CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Post deleted in the Eric Adams thread

Post deleted in the Eric Adams thread

Started by steelfox98 · · 👁 5 views · 7 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants steelfox98Charles Ross3rustydrifter10
steelfox98 steelfox98 Active MemberOP
128 messages
joined Mar 2023
#1 ·
Could someone please look into why my post on the TT thread was removed?
I suspect it was flagged as being about waste management, but my point was actually about Eric Adams—specifically how he’s basically gaslighting us all on public television. I followed the forum rules by backing up my claim with his own quote regarding waste management.
I'd appreciate it if you could restore the post.
Charles Ross3 Charles Ross3 Active Member
84 messages
joined Jun 2024
#2 ·
Over the last two weeks, we’ve already had to issue four or five moderator warnings because people kept trying to turn this entire thread into nothing more than a discussion about waste management—which is exactly what it was starting to become. We’ve provided clear instructions on where you should actually be posting about landfill issues and disposal problems, so I really think we've been more than fair. Because of that, your post isn't being returned to you.
steelfox98 steelfox98 Active MemberOP
128 messages
joined Mar 2023
#3 ·
What do moderator warnings even matter when my post about Eric Adams lying to the entire public was the actual point? The waste management stuff was just the supporting evidence.
The issue of how we handle trash wasn't even mentioned once.
By that same logic, they won't let me mention Adams when discussing waste management either.

I can't say anything bad about the mods over at the Politics board, but I get the feeling there’s some bias going on in this specific thread. And it's not just about this one instance.
Charles Ross3 Charles Ross3 Active Member
84 messages
joined Jun 2024
#4 ·
You’ve been left a few posts where you kept pushing the conversation toward waste management despite several moderator warnings and instructions, and it wasn't until your third or fourth consecutive comment—once it became clear you weren't planning on dropping it—that the thread was deleted (and not just yours, but everyone else who jumped in too).

To give you some context, what started as a discussion about New York City Mayor Eric Adams quickly spiraled into an almost exclusive debate about trash bags. I’m truly sorry if the other threads specifically designed to tackle those issues don't quite suit your style, but at the end of the day, it's entirely your choice whether you want to post elsewhere or not.

If the existing threads we've pointed you toward aren't sufficient, here is another one under the Politics section:

Waste management - waste management in New York City
steelfox98 steelfox98 Active MemberOP
128 messages
joined Mar 2023
#5 ·
My previous posts were aimed at the city administration—specifically how they handle (or fail to handle) waste management. It’s a small distinction, but a vital one. I was targeting their competence and priorities, namely the accountability of the current leadership. That's the core issue here.
Waste management doesn't just fix itself. Everything is interconnected, and my critiques focus on those in charge, not the technical execution. I’ve already posted once or twice regarding waste collection under its own thread. Even Los Angeles FC has its own dedicated space, so depending on the context, mentions of Adams will happen there.
I highly doubt I ever brought up trash bags in the Adams thread; you likely have me confused with someone else, Charles Ross3.

Let's cut to the chase: tell me where you think this post belongs. If you argue the subject is waste management rather than Adams, I'll move it to the waste thread with the appropriate links and details.
Eric Adams is driving us all insane by repeatedly lying about how only a "very small number" of citizens will see an increase in waste collection costs.
Charles Ross3 Charles Ross3 Active Member
84 messages
joined Jun 2024
#6 ·
Look, this isn't even a quote from your deleted post—and since there’s no link provided, I can't even tell where you're pulling this from—so please, just stop the trolling. If you're wondering, a deleted post isn't coming back, so you might as well just follow the rules here.
steelfox98 steelfox98 Active MemberOP
128 messages
joined Mar 2023
#7 ·
Charles Ross3 said:Look, this isn't even a quote from your deleted post—and since there’s no link provided, I can't even tell where you're pulling this from—so please, just stop the trolling. If you're wondering, a deleted post isn't coming back, so you might as well just follow the rules here.

Of course it's not word-for-word since you already wiped your post, but the point remains the same. Go ahead, paste it here. Let's see who actually missed the mark.
As for the trolling? I asked a question, and you're clearly dodging it.
rustydrifter10 rustydrifter10 Regular
693 messages
joined Apr 2011
#8 ·
The whole reason we have separate threads is to keep things organized. Just make sure you're posting in the right section according to the rules, and there shouldn't be any issues with posts being deleted.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads