dustypuma5 said:Norway banned its citizens from using credit cards for gambling at any retail outlet globally because they knew people would just fly straight to Las Vegas and blow through their entire limits. People were losing their houses and falling into massive debt.
People complained about the move, obviously, but the law stands. And honestly? The government is supposed to protect its people—even from themselves and their own bad impulses.
That’s what a civilized society looks like to me. I kind of wish this forum, which is basically on the map now, had some higher standards than even the society we live in. Like, maybe it could actually look out for the users and protect them from their own questionable urges sometimes.
I know, I'm being an idealist, but whatever, I can afford to be.
Disclaimer: Just treat this like spam, it's late and my brain is fried. I might be talking nonsense. 😬
What a beautifully packaged invitation to hand over the reins of your own life... 🙂
Is Norway going to ban reading de Sade soon? At this rate, the only socially acceptable thing left will be making out in missionary position while carrying a certificate proving you might actually conceive...
Are they actually going to care about the health and beauty of our citizens? They’re busy sending out abortion mandates to pregnant women at high risk for Down syndrome while simultaneously approving food products you wouldn't even feed to a dog...
Do you actually have any real-world experience, or is your entire existence just mental gymnastics and starting internet wars that have zero connection to reality? It’s honestly pathetic how this self-proclaimed medical and scientific elite thinks they have the right to act as a filter for life-altering decisions that belong to others... 🙂 Just wait until life finally hits you with a real disaster; then you’ll be waving that self-styled "Malleus Maleficarum" of yours around with a lot less confidence...
shadowpilot8 said:Philosophical debates aside, I fail to see how bluemason3 and Ryan Gomez4 don't realize they could face legal action. Allowing moderators to permit advice that endangers health and lives is a massive liability. 😁
bluemason3, stop philosophizing and start using common sense. Imagine someone you care about is critically ill and seriously considering an alternative treatment promoted on this forum instead of going to a hospital. Would you go after the moderator who allowed it 😉? This isn't a matter of opinion; it's basic logic. You have to draw a line. No one is talking about all alternative medicine—just cancer treatment. With nothing else are the consequences of neglecting medical care so dramatic
Is it a doctor with an inflated ego, or just a lawyer?... 😁 If I'm just offering this as my first recommendation—and I am absolutely not pushing anyone to do anything... 🙂Insisting on "professional expertise" is nothing more than a blatant intimidation tactic used to silence anyone offering an alternative perspective... 😁
Look, let’s get one thing straight... discussing medical treatments? Absolutely not allowed. But sharing personal experiences regarding alternative options? Sure, that's what this forum is actually for. This isn't about "quackery"; it's about the real-world relationship between a patient and a practitioner—someone who usually ends up facing frivolous lawsuits and navigating a legal system that makes enforcing anything feel like an uphill battle... So go ahead, keep playing judge and jury in your little virtual courtrooms if you must... 😁🤣