CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › IT › Hardware › Desktops › Office PC build: thoughts?

Office PC build: thoughts?

Started by Thomas Peterson7 · · 👁 4 views · 4 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Thomas Peterson7crimsonstag84wiredotter14Michael Jackson10Grace Kern
Thomas Peterson7 Thomas Peterson7 NewcomerOP
4 messages
joined Jul 2014
#1 ·
I'm looking to put together a basic office PC. It’ll mostly just be for browsing the web, running Microsoft Office, and some lightweight accounting software. I stumbled upon this build online:

1 x AMD Athlon x4 5350, AM1, box
1 x ASUS AM1M-A (AM1,DDR3,USB 3.0,SATA III,mATX) DVI,VGA
1 x KINGSTON 4GB 1866MHz DDR3L CL11 DIMM 1.35V HyperX FURY Black
1 x SanDisk Z400s 256GB SSD, 2.5” 7mm, SATA 6 Gbit/s - 60mj
1 x Kućište MODECOM Loki, MINI, crno
1 x Napajanje 300W, LC POWER Silver Shield Pro-Line Series LC7300 ATX V2.3/EPS 12V 80 PLUS, 120mm vent, PFC

$632

What do you guys think? I could stretch my budget a bit if necessary, but honestly, I don't feel like I need anything more powerful than this given what I actually need to do...
crimsonstag84 crimsonstag84 Regular
518 messages
joined Jun 2010
#2 ·
That looks fine, but here’s a slightly better setup for $83:

Kingston DDR4 2133MHz, CL15, 4GB
Fortron power supply Hexa plus 400 w, 80+
Intel CPU desktop Pentium G4400 (3.3GHz, 3MB, LGA1151) box
SanDisk X400 256GB SSD, 2.5” 7mm, SATA 6 Gbit/s, Read/Write: 540 MB/s / 520 MB/s, SD8SB8U-256G-1122
ASRock B150M-HDS MS ENDEAVOR motherboard
MS ENDEAVOR gaming case (no PSU)

Total cost: $721 Best Buy

You really can't go wrong with any of these... I guess.😉
wiredotter14 wiredotter14 Regular
433 messages
joined Aug 2007
#3 ·
Personally, I’d go with $667 this one

image
Newegg
In my opinion, the Celeron handles most everyday tasks better than that AMD chip.
If you're willing to shell out a little extra, crimsonstag84's build is definitely the superior choice—though I'd probably swap in that Superflower power supply instead. It comes with a 3-year warranty and is highly efficient.
Michael Jackson10 Michael Jackson10 Active Member
140 messages
joined Feb 2023
#4 ·
Thomas Peterson7 said:I need an office PC for web browsing, Office apps, and one lightweight accounting program. I stumbled upon this build:

1 x AMD Athlon x4 5350, AM1, box
1 x ASUS AM1M-A (AM1,DDR3,USB 3.0,SATA III,mATx) DVI,VGA
1 x KINGSTON 4GB 1866MHz DDR3L CL11 DIMM 1.35V HyperX FURY Black
1 x SanDisk Z400s 256GB SSD, 2.5” 7mm, SATA 6 Gbit/s - 60mj
1 x MODECOM Loki Case, MINI, black
1 x Power Supply 300W, LC POWER Silver Shield Pro-Line Series LC7300 ATX V2.3/EPS 12V 80 PLUS, 120mm fan, PFC

$632

What do you think? My budget can go higher, but I don't think I need anything beefier given my needs...

This setup is definitely a bit of a mess: it’s basically HTPC parts stuffed into an "adult" computer body.
Since I tend to be a bit of a maximalist, I wouldn't suggest changing too much—crimsonstag84's configuration is actually fine. Just a heads up though: that AMD chip is going to hit a wall pretty fast. It feels like it was designed for totally different tasks, maybe more like tablet/phablet duties with a little extra juice, so its peak performance is pretty limited.
For what you want to do, an Intel solution is honestly a better bet. Why? Because the priorities are just different. Accounting software is usually poorly written; at best, they focus on ease of use (rarely), and mostly they just care about function and fitting whatever weird UI changes come their way. They aren't optimized for anything.
Usually, these things are built with basic tools and rely on external components for reports and stuff—it's all very user-level rather than developer-level. As a result, you end up with an app that isn't heavy on resources, but when you actually need it (like when you're generating massive spreadsheets), having a processor with decent peak performance is a lifesaver. Don't confuse multitasking with just having a bunch of windows open that aren't doing anything; a ton of cores won't help if they're just idling away...

Bottom line? Run away from this one. You'll outgrow it before you know it (speaking as a user), so take a look at those other Intel builds instead.

One tiny note for the "builders" here: if price is the main goal, stay away from cheap "gaming" components. In a professional setting, it looks super unprofessional. Plus, their main selling points—lots of space, cable management room, and especially those huge mesh holes for cooling (especially without filters...)—are totally useless for this. These workstations usually sit there for their entire lifespan without ever being opened (unless something breaks). Aside from the power button, the user won't even know it exists. Space utilization is less than 20%...
Basically, it'll just create noise through those big vents. Cooling is never the priority here, and it'll end up looking like your little nephew is over to play a round of Minecraft during his lunch break... there are plenty of solid, "sealed" cases in this price range too..
Grace Kern Grace Kern Member
19 messages
joined Apr 2014
#5 ·
I’d suggest opting for a slightly more powerful processor. Honestly, when you're just building an office machine, the case doesn't really matter much to me. Here is what I would put together:
1 x Intel Core i3-4130 (3.5GHz, 3MB, LGA1151) box
1 x Kingston DDR4 2133MHz, CL15, 4GB
1 x Asrock H110M-DGS (s1151,DDR4,USB 3.0,SATA III,LAN,DVI/HDMI) mATX
1 x SanDisk Z400s 256GB SSD, 2.5” 7mm, SATA 6 Gbit/s - 60mj
1 x Fortron Hexa+ 400W, 80+
1 x NaviaTec ATX Tower PC Case, No PSU

Total: $700 assembly and shipping are included for free

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads