stormybadger8 said:It’s tough to drive a race when you mess up qualifying. You end up pushing the car way beyond its actual limits just to catch up, and you run the risk of mechanical failures...
And then, lo and behold, Max had to retire because of technical issues. It makes me wonder how that even happens...
When you qualify two, three, or five spots behind where the car actually belongs, you spend the whole race glued to the bumper of the guy in front of you. Then, suddenly, the entire car overheats, and before you know it, the engine gives up because it just couldn't handle the heat...
Red Bull—specifically under Adrian Newey's direction—has always followed this philosophy: build the lightest, leanest car possible that can snatch a pole position. They excel in clean air, but the cooling systems are often pushed right to the edge. As soon as they get stuck in traffic, all those little problems start piling up...
How exactly was Max pushing the car beyond its limits?
In Bahrain, he was 2.9 seconds behind Leclerc when the failure happened, and Leclerc was running 0.5 seconds faster per lap.
In Australia, he definitely wasn't pushing that hard. He accepted that the win was gone and just managed his delta to secure second place. The fact that he set the fastest lap right before his retirement doesn't mean much. Even if he did go faster than usual, why blame the driver for putting in one quick lap? By that logic, we should blame every single driver on the grid for driving fast.
I honestly don't think that specific lap was even his absolute limit, considering Leclerc's fastest lap was 1.4 seconds quicker.
I feel like you're taking this to an extreme. Even if he had been right on Leclerc's tail, fighting for the win, your logic would suggest Max should have just given up in South Africa to save the engine instead of chasing the lead.