CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Biased moderation in the Tom Cruise thread

Biased moderation in the Tom Cruise thread

Started by driftingcanyon2 · · 👁 5 views · 38 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants driftingcanyon2briskhound2Jose Miller3Larry Walker24Casey BennettBryan Phillips2bluecyclist64bluemason3coppersailor28brightsailor17Jessica Morris6Grace Wood5Charles Fox10Nicholas Watson
driftingcanyon2 driftingcanyon2 Active MemberOP
76 messages
joined Feb 2021
#1 ·
I’m reaching out to the higher-ups here because I’m a bit confused about why posts keep getting nuked in this thread regarding whether Tom Cruise is actually the "best" actor working today. To give a quick example, I just had a post removed after I tried to offer some perspective using international polling data—which, if you look at the numbers, shows him ranking pretty low, sitting at 100th currently and 220th all-time. It seems like instead of letting a real discussion happen, briskhound2 just deletes anything that doesn't align with their specific viewpoint. It feels like the moderation is becoming quite subjective and biased, which isn't exactly how a healthy debate should work. Thanks for looking into this.
briskhound2 briskhound2 Regular
411 messages
joined Mar 2009
#2 ·
A post was deleted.

Because of this.

Heh, it’s funny how the die-hard Tompkins fans get all worked up the second they take a hit from some negative criticism. Here’s another one for you...

That’s just not how people talk when they're having a serious discussion on a movie forum.
driftingcanyon2 driftingcanyon2 Active MemberOP
76 messages
joined Feb 2021
#3 ·
That’s just a convenient way to justify scrubbing counter-arguments—classic heavy-handed censorship if you ask me. I’ll admit I might have been a little blunt in my previous post, but the moderator's bias in this thread is pretty glaring; otherwise, there wouldn't be such an aggressive effort to wipe away any negative takes on their favorite actor.
briskhound2 briskhound2 Regular
411 messages
joined Mar 2009
#4 ·
driftingcanyon2 said:That’s just your classic excuse for scrubbing any counter-arguments—total Stalinist tactics right there... Look, maybe I was a bit blunt in my last post, I'll give you that, but the mod bias in this thread is pretty impossible to ignore. Otherwise, why would they be so aggressive about nuking anything remotely critical of their favorite actor?

Did you actually sit there and count all the negative comments? Because if you did, then they weren't deleted. So much for the "bias" argument... And just to clear things up for the back row—only ONE post was removed, yours. Any other admins can jump in and see for themselves if those "Stalinist methods" are actually happening or not.
driftingcanyon2 driftingcanyon2 Active MemberOP
76 messages
joined Feb 2021
#5 ·
So, they’re basically promising not to scrub negative feedback if I keep posting there? I have my doubts. I mean, if I were to upload results from some national survey or an earnings ranking or reviews based on any other metric, would they really just let everything stay up without deleting anything?
Jose Miller3 Jose Miller3 Regular
446 messages
joined Mar 2024
#6 ·
Tom Cruise ☕
briskhound2 briskhound2 Regular
411 messages
joined Mar 2009
#7 ·
driftingcanyon2 said:So, are you actually giving me a guarantee that if I keep posting there, negative reviews won't get nuked? Honestly, I have my doubts... Like, if I drop some data from an international survey or a ranking based on earnings or customer reviews—or whatever other metric—am I sure nothing's gonna get deleted?

Look, you clearly figured out how to make a post, but then you go around using terms like "die-hard fans" or "trolls" in another thread—and let me tell you, I'll personally make sure those get scrubbed...
Larry Walker24 Larry Walker24 Veteran
1K messages
joined Jun 2022
#8 ·
I think briskhound2 is actually a pretty solid mod. He rarely hands out bans and he's super easy to talk to if you need anything
driftingcanyon2 driftingcanyon2 Active MemberOP
76 messages
joined Feb 2021
#9 ·
It looks like the censors are back at it again; I guess those rankings just didn't sit right with you all, especially since Thomas ended up so far down the list.
Casey Bennett Casey Bennett Regular
522 messages
joined Nov 2011
#10 ·
Rachel Brooks63 said:Tom Cruise ☕

Or if you actually want to be consistent:

Biased moderation on the Tom Cruise thread

I have never understood why these grammatical idiots almost exclusively limit their ignorance to first names; it’s ridiculous when they use hyphens to force a declension, but this is significantly more laughable.
Look, if your goal is to entertain the masses, at least do it properly. 🐔
Bryan Phillips2 Bryan Phillips2 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Dec 2021
#11 ·
briskhound2 said:Because of this.

That’s quite a reason to delete a post. 🙄

I don't see what the big deal is. I'm not sure I get it. Seems like the mod might be a little too high on Tom Cruise. But hey, small imperfections shouldn't really mess with the moderation, right?

Now I see this too:
briskhound2 said:"toxic fans" or "trolls" — and I guarantee you I'll be deleting those.

Can I say—holy crap!?
briskhound2 briskhound2 Regular
411 messages
joined Mar 2009
#12 ·
Bryan Phillips2 said:That’s quite a reason to pull a post... 🙄

Total Stalinist tactics, I guess. What else would you expect...

Nothing weird about it here, honestly. Don't really get the fuss. Seems like the mod is just a little too big a fan of Tom Cruise. But hey, those little biases shouldn't really mess with how they moderate things, right?

And you guys clearly hate him just enough that you can't have a civil conversation. Perfect balance...

Now I see it—can I even say "damn"?!

🙄 Good luck with that...
bluecyclist64 bluecyclist64 Regular
369 messages
joined Oct 2011
#13 ·
Larry Walker24 said:I actually find briskhound2 to be a pretty decent moderator. He rarely hands out bans, and he's always reasonable if you need to hash something out.

And just imagine if his name were Dickhard instead; now that would be a hell of a lot more fun to negotiate with...🎉
😁
bluemason3 bluemason3 Veteran
1.1K messages
joined Jun 2016
#14 ·
I honestly thought we were only being bankrolled by Soros, the Masons, and the Democratic Party, but it looks like the Scientologists just added their names to the tab too. 🧐
Bryan Phillips2 Bryan Phillips2 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Dec 2021
#15 ·
Speaking of biased moderation, I’ve got a bone to pick regarding a thread titled: Tom Cruise - The Best Actor Alive?. Honestly, what a ridiculous and embarrassing headline. Some people just don't get the joke and end up having these dead-serious debates about whether he actually is the best. 🙄
briskhound2 briskhound2 Regular
411 messages
joined Mar 2009
#16 ·
Bryan Phillips2 said:Speaking of biased moderation—I’ve gotta say, I have a bit of a bone to pick regarding how they're letting this headline slide... Is Tom Cruise actually the best actor working today? Just a thought...Honestly, what a brainless, embarrassing headline... some people just don't get when someone's clearly joking, and then they actually turn around and try to have this serious debate about whether it’s actually the best or not... ridiculous... 🙄

I’ve got a bit of a bone to pick with these totally mindless comments... 🙄

So, there's a question mark at the end. That’s what it is... just a question.

Just debate. It’s what this forum is for anyway...
Bryan Phillips2 Bryan Phillips2 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Dec 2021
#17 ·
briskhound2 said:Let's talk. That's what this forum is for, anyway.

There’s a huge difference between an actual intelligent debate and the mindless trolling that seems to be taking over this thread—which, honestly, is mostly thanks to the headline. Even if Tom Cruise isn't exactly my favorite actor, he doesn't deserve this kind of nonsense.
Larry Walker24 Larry Walker24 Veteran
1K messages
joined Jun 2022
#18 ·
Either lock this thread or just delete the whole thing already
coppersailor28 coppersailor28 Active Member
156 messages
joined Mar 2012
#19 ·
Larry Walker24 said:just lock this thread or better yet , delete it

Once you hit post, there's no undo button.
(Think before you type, for once.)

Just to be petty, I'm quoting YOUR exact words—right up until you started begging to have things deleted. You're the only one on this entire thread making such a demand:
Larry Walker24 said:I actually think briskhound2 is a decent mod. He rarely bans people and he's easy to deal with.
Larry Walker24 Larry Walker24 Veteran
1K messages
joined Jun 2022
#20 ·
Look, I’m telling you, this whole topic is so incredibly stupid, what's even the point?

As for briskhound2, I’m sticking to my guns—the PDF film moderator does a solid job running things.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads