ironpanther5 said:Seriously, do you actually not grasp how something can be both a cultural treasure and private property, or are you just playing dumb? Doesn't matter; honestly, props to the journalist for calling out the priest's hypocrisy right to his face, regardless of whether she technically broke the law. Everyone else plays by the rules while he's out there acting like a total clown.
I can't help but wonder why Charles Roberts33—that lover of swans, skeptic of LA Galaxy, black metal enthusiast, traditionalist, and true man of the people who marches proudly in his wide-leg dungarees—has suddenly become so preoccupied with the tastes of some degenerate French little man. It’s quite peculiar, isn't it?
I had fully expected that his veins would continue to pulse with the essence of ancestors who dreamed of those prehistoric, curvaceous matriarchs from back when women were still women and dogs were still wolves.
And then, out of nowhere, there's Antoine Griezmann.
Maria Anderson said:Is there any merit to going against the grain? Like, would French women actually dig a little kit that fits right inside a brandy flask? 😢
I remember back in the fog of my youth, women with beers in hand seemed to become infinitely more attractive, though this is the first time I’ve heard that such a phenomenon might also apply to politics.
Who knows? After a liter of Jagermeister, maybe even Dr. Ivo would find himself back in those good old days.
Charles Roberts33 said:The classic woman: she absolutely has to insist on her own victimhood, even after you’ve proven to her that the insults never even happened 😍
It really brings to mind certain users on this forum who seem just as determined to stay offended, refusing to budge even when it’s pointed out that they completely misread a bit of Latin. ☕
Ryan Vaughn7 said:Small tangent here, but every day driving through downtown feels like a total dream. It’s pure fantasy. You’re cruising along Fifth Avenue, Vlaška, or Jurišić, maybe even cutting against the grain on Gaj or Masaryk, and you don't even have to wait for a green light because the streets are empty. It's beautiful. This is one of those rare moments—now or never.
That's the truth. Spot on.
But then you have those idiots who treat empty streets like their own personal drag strip; just last night, shortly before midnight, I had someone tearing past me on a bike near the old industrial district, easily pushing 150.
Why shouldn't I be allowed to film a public event like a beauty pageant, which is open to anyone who wants to attend? Whose permission am I supposed to be seeking? I'm just sitting here waiting for Paul Martinez73's lawyer to point me toward some specific legal statute that actually forbids it.
Amanda Evans2 said:No, that’s not how it works—it all comes down to whatever interpretation some lawyer of yours decides to cook up...
A thief breaking into your private residence and a journalist acting out in a church are fundamentally the same thing. You still haven't actually addressed my point: whether or not the property owner was the one who resorted to force... you've avoided that part entirely...
Didn't you notice that the property defender was waving Božanić's power of attorney? Everything is perfectly clear there; Paul Martinez73's lawyer already looked into it.
It’s funny how things work, isn't it? When it comes time to snap a photo, suddenly everything is strictly private property. But the moment there's a need for restoration, it magically transforms into a cultural treasure that belongs to all of us.
Charles Roberts33 writes exactly how darkseal9 would want him to. Of course, that assumes he actually possessed the courage to shape his thoughts into something coherent and finally stand behind them, rather than choosing this cowardly route of hiding behind a veil of sheer ignorance. ☕