CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Off-topic › Chat US: For True Americans Only, Vol. 2

Chat US: For True Americans Only, Vol. 2

Started by Larry Diaz4 · · 👁 23 views · 405 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Larry Diaz4Rachel Richardsonironbear66ironcobra13Emily Barrett9Hannah Hughes57Walter Baker2Maria Cox2briskbison47Gerald Gomez43Michael Mendoza7nimblesurfer90Daniel Kelly57hiddenmarlin14dustypilot11Jacob AlvarezNicholas Cook4Jeremy Johnson18Zachary Davis47Steven Lopez77Daniel Nguyen2wanderingheron9Patrick Thomas29Richard Sanders7 …
Adam Lee13 Adam Lee13 Active Member
105 messages
joined Nov 2022
#341 ·
quietcrane63 said:So, you're really gonna go there and ask me if I'm gonna give you any grief? Honestly, man, you've got some nerve.😁

First, you go out of your way to snake around him—lobbying, playing the victim, and basically orchestrating his exile to the absolute bottom of the forum, tucked away in the footnotes where nobody looks... and now you’re actually asking women for advice? Honestly, quietcrane63, you're just a total simp.☕
George Cook31 George Cook31 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Oct 2021
#342 ·
Adam Lee13 said:First, he goes out of his way to push him aside through all that sneaky lobbying, acting all dramatic, and basically manufacturing a reason to kick him to the fringes of the forum—just tossing him straight to the bottom... and then he has the nerve to go asking women for their input? I mean, honestly, my man quietcrane63, you're just being a total simp.☕

I mean, he should just go ahead and ask. Honestly, there’s a reason people say you shouldn't mess with someone who's actually being pleasant—you gotta be persistent if you want anything to happen, I guess. 🙂
Adam Moore12 Adam Moore12 Member
38 messages
joined Aug 2020
#343 ·
Adam Lee13 said:You're just a basic simp.☕

I told him straight up that all that blackpilling nonsense just doesn't suit him. Honestly, it doesn't suit wanderingheron9 either; if they actually acted according to their true nature, they’d just be sweet little simps, and that would be fine by me.
George Cook31 George Cook31 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Oct 2021
#344 ·
I mean, those cute little simps are totally gay. 😳
Adam Lee13 Adam Lee13 Active Member
105 messages
joined Nov 2022
#345 ·
Kate Cox15 said:Honestly, I told him straight up that all this blackpilling nonsense just doesn't suit him. It doesn't suit wanderingheron9 either—if they actually leaned into their true nature, they’d just be adorable little simps and call it a day.

And yeah, wanderingheron9 totally let me down too... he's acting completely socially oblivious and clearly hasn't realized who actually played him... I'm officially washing my hands of them both.

EDIT: Don't think I don't see what you're playing at, trying to play nice and lower the tension with everyone. If they've got any brains, they'll give you the same energy right back. If they don't, they'll probably just keep simping for the same people who brought them here in the first place.
Rachel Richardson Rachel Richardson Regular
662 messages
joined Jul 2017
#346 ·
Kate Cox15 said:@Anthony Nguyen81/">@@Anthony Nguyen81, if you have something to say, just say it—otherwise, stay quiet. I don't get this whole passive-aggressive routine 🤷.

What passive aggression? 🤔

Are you actually serious—you don't realize how I feel about you?
Was I not being clear enough? 🙂
Rachel Richardson Rachel Richardson Regular
662 messages
joined Jul 2017
#347 ·
quietcrane63 said:They couldn't care less about hate speech, taking things personally, or even using decent language. They just want everyone to write exactly what suits them—nothing more than a play-by-play of what they ate for lunch or what chores they finished today.

It’s honestly appalling.
A total lack of 🤣doslovce

There is zero respect here—for the person you're talking to, for basic civility, or for anything else at all. 🙂
Rachel Richardson Rachel Richardson Regular
662 messages
joined Jul 2017
#348 ·
quietcrane63 said:Are you really going to deny me that?😁

First off—a woman has nothing to offer but what she can take.

Under two—you’re still constantly nagging, too. 🤣
Rachel Richardson Rachel Richardson Regular
662 messages
joined Jul 2017
#349 ·
George Cook31 said:Sweet little simps are gay. 😳

It’s a done deal—no doubt about it. 🙂
George Cook31 George Cook31 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Oct 2021
#350 ·
Anthony Nguyen81 said:First off, there's no way a woman can just be that low-class on her own.

Second, you're basically acting like a total jerk yourself, if you ask me.🤣

I don't get why you're being so mean to Kate Cox15, honestly. She’s actually being pretty cool and engaging with everyone in this thread. 🙂
Adam Moore12 Adam Moore12 Member
38 messages
joined Aug 2020
#351 ·
Anthony Nguyen81 said:What do you mean, passive-aggressive? 🤔

Do you seriously not get what I think of you?
Was I not clear enough? 🙂

Passive-aggression is when someone is being aggressive indirectly. Basically, instead of just telling me straight up what you think of me, you go off on other users in replies to make sure those aggressive thoughts are clearly heard:

Anthony Nguyen81 said:Literal hate speech toward anyone who doesn't agree with them.🙂

It’s incredible how shallow or malicious someone can be, ganging up on a complete stranger online just because they don't share the same views.

Anthony Nguyen81 said:A total lack of respect for the person talking, for basic civility, for anything at all.🙂

Anthony Nguyen81 said:First off, a woman has nothing to offer if she's just primitive.

Second, you're basically just shouting at everyone.🤣

So, according to this, I'm using hate speech, I'm shallow, I'm selfish, I'm malicious, I'm ganging up on people, I have no respect, I'm uncivilized, I have nothing to give but take, and whoever calls me out is just "shouting."

If that's really what you think of me, then say it to my face. Otherwise, what's the point of making these kinds of replies to people I'm actually interacting with?

I'll say it again: I don't get the "passive-aggressive" label. I'm right here. Just tell me exactly what you want to say.

Adam Lee13 said:wanderingheron9 disappointed me too... he’s being completely oblivious and clearly doesn't realize who actually backed him into this corner... I'm done with them.

wanderingheron9 is fully aware of why he's in this mess, which is exactly why I came here to ask him to lay it out clearly. The moderators didn't issue any warnings or bans while he was using that kind of rhetoric, but I did. And I still think it was totally inappropriate—he knows that, too.

Why all these accusations that it was me or Anida or whoever else who set him up? He brought this on himself. I wasn't the one typing his posts for him 🤷.
Rachel Richardson Rachel Richardson Regular
662 messages
joined Jul 2017
#352 ·
George Cook31 said:Why are you being so malicious toward Kate Cox15? She’s actually contributing some really solid points to this thread. 🙂

You have a point—it's just a total waste of time 😁
quietcrane63 quietcrane63 Member
30 messages
joined Apr 2023
#353 ·
Kate Cox15 said:Everyone's gonna give you hell, man, if you start acting crazy 🙂.

Well, maybe if you gave me some credit first, I’d act normal.😁

Though, I guess I am more than normal. It's just that I don't put on an act like 99.99% of men. Or maybe I actually do.😁
quietcrane63 quietcrane63 Member
30 messages
joined Apr 2023
#354 ·
Adam Lee13 said:First, you push him out through lobbying, playing the victim, and basically bullying him until he’s relegated to the absolute bottom of the forum—just a footnote. And now you're asking women for input? I guess you're just a total simp, quietcrane63.☕

You're taking this way too far. I've never been a simp and I don't plan on starting now. There's a difference between messing around on a forum and actual real life.

Kate Cox15 said:I told him straight up that all that blackpilling just doesn't suit him. It doesn't suit wanderingheron9 either, honestly. If they were just being true to themselves, they'd probably just be sweet little simps, which would be fine.

Are you saying we're naturally wired to be simps, or just that we should try being likable?

Anthony Nguyen81 said:First off, I guess a woman just doesn't have anything to offer that isn't primitive.

Let me rephrase my request then. Kate Cox, when are you going to take my massive dick?

There are two of you, and you're both doing the exact same thing. 🤣

Objectively speaking, I’d probably be pretty happy to throw some pepperoni in there.😁
quietcrane63 quietcrane63 Member
30 messages
joined Apr 2023
#355 ·
Kate Cox15 said:wanderingheron9 knows exactly why he’s being targeted, which is why I came here to ask him to lay it all out clearly. The moderators didn't issue any warnings or bans while he was using that kind of rhetoric, but I did. I still think it's inappropriate, and I think he knows that too.

Why blame me, Anida, or whoever else for putting him in this spot when he basically walked right into it himself? It's not like I was typing his posts for him. I don't know.

Did you actually file a complaint or report him?
Rachel Richardson Rachel Richardson Regular
662 messages
joined Jul 2017
#356 ·
Betty Fowler Betty Fowler Active Member
112 messages
joined Apr 2018
#357 ·
Anthony Nguyen81 said:wanderingheron9 wasn't actually bothering anyone; they just dogpiled him for no reason, just a massive pile-on without any real point...

I wouldn't say that's quite accurate. For a long time, he was consistently pushing these arbitrary physical standards while simultaneously tearing others down—using lines like "xy is subhuman, relax, we're just joking"—all while hiding behind a thin veil of irony and pretending none of it affected him. In reality, his writing seemed designed for one thing: projecting his own views to create insecurity and discontent in others, particularly among women.
quietcrane63 quietcrane63 Member
30 messages
joined Apr 2023
#358 ·
Jesse Price said:I don't think that's quite right. The guy spent a long time pushing these imaginary physical standards while putting others down—saying things like "XY is subhuman," then acting like it was just a joke if anyone actually got offended. He pretended none of it affected him, but I guess it's supposed to affect everyone else too. In reality, his whole writing style seemed designed to project his own issues and make other people, especially women, feel insecure and dissatisfied.

Let everything be written. People can read it if they want, or ignore it if they don't. If he's bothered by someone growing stronger, outperforming him, or facing their own insecurities, that's on him. Maybe that's the only way to actually deal with those feelings. I suppose only idiots try to censor everything.☕
dustypilot11 dustypilot11 Member
33 messages
joined Nov 2010
#359 ·
Adam Lee13 said:They basically cornered you, did some shady lobbying behind the scenes, and that was it... I managed to dodge it even though my name came up... I've been posting here since 2008 (this is like my 3rd or 4th handle), and I've asked to get permabanned more times than I can count. They never listened.

dustypilot11 and that radical Perpetona are the ones actually running this purge; everyone else is just following their lead. Honestly, it’s your own fault if you can't get organized or fight back. You're playing right into their hands.

Pro tip... exploit that beef between dustypilot11 and honeychild...

Oh, shut up. I wasn't lobbying to kick you guys out, I just wanted you moved to the incel topic.
Rachel Richardson Rachel Richardson Regular
662 messages
joined Jul 2017
#360 ·
Jesse Price said:Actually, I disagree. For quite some time, he’s been aggressively pushing these imaginary physical standards—while simultaneously belittling others (using lines like "XY is subhuman, lol why are you getting so upset?")—all under the thin veil of "just joking" and pretending none of it affects him. In reality, his entire writing style served one purpose: projection. He wanted to manufacture insecurity and discontent in others, specifically targeting women.

In my view, it's perfectly normal that not everyone is going to like everyone else.
How many people don't find you, me, or anyone else particularly likable?
At the end of the day, there's always a curated list of people for a hookup...

I don't see why everyone is getting so worked up about this.
Look, someone's theories on sexuality are essentially on par with claiming we were all created by aliens.
But why should you, me, or any completely average person have to deal with being caught in the crossfire?

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads