thief.
The clubs would probably protest, but honestly, would it even make a difference?

casualRI said:Why is leaving the stands considered a defeat? If we step away now, we could actually change the status quo long-term. Right now, we’re just winning temporary battles while facing permanent losses like bans and jail time.

How exactly does vacating the stands change anything?

Look, the goal of this new fan legislation is to clear hooligans out of the stadiums. Unfortunately, people who don't understand our culture equate "hooligans" with entire supporter groups. The average person, who has zero connection to the terrace scene, is definitely against us. They only know us through the media, which broadcasts the same negative image we all know too well. But that’s just the reality; fans are labeled the "main" problem to distract from the current state of the country. Just look at how much coverage there was regarding the chaos in Udine, while they barely mentioned the fan protests in Warsaw—which were actually quite commendable.
Simply being pushed off the stands would be a defeat. It is better to fight from the terraces with messages and unity between different groups. That is what we need right now: for all groups to unite, even if only briefly. Because if things continue this way, nobody will be able to unite ever again.😢

Read more carefully, people. This footage from Indianapolis has been posted three times now.

As for the boycott, that’s exactly what they want—to push us out of the stadium entirely.🙂

Move these posts to the forum🤣

Insanity😁
Let’s all hit the game tomorrow to support our Cleveland😁

"You're all fools"

😁🤣

local said:It was good to hear how loudly they shut you down yesterday. It was your day, folks from Rijeka, if only that flare had actually hit its mark, but at least those Whoppers were

Maybe the goal was just to set the stadium roof on fire.😁

Larry Rivera83 said:Today... right at that specific moment when the game ended!!! Who on earth thought that was a good idea at the final whistle!!!

John Doe, as if I didn't know.

Now I'm stuck playing defense like some amateur, and it’s irritating being misunderstood.

Kudos to my memory; I was busy stifling a laugh back when things started falling apart during that 4-0 blowout (I think the Kansas City Chiefs got crushed 0-4 in Miami last week).

😁
If nothing else, at least I got a laugh out of it, even while we were losing 4-0.😁