stormybadger8
VeteranOP
1.8K messages
joined Apr 2013
Red Bull actually held their own at the end, while Ferrari clearly had the pace compared to them.
I mean, I don't know, but realistically, Alonso could have cruised to second if they hadn't botched the strategy—who knows, maybe even a win was on the table. But even then, would Vettel have managed third? Even if he hadn't pitted early, I'm not sure he could have kept Romain Grosjean or Sergio Perez from jumping him.
Red Bull had a massive top-speed issue and struggled big time to overtake anyone in front. If they ended up stuck behind someone after the pit stops, I doubt they had the guts to pass.
So, in a perfect scenario for Vettel:
Lewis Hamilton 25, Alonso 18, Vettel 15
And in the worst case for Vettel:
Alonso 25, Hamilton 18, Romain Grosjean 15, Sergio Perez 12, Vettel 10.
It's hard to say how many points Red Bull saved by pitting when they did; maybe as many as 15.😳
Still, their strategy was pretty stupid, though nowhere near as brainless as Ferrari's.
But the award for "Master Strategists" definitely goes to Jenson Button's side of the garage.🙄
Get into Q3 on the hard tires, drive through Q3 just to settle for 10th, start the race on those hards, and then pit at the exact same time as the guys who started on softs.
Honestly, I haven't seen any tactics stupider than that.
I literally have no clue what they were thinking or what they were trying to pull.😕
As for Alonso, there was this one joke he made before the race:
He said he was worried his Ferrari mechanics wouldn't want to change his tires if his Spanish buddies scored a goal against the Italians.🤣
Who knows, maybe that was actually the problem.😬 🤣