CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Final Thread / Spirituality PDF

Final Thread / Spirituality PDF

Started by Susan Price30 · · 👁 4 views · 4 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Susan Price30Chris Peterson53Nicole James
Susan Price30 Susan Price30 RegularOP
304 messages
joined Feb 2017
#1 ·
The stated reason for locking this thread was trolling and the subsequent need to clean up the discussion.

Does failing to moderate those trolls—essentially allowing useless chatter to persist—mean that everyone else, both innocent and guilty alike, will be denied the chance to participate just because of a few bad actors?

Thank you for your attention and for providing some clarity.
Chris Peterson53 Chris Peterson53 Active Member
114 messages
joined Dec 2010
#2 ·
This thread will remain locked until we moderators reach a consensus—which we feel is necessary given the actual value of this discussion.
We’ll get around to it when our schedules allow, alongside certain other circumstances that we aren't obligated to disclose to the users!

Besides, Susan Price30, there is an old American saying:
Don't count your chickens before they hatch!
So, once the thread has been cleaned up and reopened, only then can you start throwing your critiques at it!
Susan Price30 Susan Price30 RegularOP
304 messages
joined Feb 2017
#3 ·
1. This thread has been active since July 2010, and the assumption was that we were talking about "cleaning up" those last few pages where things had started heading in an undesirable direction.

2. Please save that tone and attitude for someone else or somewhere else. I asked because I actually wanted an answer, so it would be great if you could respond without the patronizing vibe and all those imperative sentences ending in exclamation points.

thx
Chris Peterson53 Chris Peterson53 Active Member
114 messages
joined Dec 2010
#4 ·
Susan Price30 said:1. This thread has been active since July 2010—the whole assumption was that we were talking about "cleaning up" those last few pages where things had veered off into an undesirable direction.

2. Please save that tone and attitude for someone else or some other venue. I asked because I actually wanted an answer, so if you could skip the patronizing tone and the constant barrage of imperative sentences ending in exclamation points, that would be great.

thx

If you were actually interested in that kind of thing, you would have reached out to the moderator privately instead of opening yet another duplicate thread here.
So much for your lecture on patronizing.
Nicole James Nicole James Regular
313 messages
joined Dec 2010
#5 ·
Alright, so we’re keeping this thread locked until the moderation team can sit down and hash things out. EOD

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads